Civil Procedure Commons^™

Civil Procedure, Kenneth Kandaras, Catherine Wozniak

Loyola University Chicago Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure, 18 Loy. U. Chi. L.J. 317 (1986), Kenneth Kandaras, Catherine Wozniak

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Aronson And Its Progeny: Limiting Derivative Actions Through Demand Requirements, 19 J. Marshall L. Rev. 571 (1986), Andrew Emerson

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure, Bradley R. Oldaker

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Practice And Procedure Under Amended Rule 11 Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Kevin P. Roddy, William Woodward Webb

Campbell Law Review

The purpose of this article is to explore the substantive provisions of amended Rule 11 and its historic antecedents, the procedure by which sanctions may be sought and/or imposed, the sanctions which the court may impose and the persons upon whom the sanctions can be imposed.

Casenotes: Constitutional Law — Civil Procedure — Landlord And Tenant — Rent Escrow Statute Requiring Payment Into Escrow Of Accrued Rents Pursuant To Demand For Jury Trial In Summary Eviction Proceeding Is An Unconstitutional Infringement Of The Right To Jury Trial — Lucky Ned Pepper's Ltd. V. Columbia Park & Recreation Ass'n, 64 Md. App. 222, 494 A.2d 947 (1985), David J. Weymer

University of Baltimore Law Review

No abstract provided.

Appellate Review Of Unclear State Law In The Ninth Circuit After In Re Mclinn, Daniel L. Brewster

Seattle University Law Review

In McLinn, the Ninth Circuit significantly departed from the practice of the other circuits, and from its own prior practice, when it rejected the deferential standard of review normally applied to a federal district court's interpretation of state law. This Note discusses the Ninth Circuit's decision in McLinn and examines the deferential standard employed in the other circuits and in the United States Supreme Court. The Note takes the position that McLinn was correct in rejecting the former practice of accepting a district court's interpretations of state law unless clearly wrong, but that McLinn went too far in holding …

Civil Procedure - Federal District Courts Have Inherent Power To Sanction Attorneys For Abuse Of The Judicial Process, Carolyn L. Dessin

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Post-Conviction In Maryland: Past, Present And Future, Edward A. Tomlinson

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Extraterritorial Discovery Under The Hague Evidence Convention, Marguerite E. Trossevin

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Proposals To Amend Rule 68- Time To Abandon Ship, Stephen B. Burbank

University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform

It is no surprise that, having included "facilitating the settlement of the case" as one of the objectives of pretrial conferences in the 1983 amendments to Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Advisory Committee has turned its attention to Rule 68. The Rule was intended to provide an incentive to settle by requiring that a prevailing claimant who has declined a more favorable offer of judgment pay post-offer "costs." But, in the Advisory Committee's view, Rule 68 has proved ineffective. The concern, apparently, is not that too few civil cases filed in federal court are settled-less …

The Opportunity To Be Heard And The Doctrines Of Preclusion: Federal Limits On State Law, William V. Luneburg

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Twelve-Person, Unanimous Jury: Does It Have More Than History To Recommend It?, Richard O. Lempert

Articles

My focus today will be on the twelve-person unanimous jury and on the contrasts between such juries and six-person juries or twelve-person juries than can return verdicts by ten-two or nine-three votes. Until about fifteen years ago, it appeared that the sixth and seventh amendments required all federal juries to have twelve members who reached unanimous verdicts, and it appeared possible that the Supreme Court would force the states to conform to the federal standards. Instead, the court did almost the opposite. It sanctioned juries as small as size six in state criminal cases and federal civil cases, and it …

Burger King Corporation V. Rudzewicz: The Minimum Contacts Test Meets The Modern-Day Franchise Agreement, 20 J. Marshall L. Rev. 169 (1986), Valerie Ann Hall

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hearsay Rule, Peter K. Westen

Book Chapters

The hearsay rule is a non constitutional rule of evidence which obtains in one form or another in every jurisdiction in the country. The rule provides that in the absence of explicit exceptions to the contrary, hearsay evidence of a matter in dispute is inadmissible as proof of the matter. Although jurisdictions define "hearsay" in different ways, the various definitions reflect a common principle: evidence that derives its relevance in a case from the belief of a person who is not present in court—and thus not under oath and not subject to cross-examination regarding his credibility—is of questionable probative value.

A Judicial Perspective On Expert Discovery Under Federal Rule 26(B)(4): An Empirical Study Of Trial Court Judges And A Proposed Amendment, David Day, Charvin Dixon

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

For Every Weapon, A Counterweapon: The Revival Of Rule 68, John P. Woods

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Rule 68 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure applies generally where a non-moving party's settlement offer is rejected, and the court judgment awarded to the moving party, or claimant, is for less than the prior offer. The non-moving party may then be entitled to "costs incurred after the making of the offer." In Marek v. Chesny, the Court made it clear that "costs" includes attorney's fees. Congress should consider revising Rule 68 to clarify its application. However, Rule 68 appropriately induces plaintiffs to thoroughly consider a defendant's offer, under threat that rejection of the offer may include reducing attorney's …

Pendant Party Jurisdiction And Section 1983: When Has Congress "By Implication Negated" Jurisdiction?, Peter E. Schomer

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Note discusses how many lower federal courts, in deciding when to allow state claims to be brought in federal court under the doctrine of pendant party jurisdiction, have interpreted the Supreme Court's "Aldinger test" in a far more restrictive manner than what the Supreme Court had intended. Additionally, the Note traces the history of the doctrines of pendant jurisdiction, pendant party jurisdiction and ancillary jurisdiction. The Note also discusses of the dispute raging about the actual validity of pendant party jurisdiction, ,focusing particularly on section 1983 cases. In conclusion, the Note articulates the process and analysis a court must …

Compulsory Process, Right To, Peter K. Westen

Book Chapters

The first state to adopt a constitution following the Declaration of Independence (New Jersey, 1776) guaranteed all criminal defendants the same ‘‘privileges of witnesses’’ as their prosecutors. Fifteen years later, in enumerating the constitutional rights of accused persons, the framers of the federal Bill of Rights bifurcated what New Jersey called the ‘‘privileges of witnesses’’ into two distinct but related rights: the Sixth Amendment right of the accused ‘‘to be confronted with the witnesses against him,’’ and his companion Sixth Amendment right to ‘‘compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.’’ The distinction between witnesses ‘‘against’’ the accused and witnesses …

Police Interrogation And Confessions, Yale Kamisar

Book Chapters

In the police interrogation room, where, until the second third of the century, police practices were unscrutinized and virtually unregulated, constitutional ideals collide with the grim realities of law enforcement.

Sanctions Under Amended Federal Rule 11–Some "Chilling" Problems In The Struggle Between Compensation And Punishment, Melissa Lee Nelken

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

The Revival Of Fact Pleading Under The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Richard L. Marcus

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Getting A Full Bite Of The Apple: When Should The Doctrine Of Issue Preclusion Make An Administrative Or Arbitral Determination Binding In A Court Of Law?, Jay C. Carlisle

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

In recent years, alternative means of dispute resolution have become important resources. Therefore, the question of when the determination of issues at administrative hearings and arbitrations should be granted preclusive effect in subsequent judicial litigations requires critical evaluation. Part I of this Article focuses on the general evolution of issue preclusion in New York. Part II discusses recent New York case law giving preclusive effect to administrative and arbitral issue determinations in subsequent state court proceedings. Part III analyzes the policy reasons for applying issue preclusion to administrative and arbitral issue determinations in such proceedings. Part IV concludes that the …

Federal Marital Privileges In A Criminal Context: The Need For Further Modification Since Trammel The

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Jury Instructions: A Bibliography. Part I: Civil Jury Instructions, Cheryl R. Nyberg, Carol Boast

Librarians' Articles

Pattern jury instructions are used by trial judges to explain the law to jurors in language that they can understand and that provide consistency from one trial to another. This bibliography contains references to 156 recent and dated compilations of civil jury instructions. An index to acronyms for civil jury instructions is included.

Religion And Procedure, Robert E. Rodes

Journal Articles

God has no use for procedural rules since He knows the full truth and is able to exercise absolute justice simultaneously alongside complete mercy. This paper discusses the religious significance of legal rules of procedure in light of this truth. It finds that since we, unlike God, are inherently fallible, we are forced to implement procedures in the legal pursuit of our goals of truth, justice, and mercy. These procedures remain imperfect in implementing these goals, as compromises must often be made between competing values such as mercy on one hand and justice on the other. Nevertheless, though legal procedure …

The Perils Of Privilege: Waiver And The Litigator, Richard L. Marcus

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Procedure And Practice, W. Hamilton Bryson

University of Richmond Law Review

This article considers recent developments in the field of Virginia civil procedure and practice, including statutes, rules of court, and opinions of the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia that have appeared between May 1985 and May 1986. This article also comments on cases in volumes three and four of Virginia Circuit Court Opinions, many of which were decided before 1985, but it is appropriate to mention them here since they were only recently made generally available through publication.

Developing Standards Under Amended Rule 11 Of The Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure, Edward D. Cavanagh

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is designed to ensure the integrity of pleadings and other papers filed in federal district court. The rule was amended in 1983 in response to the widely held perception that its provisions, as originally promulgated, had proven ineffective in deterring strike suits, litigation abuses, and lawsuits used as instruments of delay and oppression. Amended Rule 11 introduces more stringent standards designed to make attorneys stop and think about their legal obligations before signing pleadings and motions. These obligations are reinforced by imposing mandatory sanctions upon violation of the standards. The …

Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: "Settling" The Differences In The Proposed Amendments To The Offer Of Settlement Rule, Nelson Perel

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.