Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Comparative and Foreign Law (10)
- Constitutional Law (9)
- Contracts (9)
- Judges (9)
- Torts (9)
-
- Legal History (8)
- Entertainment, Arts, and Sports Law (6)
- Estates and Trusts (6)
- Intellectual Property Law (6)
- Law and Society (6)
- Legislation (6)
- Arts and Humanities (4)
- Law and Gender (4)
- Science and Technology Law (4)
- Communications Law (3)
- Courts (3)
- Human Rights Law (3)
- International Law (3)
- Philosophy (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Education Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- First Amendment (2)
- Health Law and Policy (2)
- Insurance Law (2)
- Jurisdiction (2)
- Labor and Employment Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Common Law (21)
- Jurisprudence (21)
- Torts (6)
- Constitutional Law (4)
- Legal History (4)
-
- Contracts (3)
- Law and Society (3)
- Defamation (2)
- Human Rights Law (2)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Philosophy (2)
- Politics (General) (2)
- War (2)
- 9/11 (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bullying (1)
- Business Practice and Procedure (1)
- Business and the Law (1)
- Climate Change (1)
- Commercial Law (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutions (1)
- Crimes Against the Person (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Cyberbullying (1)
- Duress (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 70
Full-Text Articles in Common Law
Cross-Talk, Alicia Bannon, John Q. Barrett, Tyler Rose Clemons, Wilfred U. Codrington Iii, Mark C. Niles
Cross-Talk, Alicia Bannon, John Q. Barrett, Tyler Rose Clemons, Wilfred U. Codrington Iii, Mark C. Niles
Articles
The symposium examines the Supreme Court's recent trend of overturning precedent, arguing that this practice undermines the principle of *stare decisis* and the Court's legitimacy. Historically, the Court has used precedent to protect marginalized groups, but recent decisions suggest a shift toward benefiting non-marginalized interests, such as big businesses and conservative groups. This change is seen as a departure from the Court's traditional role and raises concerns about judicial humility and the politicization of the judiciary.
A Comparative Law Guide To A Post-Dobbs America, James Hart, Flore Foulon
A Comparative Law Guide To A Post-Dobbs America, James Hart, Flore Foulon
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The article argues that the U.S. Supreme Court's Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization decision, which overturned *Roe v. Wade* and Planned Parenthood v. Casey, necessitates a federal legislative solution to restore abortion rights. Drawing on France's civil law system, the article proposes a clear, comprehensive federal law that guarantees absolute abortion rights pre-viability and includes safeguards post-viability. It emphasizes the need for consistency and clarity, similar to France's approach, to address the legal void left by *Dobbs* and ensure uniform protections across all U.S. states.
The Future Of Property, Yael R. Lifshitz, Maytal Gilboa, Yotam Kaplan
The Future Of Property, Yael R. Lifshitz, Maytal Gilboa, Yotam Kaplan
Cardozo Law Review
Property law focuses predominantly on spatial conflicts of interest between neighbors but neglects temporal conflicts between generations. This lack of attention to the temporal dimension leads to a troubling mismatch in property law: while property rights last forever, the corresponding duties that require property holders to respect the interests of others are remarkably short lived. The result is that property law currently does not adequately protect the rights of future generations. In this Article, we offer a blueprint for correcting this anomaly. We advocate a change in the current conception of property and propose that property law focus more on …
Reparations For A Public Nuisance? The Effort To Compensate Survivors, Victims, And Descendants Of The Tulsa Race Massacre One Hundred Years Later, Adam Coretz
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
What War Did To The Academy, What The Academy Did To War: A 20-Year Retrospective On The Effects Of The Post-9/11 Wars, Deborah Pearlstein
What War Did To The Academy, What The Academy Did To War: A 20-Year Retrospective On The Effects Of The Post-9/11 Wars, Deborah Pearlstein
Articles
The history of the legal academy’s impact on the way states fight wars is hardly one of unmixed glory. It was a law professor moonlighting for President Lincoln who authored “Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field” during the Civil War, a code still recognized worldwide today for having laid critical groundwork for the modern law of war. It was likewise a law professor whose work came to serve as both theoretical and practical justification for the sweeping powers of the Nazi state. So it should perhaps be unsurprising that, two decades of engagement …
The Ordinary Authors Of The Bureau Of New Plays: Copyright And Reallocating Authority In The American Theatre (1936-1949), Brent Salter
The Ordinary Authors Of The Bureau Of New Plays: Copyright And Reallocating Authority In The American Theatre (1936-1949), Brent Salter
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
This Article examines the brief history of the Bureau of New Plays, a nonprofit enterprise funded in 1936 by seven major Hollywood film studios and administered by the Theatre Guild's Theresa Helburn, to identify and develop talented young American playwrights. A study of the Bureau of New Plays provides a window into the authority that playwrights, and particularly younger writers, exercised over the work they created. In one respect, the establishment of the Bureau of New Plays complemented American copyright's general trajectory toward the expansion of the rights of the individual author, and in the context of the theatre the …
The Need For Certainty And Written Form In Land Sale Contracts In China: A Legal Reform Recommendation, Wei Wen
Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review
Despite the significance of land sale contracts, China's Contract Law (the supreme authority in contractual matters) fails to articulate whether written form is mandatory for land sale contracts as a prerequisite for contractual remedies. The result of this ambiguity is that urban and rural courts across China have delivered contradictory judgments on this matter, and Chinese claimants do not have clear rules or authorities to follow. This imposes unfairness on those claimants. This article examines and analyzes the uncertainty and its causes, reaching a conclusion that the solution to addressing the nationwide uncertainty is a legal reform-Contract Law should articulate …
State Constitutional General Welfare Doctrine, Gerald S. Dickinson
State Constitutional General Welfare Doctrine, Gerald S. Dickinson
Cardozo Law Review
It is black-letter law that the U.S. Supreme Court's takings doctrine presupposes exercises of eminent domain are in pursuit of valid public uses that require just compensation. But, neither federal doctrine nor the text of the Takings Clause offers any additional constraints. The story of the Supreme Court's takings jurisprudence is, in other words, incomplete and deserves reexamination. However, the usual protagonists, such as the Supreme Court or federal courts, are not central 'to this Article's reexamination. Instead, this Article's narrative is federalism, its characters are state courts, and its script is state constitutions.
In the post-Kelo v. New London …
How Subterranean Regulation Hinders Innovation In Assisted Reproductive Technology, Myrisha S. Lewis
How Subterranean Regulation Hinders Innovation In Assisted Reproductive Technology, Myrisha S. Lewis
Cardozo Law Review
Most scholars believe assisted reproductive technology is subject only to minimal regulation, especially by the federal government. This belief I contend, is wrong. In this Article, I examine agency documents, statements by officials, and letters that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has sent to physicians and researchers over the past fifteen years to reveal an overlooked regulatory program. The FDA has been targeting new forms of assisted reproductive technology that involve small genetic modifications (advanced assisted reproductive technologies or AARTs) through regulatory actions that receive little public, media, or scholarly attention. I term this method of regulation "subterranean …
Cardozo's "Law And Literature": A Guide To His Judicial Writing Style, Richard H. Weisberg
Cardozo's "Law And Literature": A Guide To His Judicial Writing Style, Richard H. Weisberg
Articles
The article discusses Benjamin N. Cardozo's essay "Law and Literature," which emphasizes the essential unity of style and substance in legal writing. Cardozo argues against the notion that law and literature are separate domains, asserting that effective legal communication requires a harmonious integration of form and function. He advocates for a judicial writing style that prioritizes clarity, precision, and the "magisterial" approach, which eschews ornamentation in favor of substance.
The Uniform Trust Code And The Common Law: An Analysis Of Three Sections Of The Code That Deviate From The Common Law And Why The Drafters Changed The Law, Christina Bogdanski
The Uniform Trust Code And The Common Law: An Analysis Of Three Sections Of The Code That Deviate From The Common Law And Why The Drafters Changed The Law, Christina Bogdanski
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Did Vimeo Kill The Radio Star? Dmca Safe Harbors, Pre-1972 Sound Recordings & The Future Of Digital Music, Tatsuya Adachi
Did Vimeo Kill The Radio Star? Dmca Safe Harbors, Pre-1972 Sound Recordings & The Future Of Digital Music, Tatsuya Adachi
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tweeting #Justice: Audio-Visual Coverage Of Court Proceedings In A World Of Shifting Technology, Itay Ravid
Tweeting #Justice: Audio-Visual Coverage Of Court Proceedings In A World Of Shifting Technology, Itay Ravid
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
The debate over whether to allow cameras into courtrooms refuses to fade away. In 2015 alone, U.S. federal courts completed a five-year experiment with cameras in courts, New Zealand published new guidelines for audio-visual coverage, and Scotland completely revised its former broadcast policy. These jurisdictions, and others around the globe, constantly struggle to design model practices that successfully balance freedom of the press, transparency, and public access to information, with rights to a fair trial and privacy. The constant need to rethink coverage policies can be attributed in large part to the advancement of technology, providing the media innovative tools …
Accident Of Birth Or Matter Of Choice: Legal Recognition Of Transsexual People In The Common Law, Kevin K.S. Tso
Accident Of Birth Or Matter Of Choice: Legal Recognition Of Transsexual People In The Common Law, Kevin K.S. Tso
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
The purpose of the Article is to look at the recognition-or lack thereof-of transsexual people at common law in relation to the "proper" sex and gender with which they associate themselves. This Article will begin by addressing and defining transsexualism and how the medical community's position on this topic has evolved over the years. It will then look at the historical foundations of transsexualism in the common law, especially at the Corbett decision that held sway in England and Wales for over thirty-five years and was followed internationally. The Article will then provide an overview of the current positions in …
Mos Americanus Or Common Law In Partibus Infidelium, Peter Goodrich
Mos Americanus Or Common Law In Partibus Infidelium, Peter Goodrich
Articles
No abstract provided.
How Wartime Detention Ends, Deborah N. Pearlstein
How Wartime Detention Ends, Deborah N. Pearlstein
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Mandatory Death Penalty In Ghana: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective On Dexter Johnson V. Republic, Andrew Novak
The Mandatory Death Penalty In Ghana: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective On Dexter Johnson V. Republic, Andrew Novak
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article examines the Supreme Court of Ghana's decision to uphold the mandatory death penalty, contrasting it with the global trend towards abolition. It highlights the tension between the court's textual interpretation of the constitution and international human rights pressures, emphasizing the need for legislative reform to align with human rights standards.
A Theory Of Local Common Law, Annie Decker
Constitutional Implications Of School Punishment For Cyber Bullying, Raul R. Calvoz, Bradley W. Davis, Mark A. Gooden
Constitutional Implications Of School Punishment For Cyber Bullying, Raul R. Calvoz, Bradley W. Davis, Mark A. Gooden
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
In this article, we address the scope of student free speech rights as it relates to cyber bullying. We provide a review of legal theories under which school administrators can address cyber bullying while still respecting student free speech rights and the First Amendment. Additionally, we address the jurisdiction of administrators to deal with off-campus bullying conduct.
The Controversy Over Citations To Foreign Authorities In American Constitutional Adjudication And The Conflict Of Judicial Philosophies: A Reply To Professor Glendon, Michel Rosenfeld
Articles
The controversy over U.S. Supreme Court justices citing foreign authorities in constitutional cases reflects a deeper ideological divide between restrictive and expansive judicial philosophies. This debate, evident in cases like Lawrence v. Texas and Roper v. Simmons, transcends traditional labels like originalism or political ideology, focusing instead on whether judges should defer to majoritarian decisionmaking or actively shape evolving rights. The article argues that the furor over foreign citations will diminish once the broader philosophical clash over judicial interpretation is resolved, as differences over foreign authorities are secondary to this central divide.
Criminal Forfeiture And The Sixth Amendment: The Role Of The Jury At Common Law, Richard E. Finneran, Steven K. Luther
Criminal Forfeiture And The Sixth Amendment: The Role Of The Jury At Common Law, Richard E. Finneran, Steven K. Luther
Cardozo Law Review
Throughout its recent jurisprudence after Apprendi v. New Jersey, the Supreme Court has emphasized that its analysis of the Sixth Amendment jury trial right centers upon the historical role of the jury at common law. Just last year, in Southern Union Co. v. United States, the Court extended the Sixth Amendment jury trial right to criminal fines after concluding that the jury's verdict determined the maximum fine that could be imposed at common law. The Court remained silent, however, with regard to another financial penalty commonly applied in the federal system: criminal forfeitures. Given that the Supreme Court …
Congressional Policy For Work Product Protection In Congressional Investigations, Jay Brody
Congressional Policy For Work Product Protection In Congressional Investigations, Jay Brody
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note examines the conflict between congressional investigative powers and the work product doctrine, advocating for a balanced approach that considers the nature of the investigation. It argues that the type of congressional investigation—legislative, oversight, or investigative—should determine the level of work product protection applied, ensuring both effective governance and legal fairness.
Constitutionalism Ancient And Early Modern: The Contributions Of Roman Law, Canon Law, And English Common Law, Janelle Greenberg, Michael J. Sechler
Constitutionalism Ancient And Early Modern: The Contributions Of Roman Law, Canon Law, And English Common Law, Janelle Greenberg, Michael J. Sechler
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Innovation In China: Fragmentation, Structured Uncertainty, And Technology Standards, Michael Murphree, Dan Breznitz
Innovation In China: Fragmentation, Structured Uncertainty, And Technology Standards, Michael Murphree, Dan Breznitz
Cardozo Law Review de•novo
This Article discusses the history of China’s attempts to develop indigenous technology standards. A case study is presented on China’s attempts to develop digital optical storage media standards, the failure of which we attribute to fragmentation of production and structured uncertainty in China’s economy. Despite the market failures of China’s domestic standards development efforts, we conclude by highlighting some of the appurtenant benefits they produce for Chinese manufacturers.
Joint Bank Accounts In New York: Confusion, Discrimination, And The Need For Change, Carolyn Satenberg
Joint Bank Accounts In New York: Confusion, Discrimination, And The Need For Change, Carolyn Satenberg
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The note argues that New York's legal presumption of joint tenancy in joint bank accounts disproportionately burdens same-sex couples, leading to unfair gift and estate tax implications. It advocates for reforming New York's approach to align with the Uniform Probate Code (UPC), which better reflects depositor intent and reduces discrimination. The current system, compounded by federal policies like the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), exacerbates financial and emotional hardships for same-sex couples in tax and probate matters.
The Bankruptcy Hegemon: Section 524(A) And Its Effect On State And Federal Comity, Benjamin Margulis
The Bankruptcy Hegemon: Section 524(A) And Its Effect On State And Federal Comity, Benjamin Margulis
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Not Confused? Don't Be Troubled: Meeting The First Amendment Attack On Protection Of "Generic" Foreign Geographical Indications, Scott Danner
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Judicial Discretion In Talmudic Times And The Modern Era, A. David Pardo
Judicial Discretion In Talmudic Times And The Modern Era, A. David Pardo
Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal
The article explores the concept of judicial discretion within the Talmud, particularly comparing the approaches of the Palestinian Talmud (Yerushalmi) and the Babylonian Talmud (Bavli). It highlights how the Yerushalmi adheres to a stricter, more unified interpretation of the Halakhah, while the Bavli adopts a more flexible approach, incorporating extralegal considerations and societal context. The analysis demonstrates that these differences reflect broader jurisprudential theories about the role of discretion in legal decision-making.
Emerging As Heroes After The Devastation Of Natural Disaster: Can Women And Children Utilize Public Nuisance Claims To Catalyze Regulation Of Greenhouse Gas Emissions By U.S. Corporations?, Tressie K. Kamp
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Rediscovering The Public Interest: An Analysis Of The Common Law Governing Post-Employment Non-Compete Contracts For Media Employees, Cathy Packer, Johanna Cleary
Rediscovering The Public Interest: An Analysis Of The Common Law Governing Post-Employment Non-Compete Contracts For Media Employees, Cathy Packer, Johanna Cleary
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.