Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (3263)
- Law and Race (2557)
- Law and Society (2111)
- Law and Gender (2005)
- Human Rights Law (1881)
-
- Labor and Employment Law (1682)
- Criminal Law (1429)
- Education Law (1256)
- Criminal Procedure (1169)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (1153)
- Fourteenth Amendment (1050)
- Supreme Court of the United States (1045)
- Sexuality and the Law (1014)
- Legislation (994)
- Courts (970)
- Legal History (915)
- First Amendment (805)
- State and Local Government Law (801)
- Law and Politics (783)
- Health Law and Policy (751)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (744)
- Disability Law (689)
- Immigration Law (650)
- Environmental Law (647)
- Legal Education (640)
- Sociology (635)
- Jurisprudence (628)
- Legal Profession (627)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (1054)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (765)
- Seattle University School of Law (697)
- William & Mary Law School (532)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (422)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (418)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (395)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (365)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (357)
- Columbia Law School (292)
- Fordham Law School (265)
- University of Miami Law School (239)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (237)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (227)
- BLR (215)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (215)
- Roger Williams University (213)
- University of Richmond (207)
- University of Colorado Law School (205)
- Brigham Young University Law School (192)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (191)
- New York Law School (190)
- Georgetown University Law Center (188)
- Hollins University (185)
- St. John's University School of Law (175)
- University of Georgia School of Law (172)
- UIC School of Law (171)
- Cleveland State University (164)
- Pepperdine University (160)
- University of Washington School of Law (159)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (1342)
- Civil rights (1006)
- Civil Rights (818)
- Race (644)
- Title VII (460)
-
- Racism (394)
- Constitutional Law (338)
- Supreme Court (325)
- Affirmative action (323)
- Race and law (294)
- Equal protection (291)
- United States Supreme Court (289)
- Equality (284)
- Employment discrimination (283)
- Racial discrimination (278)
- Women (269)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (257)
- Sex discrimination (245)
- Gender (236)
- Constitutional law (235)
- Segregation (234)
- Minorities (230)
- First Amendment (228)
- Diversity (212)
- Constitution (210)
- Education (201)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (198)
- Slavery (184)
- Fourteenth Amendment (183)
- Race discrimination (172)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (1042)
- Michigan Law Review (461)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (386)
- Faculty Publications (353)
- Seattle University Law Review (333)
-
- Articles (299)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (281)
- All Faculty Scholarship (275)
- Scholarly Works (270)
- Touro Law Review (217)
- ExpressO (202)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (185)
- Ann B. Hopkins Papers (181)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (178)
- Publications (175)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (171)
- Faculty Articles (166)
- Indiana Law Journal (160)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (159)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (156)
- William & Mary Law Review (151)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (145)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (137)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (132)
- UIC Law Review (130)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (120)
- Cardozo Law Review (118)
- Pepperdine Law Review (118)
- West Virginia Law Review (115)
- Law Faculty Publications (114)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 7381 - 7410 of 14885
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Our Illegal Founders, Victor C. Romero
Our Illegal Founders, Victor C. Romero
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay briefly mines America’s history to argue that the law setting forth where our national borders are and how strictly we patrol them has always been subject to the vagaries of politics, economics, and perception. Illegal (im)migration has long been part of our migration history, engaged in not just by Latin American border crossers, but also by prominent colonists, giving the lie to the claim that upholding border laws should always be sacrosanct. In many school districts today, the usual summary of American history from our childhood civics classes no longer bypasses the uncomfortable truths of conquest and westward …
On Estimating Disparity And Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply To The U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff, Sonja B. Starr, M. Marit Rehavi
On Estimating Disparity And Inferring Causation: Sur-Reply To The U.S. Sentencing Commission Staff, Sonja B. Starr, M. Marit Rehavi
Articles
In this Essay, Professors Starr and Rehavi respond to the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s empirical staff’s criticisms of their recent article, which found, contrary to the Commission’s prior work, no evidence that racial disparity in sentences increased in response to United States v. Booker. As Starr and Rehavi suggest, their differences with the Commission perhaps relate to differing objectives. The Commission staff’s reply expresses a lack of interest in identifying Booker’s causal effects; in contrast, that is Starr and Rehavi’s central objective. In addition, Starr and Rehavi’s approach also accounts for disparities arising throughout the post-arrest justice process, extending beyond the …
Mandatory Sentencing And Racial Disparity, Assessing The Role Of Prosecutors And The Effects Of Booker, Sonja B. Starr, M. Marit Rehavi
Mandatory Sentencing And Racial Disparity, Assessing The Role Of Prosecutors And The Effects Of Booker, Sonja B. Starr, M. Marit Rehavi
Articles
This Article presents new empirical evidence concerning the effects of United States v. Booker, which loosened the formerly mandatory U.S. Sentencing Guidelines, on racial disparities in federal criminal cases. Two serious limitations pervade existing empirical literature on sentencing disparities. First, studies focus on sentencing in isolation, controlling for the “presumptive sentence” or similar measures that themselves result from discretionary charging, plea-bargaining, and fact-finding processes. Any disparities in these earlier processes are excluded from the resulting sentence-disparity estimates. Our research has shown that this exclusion matters: pre-sentencing decision-making can have substantial sentence-disparity consequences. Second, existing studies have used loose causal inference …
Prison Segregation: Symposium Introduction And Preliminary Data On Racial Disparities, Margo Schlanger
Prison Segregation: Symposium Introduction And Preliminary Data On Racial Disparities, Margo Schlanger
Articles
For this Introduction, I undertake to look a bit more broadly at recent data. The best sources of demographic information about prisoners are the various surveys and censuses conducted by the U.S. Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS). While no BJS publication directly addresses the issue, and no BJS dataset allows its full analysis, it is possible to glean something from the most recent BJS prison census, the 2005 Census of State and Federal Adult Correctional Facilities.
Plata V. Brown And Realignment: Jails, Prisons, Courts, And Politics, Margo Schlanger
Plata V. Brown And Realignment: Jails, Prisons, Courts, And Politics, Margo Schlanger
Articles
The year 2011 marked an important milestone in American institutional reform litigation. That year, a bare majority of the U.S. Supreme Court, in an opinion in Brown v. Plata by Justice Anthony Kennedy, affirmed a district court order requiring California to remedy its longstanding constitutional deficits in prison medical and mental health care by reducing prison crowding. Not since 1978 had the Court ratified a lower court's crowding-related order in a jail or prison case, and the order before the Court in 2011 was fairly aggressive; theoretically, it could have (although this was never a real prospect) induced the release …
Shelby County V. Holder: Why Section 2 Matters, Ellen D. Katz
Shelby County V. Holder: Why Section 2 Matters, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
Editor’s Note: Professor Ellen D. Katz writes and teaches about election law, civil rights and remedies, and equal protection. She and the Voting Rights Initiative at Michigan Law filed a brief as amicus curiae in Shelby County v. Holder, on which the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments February 27. Here, she examines why Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bears consideration in the case, which involves a challenge to Section 5 of the act.
The Aesthetics Of Affirmative Action, Brian Soucek
The Aesthetics Of Affirmative Action, Brian Soucek
Studio for Law and Culture
Justice Thomas’s dissent in Grutter v. Bollinger — which dismissed diversity as an “aesthetic” — highlighted the Supreme Court’s least-discussed rationale for affirmative action in higher education: the claim that visible diversity in elite institutions bolsters those institutions’ “perceived legitimacy.” This Article takes seriously that claim, and Thomas’s critique, as distinctively aesthetic arguments about the role of appearances in public life. By distinguishing the perceived legitimacy argument from others made on behalf of affirmative action, the Article traces for the first time its origins, scope, and unacknowledged popularity. By identifying the aesthetic logic of the Court's argument and drawing on …
The Power To Destroy: Discriminatory Property Assessments And The Struggle For Tax Justice, Andrew W. Kahrl
The Power To Destroy: Discriminatory Property Assessments And The Struggle For Tax Justice, Andrew W. Kahrl
Studio for Law and Culture
High assessments on African American-owned land became a common, if often invisible, feature of Jim Crow governance. Discriminatory modes of property taxation served as a weapon of social control, an instrument of land speculation and redevelopment, and a vehicle for the unequal distribution of public services. This essay traces the strange career of the property tax from the period of Reconstruction to the age of Jim Crow, situating racial differentials in the assessment and collection of ad valorem taxes within the broader framework of white supremacist governance, and provides a case study of property tax discrimination in civil rights-era Mississippi. …
Lincoln, The Emancipation Proclamation And Executive Power, Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Lincoln, The Emancipation Proclamation And Executive Power, Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Law Faculty Publications
This Essay explores whether President Lincoln's Emancipation Proclamation, freeing all slaves held in areas designated by the President to be under rebellion onJanuary 1, 1863, could be justified as an exercise of his power under the Take Care Clause. Part I of this Essay discusses the legislation that preceded the Emancipation Proclamation. Part II discusses the Emancipation Proclamation. Part III discusses the Take Care Clause and how it might authorize significant parts of the Emancipation Proclamation, if not the entire document.
Promoting Language Access In The Legal Academy, Jayesh Rathod, Gillian Dutton, Beth Lyon, Deborah M. Weissman
Promoting Language Access In The Legal Academy, Jayesh Rathod, Gillian Dutton, Beth Lyon, Deborah M. Weissman
Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals
Since the 1960s, the United States government has paid increasing attention to the rights of language minorities and to the need for greater civic and political integration of these groups. With the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the issuance of Executive Orders, and intervention by the federal judiciary, progress has been made in the realm of language access. State and local courts have likewise taken steps (albeit imperfectly) to provide interpretation and translation assistance to Limited English Proficient persons. Most recently, responding to both lack of services and inconsistent practices, the American Bar Association has set out …
The Court's Denial Of Racial Societal Debt, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw
The Court's Denial Of Racial Societal Debt, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw
Faculty Scholarship
In this year of civil rights anniversaries, the narrative of racial progress has been tempered by the Supreme Court’s game-changing decisions this past summer. The notion that “we’ve come a long way and we have much more work to do” sounds ever more like wishful thinking in the face of a Supreme Court that is no longer an active contributor to the cause. Having abandoned its unprecedented insistence that white supremacy be upended root and branch, the current Court’s boldness is measured by its audacious efforts to reverse engineer the transformative mechanisms these anniversaries celebrate.
Intersectionality: Mapping The Movements Of A Theory, Devon Carbado, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, Vicki M. Mays, Barbara Tomlinson
Intersectionality: Mapping The Movements Of A Theory, Devon Carbado, Kimberlé W. Crenshaw, Vicki M. Mays, Barbara Tomlinson
Faculty Scholarship
Very few theories have generated the kind of interdisciplinary and global engagement that marks the intellectual history of intersectionality. Yet, there has been very little effort to reflect upon precisely how intersectionality has moved across time, disciplines, issues, and geographic and national boundaries. Our failure to attend to intersectionality’s movement has limited our ability to see the theory in places in which it is already doing work and to imagine other places to which the theory might be taken. Addressing these questions, this special issue reflects upon the genesis of intersectionality, engages some of the debates about its scope and …
Brief Of Amici Curiae Professors Nan D. Hunter, Et Al., Addressing The Merits In Support Of Respondents, Nan D. Hunter, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Brief Of Amici Curiae Professors Nan D. Hunter, Et Al., Addressing The Merits In Support Of Respondents, Nan D. Hunter, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
In this amicus brief filed in United States v. Windsor, pending before the Supreme Court, amici constitutional law professors argue that all classifications that carry the indicia of invidiousness should trigger a more searching inquiry than the traditional rational basis test under the Equal Protection Clause would suggest. Classifications that already receive heightened scrutiny, such as race or sex, fit easily into this approach. But the Court’s equal protection jurisprudence has become muddied in a series of cases in which it says rational basis review, but appears to do a more rigorous review. Sexual orientation classifications seemingly were analyzed …
White Men As The New Victims: Reverse Discrimination Cases And The Men's Rights Movement, Bethany M. Coston, Michael Kimmel
White Men As The New Victims: Reverse Discrimination Cases And The Men's Rights Movement, Bethany M. Coston, Michael Kimmel
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
E Pluribus Unum: Liberalism's March To Be The Singular Influence On Civil Rights At The Supreme Court, Aaron J. Shuler
E Pluribus Unum: Liberalism's March To Be The Singular Influence On Civil Rights At The Supreme Court, Aaron J. Shuler
Barry Law Review
This article seeks to apply Rogers Smith’s Multiple Traditions thesis to the United States Supreme Court’s treatment of the Fourteenth Amendment to uncover the influences behind its major civil rights decisions. It will argue that liberalism dominates at the Court after mostly, but not completely, shedding its illiberal tendencies. This article will argue that the Court’s focus on intent over impact and its “color-blind” approach to racial classifications in the era of subterranean prejudice and indifference or ignorance to inequality solidifies and perpetuates the hierarchies created by ascriptive forms of Americanism under the Court’s liberal notions. This article will also …
Who's The Boss? A Distinction Without A Difference, Lakisha A. Davis
Who's The Boss? A Distinction Without A Difference, Lakisha A. Davis
Barry Law Review
This case note provides the factual background of Vance v. Ball State and briefly summarizes the legal precedent behind the decision. It analyzes the opinion of the Court, suggesting that the decision severely limited the essential protections against workplace harassment provided by Title VII, consequently making it more difficult for employees to prove employer vicarious liability for workplace harassment.
According To Our Hearts And Location: Toward A Structuralist Approach To The Study Of Interracial Families, Robin A. Lenhardt
According To Our Hearts And Location: Toward A Structuralist Approach To The Study Of Interracial Families, Robin A. Lenhardt
Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a review of Angela Onwuachi-Willig’s wonderful book, According to Our Hearts: Rhinelander v. Rhinelander and the Law of the Multiracial Family. Race scholars have begun to productively deploy structuralism to discuss cumulative racial disadvantage and the ongoing, racially segregative effects of government systems and policies. of such systems on intimate choice and family formation. Likewise, some scholars have employed structuralism to explore how law shapes our intimate preferences and opportunities for intimate engagements. Still, scholars of this very exciting work have not yet engaged as fully as they might regarding questions of race. This Article contends that …
State Speech And Political Liberalism, Abner S. Greene
State Speech And Political Liberalism, Abner S. Greene
Faculty Scholarship
Jim Fleming and Linda McClain have written an impressive book on the responsible exercise of rights, which flows from prior writing by each.Their title, "Ordered Liberty," is a bit of a misnomer, however. When one thinks of that phrase, one thinks of the ways in which we balance liberty against order, i.e., against security, police power, controlling the excesses of liberty. Responsibility in the exercise of rights is an aspect of how rights are orderly, but the major hard cases involving rights are hard because significant claims of harm are in play. Think of much of constitutional criminal procedure, free …
The Only Thing That Stops A Guy With A Bad Policy Is A Guy With A Good Policy: An Examination Of The Nra’S “National School Shield” Proposal, Gordon A. Crews, Angela D. Crews, Catherine E. Burton
The Only Thing That Stops A Guy With A Bad Policy Is A Guy With A Good Policy: An Examination Of The Nra’S “National School Shield” Proposal, Gordon A. Crews, Angela D. Crews, Catherine E. Burton
Criminal Justice Faculty Publications
With the recent tragedy at Sandy Hook Elementary in Newtown, CT, the public and the government are looking for solutions to school violence. The National Rifle Association (NRA), a Second Amendment, pro-gun advocacy group, has proposed an “education and training emergency response program” called The National School Shield, which advocates the placement of armed security in schools. Although the program sounds provocative, serious questions complicate its plausibility, necessity, motive, and effectiveness. Furthermore, the potential policy and practical ramifications of encouraging armed security forces in U.S. schools are complex. The authors examined the proposal’s key elements from a public policy …
Cold Comfort: Sec. 1983 As The Exclusive Damages Remedy For Violations Of Sec. 1918 By State Actors, Darlene Goring
Cold Comfort: Sec. 1983 As The Exclusive Damages Remedy For Violations Of Sec. 1918 By State Actors, Darlene Goring
All Scholarship
No abstract provided.
How I Rode The Bus To Become A Professor At The University Of Denver Sturm College Of Law; Reflections On Keyes's Legacy For The Metropolitan, Post-Racial, And Multiracial Twenty-First Century, Tom I. Romero Ii
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Deactivating Implanted Cardiac Devices: Euthanasia Or The Withdrawal Of Treatment?, David Orentlicher
Deactivating Implanted Cardiac Devices: Euthanasia Or The Withdrawal Of Treatment?, David Orentlicher
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Masculine Law Firms, Ann C. Mcginley
Masculine Law Firms, Ann C. Mcginley
Scholarly Works
This article describes the masculine culture in law firms and analyzes how this culture harms both men and women because of their gender. Part II explains MMT, and analyzes the masculine practices that exist in modern law firms. Part III studies a lawsuit brought by a law firm associate, a white male father of two who allegedly was fired in retaliation for taking leave under the Family Medical Leave Act and because of his failure to adhere to the macho stereotypes prevalent in the law firm. Part IV analyzes how the law should respond to masculine norms, and suggests that …
Masculinity, Labor, And Sexual Power, Ann C. Mcginley
Masculinity, Labor, And Sexual Power, Ann C. Mcginley
Scholarly Works
This Essay focuses on gender and sexuality to analyze Hannah Rosin's thesis in the The End of Men. It relies in large part on feminist and masculinities theories to consider how men and women may both suffer gendered disadvantage. It looks specifically at Las Vegas, a market that is sexualized, in order to complicate Rosin's narrative, and to create a better understanding of what is happening in the U.S. workforce. While the Las Vegas market is not representative of markets across the country, it is economically and socially significant and, with the expansion of the casino and gaming industries …
Blacks And Voting Rights In Nevada, Rachel J. Anderson
Blacks And Voting Rights In Nevada, Rachel J. Anderson
Scholarly Works
This article is a brief foray into black suffrage and equal rights in Nevada legal history. It is part of "A Special Series on African Americans in Nevada Politics - Past and Present" on pages 16-21 of the issue. Sources are on page 21 of the issue.
Blacks In Nevada Elections, Rachel J. Anderson
Blacks In Nevada Elections, Rachel J. Anderson
Scholarly Works
This article is a snapshot of challenges, contributions, and achievements of African Americans in Nevada elections. It is part of "A Special Series on African Americans in Nevada Politics - Past and Present" on pages 16-21 of the issue.
Blacks In The Nevada Legal Profession, Rachel J. Anderson
Blacks In The Nevada Legal Profession, Rachel J. Anderson
Scholarly Works
This article discusses the history of African-Americans in the Nevada legal profession. It is part of "A Special Series on African Americans in Nevada Politics - Past and Present" on pages 16-21 of the issue. Sources are on page 21 of the issue.
'Baton Bullying': Understanding Multi-Aggressor Rotation In Anti-Harassment Cases, Kris Franklin
'Baton Bullying': Understanding Multi-Aggressor Rotation In Anti-Harassment Cases, Kris Franklin
Articles & Chapters
Schools are increasingly expected to intervene to prevent the sorts of bullying behavior that can interfere with education. If they do so inadequately, as a number of recent cases show, school districts may be held liable under Title IX for their “deliberate indifference” to harassment that effectively prevents the victim from receiving the benefits of public education. In popular imagination, “bullying” usually consists of one aggressor terrorizing one victim, sometimes with the assistance or tacit approval of other students. But least with respect to the many cases of students being targeted because they were, or were perceived to be, gay, …
A Thought Experiment, Louis Michael Seidman
A Thought Experiment, Louis Michael Seidman
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Herewith, Justice Antonin Scalia's long lost dissenting opinion in Brown v. Board of Education.
Reflections On Sexual Liberty And Equality: "Through Seneca Falls And Selma And Stonewall", Nan D. Hunter
Reflections On Sexual Liberty And Equality: "Through Seneca Falls And Selma And Stonewall", Nan D. Hunter
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
This Essay uses the opportunity to examine Roe v. Wade forty years after it was decided and Lawrence v. Texas ten years after it was decided as a platform from which to analyze the status of the civil rights paradigm in American law. A comparison of the two decisions illustrates an important and new point about how civil rights law is deployed to achieve very different goals.