Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (321)
- University of Michigan Law School (213)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (206)
- American University Washington College of Law (146)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (137)
-
- BLR (115)
- William & Mary Law School (77)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (70)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (70)
- Roger Williams University (66)
- Georgetown University Law Center (62)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (61)
- University of Colorado Law School (58)
- Duke Law (57)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (51)
- Fordham Law School (48)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (48)
- UIC School of Law (46)
- Brooklyn Law School (40)
- Cornell University Law School (40)
- Pepperdine University (40)
- University of Maine School of Law (39)
- The University of Akron (38)
- University of Georgia School of Law (37)
- Brigham Young University Law School (35)
- Columbia Law School (35)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (35)
- University of Washington School of Law (33)
- New York Law School (31)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (30)
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law (314)
- Discrimination (261)
- Civil rights (248)
- Civil Rights (193)
- Supreme Court (189)
-
- Constitutional law (187)
- Constitution (162)
- Equal protection (143)
- Race (141)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (126)
- First Amendment (121)
- Fourteenth Amendment (108)
- Affirmative action (104)
- Racism (92)
- Due process (91)
- United States Supreme Court (85)
- Equal Protection Clause (79)
- Equality (72)
- Racial discrimination (72)
- Equal Protection (71)
- Slavery (64)
- Title VII (64)
- Law and Society (60)
- Religion (56)
- Fourth Amendment (55)
- Education (54)
- Segregation (54)
- Abortion (51)
- Brown v. Board of Education (51)
- Diversity (50)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (261)
- Faculty Scholarship (201)
- Michigan Law Review (144)
- Touro Law Review (122)
- ExpressO (108)
-
- Faculty Publications (84)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (82)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (64)
- Articles (63)
- Scholarly Works (56)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (54)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (53)
- Supreme Court Case Files (53)
- Publications (46)
- All Faculty Scholarship (40)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (39)
- Maine Law Review (39)
- UIC Law Review (38)
- Pepperdine Law Review (36)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (34)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (33)
- Northwestern University Law Review (31)
- Akron Law Review (29)
- BYU Law Review (29)
- Indiana Law Journal (29)
- Fordham Law Review (27)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (27)
- American University Law Review (25)
- Nebraska Journal on Advancing Justice (25)
- Washington Law Review (25)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2761 - 2790 of 3262
Full-Text Articles in Civil Rights and Discrimination
Chisom V. Roemer: Where Do We Go From Here?, Randolph M. Mclaughlin
Chisom V. Roemer: Where Do We Go From Here?, Randolph M. Mclaughlin
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
In Chisom and Houston Lawyers' Association, the Court declined to address two substantive issues critical for pending and future litigation challenging the at-large election of state judges. The Court expressly stated that it would not decide the elements that must be proved to establish a violation of section 2 or the remedy that would be appropriate for a violation proven in the context of a judicial election. Part II will discuss the Chisom and Houston Lawyers' Association decisions. Analysis of these decisions, combined with a review of the legislative history, supports the Court's view of the amended section 2. In …
The New Aids Look Back Statute: Contact Tracing In The Health Care Setting - A Step In The Wrong Direction, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 769 (1992), Margery M. Tamburro
The New Aids Look Back Statute: Contact Tracing In The Health Care Setting - A Step In The Wrong Direction, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 769 (1992), Margery M. Tamburro
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sex Discrimination (Update 1), Christina B. Whitman
Sex Discrimination (Update 1), Christina B. Whitman
Book Chapters
During the 1980s and early 1990s intense disagreement has arisen over the appropriate strategy for eliminating sex discrimination. Some courts and commentators argue for gender-neutral rules that define categories in purely functional terms. Others, who point out that gender-neutral rules promise equality only for women who can meet a ‘‘male standard,’’ think that legal distinctions between the sexes are not only appropriate but necessary, at least in cases involving perceived biological differences. Still others refuse to think in terms of sameness and difference. They analyze each issue by asking whether the disputed rule furthers the domination of men and the …
The Role Of Institutional Factors In Protecting Individual Liberties, Thomas W. Merrill
The Role Of Institutional Factors In Protecting Individual Liberties, Thomas W. Merrill
Faculty Scholarship
Questions about the efficacy of the Bill of Rights cry out for serious comparative legal scholarship. Robert Ellickson and Frank Easterbrook suggest that one might approach these questions by looking at different state constitutions. One might also look more seriously at the different constitutional regimes around the world, and try to draw some judgments about what impact, if any, different types of constitutional arrangements have on individual rights. We have heard expressions of skepticism about this approach, but there has been very little serious comparative scholarship by constitutional law scholars in this country. The scholarly tradition in America has been …
Reconstructing Liberty, Robin West
Reconstructing Liberty, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
It is commonly and rightly understood in this country that our constitutional system ensures, or seeks to ensure, that individuals are accorded the greatest degree of personal, political, social, and economic liberty possible, consistent with a like amount of liberty given to others, the duty and right of the community to establish the conditions for a moral and secure collective life, and the responsibility of the state to provide for the common defense of the community against outside aggression. Our distinctive cultural and constitutional commitment to individual liberty places very real restraints on what our elected representatives can do, even …
Extinguishing The Burning Crosses: Washington's Malicious Harassment Statute In Light Of The Issues Of Overbreadth And Vagueness, Edward Comitz
Extinguishing The Burning Crosses: Washington's Malicious Harassment Statute In Light Of The Issues Of Overbreadth And Vagueness, Edward Comitz
Seattle University Law Review
This Comment briefly discusses how Washington’s malicious harassment statute should be interpreted in light of the recent United States Supreme Court case R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul. Because the issues of overbreadth and vagueness are of imminent importance, to Washington’s statute, the majority of this Comment focuses on an analysis of those issues Both issues are discussed in terms of the specific crime of cross burning with the intent to intimidate or harass as proscribed by Section (1) of Washington’s malicious harassment statute. Finally, because the real harms minority victims of hate crimes experience, this Comment argues that Washington’s …
Racism And Patriarchy In The Meaning Of Motherhood, Dorthy E. Roberts
Racism And Patriarchy In The Meaning Of Motherhood, Dorthy E. Roberts
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Expanding Our Vision Of Legal Services Representation– The Hermanas Unidas Project, Stacy Brustin
Expanding Our Vision Of Legal Services Representation– The Hermanas Unidas Project, Stacy Brustin
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Roe V. Wade And The Dred Scott Decision: Justice Scalia's Peculiar Analogy In Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Jamin B. Raskin
Roe V. Wade And The Dred Scott Decision: Justice Scalia's Peculiar Analogy In Planned Parenthood V. Casey, Jamin B. Raskin
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Babies, Parents, And Grandparents: A Story In Two Cases, Karen Czapanskiy
Babies, Parents, And Grandparents: A Story In Two Cases, Karen Czapanskiy
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Discovering Our Connections: Race And Gender In The Law Symposium Keynote Address, Margaret Walker Alexander
Discovering Our Connections: Race And Gender In The Law Symposium Keynote Address, Margaret Walker Alexander
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Lost Innocence And The Moral Foundation Of Law, Kate Nace Day
Lost Innocence And The Moral Foundation Of Law, Kate Nace Day
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Rouge Et Noir Reread: A Popular Constitutional History Of The Angelo Herndon Case, Kendall Thomas
Rouge Et Noir Reread: A Popular Constitutional History Of The Angelo Herndon Case, Kendall Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
In 1932, Eugene Angelo Braxton Hemdon, a young Afro-American member of the Communist Party, U.S.A., was arrested in Atlanta and charged with an attempt to incite insurrection against that state's lawful authority. Some five years later, in Herndon v. Lowry, Herndon filed a writ of habeas corpus asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider the constitutionality of the Georgia statute under which he had been convicted. Two weeks before his twenty-fourth birthday, the Court, voting 5-4, declared the use of the Georgia political-crimes statute against him unconstitutional on the grounds that it deprived Herndon of his rights to freedom …
The Breath Of The Unfee'd Lawyer: Statutory Fee Limitations And Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel In Capital Litigation, Albert L. Vreeland Ii
The Breath Of The Unfee'd Lawyer: Statutory Fee Limitations And Ineffective Assistance Of Counsel In Capital Litigation, Albert L. Vreeland Ii
Michigan Law Review
This Note argues that fee limitations deprive indigent defendants of their right to effective assistance of counsel. Part I of this Note reviews state court decisions that address Sixth Amendment challenges to fee limitations, yet fail to address the broader concerns about the appointed counsel system. Part II considers the inherent disincentives and burdens fee limitations impose on attorneys and suggests that the limits threaten the indigent accused's right to effective assistance of counsel. A comparison of the fee limitations and the time required to prepare and try a capital case reveals the gross inadequacy of statutory fee provisions. In …
The New York Law School Reporter, Vol. 9, No. 3, November, 1991, New York Law School
The New York Law School Reporter, Vol. 9, No. 3, November, 1991, New York Law School
Student Newspapers
No abstract provided.
Looking Back At City Of Richmond V. J.A. Croson Co.: Its Effects On State And Local Set-Aside Programs, Bryan B. Chambers
Looking Back At City Of Richmond V. J.A. Croson Co.: Its Effects On State And Local Set-Aside Programs, Bryan B. Chambers
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Operation Rescue: Was The Justice Dept. Right To Intervene In Wichita?, Gary S. Lawson, Celeste Lacy Davis, Eve W. Paul
Operation Rescue: Was The Justice Dept. Right To Intervene In Wichita?, Gary S. Lawson, Celeste Lacy Davis, Eve W. Paul
Faculty Scholarship
Discussion of Operation Rescue attempt to shut down abortion clinic in Wichita, KS in August 1991, and ensuing decision of U.S. District Judge Patrick Kelly, as well as intervention of Justice Department. A debate-style article with "pro" side written by Gary Lawson and "con" side written by C.L. Davis & E.W. Paul.
Partisan Gerrymandering: A New Concept For Florida's 1992 Reapportionment, Bill L. Bryant, Katherine E. Giddings, Mark E. Kaplan
Partisan Gerrymandering: A New Concept For Florida's 1992 Reapportionment, Bill L. Bryant, Katherine E. Giddings, Mark E. Kaplan
Florida State University Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Effects Of Intent: Do We Know How Legal Standards Work?, Theodore Eisenberg, Sheri Lynn Johnson
The Effects Of Intent: Do We Know How Legal Standards Work?, Theodore Eisenberg, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No one knows how the intent standard works in racial discrimination cases, though many have speculated. To test the speculation, this study examines how the intent standard actually operates. Its findings cast doubt on whether we really know how any legal standard functions.
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Confessions, Criminals, And Community, Sheri Lynn Johnson
Cornell Law Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. V Fcc: Affirmative Action At The Crossroads Of Constitutional Liberty And Equality, Michel Rosenfeld
Metro Broadcasting, Inc. V Fcc: Affirmative Action At The Crossroads Of Constitutional Liberty And Equality, Michel Rosenfeld
Articles
The article examines the Supreme Court's inconsistent approach to affirmative action, particularly through the lens of *Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC*, which upheld the FCC's race-based policies to promote broadcast diversity. While the decision aligns with constitutional values of equality and free speech, the Court's opinions fail to coherently reconcile liberty and equality principles. The article argues for a more integrated framework to address the complexities of affirmative action jurisprudence and its intersection with First Amendment rights.
Voluntary Affirmative Action In Employment For Women And Minorities Under Title Vii Of The Civil Rights Act: Extending Possibilities For Employers To Engage In Preferential Treatment To Achieve Equal Employment Opportunity, 24 J. Marshall L. Rev. 731 (1991), Chris Engels
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Thurgood Marshall And The Administrative State, Jonathan Weinberg
Law Faculty Research Publications
No abstract provided.
The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West
The Ideal Of Liberty: A Comment On Michael H. V. Gerald D., Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
What is the meaning and content of the "liberty" protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment? In Michael H. v. Gerald D. Justices Brennan and Scalia spelled out what at first blush appear to be sharply contrasting understandings of the meaning of liberty and of the substantive limits liberty imposes on state action. Justice Scalia argued that the "liberty" protected by a substantive interpretation of due process is only the liberty to engage in activities historically protected against state intervention by firmly entrenched societal traditions. I will sometimes call this the "traditionalist" interpretation of liberty. Justice Brennan, …
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Review Of Affirmative Action After Metro Broadcasting V. Fcc: The Solution Almost Nobody Wanted, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Indian Reservations And The Preservation Of Tribal Culture: Beyond Wardship To Stewardship, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Indian Reservations And The Preservation Of Tribal Culture: Beyond Wardship To Stewardship, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Toward An Abolitionist Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West
Toward An Abolitionist Interpretation Of The Fourteenth Amendment, Robin West
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
It is by now an open secret that current interpretations of the meaning of the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and of its relevance and mandate for contemporary problems of racial, gender, and economic justice, are deeply and, in a sense, hopelessly conflicted. The conflict, simply stated, is this: to the current Supreme Court, and to a sizeable and influential number of constitutional theorists, the "equal protection of the laws" guaranteed by the Constitution is essentially a guarantee that the categories delineated by legal rules will be "rational" and will be rationally related to legitimate state ends. To …
The First Amendment, Burt Neuborne
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
A Comparison Of A Mentally Ill Individual's Right To Refuse Medication Under The United States And The New York State Constitutions, William M. Brooks
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.