Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons^™

Book Review Of Forced Justice: School Desegregation And The Law And Race Relations Litigation In An Age Of Complexity, Davison M. Douglas

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Court Interpreting Services In State And Federal Courts: Reasons And Options For Inter-Court Coordination, William E. Hewitt, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Catherine Gill, Melissa Cantrell

Faculty Publications

In 1978 a federal law marked the beginning of standard setting and professionalization of court interpreters through testing. In 1995, an entity now called the Consortium for State Court Interpreter Certification was created by the National Center for State Courts and four founding states (Minnesota, New Jersey, Oregon, and Washington.) The Consortium was created as a way to ameliorate shortages of resources and expertise to implement standards for interpreting proficiency at the state level, problems shared by virtually all of the states. Now, as a consequence of institutionalization, a forum has been created wherein exchange of information and expertise, and …

Section 5: Civil Rights, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School

Supreme Court Preview

No abstract provided.

Equal Pay: A Proposed Amendment To The Fairllabor Standards Act, Caroline Edwards

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Is Sexual Harassment Sex Discrimination? Still An Open Question, Helen Lafferty

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Patriarchy And Dicrimination In Apartheid South Africa's Abortion Law, Jeremy Sarkin

Buffalo Human Rights Law Review

No abstract provided.

Analysis Of People Of The State Of New York, Buffalo Gyn Womenservices, Planned Parenthood Of Rochester/Syracuse Region, Et. Al. V. Operation Rescue National, Et. Al., Lucinda Finley

Buffalo Women's Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Remedies, Section 1983 And The Common Law, Michael L. Wells

Scholarly Works

Constitutional tort law marries the substantive rights granted by the Constitution to the remedial mechanism of tort law. The sweeping language of 42 U.S.C. 1983 provides that "[e]very person who, under color of any [state law] subjects, or causes to be subjected, any [person] to the deprivation of any [constitutional rights] shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress." Constitutional tort suits raise, in a new context, many tort-like remedial questions relating to causation, immunity, and damages--and therein lies a problem. The usual source of answers to …

Madiba 80th Birthday Bash July 18, 1998, Desmond Tutu

Archbishop Desmond Tutu Collection Textual

Speech written by Archbishop Tutu for Nelson Mandela's 80th birthday.

A Comparative Vision Of The Convergence Of Ecology, Empowerment, And The Quest For A Just Society, James A. Kushner

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Family Values: Prevention Of Discrimination And The Housing For Older Persons Act Of 1995, Jonathan I. Edelstein

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Mandates Unsatisfied: The Low Income Housing Tax Credit Program And The Civil Rights Laws, Florence Wagman Roisman

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Time For Reflection, Marc A. Fajer

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Housing Segregation And Housing Integration: The Diverging Paths Of Urban America, Richard H. Sander

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Race And Property Values In Entrenched Segregation, Margalynne Armstrong

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Race/Ism Lost And Found: The Fair Housing Act At Thirty, John O. Calmore

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

Dicenso V. Cisneros: An Argument For Recognizing The Sanctity Of The Home In Housing Sexual Harassment Cases, Carlotta J. Ross

University of Miami Law Review

No abstract provided.

A Generation Of Human Rights: Looking Back To The Future, Rosalie Silberman Abella

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

The author traces the development of human rights in North America since the Second World War, and examines the socio-political environment in which these developments took place. In examining what appears to be an existing backlash against the earlier vigorous pursuit of rights for disadvantaged groups, the author distinguishes between civil liberties and human rights, and focuses on how a preoccupation with civil liberties is impeding the ability to promote human rights. She concludes by discussing the evolution of human rights for women this generation, and observes that while there have been significant gains, especially numerically, there has also been …

Unconscious Racism And The Criminal Law, Sheri Johnson

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Négligence, Victimes Indirectes Et Préjudice Moral En Common Law: Les Limites A La Réparation Se Justifient-Elles?, Louise Belanger-Hardy

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Common law courts have traditionally been reluctant to award damages for emotional harm. This is particularly true in cases of secondary victims of negligence. Preoccupied by the fear of fraudulent claims or the danger of opening the floodgates, courts strive to limit the scope of liability in these circumstances. But how legitimate is the reasoning that has served to support such a restrictive analysis of the decision to award damages for emotional harm? The author explores the limitations of the Canadian courts' current approach and analyzes the basis of their concern. She concludes that not only do the beliefs espoused …

Civil Rights, Robin Jean Davis, Louis J. Palmer Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Challenges To The Future Of Civil And Political Rights, Dinah Shelton

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Human Rights In The United States Courts: The Role Of Lawyers, Steven M. Schneebaum

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

No Cure For A Broken Heart, Daniel J. Sharfstein

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Davis filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit pro se for the violation of his constitutional right to privacy, seeking $1.5 million in compensatory and punitive damages. The district court dismissed the claim sua sponte, relying on a section of the newly enacted Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), entitled "Limitation on Recovery": "No Federal civil action may be brought by a prisoner confined in a jail, prison, or other correctional facility, for mental or emotional injury suffered while in custody without a prior showing of physical injury."

Davis challenged this physical injury requirement on equal protection grounds, but in "Davis …

Fax: The White House – May 7, 1998, Remarks By The President, Arab American Institute Conference, Office Of The Press Secretary

Saffy Collection - All Textual Materials

Bill Clinton’s speech for the Arab American Institute Conference May 7, 1998 at Grand Hyatt Hotel Washington, D.C.

Justice John Marshall Harlan As Prophet: The Plessy Dissenter's Color-Blind Constitution, Molly Townes O'Brien

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

The concept of color-blindness has long elicited much debate over its precise meaning and the role it should play in jurisprudence. Such debate was catalyzed by Justice John Marshall Harlan's well-known Plessy dissent. In the wake of the efforts of both civil rights activists and conservatives to use color-blindness to further their respective goals, Professor O'Brien seeks to clarify Harlan's vision of color-blind jurisprudence and examines the ways in which recent Supreme Court decisions echo Harlan's concepts regarding a color-blind constitution.

Professor O'Brien first provides a brief introduction to the concept of color-blindness. O'Brien then examines Harlan's experiences in politics …

And What Of The Meek?: Devising A Constitutionally Recognized Duty To Protect The Disabled At State Residential Schools, Yama Shansab

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Section 1983 provides a statutory right to a remedy for Fourteenth Amendment due process violations. The Supreme Court has suggested that the state only has a duty to protect when an individual is incarcerated, involuntarily institutionalized, or has other similar restraints of his or her personal liberty. Based on this, courts generally have found that schools have no constitutional duty to protect their students against injury from other students or staff members. Lower courts have struggled with what constitutes other similar restraints, but have generally been unwilling to find that a state has a constitutional duty in all but the …

Rough Terrain Ahead: A New Course For Racial Preference Programs, Jeremy Moeser

Mercer Law Review

Debate over affirmative action has dominated recent legislative and court agendas. In November 1996, for example, fifty-four percent of California voters approved a referendum, Proposition 209, which eliminated preference programs in state and local government for minorities and women. Similarly, in 1995 the Board of Regents of the University of California system ended affirmative action in California's public universities. This phenomenon, however, has not limited itself to California. The Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in Hopwood v. Texas, held that the University of Texas School of Law's admissions program, which gave preference to African-Americans and Mexican- Americans, …

The Enforcement Of Prisoners’ Rights In The United States: An Access To The Courts Issue, Roberta M. Harding

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

This article examines how the development and status of the rights of incarcerated people is significantly effected by their ability to access the judiciary; specifically the federal judicial system. The relatively recent explosion in the American prison population provided the impetus for researching this topic. The objective was to examine whether this tremendous rise in the number of people incarcerated in U.S. penal facilities had impacted the posture of the rights afforded to these individuals. One conclusion reached was that the rise in the prison population had harshly eroded the right of access to the courts. The exploration of the …

Review Of What Are Freedoms For?, By John H. Garvey, Scott D. Pomfret

Michigan Law Review

In 1988, Jeffrey Kendall and Barbara Zeitler Kendall were married. Though Jeffrey was Catholic at the time and Barbara was Jewish, the couple agreed to raise their children in Barbara's faith. In 1991, Jeffrey joined Boston Church of Christ, a fundamentalist Christian church. The tenets of that faith include a belief that those who do not accept Jesus Christ are damned to Hell, where there will be "weeping and gnashing of teeth." Barbara's faith also underwent a change during the marriage: she became an Orthodox Jew. Citing irreconcilable differences, the Kendalls sought a divorce in November, 1994. Before their marriage …