Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (187)
- Law and Society (37)
- Courts (36)
- Law and Race (35)
- Fourteenth Amendment (33)
-
- Legal History (31)
- Human Rights Law (27)
- Supreme Court of the United States (25)
- Criminal Law (24)
- Civil Procedure (22)
- Law and Gender (21)
- First Amendment (20)
- State and Local Government Law (20)
- Education Law (19)
- Judges (19)
- Civil Law (17)
- Criminal Procedure (17)
- Jurisdiction (15)
- Jurisprudence (15)
- Legislation (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (13)
- Law and Politics (12)
- Rule of Law (12)
- Labor and Employment Law (11)
- Social Welfare Law (11)
- Health Law and Policy (10)
- Family Law (9)
- Institution
-
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (19)
- Pepperdine University (15)
- University of Colorado Law School (15)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (15)
- The University of Akron (13)
-
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- American University Washington College of Law (9)
- Boston University School of Law (9)
- Duke Law (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- Cleveland State University (7)
- West Virginia University (6)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (5)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (5)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (5)
- BLR (4)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (4)
- Seattle University School of Law (4)
- University of Baltimore Law (4)
- Marquette University Law School (3)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (3)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (3)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (3)
- Valparaiso University (3)
- William & Mary Law School (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- Duquesne University (2)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (2)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (38)
- Publications (15)
- Touro Law Review (15)
- Pepperdine Law Review (13)
- Scholarly Works (11)
-
- Akron Law Review (10)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (10)
- All Faculty Scholarship (9)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (8)
- West Virginia Law Review (6)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (5)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (4)
- Cleveland State Law Review (4)
- ExpressO (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Northwestern University Law Review (4)
- Supreme Court Case Files (4)
- American University Law Review (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (3)
- Marquette Benefits and Social Welfare Law Review (3)
- ConLawNOW (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (2)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (2)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Maine Law Review (2)
- Oklahoma Law Review (2)
- Osgoode Hall Law Journal (2)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 181 - 210 of 235
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Drug Exceptionalism, Erik Luna
Constitutional Classifications And The "Gay Gene", Susan J. Becker
Constitutional Classifications And The "Gay Gene", Susan J. Becker
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
In this essay the author discusses the use of genetic information to classify individuals for purposes of the law, and more specifically, the impact of the so-called “gay gene” on legal classifications.
Foreword: The Legal History Of The Great Sit-In Case Of Bell V. Maryland, William L. Reynolds
Foreword: The Legal History Of The Great Sit-In Case Of Bell V. Maryland, William L. Reynolds
Faculty Scholarship
Reviews the environment and history of the 1960 Baltimore sit-in case that eventually made its way to the United States Supreme Court.
Constitutional Law: Affirmative Action In The Public Sector: The Admissibility Of Post-Enactment Evidence Of Discrimination To Provide A Compelling Governmental Interest, Andrew C. Jayne
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law: Boy Scouts Of America V. Dale: The Scout Oath And Law Survive Government Intrusion, J. Craig Buchan
Constitutional Law: Boy Scouts Of America V. Dale: The Scout Oath And Law Survive Government Intrusion, J. Craig Buchan
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
Piercing The Veil: William J. Brennan's Account Of Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight
Piercing The Veil: William J. Brennan's Account Of Regents Of The University Of California V. Bakke, Lee Epstein, Jack Knight
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
A Case Of Unconstitutional Immigration: The Importation Of England's National Curriculum To The United States, Jaime S. Boutwell
A Case Of Unconstitutional Immigration: The Importation Of England's National Curriculum To The United States, Jaime S. Boutwell
Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law
The decline in the quality of the American educational system continues to spawn debate and criticism across the nation. Despite many suggestions and arguments on how to improve American schools, such as voucher systems, smaller class size, and higher teacher qualifications, the concern, while deeply felt, appears to be empty rhetoric. Teachers' low salaries, the disparity in funding among schools, and the lack of parent and community involvement demonstrate America's apathy towards education reform. To effectuate meaningful changes in education, American communities must reach consensus on education's purpose and importance.
The failure of schools requires America to take action. State …
Why A Fundamental Right To A Quality Education Is Not Enough, James G. Wilson
Why A Fundamental Right To A Quality Education Is Not Enough, James G. Wilson
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
This article relies upon the political and economic analysis of such great thinkers as Aristotle and Rousseau to understand and normatively evaluate constitutional caselaw in general and education cases in particular. The article's title contains its conclusion: a judicially created right to a quality education is a laudable, but possibly counterproductive and definitely insufficient condition, for creating a humane constitutional system. The rest of society needs to do far more to protect the average citizen and worker from the ever-ravenous ruling class. All the edification in the world will not mean much if there are only a few decent jobs …
The Empty State And Nobody's Market: The Political Economy Of Non-Responsibility And The Judicial Disappearing Of The Civil Rights Movement, Kenneth M. Casebeer
The Empty State And Nobody's Market: The Political Economy Of Non-Responsibility And The Judicial Disappearing Of The Civil Rights Movement, Kenneth M. Casebeer
University of Miami Law Review
No abstract provided.
Mirabile Dictum! The Case For 'Unnecessary' Constitutional Rulings In Civil Rights Damages Actions, John M. Greabe
Mirabile Dictum! The Case For 'Unnecessary' Constitutional Rulings In Civil Rights Damages Actions, John M. Greabe
Law Faculty Scholarship
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsuits doomed to fail on grounds of qualified immunity should presumably address the question whether the complaint pleads a viable claim that the defendant caused a violation of the plaintiff's federal rights. The article also contends that such "unnecessary" threshold rulings are not dicta.
Antidiscrimination And Affirmative Action Policies: Economic Efficiency And The Constitution, Edward M. Iacobucci
Antidiscrimination And Affirmative Action Policies: Economic Efficiency And The Constitution, Edward M. Iacobucci
Osgoode Hall Law Journal
This article assesses the economic efficiency of race-based antidiscrimination and affirmative action policies with a view to assessing relevant Canadian and American constitutional law. The article reviews economic arguments about why antidiscrimination laws may be efficient in addressing externalities, in hastening the exit of bigoted employers from the market, and in preventing the potentially inefficient use of race as a proxy for information; affirmative action may be efficient in accounting for differential signaling costs across race. The article concludes that economic analysis supports the approach in section 15 of the Charter which generally bans discriminatory government action, but recognizes that …
Subtracting Sexism From The Classroom: Law And Policy In The Debate Over All-Female Math And Science Classes In Public Schools, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Subtracting Sexism From The Classroom: Law And Policy In The Debate Over All-Female Math And Science Classes In Public Schools, Carolyn B. Ramsey
Publications
No abstract provided.
Diversity: The Red Herring Of Equal Protection, Sharon E. Rush
Diversity: The Red Herring Of Equal Protection, Sharon E. Rush
UF Law Faculty Publications
Couching the constitutional inquiry in cases like Bakke and VMI in the context of integration also puts in perspective the diversity justification. Affirmative action policies are constitutional because they integrate state programs. Integration on the basis of race and sex also diversifies state programs. In contrast, attempts to justify sex-segregation in state programs by arguing the policy promotes diversity is irrelevant to an equal protection analysis. Voluntarily created all-female schools should be constitutional because they promote the equal citizenship of women without damaging the equal citizenship stature of men. This is true for voluntarily race-segregated programs for minorities; as well. …
Ex Post Facto Laws: Supreme Court New York County People V. Griffin (Decided December 5, 1996
Ex Post Facto Laws: Supreme Court New York County People V. Griffin (Decided December 5, 1996
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Buck Does Not Stop Here: Supervisory Liability In Section 1983 Cases, Kit Kinports
The Buck Does Not Stop Here: Supervisory Liability In Section 1983 Cases, Kit Kinports
Faculty Scholarship
The appropriate standard for supervisory liability in Section 1983 cases has been a source of considerable disagreement among federal courts of appeals. In the absence of established Supreme Court authority on the subject, courts have rejected vicarious and negligence liability in favor of a higher culpability requirement, but they have not agreed on precisely what form this higher standard should take. In this article, the Author addresses the need for a uniform standard consistent with the statute's twin goals of compensating the victims of constitutional violations and deterring constitutional infractions.
The author notes at the outset that lower courts have …
Utilitarianism Left And Right: A Response To Professor Armour, Robert F. Nagel
Utilitarianism Left And Right: A Response To Professor Armour, Robert F. Nagel
Publications
No abstract provided.
California’S Proposition 187--Does It Mean What It Says? Does It Say What It Means? A Textual And Constitutional Analysis, Lolita K. Buckner Inniss
California’S Proposition 187--Does It Mean What It Says? Does It Say What It Means? A Textual And Constitutional Analysis, Lolita K. Buckner Inniss
Publications
No abstract provided.
Federal Enforcement Of Civil Rights During The First Reconstruction, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Federal Enforcement Of Civil Rights During The First Reconstruction, Robert J. Kaczorowski
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This essay recounts the heroic efforts of federal legal officers and judges to enforce citizens' rights during the 1870s. Part I sets forth the historical events giving rise to the enforcement effort of the Grant Administration. Part II details the problems which the federal executive branch faced when it aggressively prosecuted civil rights violations. Part III details the problems which the federal judiciary faced in administering the civil rights prosecutions brought by the executive branch. Part IV details the national political problems that eventually ended effective enforcement of federal civil rights laws. This Essay concludes that, notwithstanding the problems faced …
Affirmative Action As A Women's Issue, Helen Norton
Affirmative Action As A Women's Issue, Helen Norton
Publications
No abstract provided.
Fundamental Rights In The "Gray" Area: The Right Of Privacy Under The Minnesota Constitution, Michael K. Steenson
Fundamental Rights In The "Gray" Area: The Right Of Privacy Under The Minnesota Constitution, Michael K. Steenson
Faculty Scholarship
This Article explores the constitutional aspects of Minnesota privacy law. Part II briefly explains federal privacy law to provide a baseline for consideration of privacy law in Minnesota. Part III examines the right of privacy as it has evolved in the Minnesota common law. Part IV evaluates the Minnesota Supreme Court's application of federal privacy standards and then examines the court's decisions that outline the right of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution. Part V concludes by raising questions concerning the potential application of the court's concept of privacy under the Minnesota Constitution as applied to two areas: same-sex marriages and …
Facing The Challenge: A Lawyer's Response To Anti-Gay Initiatives, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Facing The Challenge: A Lawyer's Response To Anti-Gay Initiatives, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
We are living in an extraordinary period of gay and lesbian history. As lesbian and gay civil rights gain increasing recognition throughout the country – through small but growing numbers of laws prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination, court rulings protecting lesbian and gay parents' custody of their children, and a historically unprecedented level of positive media coverage – our struggles also have escalated enormously. Not only must we litigate and negotiate for equal opportunity in employment, housing, and parenting rights as always, but also we face a nationally organized and terrifically well-funded assault on our fundamental rights as citizens.
This nationwide …
Shaw V. Reno: On The Borderline, Emily Calhoun
Did The Slaves Author The Thirteenth Amendment? An Essay In Redemptive History, Guyora Binder
Did The Slaves Author The Thirteenth Amendment? An Essay In Redemptive History, Guyora Binder
Journal Articles
American constitutional interpretation is deeply traditionalist, and privileges original intent. The difficulty with thus authorizing the past in interpreting the Thirteenth Amendment is that it purports to abolish custom and tradition as unjust. This essay argues that, given the Amendment’s denunciation of the polity that enacted it as illegitimate, its questionable formal pedigree, and the agency of the slaves in precipitating, defining, and resolving the crisis that enabled it, the slaves have a moral claim to status as its authors. It follows that the original intent guiding interpretation should be that of the slaves themselves.
Lost Innocence And The Moral Foundation Of Law, Kate Nace Day
Lost Innocence And The Moral Foundation Of Law, Kate Nace Day
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Operation Rescue: Was The Justice Dept. Right To Intervene In Wichita?, Gary S. Lawson, Celeste Lacy Davis, Eve W. Paul
Operation Rescue: Was The Justice Dept. Right To Intervene In Wichita?, Gary S. Lawson, Celeste Lacy Davis, Eve W. Paul
Faculty Scholarship
Discussion of Operation Rescue attempt to shut down abortion clinic in Wichita, KS in August 1991, and ensuing decision of U.S. District Judge Patrick Kelly, as well as intervention of Justice Department. A debate-style article with "pro" side written by Gary Lawson and "con" side written by C.L. Davis & E.W. Paul.
The Ripple Effects Of Slaughter-House: A Critique Of A Negative Rights View Of The Constitution, Michael J. Gerhardt
The Ripple Effects Of Slaughter-House: A Critique Of A Negative Rights View Of The Constitution, Michael J. Gerhardt
Vanderbilt Law Review
Upon seeing Niagara Falls for the first time, Oscar Wilde reportedly remarked that it "would be more impressive if it flowed the other way." I have a similar reaction to a series of narrow Supreme Court interpretations of the fourteenth amendment, beginning with the Slaughter-House Cases, decided in 1872, and extending to the 1989 decisions in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services and DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services. In Slaughter-House the Court interpreted the privileges or immunities clause of the fourteenth amendment as merely protecting interests other federal laws already protected, while recently the Court interpreted the due …
Reconstructing Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment To Assist Impoverished Children, James G. Wilson
Reconstructing Section Five Of The Fourteenth Amendment To Assist Impoverished Children, James G. Wilson
Law Faculty Articles and Essays
Liberal lawyers encounter grim alternatives caused by the Supreme Court's relentless shift to the right, particularly if they consider stare decisis a major constitutional value. They can attack specific decisions, demonstrating inconsistencies with prior cases, conclusory reasoning and/ or poor policy. They can use history, jurisprudence or even literature to make broad-based critiques of the Court's increasing callousness. They can propose counter-doctrine which is consistent with existing caselaw. The third response may appear quixotic, even naive, given the present Court. Nevertheless, exploration of progressive alternatives illuminates existing doctrine and provides potential openings if the Court ever decides to become more …
Mastery, Slavery, And Emancipation, Guyora Binder
Mastery, Slavery, And Emancipation, Guyora Binder
Journal Articles
Hegel's dialectic of master and slave in the Phenomenology of Mind portrays a master unable to win genuine recognition from a slave because unwilling to confer it. The dialectic implies that freedom has to be conceived as association based on mutual respect, rather than independence. This article offers a communitarian interpretation of emancipation inspired by Hegel's dialectic of master and slave. It proceeds from an account of slave society which, like Hegel's dialectic, equates slavery with the denial of social recognition. This account argues that the experience of slave society led both the masters and the slaves to conceive of …
Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thornburg V. Gingles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Thornburg V. Gingles, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.