Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (236)
- University of Michigan Law School (145)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (67)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (57)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (52)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (49)
- University of Colorado Law School (47)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (45)
- William & Mary Law School (44)
- Pepperdine University (41)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (40)
- Cleveland State University (34)
- University of Georgia School of Law (32)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (29)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (28)
- Mercer University School of Law (27)
- University of Washington School of Law (27)
- BLR (24)
- Brigham Young University Law School (23)
- West Virginia University (22)
- UIC School of Law (21)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (20)
- Washington University in St. Louis (20)
- University of Richmond (19)
- Columbia Law School (17)
- Fordham Law School (16)
- Marquette University Law School (16)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (16)
- University of Connecticut (16)
- Florida International University College of Law (15)
- Keyword
-
- Discrimination (265)
- Title VII (265)
- Employment discrimination (217)
- Employment (105)
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (103)
-
- Civil rights (79)
- Civil Rights (64)
- Sex discrimination (64)
- Employment law (60)
- Sexual harassment (59)
- Women (59)
- EEOC (52)
- Employment Discrimination (49)
- Civil Rights Act (48)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (42)
- Gender (40)
- United States Supreme Court (40)
- Employees (39)
- Gender and law (39)
- Race (38)
- Employers (37)
- Labor Law (34)
- Americans with Disabilities Act (30)
- Employment Practice (30)
- Labor law (30)
- Workplace (29)
- Discrimination in employment (28)
- Retaliation (28)
- Supreme Court (28)
- Age Discrimination in Employment Act (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (206)
- Faculty Scholarship (84)
- Michigan Law Review (63)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (51)
- Scholarly Works (48)
-
- Publications (46)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (36)
- Faculty Publications (32)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Mercer Law Review (27)
- Articles (26)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (26)
- Supreme Court Case Files (23)
- Cardozo Law Review (22)
- ExpressO (22)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review (22)
- Indiana Law Journal (21)
- All Faculty Scholarship (20)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (20)
- BYU Law Review (20)
- Scholarship@WashULaw (20)
- Touro Law Review (20)
- UIC Law Review (20)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (19)
- West Virginia Law Review (19)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (18)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (16)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (16)
- Maine Law Review (15)
- Nevada Law Journal (15)
- Publication Type
Articles 1201 - 1230 of 1681
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
The Irrational Turn In Employment Discrimination Law: Slouching Toward A Unified Approach To Civil Rights Law, John Valery White
The Irrational Turn In Employment Discrimination Law: Slouching Toward A Unified Approach To Civil Rights Law, John Valery White
Scholarly Works
This Article argues that the Supreme Court's recent disparate treatment decisions under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 represent a trend toward unifying all civil rights law under an approach most closely akin to traditional equity. This trend explains the curious tension between substance and process in the Court's most recent decisions, St. Mary's Honor Center v. Hicks and Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing. It also explains the Court's uncommon confidence in its yet undefined notions of what constitutes discrimination on the basis of the several protected categories recognized in Title VII and related statutes. The trend toward …
Eeoc Fights To Curb Backlash Discrimination Following Terrorist Attacks, Kristen Grisius
Eeoc Fights To Curb Backlash Discrimination Following Terrorist Attacks, Kristen Grisius
Public Interest Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Contract Rights And Civil Rights, Davison M. Douglas
Contract Rights And Civil Rights, Davison M. Douglas
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Equal Protection Victory, Arthur S. Leonard
Contract Rights And Civil Rights, Davison M. Douglas
Contract Rights And Civil Rights, Davison M. Douglas
Michigan Law Review
Have African Americans fared better under a scheme of freedom of contract or of government regulation of private employment relationships? Have court decisions striking down regulation of employment contracts on liberty of contract grounds aided black interests? Many contemporary observers, although with some notable dissenters, would respond that government regulation of freedom of contract, particularly the antidiscrimination provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, has benefited African Americans because it has restrained discriminatory conduct by private employers. Professor David E. Bernstein challenges the view that abrogation of freedom of contract has consistently benefited African Americans by …
Evaluating The Sex Discrimination Argument For Lesbian And Gay Rights, Edward D. Stein
Evaluating The Sex Discrimination Argument For Lesbian And Gay Rights, Edward D. Stein
Articles
The sex discrimination argument for lesbian and gay rights analyzes laws that discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in terms of sex discrimination. For example, sodomy laws that prohibit only same-sex sexual activities are analyzed as discriminating on the basis of sex because they prohibit women from doing something men are permitted to do, that is, have sex with women. This argument has been championed by some scholars and litigators, and it has persuaded some judges. Edward Stein shows that there are sociological, theoretical, moral, and practical problems facing the sex discrimination argument. He suggests that there are better …
Envisioning A Future For Age And Disability Discrimination Claims, Alison Barnes
Envisioning A Future For Age And Disability Discrimination Claims, Alison Barnes
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
This Article considers the reasons for reinterpretations of age and disability and examines the fundamental reasons for changes in the implementation of both the ADA and ADEA. Part I presents the basic structure and relevant requirements of the two statutes and comments on the reasons their legislative purposes are not often seen as overlapping. Part II discusses the recent Supreme Court decisions that have undermined the purposes and implementation of both the ADA and ADEA and chilled causes of action based on the ADA and ADEA. Part III projects the current problems with anti-discrimination causes into the future, when older …
Evaluating The Sex Discrimination Argument For Lesbian And Gay Rights, Edward D. Stein
Evaluating The Sex Discrimination Argument For Lesbian And Gay Rights, Edward D. Stein
Articles
The sex discrimination argument for lesbian and gay rights analyzes laws that discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation in terms of sex discrimination. For example, sodomy laws that prohibit only same-sex sexual activities are analyzed as discriminating on the basis of sex because they prohibit women from doing something men are permitted to do, that is, have sex with women. This argument has been championed by some scholars and litigators, and it has persuaded some judges. Edward Stein shows that there are sociological, theoretical, moral, and practical problems facing the sex discrimination argument. He suggests that there are better …
Toward A Motivating Factor Test For Individual Disparate Treatment Claims, Benjamin C. Mizer
Toward A Motivating Factor Test For Individual Disparate Treatment Claims, Benjamin C. Mizer
Michigan Law Review
Nathan Fields, an African-American employee at the New York State Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities ("OMRDD"), was in many ways the typical Title VIP employment discrimination plaintiff, with a case that, on its face, suggested both discriminatory and benign actions by his employer. For six years, Fields worked as a maintenance assistant in the electrical shop at OMRDD's Oswald D. Heck Developmental Center ("Heck"). During that time, he twice applied for a promotion, and on each occasion, Heck selected white employees for the position. In addition, Fields claimed that he was discriminatorily singled out for disciplinary treatment, that …
Employer Liability For Sexual Harassment - Normative, Descriptive, And Doctrinal Interactions: A Reply To Professors Beiner And Bisom-Rapp, Linda Hamilton Krieger
Employer Liability For Sexual Harassment - Normative, Descriptive, And Doctrinal Interactions: A Reply To Professors Beiner And Bisom-Rapp, Linda Hamilton Krieger
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Using Evidence Of Women's Stories In Sexual Harassment Cases, Theresa M. Beiner
Using Evidence Of Women's Stories In Sexual Harassment Cases, Theresa M. Beiner
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Fixing Watches With Sledgehammers: The Questionable Embrace Of Employee Sexual Harassment Training By The Legal Profession, Susan Bisom-Rapp
Fixing Watches With Sledgehammers: The Questionable Embrace Of Employee Sexual Harassment Training By The Legal Profession, Susan Bisom-Rapp
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Black Plaintiffs And Class Action Employment Discrimination Lawsuits In Corporate America, Michael Green
Black Plaintiffs And Class Action Employment Discrimination Lawsuits In Corporate America, Michael Green
University of the District of Columbia Law Review
Class action lawsuits initiated by black employees against corporations have been commonplace in the United States in recent years. Why has there been an influx of litigation targeted to corporate America? Is there an epidemic of discrimination directed toward black employees in many companies- or is this legal action a result of a phenomenon that is coincidental? Although many argue that there is no "systematic" approach or policy to hinder the development of blacks in corporations, it is evident that serious problems do exist in many companies that have the propensity to curtail the advancement of black employees. In essence, …
Section 1: Adarand Constructors V. Mineta, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Section 1: Adarand Constructors V. Mineta, Institute Of Bill Of Rights Law, William & Mary Law School
Supreme Court Preview
No abstract provided.
Closing A Discrimination Loophole: Using Title Vii's Anti-Retaliation Provision To Prevent Employers From Requiring Unlawful Arbitration Agreements As Conditions Of Continued Employment, Sidney Charlotte Reynolds
Closing A Discrimination Loophole: Using Title Vii's Anti-Retaliation Provision To Prevent Employers From Requiring Unlawful Arbitration Agreements As Conditions Of Continued Employment, Sidney Charlotte Reynolds
Washington Law Review
Courts have long viewed mandatory arbitration agreements (MAAs) as contract provisions that employees may accept or decline based on the common law doctrine of employment at-will. However, employees may see such MAAs as attempts to curtail Title VII rights and may refuse to sign them. Title VII prohibits employers from retaliating against employees who oppose discriminatory employment practices. A legal loophole has developed where some employers seek explicitly or implicitly to exempt themselves from Title VII's provisions by drafting MAAs that eliminate statutory rights and remedies from the arbitration process or deter employees from filing discrimination claims altogether. The U.S. …
Resurgence Of The Class Action Lawsuit In Employment Discrimination Cases: New Obstacles Presented By The 1991 Amendments To The Civil Rights Act, Scotty Shively
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Attachment Gap: Employment Discrimination Law, Women's Cultural Caregiving, And The Limits Of Economic And Liberal Legal Theory, Laura T. Kessler
The Attachment Gap: Employment Discrimination Law, Women's Cultural Caregiving, And The Limits Of Economic And Liberal Legal Theory, Laura T. Kessler
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
Title VII has prohibited employment discrimination on the basis of pregnancy since 1978, when Congress passed the Pregnancy Discrimination Act ("PDA"), but it does not require employers to recognize women's caregiving obligations beyond the immediate, physical events of pregnancy and childbirth. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 ("FMLA ") also does little more than provide job security to some relatively privileged women in the case of childbirth. Neither of these statutes, which constitute the bulk of the United States' maternity and parental leave policies, provides for the most common employment leave needs of caregivers, who by all measures …
Your Dna Is Your Resume: How Inadequate Protection Of Genetic Information Perpetuates Employment Discrimination
Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice
No abstract provided.
Two Wrongs Do Not Make A Defense: Eliminating The Equal-Opportunity-Harasser Defense, Shylah Miles
Two Wrongs Do Not Make A Defense: Eliminating The Equal-Opportunity-Harasser Defense, Shylah Miles
Washington Law Review
Sexual harassment is a prevalent problem in the American workplace that accounts for nearly sixty-four percent of all gender discrimination claims under Title VII. The equal-opportunity-harasser defense allows harassers who target both males and females to escape liability. Courts have allowed the defense because they have interpreted the "because of sex" element of a sexual harassment claim to require disparate treatment or a showing that the plaintiffs would not have been harassed if they were members of the opposite sex. An equal-opportunity harasser harasses both sexes and, therefore, plaintiffs cannot prove disparate treatment. This Comment argues that the disparate-treatment requirement …
The Cash Balance Controversy Revisited: Age Discrimination And Fidelity To Statutory Text, Edward A. Zelinsky
The Cash Balance Controversy Revisited: Age Discrimination And Fidelity To Statutory Text, Edward A. Zelinsky
Articles
No abstract provided.
The Uncertain Future Of Title Vii Class Actions After The Civil Rights Act Of 1991, Daniel F. Piar
The Uncertain Future Of Title Vii Class Actions After The Civil Rights Act Of 1991, Daniel F. Piar
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Litigating Age And Disability Claims Against State And Local Government Employers In The New "Federalism" Era, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Litigating Age And Disability Claims Against State And Local Government Employers In The New "Federalism" Era, Ivan E. Bodensteiner, Rosalie Levinson
Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Genetic Testing And Employment Litigation, Harry Zanville
Genetic Testing And Employment Litigation, Harry Zanville
Journal of Law and Health
There are a number of very surprising studies that talk about the absolute amenability of these healthcare providers to turn over information without authority. So when we go over those kinds of facts and in some cases partial assumption together, you end up in a context where bad things can happen to good people, and that's what the Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) case really was about.
A Matter Of Class: The Impact Of Brown V. Mclean On Employee Discharge Cases, Christina M. Sautter
A Matter Of Class: The Impact Of Brown V. Mclean On Employee Discharge Cases, Christina M. Sautter
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Sexists, Misogynists And The Male-Dominated Workplace: Whether Prevailing Workplace Norms Should Discredit A Hostile Work Environment In Williams V. General Motors Corp., Maresa Torregrossa
Sexists, Misogynists And The Male-Dominated Workplace: Whether Prevailing Workplace Norms Should Discredit A Hostile Work Environment In Williams V. General Motors Corp., Maresa Torregrossa
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Legislation And Genetic Discrimination, Sharona Hoffman
Legislation And Genetic Discrimination, Sharona Hoffman
Journal of Law and Health
State legislation addresses genetic discrimination in both employment and health insurance. Thirty-one states have passed laws that address genetic discrimination in employment. Approximately thirteen states prohibit employers from requiring applicants to undergo genetic testing as a condition of employment. Some states have more limited restrictions. Florida prohibits only the screening of applicants for the sickle-cell trait. Wisconsin requires employers to obtain written and informed consent from applicants prior to administering genetic tests, but does not preclude their utilization altogether. Some states establish exceptions that permit genetic testing that is job-related or that is conducted, with the employee's written and informed …
Discrimination, Plain And Simple, Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Discrimination, Plain And Simple, Henry L. Chambers, Jr.
Law Faculty Publications
This short essay is a brief examination of the Court's relatively recent attempts to simplify Title VII and employment discrimination; it is not intended to be a comprehensive review of the Court's discrimination jurisprudence. Rather, it seeks to identify a few concerns with and implications of the Court's apparent desire to simplify Title VII jurisprudence. Part I briefly examines how the Court has simplified employment discrimination through Hicks and Oncale. Part II examines how the Court's simplifications have been used. Part III suggests concerns that should accompany the Court's simplification.
Introduction: Employment Discrimination And The Problems Of Proof, John Valery White, Gregory Vincent
Introduction: Employment Discrimination And The Problems Of Proof, John Valery White, Gregory Vincent
Scholarly Works
This is an introduction to articles presented at a symposium on the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods. Co. sponsored by the Louisiana Law Review. Presenting papers were five of the leading scholars on employment discrimination law: Professor Catherine J. Lanctot of the Villanova University Law School, Professor Michael Selmi of the George Washington Law School, Professor Linda Hamilton Krieger, University of California at Berkely School of Law, Professor Rebecca Hanner White of the University of Georgia Law School, and Professor Michael Zimmer of the Seton Hall University School of Law. Respondents were the authors and …
Next Challenge In Sexual Harassment Reform: Racial Disparity, The Panel One: Gender, Race, And Sexuality: Historical Themes And Emerging Issues In Women's Rights Law, Tanya K. Hernandez
Next Challenge In Sexual Harassment Reform: Racial Disparity, The Panel One: Gender, Race, And Sexuality: Historical Themes And Emerging Issues In Women's Rights Law, Tanya K. Hernandez
Faculty Scholarship
In order to do my homework in discussing both a tribute to women's lawyering and activism and also discuss emerging issues, I am going to focus on sexual harassment.
Pink Slip Introduction, Dena S. Davis
Pink Slip Introduction, Dena S. Davis
Journal of Law and Health
What has changed however, is the degree of worry and concern that people feel about the uses to which their genetic information can be put. When the HGP (Human Genome Project) began, a number of pundits were convinced that the "future knowledge" that genetic information can deliver to consumers and insurers alike would completely undermine the practice of private health insurance, and send our current system crashing to the ground. Needless to say, that has not happened; but with 42 million Americans currently without health insurance, and with insurance tightly entwined with employment, many people fear that genetic information will …