Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (67)
- Labor and Employment Law (54)
- Human Rights Law (48)
- Law and Gender (44)
- Criminal Law (41)
-
- Education Law (33)
- Law and Society (32)
- Courts (29)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (26)
- Fourteenth Amendment (25)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (25)
- Legal History (24)
- Criminal Procedure (23)
- Sexuality and the Law (22)
- Health Law and Policy (21)
- Disability Law (20)
- Legislation (19)
- Law and Race (18)
- State and Local Government Law (18)
- Legal Remedies (17)
- Sociology (17)
- Family Law (15)
- First Amendment (15)
- Religion Law (13)
- Immigration Law (12)
- Judges (12)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (11)
- Litigation (11)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (89)
- Seattle University School of Law (28)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (25)
- University of Michigan Law School (12)
- Duke Law (11)
-
- University of Georgia School of Law (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (11)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (10)
- Georgetown University Law Center (9)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (9)
- William & Mary Law School (9)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (8)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (8)
- Western New England University (8)
- University of Tennessee College of Law (7)
- American University Washington College of Law (6)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (6)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (5)
- Mercer University School of Law (5)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (5)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (5)
- University of Baltimore Law (5)
- University of South Carolina (5)
- University of Southern Maine (5)
- Fordham Law School (4)
- New York Law School (4)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- West Virginia University (4)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (42)
- Civil rights (29)
- Civil Rights (20)
- Employment discrimination (19)
- Supreme Court (19)
-
- Constitution (16)
- Race (14)
- Title VII (14)
- United States (14)
- Race discrimination (13)
- Affirmative action (11)
- First Amendment (11)
- Fourteenth Amendment (11)
- Constitutional law (10)
- Employment (10)
- Gender (10)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Women (10)
- Education (9)
- Equality before the law (9)
- Racial discrimination (9)
- Criminal justice system (8)
- Criminal law (8)
- Equal protection (8)
- Equality (8)
- Poverty (8)
- Race and law (8)
- Religion (8)
- Segregation (8)
- Sex discrimination (8)
- Publication
-
- Pepperdine Law Review (80)
- Faculty Scholarship (37)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (25)
- All Faculty Scholarship (16)
- Faculty Articles (15)
-
- Faculty Publications (15)
- Georgia Law Review (11)
- Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality (9)
- Scholarly Works (9)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (8)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (8)
- Articles (7)
- Tennessee Journal of Race, Gender, & Social Justice (6)
- Touro Law Review (6)
- American Indian Law Journal (5)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (5)
- Indiana Law Journal (5)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (5)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (5)
- Torch: The Civil Rights Team Project Newsletter (5)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Legislation and Policy Brief (4)
- Mercer Law Review (4)
- West Virginia Law Review (4)
- Articles & Chapters (3)
- Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Publications (3)
- Supreme Court Briefs (3)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (3)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 360 of 405
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Educating English Learners: Reconciling Bilingualism And Accountability, Rosemary C. Salomone
Educating English Learners: Reconciling Bilingualism And Accountability, Rosemary C. Salomone
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
In late July 2011, an estimated 5,000 individuals converged on Washington, D.C., to protest the direction of state and federal education policy. Fueled by social media, the Save Our Schools March and National Call to Action was a grassroots effort organized largely by teachers, with principals, school board members, and activists lending support. Featured speakers included prominent education figures, like historian Diane Ravitch and Jonathan Kozol, a former teacher known for his writings on school inequalities. Specific points of contention focused on high stakes testing and test-based accountability, key elements in the Obama Administration’s Blueprint for Reform and Race …
How Predatory Mortgage Lending Changed African American Communities And Families, Cheryl L. Wade
How Predatory Mortgage Lending Changed African American Communities And Families, Cheryl L. Wade
Faculty Publications
(Excerpt)
This symposium focuses on efforts to reform the secondary mortgage market in the aftermath of the most potent economic downturn in U.S. history since The Great Depression. One question posed at the symposium in several forms was whether low-income Americans should be encouraged to own a home. Implicit in this question is the idea that low-income homebuyers were responsible for the losses that investors in mortgage-backed securities incurred. This question is part of a familiar narrative: investors in mortgage-backed securities suffered, and the economy suffered, because low-income homebuyers defaulted. My essay, however, looks beyond the alleged irresponsibility of homebuyers …
Promoting Social Change In Asia And The Pacific: The Need For A Disability Rights Tribunal To Give Life To The Un Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities, Michael L. Perlin
Promoting Social Change In Asia And The Pacific: The Need For A Disability Rights Tribunal To Give Life To The Un Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities, Michael L. Perlin
Articles & Chapters
There is no question that the existence of regional human rights courts and commissions has been an essential element in the enforcement of international human rights in those regions of the world where such tribunals exist. In the specific area of mental disability law, there is now a remarkably robust body of case law from the European Court on Human Rights, some significant and transformative decisions from the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and at least one major case from the African Commission onHuman Rights.
In Asia and the Pacific region, however, there is no such body. Many reasons have …
Superheroes, Bandits, And Cyber-Nerds: Exploring The History And Contemporary Development Of The Vigilante, Stephanie Juliano
Superheroes, Bandits, And Cyber-Nerds: Exploring The History And Contemporary Development Of The Vigilante, Stephanie Juliano
Articles & Chapters
This article will first discuss what defines a vigilante, the history of vigilantes, and the contemporary vigilante's effect on the legal system as a whole. Also, this article will focus on those scenarios that bring an ordinary person to react in an illegal way to a perceived injustice. In focusing on these scenarios, this article will examine a little more closely the answers of deeper questions about the nature of law and justice, and their roles in the accelerating world of new media.
"I Didn't Agree To Arbitrate That!"-How Courts Determine If Employees' Sexual Assault And Sexual Harassment Claims Fall Within The Scope Of Broad Mandatory Arbitration Clauses, Eric Koplowitz
Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution
Throughout the last few decades, mandatory arbitration clauses have become more prevalent in employment contracts. Mandatory arbitration clauses provide employers with a cheaper and less formal method to resolve disputes with their employees once they occur. Employers who want most or all of their employees' claims subjected to mandatory arbitration will use broad language in the arbitration clauses. Despite the use of broad and seemingly all-encompassing language in broad mandatory arbitration clauses, some employees' claims can escape their reach and proceed to court. This Note will look at how courts determine if employees' sexual assault and sexual harassment claims against …
An Updated Quantitative Study Of Iqbal's Impact On 12(B)(6) Motions, Patricia W. Moore
An Updated Quantitative Study Of Iqbal's Impact On 12(B)(6) Motions, Patricia W. Moore
Faculty Articles
The effect of Ashcroft v. Iqbal on pleading standards and behavior is a source of significant legal debate. This article serves as a follow-up to Professor Moore's 2010 empirical study on Iqbal's effect on courts' rulings on motions to dismiss complaints for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Professor Moore's previous study found a statistically significant increase in the likelihood that a court grants a 12(b)(6) motion with leave to amend following Iqbal. In this article, Professor Moore updates and increases the pool of cases in her database. The updated data …
Defining The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, Jennifer Mason Mcaward
Defining The Badges And Incidents Of Slavery, Jennifer Mason Mcaward
Journal Articles
Most agree that Section Two of the Thirteenth Amendment empowers Congress to legislate regarding the “badges and incidents of slavery.” Few, however, have explored in depth the precise meaning of this concept. The goal of this Article is to provide a historical and conceptual framework for interpreting and identifying the badges and incidents of slavery. It examines the original public meaning of the terms “badge of slavery” and “incident of slavery” as well as how the “badges and incidents” concept has been incorporated into and used in Thirteenth Amendment jurisprudence. It considers several analytical variables from historical, jurisprudential, and policy …
Racial Disparities In Accessing Health Care And Health Status, Ruqaiijah Yearby
Racial Disparities In Accessing Health Care And Health Status, Ruqaiijah Yearby
All Faculty Scholarship
Point (Overview): Interpersonal and institutional racial biases are the principal reasons for racial disparities in accessing health care and disparities in African Americans’ health status, which can only be addressed by acknowledging and putting an end to interpersonal and institutional racial bias in the health care system that adversely affects the health status African-Americans.
Counterpoint (Overview): The irrational structure of health care, which is based on ability to pay, rather than need is the main cause of racial disparities in health, which will not be equalized until the structure of the health care system is fixed or when African Americans’ …
A Horrible Fascination: Segregation, Obscenity, & The Cultural Contingency Of Rights, Anders Walker
A Horrible Fascination: Segregation, Obscenity, & The Cultural Contingency Of Rights, Anders Walker
All Faculty Scholarship
Building on current interest in the regulation of child pornography, this article goes back to the 1950s, recovering a lost history of how southern segregationists used the battle against obscenity to counter the Supreme Court’s ruling in Brown v. Board of Education. Itself focused on the psychological development of children, Brown sparked a discursive backlash in the South focused on claims that the races possessed different cultures and that white children would be harmed joined a larger, regional campaign, a constitutional guerilla war mounted by moderates and extremists alike that swept onto cultural, First Amendment terrain even as the frontal …
Plausibility Pleading And Employment Discrimination, Suzette M. Malveaux
Plausibility Pleading And Employment Discrimination, Suzette M. Malveaux
Publications
No abstract provided.
Title Vii Works - That's Why We Don't Like It, Chuck Henson
Title Vii Works - That's Why We Don't Like It, Chuck Henson
Faculty Publications
In response to the universal belief that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is not fulfilling its purpose, this Article presents a different perspective on the reality of this federal employment discrimination law. Title VII is fulfilling the purpose of the Congress that created it. The purpose was not the eradication of all discrimination in employment. The purpose was to balance the prohibition of the most obvious forms of discrimination with the preservation of as much employer decision-making latitude as possible. Moreover, the seminal Supreme Court decision, McDonnell Douglas v. Green, accurately implemented this balance. This Article …
Share His Dream: A Fair Use Standard For Historico-Political Figures' Rights Of Publicity, Joshua Bloomgarden
Share His Dream: A Fair Use Standard For Historico-Political Figures' Rights Of Publicity, Joshua Bloomgarden
Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Disparate Impact And Equal Protection After Ricci V. Destefano, Marcia L. Mccormick
Disparate Impact And Equal Protection After Ricci V. Destefano, Marcia L. Mccormick
All Faculty Scholarship
As Professor Richard Primus noted in his article, Equal Protection and Disparate Impact: Round Three, the constitutional issues surrounding the disparate impact theory of discrimination have evolved significantly over time. First the question was whether the Constitution’s equal protection guarantee embodied disparateimpact. Most people assumed yes, but the Supreme Court said no in 1976 in Washington v. Davis. Second, the source of Congress’ power to prohibit disparate impact discrimination was called into question with the so-called federalism revolution. Only if it was within Congress’ power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment could disparate impact legislation be applied to the …
Breaking The Cycle Of “Unequal Treatment” With Health Care Reform: Acknowledging And Addressing The Continuation Of Racial Bias, Ruqaiijah A. Yearby
Breaking The Cycle Of “Unequal Treatment” With Health Care Reform: Acknowledging And Addressing The Continuation Of Racial Bias, Ruqaiijah A. Yearby
All Faculty Scholarship
Since the Civil War access to health care in the United States has been racially unequal. This racially unequal access to health care remains even after the passage of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VI”) and the election of an African-American President. Both of these events held the promise of equality, yet the promise has never been fulfilled. Now, many hail the passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act (“ACA”) as the biggest governmental step in equalizing access to health care because it has the potential to increase minority access to health …
Gender, Family, And Work, Marcia L. Mccormick
Gender, Family, And Work, Marcia L. Mccormick
All Faculty Scholarship
The country has prohibited sex discrimination since the 1960’s, but society continues to view women and men differently because women give birth, breastfeed, and are traditional caregivers. This article takes a historical look at court decisions and legislative efforts to address equality where men and women are not similarly situated and also explores recent developments and current debates, such as caregiver discrimination, lactation rooms and breaks, and the Affordable Care Act’s contraceptive mandate. Despite the abundance of legislation and court decisions over the past forty years, much progress still needs to be made.
Keynote: The Crisis And Criminal Justice, Bernard Harcourt
Keynote: The Crisis And Criminal Justice, Bernard Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
There has been a lot of recent debate over whether the economic crisis presents an opportunity to reduce prison populations and improve the state of criminal justice in this country. Some commentators suggest that the financial crisis has already triggered a move towards reducing the incarcerated population. Some claim that there is a new climate of bipartisanship on punishment. Kara Gotsch of the Sentencing Project, for example, suggests that we are now in a unique political climate embodied by the passage of the Second Chance Act under President George W. Bush – a climate that is substantially different than the …
The Use Of Uncounseled Tribal Court Convictions In Federal Court Under The Habitual Offender Provision Of The Violence Against Women Act: A Violation Of The Sixth Amendment Right To Counsel Or An Extension Of Comity?, Rebecca Zimmerman
Catholic University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Dangers Of Reform: Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, And The Limits Of Law, Jennifer L. Levi, Giovanna Shay
The Dangers Of Reform: Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, And The Limits Of Law, Jennifer L. Levi, Giovanna Shay
Faculty Scholarship
Professors Jennifer Levi and Giovanna Shay review Dean Spade's new book "Normal Life: Administrative Violence, Critical Trans Politics, and the Limits of Law." They argue that Professor Spade's theoretical approach, which he describes as "critical trans politics," is most useful when employed to analyze issues relating to criminal punishment and mass incarceration, and that it is less appropriate as a critique of the marriage equality movement. Despite some areas of disagreement with Professor Spade, the Authors conclude that the book makes an important contribution.
National Security Interest Convergence, Sudha Setty
National Security Interest Convergence, Sudha Setty
Faculty Scholarship
Over a decade after the attacks of September 11, 2001, lawmakers, scholars, activists, and policy makers continue to confront the questions of whether and to what extent robust counterterrorism laws and policies should be reined in to protect against the abuse of civil rights and the marginalization of outsider groups. This Article uses political and critical race theory to identify areas of national security interest convergence in which political will can be marshaled to limit some national security policies.
Legislators act in their political self-interest — both in terms of responding to party forces and constituents — in casting votes …
Taking In Strays: A Critique Of The Stray Comment Doctrine In Employment Discrimination Law, Kerri Lynn Stone
Taking In Strays: A Critique Of The Stray Comment Doctrine In Employment Discrimination Law, Kerri Lynn Stone
Faculty Publications
This Article traces the genesis of this misguided doctrine, its proliferation, and it’s many flaws. It explains what the doctrine has come to mean and which facets of a comment can render it “stray” as a matter of law. Part II evaluates this unwieldy and untenable doctrine and its haphazard and misguided application over the past two decades. Specifically, it was never intended to be a formal doctrine. As employed by courts, the term “stray” means too many things and is too ambiguous for the doctrine to be coherent or effective. Moreover, courts ascribe varying degrees of significance to the …
On Overreaching, Or Why Rick Perry May Save The Voting Rights Act But Destroy Affirmative Action, Ellen D. Katz
On Overreaching, Or Why Rick Perry May Save The Voting Rights Act But Destroy Affirmative Action, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
The State of Texas is presently staking out two positions that are not typically pursued by a single litigant. On the one hand, Texas is seeking the invalidation of the Voting Rights Act, and, on the other, the State is now defending the validity of the expansive race-based affirmative action policy it uses at its flagship university. This Essay presses the claim that Texas has increased the chance it will lose in bothTexas v. Holder andFisher v. University of Texas because it has opted to stake out markedly extreme positions in each. I argue that Texas would be more likely …
Minnie Liddell's Forty-Year Quest For Quality Public Education Remains A Dream Deferred, Kimberly Jade Norwood
Minnie Liddell's Forty-Year Quest For Quality Public Education Remains A Dream Deferred, Kimberly Jade Norwood
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Article is a historic account of the hopes and dreams that a mother had for her children and her efforts to make those hopes and dreams come true. The mother, Minnie Liddell, never imagined, when she first became a mom in 1959, or years later after the birth of her fifth child, or even after she filed a lawsuit against a city school district, that she would become a pioneer and icon in the school desegregation history of St. Louis, Missouri. She really only wanted a quality public education for her children, for black children, for all children. This …
Response: The Death Of The Bisexual Saboteur, Naomi Mezey
Response: The Death Of The Bisexual Saboteur, Naomi Mezey
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Professor Glazer offers us, in Sexual Reorientation, an appealing and intuitive way to deal with the difficulty of bisexual identity, an identity that has always fit uneasily and sometimes quite unhappily in the LGBT rights movement. If the principal problem of bisexuality is its very temporal changeability, its tendency to dissolve into heterosexuality or homosexuality depending on the gender of one's sexual partner, then Glazer's solution is elegant. She proposes that we bifurcate (so to speak) sexual orientation into two subcategories and acknowledge for everyone both a general and a specific orientation. General orientation "is the sex toward which …
Reimagining Criminal Prosecution: Toward A Color-Conscious Professional Ethic For Prosecutors, Justin Murray
Reimagining Criminal Prosecution: Toward A Color-Conscious Professional Ethic For Prosecutors, Justin Murray
Publications
Prosecutors, like most Americans, view the criminal-justice system as fundamentally race neutral. They are aware that blacks are stopped, searched, arrested, and locked up in numbers that are vastly out of proportion to their fraction of the overall population. Yet, they generally assume that this outcome is justified because it reflects the sad reality that blacks commit a disproportionate share of crime in America. They are unable to detect the ways in which their own discretionary choices--and those of other actors in the criminal-justice system, such as legislators, police officers, and jurors--contribute to the staggering and disproportionate incarceration of black …
Recovering The Assembly Clause, Timothy Zick
Recovering The Assembly Clause, Timothy Zick
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
You Kill Me: Why I Don’T Want To Live Around People With Guns, Brandt Goldstein
You Kill Me: Why I Don’T Want To Live Around People With Guns, Brandt Goldstein
Other Publications
No abstract provided.
Racial Cartels And The Thirteenth Amendment Enforcement Power, Darrell A. H. Miller
Racial Cartels And The Thirteenth Amendment Enforcement Power, Darrell A. H. Miller
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Fiscal Crisis As An Opportunity For Criminal Justice Reform: Defenders Building Alliances With Fiscal Conservatives, Randolph N. Jonakait, Larry Eger
The Fiscal Crisis As An Opportunity For Criminal Justice Reform: Defenders Building Alliances With Fiscal Conservatives, Randolph N. Jonakait, Larry Eger
Articles & Chapters
No abstract provided.
Reframing Roe: Property Over Privacy, Becca Rausch
Reframing Roe: Property Over Privacy, Becca Rausch
Faculty Articles
Roe v. Wade has received much criticism from both sides of the political spectrum. These critiques diverge divisively but for one commonality. Specifically, commentators from both the pro- and anti-choice camps have expressed concern about the absence of an express constitutional right to privacy, upon which the Supreme Court in Roe based its finding of a "fundamental" right to abortion. This lack of express constitutional provision renders the Roe decision, and its resulting reproductive rights, vulnerable. Further, pro-choice advocates find fault with the privacy basis because it yields no positive rights to funding or governmental support for accessing abortion services. …
American Skin: Dispensing With Colorblindness And Critical Mass In Affirmative Action, Deirdre Bowen
American Skin: Dispensing With Colorblindness And Critical Mass In Affirmative Action, Deirdre Bowen
Faculty Articles
This exploratory empirical work examines whether students of color enjoy the benefits articulated by the U.S. Supreme Court in the Grutter decision that rationalized the continuation of affirmative action based on diversity interests. Specifically, the Court stated that affirmative action was permissible because students of all backgrounds would increase their racial understanding and decrease their racial stereotyping of minorities. Neither side was happy with the decision—both skeptical that such benefits could transpire for minority students. Yet, in the heat of continuing debate, neither group has empirical support for their arguments until now.
Using survey data of over 370 under-represented minority …