Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3264)
- Law and Race (2559)
- Law and Society (2111)
- Law and Gender (2005)
- Human Rights Law (1881)
-
- Labor and Employment Law (1683)
- Criminal Law (1428)
- Education Law (1256)
- Criminal Procedure (1168)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1153)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1053)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1046)
- Sexuality and the Law (1014)
- Legislation (995)
- Courts (971)
- Legal History (915)
- First Amendment (805)
- State and Local Government Law (801)
- Law and Politics (783)
- Health Law and Policy (751)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (744)
- Disability Law (689)
- Immigration Law (651)
- Environmental Law (647)
- Legal Education (640)
- Sociology (635)
- Jurisprudence (628)
- Legal Profession (627)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1054)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (766)
- Seattle University School of Law (697)
- William & Mary Law School (532)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (423)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (418)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (395)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (365)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (357)
- Columbia Law School (292)
- Fordham Law School (265)
- University of Miami Law School (239)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (237)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (227)
- BLR (215)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (215)
- Roger Williams University (213)
- University of Richmond (207)
- University of Colorado Law School (205)
- Brigham Young University Law School (192)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (191)
- New York Law School (190)
- Georgetown University Law Center (188)
- Hollins University (185)
- St. John's University School of Law (175)
- University of Georgia School of Law (172)
- UIC School of Law (171)
- Cleveland State University (164)
- Pepperdine University (160)
- University of Washington School of Law (159)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (1342)
- Civil rights (1003)
- Civil Rights (818)
- Race (644)
- Title VII (460)
-
- Racism (394)
- Constitutional Law (338)
- Supreme Court (325)
- Affirmative action (323)
- Race and law (294)
- Equal protection (291)
- United States Supreme Court (289)
- Equality (284)
- Employment discrimination (283)
- Racial discrimination (278)
- Women (269)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (257)
- Sex discrimination (245)
- Gender (236)
- Constitutional law (235)
- Segregation (234)
- Minorities (230)
- First Amendment (228)
- Diversity (212)
- Constitution (210)
- Education (201)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (198)
- Fourteenth Amendment (184)
- Slavery (184)
- Race discrimination (172)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1042)
- Michigan Law Review (461)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (386)
- Faculty Publications (353)
- Seattle University Law Review (333)
-
- Articles (300)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (281)
- All Faculty Scholarship (275)
- Scholarly Works (270)
- Touro Law Review (217)
- ExpressO (202)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (185)
- Ann B. Hopkins Papers (181)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (178)
- Publications (175)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (171)
- Faculty Articles (166)
- Indiana Law Journal (160)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (156)
- William & Mary Law Review (151)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (145)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (137)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (132)
- UIC Law Review (130)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (120)
- Cardozo Law Review (118)
- Pepperdine Law Review (118)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Law Faculty Publications (114)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 9841 - 9870 of 14889
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Section 4: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 4: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Integrating Spaces: New Perspectives On Race In The Property Curriculum, Alfred Brophy
Integrating Spaces: New Perspectives On Race In The Property Curriculum, Alfred Brophy
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Letter To The Editors, Girardeau A. Spann
Letter To The Editors, Girardeau A. Spann
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Book Review, Juan R. Torruella
The Constitutional Rhetoric Of White Innocence, Cecil J. Hunt
The Constitutional Rhetoric Of White Innocence, Cecil J. Hunt
ExpressO
This article discusses the Supreme Court’s use of the rhetoric of white innocence in deciding racially inflected claims of constitutional shelter. It argues that the Court’s use of this rhetoric reveals that it has adopted a distinctly white-centered-perspective which reveals only a one-sided view of racial reality and thus distorts its ability to accurately appreciate the true nature of racial reality in contemporary America. This article examines the Court’s habit of consistently choosing a white-centered-perspective in constitutional race cases by looking at the Court’s use of the rhetoric of white innocence first in the context of the Court’s concern with …
Role-Based Policing: Restraining Police Conduct “Outside The Legitimate Investigative Sphere”, Eric J. Miller
Role-Based Policing: Restraining Police Conduct “Outside The Legitimate Investigative Sphere”, Eric J. Miller
ExpressO
The last quarter of a century has produced a growing legitimacy crisis in the criminal justice system arising from profound and familiar differences in race and class. The same tactics used to win the War on Crime also harassed and intimidated the very people policing was supposed to protect, sending disproportionate numbers of young minority men and women to prison as part of War On Drugs.
In this article, I take up challenge of social norms theorists who advocate empowering police and local communities through a variety of traditional and newly minted public order offenses. My claim is that the …
Broken Borders: Decanas V. Bica, And The Standards That Govern The Validity Of State Measures Designed To Deter Undocumented Immigration, Joshua J. Herndon
Broken Borders: Decanas V. Bica, And The Standards That Govern The Validity Of State Measures Designed To Deter Undocumented Immigration, Joshua J. Herndon
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Causation And Attenuation In The Slavery Reparations Debate, Kaimipono D. Wenger
Causation And Attenuation In The Slavery Reparations Debate, Kaimipono D. Wenger
ExpressO
The success or failure of slavery reparations will depend on causation. Many criticisms of reparations have focused on the attenuated nature of the harm, suggesting that modern claimants are not connected to slaves, that modern payers are not connected to slave owners, and that harms suffered by modern Blacks cannot be connected to slavery. This Article examines these attenuation concerns and finds that they come in three related but distinct varieties: Victim attenuation, wrongdoer attenuation, and act attenuation. These three components, defined in this Article, show themselves in a number of interrelated arguments.
The Article then discusses how ideas about …
Getting Real About Privacy: Eccentric Expectations In The Post-9/11 World, Jeffrey A. Breinholt
Getting Real About Privacy: Eccentric Expectations In The Post-9/11 World, Jeffrey A. Breinholt
ExpressO
What if science developed technology that would eliminate violent crime on American streets entirely, without jeopardizing civil liberties or personal privacy? This article describes such a scenario, and uses it to take a critical look at some of legal commentary claiming that Americans are bound to lose their rights and privacy if they fail to object to modern tools of domestic security. It concludes that those who have criticize modern scientific applications to the security challenge are overlooking well-established legal doctrines, based on eccentric fears of technology and the nation's law enforcers.
The Recognition Of Same-Sex Relationships: Comparative Institutional Analysis, Contested Social Goals, And Strategic Institutional Choice, Nancy J. Knauer
The Recognition Of Same-Sex Relationships: Comparative Institutional Analysis, Contested Social Goals, And Strategic Institutional Choice, Nancy J. Knauer
ExpressO
The emerging field of comparative institutional analysis (CIA) has much to offer public policy analysts. However, the failure of CIA to address the dynamic process through which social goals are articulated limits the scope of its application to the largely prescriptive pronouncements of legal scholars. By examining the movement for equal recognition of same-sex relationships, this Essay builds on the basic observations of CIA and introduces a new dimension, namely the dynamic process through which social goals are articulated and social change is pursued. The acknowledgment that the production of social goals involves institutional behavior, as well as multiple sites …
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
Breaking The Bank: Revisiting Central Bank Of Denver After Enron And Sarbanes-Oxley, Celia Taylor
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Adjudication, Civil Rights, And Social Change, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Constitutional Adjudication, Civil Rights, And Social Change, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Rutgers Law School (Newark) Faculty Papers
Judicial opinions typically rely on “facts” about a social group to justify or reject limitations on group members’ rights, especially when traditional views about the status or capacity of group members are in contest. Yet the fact-based approach to decision-making obscures the normative judgments that actually determine whether restrictions on individual rights are reasonable. This article offers an account of how and why courts intervene in social conflicts by focusing on facts rather than declaring norms. In part, it argues that this approach preserves judicial power to retain traditional justifications for restricting group members’ rights in some settings but not …
Moving Beyond The Black/White Paradigm: An Introduction, Dorothy A. Brown
Moving Beyond The Black/White Paradigm: An Introduction, Dorothy A. Brown
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
What Intergroup Relations Research Can Tell Us About Coalition Building, Robyn K. Mallett, Stacey Sinclair, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger
What Intergroup Relations Research Can Tell Us About Coalition Building, Robyn K. Mallett, Stacey Sinclair, Jeffrey R. Huntsinger
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
What If You Were First And No One Cared: The Appointment Of Alberto Gonzales And Coalition Building Between Latinos And Communities Of Color, Reynaldo A. Valencia
What If You Were First And No One Cared: The Appointment Of Alberto Gonzales And Coalition Building Between Latinos And Communities Of Color, Reynaldo A. Valencia
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Paper Daughters, Nancy K. Ota
Paper Daughters, Nancy K. Ota
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Some Potential Casualties Of Moving Beyond The Black/White Paradigm To Build Racial Coalitions, Rogelio A. Lasso
Some Potential Casualties Of Moving Beyond The Black/White Paradigm To Build Racial Coalitions, Rogelio A. Lasso
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Race And The Death Penalty After Mccleskey: A Case Study Of Kentucky's Racial Justice Act, Justin R. Arnold
Race And The Death Penalty After Mccleskey: A Case Study Of Kentucky's Racial Justice Act, Justin R. Arnold
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Better Late Than Never: A Takings Clause Solution To Reparations, Yanessa L. Barnard
Better Late Than Never: A Takings Clause Solution To Reparations, Yanessa L. Barnard
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
“Racially-Tailored” Medicine Unraveled, Sharona Hoffman
“Racially-Tailored” Medicine Unraveled, Sharona Hoffman
ExpressO
In June 2005, the FDA approved BiDil, a heart failure medication that is labeled for use only by African-Americans and thus, is the first treatment of its kind. The drug likely portends a future of growing interest in “race-based” medicine. This phenomenon is emerging at the same time that scientists, in light of the Human Genome Project, are reaching an understanding that “race” has no biological meaning, and consequently, “racially-tailored” medicine is both puzzling and troubling.
This Article explores the reasons for the new focus on “racial-profiling” in medicine. It analyzes the risks and dangers of this approach, including medical …
Lost In The Shuffle: State-Recognized Tribes And The Tribal Gaming Industry, Alexa Koenig, Jonathan Stein
Lost In The Shuffle: State-Recognized Tribes And The Tribal Gaming Industry, Alexa Koenig, Jonathan Stein
ExpressO
This article presents the emerging argument that Native American tribes that have received state but not federal recognition have a legal right to engage in gaming under state law. This argument is based on five points: that 1) the regulation of gaming is generally a state right; 2) state tribes are sovereign governments with the right to game, except as preempted by the federal government; 3) federal law does not preempt gaming by state tribes; 4) state tribal gaming does not violate Equal Protection guarantees; and 5) significant policy arguments weigh in favor of gaming by state tribes under state …
Another Case In Lochner’S Legacy, The Court’S Assault On New Property: The Right To The Mandatory Enforcement Of A Restraining Order Is “A Sham, Nullity And Cruel Deception” , Christopher J. Roederer
Another Case In Lochner’S Legacy, The Court’S Assault On New Property: The Right To The Mandatory Enforcement Of A Restraining Order Is “A Sham, Nullity And Cruel Deception” , Christopher J. Roederer
ExpressO
This article provides a thorough critique of the Supreme Court decision of Castle Rock v. Gonzales 125 S. Ct. 2796 (2005) which dismissed respondent’s case for failing to establish that she had a property right in the enforcement of a restraining order that was worthy of procedural due process protection. The article critiques the Court’s methodology and substantive arguments. The article concludes by situating the decision in “Lochner’s legacy,” a legacy of decisions that Cass Sunstein has identified as privileging “government inaction,” and “the existing distribution of entitlements” as set by the common law. Just as the Lochner Court decided …
Rhetorical Holy War: Polygamy, Homosexuality, And The Paradox Of Community And Autonomy, Gregory C. Pingree
Rhetorical Holy War: Polygamy, Homosexuality, And The Paradox Of Community And Autonomy, Gregory C. Pingree
ExpressO
The article explores the rhetorical strategies deployed in both legal and cultural narratives of Mormon polygamy in nineteenth-century America. It demonstrates how an understanding of that unique communal experience, and the narratives by which it was represented, informs the classic paradox of community and autonomy – the tension between the collective and the individual. The article concludes by using the Mormon polygamy analysis to illuminate a contemporary social situation that underscores the paradox of community and autonomy – homosexuality and the so-called culture wars over family values and the meaning of marriage.
Rfk, Day Of Affirmation Speech And Human Rights In America, Stuart Weinstein
Rfk, Day Of Affirmation Speech And Human Rights In America, Stuart Weinstein
ExpressO
An examination of Robert Kennedy historic Day of Affirmation speech made forty years ago. Is the role he envisioned for the US to play in international affairs and in advancing the cause of freedom and social justice for all humanity relvant in a post-Iraq abu Gharaib world?
Counter-Majoritarian Power And Judges' Political Speech, Michael R. Dimino
Counter-Majoritarian Power And Judges' Political Speech, Michael R. Dimino
ExpressO
Canons of ethics restrict judicial campaigning and prohibit sitting judges from engaging in political activity. Only recently, in Republican Party v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002), has the Supreme Court addressed the constitutionality of these restrictions, concluding that judicial candidates must be allowed some opportunity to discuss legal and political issues in their campaigns. But White left many questions unanswered about the permissible scope of restrictions on judges’ political activity.
This Article suggests that those questions will be answered not by applying principles of free speech, but by analyzing the opportunities the restrictions provide for independent judicial policy-making. Restrictions on …
How Many Kicks At The Cat? Multiple Settlement Protests By Class Members Who Have Refused To Opt Out, Nicholas Barnhorst
How Many Kicks At The Cat? Multiple Settlement Protests By Class Members Who Have Refused To Opt Out, Nicholas Barnhorst
ExpressO
No abstract provided.
Equity Measures And Systems Reform As Tools For Reducing Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Health Care, Sidney D. Watson
Equity Measures And Systems Reform As Tools For Reducing Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Health Care, Sidney D. Watson
All Faculty Scholarship
Many health care quality regulators, including officials of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and other agencies, have embraced systems reform—largely through mandates that require health care providers to implement Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) initiatives. Currently, however, no QAPI requirements stipulate that individual plans or providers measure racial and ethnic disparities. Performance measurements that do not track data by race and ethnicity, the author says, not only miss inequities but are likely to overlook promising techniques for reaching patients of particular racial and ethnic backgrounds. Incorporating equity measures into existing QAPI requirements, the report finds, would not …
Universal Human Rights: Moral Order In A Divided World, David Reidy, Mortimer N.S. Sellers
Universal Human Rights: Moral Order In A Divided World, David Reidy, Mortimer N.S. Sellers
Books
Universal Human Rights brings new clarity to the important and highly contested concept universal human rights. The Charter of the United Nations commits nearly all nations of the world to promote, to realize and take action to achieve human rights and fundamental freedoms for all, yet this formal consensus masks an underlying confusion about the philosophical basis and practical implications of rights in a world made up of radically different national communities. This collection of essays explores the foundations of universal human rights in four sections devoted to their nature, application, enforcement and limits, concluding that shared rights help to …
Race Against The Machine: An Argument For The Standardization Of Voting Technology, Jason Belmont Conn
Race Against The Machine: An Argument For The Standardization Of Voting Technology, Jason Belmont Conn
ExpressO
In this article/note, I examine a lingering question from the court cases arising out of the 2000 election: Does Bush v. Gore and the relevant equal protection case law open the door for a legal challenge to a state’s use of different voting machines/technologies and how do racial disparities in machine error rates impact this analysis? In addition to reviewing the current literature and case law on voting machine standardization, I also present an unrecognized and undocumented connection between the “all deliberate speed” order in Brown and the Court’s discussion of voting technology in Bush v. Gore.
Bolling, Equal Protection, Due Process, And Lochnerphobia, David E. Bernstein
Bolling, Equal Protection, Due Process, And Lochnerphobia, David E. Bernstein
George Mason University School of Law Working Papers Series
In Brown v. Board of Education, the United States Supreme Court invalidated state and local school segregation laws as a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. That same day, in Bolling v. Sharpe, the Court held unconstitutional de jure segregation in Washington, D.C.'s public schools under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. Fifty years after it was decided, Bolling remains one of the Warren Court's most controversial decisions.
The controversy reflects the widespread belief that the outcome in Bolling reflected the Justices' political preferences and was not a sound interpretation of the Due Process Clause. The Bolling Court …