Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Labor and Employment Law (41)
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Education Law (37)
- Law and Society (28)
- Law and Gender (25)
-
- Disability Law (23)
- Legal Remedies (23)
- Fourteenth Amendment (22)
- Administrative Law (20)
- Criminal Law (18)
- Criminal Procedure (17)
- Courts (16)
- Legislation (16)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (14)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (14)
- State and Local Government Law (14)
- First Amendment (13)
- Jurisprudence (13)
- Judges (12)
- Legal History (12)
- Litigation (9)
- Organizations Law (9)
- Health Law and Policy (8)
- Religion Law (8)
- Legal Education (7)
- Other Law (7)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (7)
- Jurisdiction (6)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (21)
- Constitutional law (15)
- Employment discrimination (15)
- Gender (15)
- Title VII (13)
-
- Equal protection (12)
- IDEA (12)
- Sex discrimination (12)
- Special education (12)
- Civil rights (11)
- Constitution (11)
- First Amendment (11)
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (11)
- Supreme Court (11)
- United States Supreme Court (10)
- Women (10)
- Civil Rights (8)
- Privacy (8)
- Alternative dispute resolution (7)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (7)
- Crime victims (7)
- Criminal justice system (7)
- Criminal law (7)
- Disabled students (7)
- Fourteenth Amendment (7)
- Mediation (7)
- Race (7)
- Victims of crimes (7)
- Victims' rights (7)
- California (6)
- Publication Year
Articles 151 - 160 of 160
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
The Disability History Mystery: Assessing The Employer's Reasonable Accommodation Obligation In "Record Of Disability" Cases, Michael D. Moberly
The Disability History Mystery: Assessing The Employer's Reasonable Accommodation Obligation In "Record Of Disability" Cases, Michael D. Moberly
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Revisiting The Promise Of Mediation For Employment Discrimination Claims , Susan K. Hippensteele
Revisiting The Promise Of Mediation For Employment Discrimination Claims , Susan K. Hippensteele
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
This paper generally examines the theory and practice of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and specifically examines the role mediation has played in propelling rights discourse away from the center of efforts to achieve equal employment opportunity in the United States. It further addresses assumptions regarding individual employee goals in the context of a legal environment in which litigating to achieve rights-based remedies is increasingly difficult for grievants.
The Assault Of Jamie Leigh Jones: How One Woman's Horror Story Is Changing Arbitration In America, Jeffrey Adams
The Assault Of Jamie Leigh Jones: How One Woman's Horror Story Is Changing Arbitration In America, Jeffrey Adams
Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal
This article examines Jones v. Halliburton Co., the "Al Franken Amendment" to the 2010 U.S. Defense Department Budget (Franken Amendment) that was created in response to Jones, and the impact that both could have on mandatory arbitration clauses in employment contracts in the future. Part II recounts the troubling events that led to Jones and the inclusion of the Franken Amendment in the 2010 Defense Department Budget. Part III details the arguments made for and against the inclusion of the Franken Amendment. Part IV analyzes the impact that the Franken Amendment could have on mandatory arbitration clauses in contacts in …
The Saucier Qualified Immunity Experiment: An Empirical Analysis, Nancy Leong
The Saucier Qualified Immunity Experiment: An Empirical Analysis, Nancy Leong
Pepperdine Law Review
This paper provides an empirical analysis of the impact of the approach to qualified immunity that the Supreme Court first suggested in Siegert v. Gilley and later made mandatory in Saucier v. Katz. That approach dictates that lower courts should resolve constitutional issues prior to deciding whether a government official is shielded from liability by qualified immunity. A primary justification for this sequencing approach is the notion that where courts decide that constitutional law is not clearly established, and thus qualified immunity is available, future defendants can also escape liability for the same behavior. But the empirical analysis provided in …
On Equal Footing: Does Accommodating Athletes With Disabilities Destroy The Competitive Playing Field Or Level It?, Sarah J. Wild
On Equal Footing: Does Accommodating Athletes With Disabilities Destroy The Competitive Playing Field Or Level It?, Sarah J. Wild
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Are Bills Of Attainder The New Currency? Challenging The Constitutionality Of Sex Offender Regulations That Inflict Punishment Without The "Safeguard Of A Judicial Trial", Joel A. Sherwin
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hispanic National Bar Association National Study On The Status Of Latinas In The Legal Profession - Few And Far Between: The Reality Of Latina Lawyers, Jill L. Cruz, Melinda S. Molina
Hispanic National Bar Association National Study On The Status Of Latinas In The Legal Profession - Few And Far Between: The Reality Of Latina Lawyers, Jill L. Cruz, Melinda S. Molina
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scrutinize This!: The Questionable Constitutionality Of Gender-Conscious Admissions Policies Utilized By Public Universities, Amy Hinkley
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection, Same-Sex Marriage, And Classifying On The Basis Of Sex, Mark Strasser
Equal Protection, Same-Sex Marriage, And Classifying On The Basis Of Sex, Mark Strasser
Pepperdine Law Review
This article reviews several state court analyses of whether same-sex marriage bans violate the equal protection guarantees afforded by the respective state constitutions. The article discusses the lack of uniformity not only with respect to the result but with respect to the kind of classification that is implicated in such bans. The article concludes that unless the Supreme Court corrects some of the misunderstandings regarding the proper application of equal protection guarantees, that jurisprudence will either become even more confused or, perhaps, will coalesce around a doctrine that has been rejected for almost half a century.
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007): Faithful To Title Vii Or Blind To Sex Discrimination?, Garrett M. Fahy
Ledbetter V. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 550 U.S. 618 (2007): Faithful To Title Vii Or Blind To Sex Discrimination?, Garrett M. Fahy
The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law
No abstract provided.