Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (72)
- Law and Society (48)
- Law and Race (43)
- Labor and Employment Law (32)
- Legal History (32)
-
- Education Law (31)
- Fourteenth Amendment (26)
- Human Rights Law (25)
- Law and Gender (22)
- Criminal Law (20)
- Sexuality and the Law (19)
- Legislation (16)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (16)
- Supreme Court of the United States (15)
- Courts (13)
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Legal Education (13)
- Disability Law (12)
- Sociology (12)
- Criminal Procedure (11)
- Immigration Law (11)
- Arts and Humanities (10)
- Family Law (10)
- International Law (10)
- Law and Politics (9)
- Housing Law (8)
- Race, Ethnicity and Post-Colonial Studies (8)
- African American Studies (7)
- Institution
-
- BLR (36)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (22)
- University of Michigan Law School (18)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (16)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (12)
-
- Fordham Law School (11)
- William & Mary Law School (10)
- Columbia Law School (9)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (9)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (9)
- University of Richmond (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- Georgetown University Law Center (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (8)
- Association of American Law Schools (7)
- Cleveland State University (6)
- University of North Florida (6)
- Brigham Young University Law School (5)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Mitchell Hamline School of Law (5)
- University of Colorado Law School (5)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (5)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
- New York Law School (4)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (4)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (4)
- University of San Diego (4)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (3)
- Mercer University School of Law (3)
- Keyword
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (39)
- Constitutional Law (31)
- Discrimination (28)
- Race (26)
- Brown v. Board of Education (23)
-
- Civil rights (23)
- Civil Rights (21)
- Affirmative action (18)
- Segregation (17)
- Law and Society (15)
- Grutter v. Bollinger (12)
- Critical race theory (11)
- Human Rights Law (11)
- Equal protection (10)
- Equality (10)
- Title VII (10)
- Civil rights in education (9)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (9)
- Racial discrimination (9)
- Separate but equal (9)
- Courts (8)
- International Law (8)
- Race and law (8)
- Racism (8)
- History (7)
- Jurisprudence (7)
- Race discrimination (7)
- Slavery (7)
- Supreme Court (7)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (6)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (32)
- Faculty Scholarship (30)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (12)
- Nevada Law Journal (11)
- Scholarly Works (11)
-
- The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process (10)
- Articles (8)
- All Faculty Scholarship (7)
- Faculty Publications (7)
- Journal of Legal Education (7)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (7)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (6)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (6)
- Michigan Law Review (6)
- Faculty Publications & Other Works (5)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (5)
- Publications (5)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (5)
- American University Law Review (4)
- Law Faculty Publications (4)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (4)
- Textual material from the Rodney Lawrence Hurst, Sr. Papers (4)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (4)
- William & Mary Law Review (4)
- Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal (3)
- Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Journal Articles (3)
- Law Faculty Articles and Essays (3)
- Publication Type
Articles 301 - 323 of 323
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
The Journey From Brown V. Board Of Education To Grutter V. Bollinger: From Racial Assimilation To Diversity, Harry T. Edwards
Michigan Law Review
Fifty years ago, in Brown v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court confronted a precise and straightforward question: "Does segregation of children in public schools solely on the basis of race, even though the physical facilities and other 'tangible' factors may be equal, deprive the children of the minority group of equal educational opportunities?" The Court's answer was precise and straightforward: "We conclude that in the field of public education the doctrine of "separate but equal" has no place. Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs ... are, by reason of the segregation complained of, …
The Legally Queer Child, Bruce Macdougall
The Legally Queer Child, Bruce Macdougall
All Faculty Publications
This article explores the various presumptions and arguments of Canadian courts in largely denying queer children a legal presence. An analysis of the intersection of homosexuality and children is explored with a view to arguing that legally, queer children deserve a voice. The author begins by outlining the development of the legal conceptualization of the "child". This conceptualization led to the notion of the child as innocent, and thus in need of protection. In comparison, homosexuals came to be characterized as "aberrant" and "predatory". Protecting children from homosexuals then became a simple step of logic, which ultimately led to the …
Derechos Y Honra Públicos: Louis Martinet, Plessy Contra Ferguson Y El Acceso A La Ley En Luisiana, 1888-1917, Rebecca J. Scott
Derechos Y Honra Públicos: Louis Martinet, Plessy Contra Ferguson Y El Acceso A La Ley En Luisiana, 1888-1917, Rebecca J. Scott
Articles
Rebecca J. Scott explores the historical context of Plessy v. Ferguson to two ends. First, Scott argues that that the historical situation, including everyday legal practice, helps us understand the source of the arguments in the case. In particular, the plaintiffs based their understanding of their rights in the French revolution, the Louisiana Constitution, and their experience exercising their rights through notaries. Second, Scott argues that the plaintiffs and defendants sought to frame the case with different rights. For the plaintiffs, the issue with the Separate Car Act was "public rights" and "the dignity of citizenship." The defendants instead framed …
Foreword To Legalizing Gay Marriage, David L. Chambers
Foreword To Legalizing Gay Marriage, David L. Chambers
Other Publications
The significance and timeliness of Michael Mello’s book was brought home to me recently when I participated in a conference on same-sex marriage at Brigham Young University Law School in Provo, Utah. Nearly everyone in the audience opposed permitting two men or two women to marry each other. Many favored an amendment to the United States Constitution to prevent any state from permitting same-sex couples to marry. Most regretted the decision of the United States Supreme Court in June 2004 holding sodomy laws unconstitutional. To them, the institution of marriage was under siege. The welfare of unborn children was at …
The Antebellum Political Background Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Garrett Epps
The Antebellum Political Background Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Garrett Epps
All Faculty Scholarship
Understanding the Fourteenth Amendment is the key question of Constitutional law, both as it pertains to individual rights and, in many areas, as it relates to questions of Congressional power as opposed to the reserved powers of the states. The Amendment is often disaggregated and read clause by clause - but the intellectual and political background of its framers suggests that the Amendment in fact forms a coherent whole and that reading it as a whole might be a fertile source of new meanings. The Amendment was written by politicians who had spent their careers deeply involved in anti-slavery politics. …
Causation In Antidiscrimination Law: Beyond Intent Versus Impact , Sheila R. Foster
Causation In Antidiscrimination Law: Beyond Intent Versus Impact , Sheila R. Foster
Faculty Scholarship
Antidiscrimination law and scholarship have long been engaged in the debate over whether a discriminatory intent or disparate impact test best captures the type of discrimination the law should, or can, prohibit. This Article suggests that we move beyond this dichotomous debate and focus instead on how courts reason about discrimination cases brought under both the intent and impact doctrines. This Article identifies a distinct pattern, or framework, in the way courts reason about discrimination in both types of cases that defies neat doctrinal labels. reasoning process, which I shorthandedly refer to as "causation," is at the heart of evidentiary …
Toward A More Perfect Union: The Road To Marriage Equality For Same-Sex Couples, Jennifer L. Levi
Toward A More Perfect Union: The Road To Marriage Equality For Same-Sex Couples, Jennifer L. Levi
Faculty Scholarship
The Author believes that civil unions have become synonymous with inequality. In this posture, the term inequality should be descriptive rather than subjective. She argues that civil unions relegate gay and lesbian couples to second-class status. However characterized or defined, civil unions are not marriages. Those two statuses are not equivalent; they are not equal. Within that framework, in order for any one person to decide where he or she stands on the issue of whether gay and lesbian couples should be entitled to marriage, civil unions, something else, or nothing, he or she must first understand why marriage matters …
The Effect Of Eliminating Distinctions Among Title Vii Disparate Treatment Cases, Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
The Effect Of Eliminating Distinctions Among Title Vii Disparate Treatment Cases, Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Law Faculty Publications
St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks eliminated the effect of the pretext test and the distinction between standard and pretext cases. Desert Palace interpreted the motivating-factor test in a way that eliminates the distinction between mixed-motives and non-mixed-motives cases. The point is not that the Court has decided the cases incorrectly or with an inappropriate bias. Rather, it is that eliminating the distinctions between the different types of cases suggests that all disparate treatment cases should be treated the same. The result of these decisions will likely be a reversion to an older litigation model in which trial judges are …
Brown's Legacy At Fifty, Carl W. Tobias
Brown's Legacy At Fifty, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
Review of James T. Patterson, Brown v. Board of Education: A Civil Rights Milestone and Its Troubled Legacy (2001)
Brown And The Desegregation Of Virginia Law Schools, Carl W. Tobias
Brown And The Desegregation Of Virginia Law Schools, Carl W. Tobias
Law Faculty Publications
One-half century ago, the Supreme Court of the United States declared unconstitutional racially segregated public elementary and secondary schools in Brown v. Board of Education. The pathbreaking opinion culminated a three-decade effort that the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP") and the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund ("LDF"), an independent litigating entity, had orchestrated. An important feature of the evolving NAACP and LDF tactical approach was to contest the segregation of government-sponsored professional and graduate education, particularly implicating law schools in jurisdictions bordering the South, namely Maryland, Missouri, Oklahoma, and Texas. These pioneering attorneys and the …
Under The Empirical Radar: An Initial Expressive Law Analysis Of The Ada, Michael Ashley Stein
Under The Empirical Radar: An Initial Expressive Law Analysis Of The Ada, Michael Ashley Stein
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Solving Problems Vs. Claiming Rights: The Pragmatist Challenge To Legal Liberalism, William H. Simon
Solving Problems Vs. Claiming Rights: The Pragmatist Challenge To Legal Liberalism, William H. Simon
Faculty Scholarship
Recent developments in both theory and practice have inspired a new understanding of public interest lawyering. The theoretical development is an intensified interest in Pragmatism. The practical development is the emergence of a style of social reform that seeks to institutionalize the Pragmatist vision of democratic governance as learning and experimentation. This style is reflected in a variety of innovative responses to social problems, including drug courts, ecosystem management, and "new accountability" educational reform. The new understanding represents a significant challenge to an influential view of law among politically liberal lawyers over the past fifty years. That view, Legal Liberalism, …
"You Are Entering A Gay And Lesbian Free Zone": On The Radical Dissents Of Justice Scalia And Other (Post-) Queers – [Raising Questions About Lawrence, Sex Wars, And The Criminal Law], Bernard Harcourt
Faculty Scholarship
The most renowned substantive criminal law decision of the October 2002 Term, Lawrence v. Texas, will go down in history as a critical turning point in criminal law debates over the proper scope of the penal sanction. For the first time in the history of American criminal law, the United States Supreme Court has declared that a supermajoritarian moral belief does not necessarily provide a rational basis for criminalizing conventionally deviant conduct. The Court's ruling is the coup de grâce to legal moralism administered after a prolonged, brutish, tedious, and debilitating struggle against liberal legalism in its various criminal …
Lawrence & The Road From Liberation To Equality, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Lawrence & The Road From Liberation To Equality, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
To think about the future of lesbian and gay rights in the wake of Lawrence v. Texas, we inevitably need to look to the past. After all, the movement that first sparked efforts to challenge statutes like the Texas "Homosexual Conduct" law was not a rights movement at all. Instead, when lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender individuals began organizing in 1969, their rallying cry was for liberation. To gauge what Lawrence means, then, we need to think in terms of both liberation, as the movement's early aim, and legal equality, which is the dominant demand of today's activists and advocates. …
Bolling Alone, Richard A. Primus
Bolling Alone, Richard A. Primus
Articles
Under the doctrine of reverse incorporation, generally identified with the Supreme Court's decision in Bolling v. Sharpe, equal protection binds the federal government even though the Equal Protection Clause by its terms is addressed only to states. Since Bolling, however, the courts have almost never granted relief to litigants claiming unconstitutional racial discrimination by the federal government. Courts have periodically found unconstitutional federal discrimination on nonracial grounds such as sex and alienage, and reverse incorporation has also limited the scope of affirmative action. But in the presumed core area of preventing federal discrimination against racial minorities, Boiling has virtually no …
Resurrecting The White Primary, Ellen D. Katz
Resurrecting The White Primary, Ellen D. Katz
Articles
An unprecedented number of noncompetitive or "safe" electoral districts operate in the United States today. Noncompetitive districts elect officials with more extreme political views and foster more polarized legislatures than do competitive districts. More fundamentally, they inhibit meaningful political participation. That is because participating in an election that is decided before it begins is an empty exercise. Voting in a competitive election is not, even though a single vote will virtually never decide the outcome. What a competitive election offers to each voter is the opportunity to be the coveted swing voter, the one whose support candidates most seek, the …
The Political Delinquent: Crime, Deviance, And Resistance In Black America, Trevor George Gardner
The Political Delinquent: Crime, Deviance, And Resistance In Black America, Trevor George Gardner
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Article is largely an argument that the pervasive sense of cultural resistance in the African American community must be considered by criminal theorists as, at least, a partial explanation of “criminality” within the African American community. Woven into the fabric of African American culture is a vital oppositional element. This element, spoken of in many circles as “oppositional culture” constitutes a bold and calculated rejection of destructive mainstream values that have perpetuated social inequalities and power imbalances. African American resistance culture is captured by novelist John Edgar Wideman in his account of his brother ’s criminal lifestyle and the …
Reading Clarence Thomas, Kendall Thomas
Reading Clarence Thomas, Kendall Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
Several years ago, a special issue of The New Yorker entitled "Black in America" included an extraordinary profile of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Authored by Jeffrey Rosen, the article begins with an account of Justice Thomas's interventions in two of the most important cases decided during the Court's previous term. In the first of these cases, Missouri v. Jenkins, the Court was called upon to define the constitutional scope and limits of the federal judicial power to address racial concentration in Kansas City's public schools through salary increases and the creation of magnet programs. In the second …
Panel Three: Introduction, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Panel Three: Introduction, Suzanne B. Goldberg
Faculty Scholarship
I think some of my colleagues will ask questions about these cases, to ask who is a man or woman, but if the question is legally, what is male or female, and if you think about the questions that you've read, say, in common law out of the Supreme Court – and I'll just talk about discrimination cases, although I think you can talk about other ones, too – think about the sex discrimination cases. The struggle is about, what is discrimination, but the Court in Craig v. Born is talking about different control restrictions for men and women. Or …
Reparations And Equal Opportunity, David B. Lyons
Reparations And Equal Opportunity, David B. Lyons
Faculty Scholarship
This paper offers a sympathetic interpretation of reparations claims made on behalf of African Americans and suggests how they could properly be honored. It reviews the federal government’s role in supporting racial subordination and its continuing failure to address the inequitable consequences, which public policy now largely ignores. It sketches a national rectification project, comprising a comprehensive set of public programs that would attack the persisting legacy of slavery and Jim Crow. The programs can be justified by the government’s duty to insure equal opportunity for our society’s children and, most urgently, by corrective justice, because the inequities are attributable …
Le 'Droit D'Avoir Des Droits': Les Revendications Des Ex-Esclaves À Cuba (1872-1909), Rebecca J. Scott, Michael Zeuske
Le 'Droit D'Avoir Des Droits': Les Revendications Des Ex-Esclaves À Cuba (1872-1909), Rebecca J. Scott, Michael Zeuske
Articles
In Cuba, a distinctive process of gradual emancipation brought a large number of enslaved and recently-freed men and women into the legal culture. What earlier might have remained oral or physical challenges now took legal form, as slaves and former slaves built alliances with those who could assist them in their appeals. The assertions of former slaves suggest an emerging conviction of a "right to have rights", going well beyond the immediate refusal of their own bondage. In this light, the office of the notary and the courts of first instance became places where freedom itself was constituted through the …
A Glimpse Behind And Beyond Grutter, Evan H. Caminker
A Glimpse Behind And Beyond Grutter, Evan H. Caminker
Articles
Many people have suggested that the recent battle over affirmative action was a defining moment for the contemporary relevance of Brown v. Board of Education and that it would determine the promise and potential for widespread societal integration. In my remarks, I want to comment upon a couple of comparisons and links between the Brown, Bakke, Grutter, and Gratz cases.
Marriage, Cohabitation, And Collective Responsibility For Dependency, Elizabeth S. Scott
Marriage, Cohabitation, And Collective Responsibility For Dependency, Elizabeth S. Scott
Faculty Scholarship
Marriage has fallen on hard times. Although most Americans say that a lasting marriage is an important part of their life plans, the institution no longer enjoys its former exclusive status as the core family form. This is so largely because social norms that regulate family life and women's social roles have changed. A century (or even a couple of generations) ago, marriage was a stable economic and social union that, for the most part, lasted for the joint lives of the spouses. It was the only option for a socially sanctioned intimate relationship and was the setting in which …