Civil Procedure Commons^™

Tnuva Co-Op V. Ministry Of Industry, Trade, And Employment, Yigal Mersel

Translated Opinions

[This abstract is not part of the Court's opinion and is provided for the reader's convenience. It has been translated from a Hebrew version prepared by Nevo Press Ltd. and is used with its kind permission.]

The case concerns the question of once it was decided to order a party to pay costs, including attorney’s fees (hereinafter: costs), what is the standard for assessing the amount to be paid: whether “real” costs (that is costs expended by a party in actuality or that the party has committed to expend) or a different standard, such as reasonable expenses or minimal expenses. …

Summary Of Matter Of Harrison Living Trust, 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 26, Jarrod Rickard

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal challenging a district court decision denying the petition of a trust beneficiary asking for an order surcharging the trustee for breach of fiduciary duty in distributing assets according to court order that the trustee knew was void.

Are Rules Just Meant To Be Broken? The One-Year Two-Step In Tedford V. Warner- Lambert Co., E. Kyle Mcnew

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Trial Trends And Implications For The Civil Justice System, Paula Hannaford-Agor, Robert C. Lafountain, Shauna Strickland

Faculty Publications

Bench and jury trials have been declining steadily for the past twenty years, both in absolute numbers and as a proportion of civil dispositions. This “vanishing trial” phenomenon was long suspected by many within the state court system, but has only recently been empirically confirmed. This issue of Caseload Highlights focuses on trends in civil trial characteristics and discusses possible causes of these trends and their implications for practitioners and policy-makers in state courts.

This abstract has been taken from the body of the report.

Toward A New Federalism In State Civil Justice: Developing A Uniform Code Of State Civil Procedure Through A Collaborative Rule-Making Process, Glenn S. Koppel

Vanderbilt Law Review

There is a sense of "deja vu" to the vision of a uniform body of state procedural law applicable in every state court throughout the nation. "Swift v. Tysons'" dream of a nationally uniform body of state substantive common law that mirrored an evolving body of uniform federal common law never materialized because state courts refused to defer to federal common law, which was applied only in federal court. Swift itself was overturned in 1938 by the Supreme Court's ruling in "Erie Railroad v. Tompkins" that federal courts must defer to the substantive lawmaking authority of state courts. But almost …

When Does A Party Prevail?: A Proposed "Third-Circuit-Plus" Test For Judicial Imprimatur, Matthew B. Tenney

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Summary Of Aviation Ventures, Inc. V. Joan Morris, Inc., 121 Nev. Adv. Op. 13, 110 P.3d 59, Bryce Loveland

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

No abstract provided.

Florida's Request For Admission Rule: 150 Years On The Road To Inconsistency, Ineffectiveness And Appellate Nullification, Mitchell J. Frank

Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Opening Remarks: Advocating For Change, Kurt Mundorff

Cardozo Public Law, Policy & Ethics Journal

The article critiques the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act (CAPTA) for focusing narrowly on parental responsibility while neglecting broader societal factors like poverty and racism. It highlights the challenges in predicting child abuse and the negative outcomes of foster care, arguing that the system's approach is flawed and in need of reform.

Archibald Cox And The Genius Of Our Institutions, Larry Yackle

Faculty Scholarship

I am confident that historians will write that the trend of decisions during the 1950's and 1960's was in keeping with the mainstream ofAmerican history - a bit progressive but also moderate, a bit humane but not sentimental, a bit idealistic but seldom doctrinaire, and in the long run essentially pragmatic - in short, in keeping with the true genius of our institutions. 1 In the dedication of his classic work Democracy and Distrust2 to Chief Justice Earl Warren, the late John Hart Ely wrote "You don't need many heroes if you choose carefully." 3 For several generations of lawyers …

Teaching Civil Procedure Stories, Nancy S. Marder

Journal of Legal Education

No abstract provided.

Irregulars: The Appellate Rights Of Persons Who Are Not Full-Fledged Parties, Joan E. Steinman

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

"To Sue Or Not To Sue": The Past, Present And Future Of Construction Defect Litigation In Nevada, Robert J. Aalberts

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Reconsidering Absolute Prosecutorial Immunity, Margaret Z. Johns

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

There Is Always A Need: The "Necessity Doctrine" And Class Certification Against Government Agencies, Daniel Tenny

Michigan Law Review

On its face, Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seems tailor-made for lawsuits against government. Rule 23(b)(2) allows a class action when "the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole." This situation arises frequently in people's dealings with government agencies: recipients of public benefits and consumers using public utilities, for example, constitute large groups of people all subject to identical government policies who might seek injunctive relief. Litigants attempting …

Summary Of Reno Hilton Resort Corp. V. Verderber, 121 Nev. Adv. Rep. 1 , Robert M. Henriksen

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

A class action was brought as a result of a Norwalk-like virus outbreak at the Reno Hilton in May and June of 1996. The district court divided the action into two phases. The first phase consisted of a jury trial regarding liability and class-wide punitive damages. The jury, imposing $25 million in punitive damages, found that the appellant’s (Reno Hilton Resort Corp.) policy of unpaid sick leave was the proximate cause of the outbreak. The second phase, which has not yet ensued, will consist of individual hearings to assess compensatory damages for each class member. Following the conclusion of the …

Teaching Civil Procedure Stories (Reviewing Civil Procedure Stories, Foundation Press 2004), Nancy S. Marder

All Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Private Attorneys General And The First Amendment, Trevor W. Morrison

Michigan Law Review

The "private attorney general" is under fire again. It has been in and out of favor in the six decades since it was named, in part because it has come to signify so many different things. At its core, however, the term denotes a plaintiff who sues to vindicate public interests not directly connected to any special stake of her own. The remedies sought in such actions tend to be correspondingly broad: rather than seeking redress for discrete injuries, private attorneys general typically request injunctive or other equitable relief aimed at altering the practices of large institutions. From school desegregation …

Peace And Justice: Notes On The Evolution And Purposes Of Legal Processes, Carrie Menkel-Meadow

Georgetown Law Faculty Lectures and Appearances

This text of the inaugural lecture for the A.B. Chettle, Jr. Chair in Dispute Resolution and Civil Procedure at Georgetown University Law Center presents an intellectual outline (theory and practice) for a house of justice built on the foundations of Lon Fuller, the Legal Process school, Jurgen Habermas' and Stuart Hampshire's social philosophy about democratic processes, the floors of comparative processes, drawing on the work of political theorist Jon Elster and empirical work on legal and political processes and the ceilings of new processes, like consensus building fora, truth and reconciliation commissions and other combinations of legal and political processes. …

Brave New World: U.S. Responses To The Rise In International Crime - An Overview, John F. Murphy

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Preventing "You've Got Mail"™ From Meaning "You've Been Served": How Service Of Process By E-Mail Does Not Meet Constitutional Procedure Due Process Requirements, 38 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1121 (2005), Matthew R. Schreck

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Injunctions Against Liquidation In Trade Remedy Cases: A Petitioner's View, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 45 (2005), Jeffrey M. Telep

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Adjudicating International Trade Cases At The U.S. Commerce Department: Endless Remand Or Balanced Resolve?, 39 J. Marshall L. Rev. 59 (2005), Elizabeth C. Seastrum, Matthew D. Walden

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Ailor V. City Of Maynardville, Tennessee: What Constitutes Compliance Under The Clean Water Act, Jennifer Stratis

Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - )

No abstract provided.

Defining The Limits Of Supplemental Jurisdiction Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367: A Hearty Welcome To Permissive Counterclaims, Michelle S. Simon

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

In 1990, Congress passed 28 U.S.C. § 1367, which combined the judge-made doctrines of ancillary and pendent jurisdiction into a new category, “supplemental jurisdiction.” Supplemental jurisdiction allows federal district courts with original jurisdiction to also have jurisdiction over all other claims that form part of the “same case or controversy under Article III of the United States Constitution.” This Article analyzes supplemental jurisdiction over both permissive and compulsory counterclaims, before and after the codification of § 1367, by looking at the meaning of “same case or controversy.” It then examines two Circuit Court opinions that have held permissive counterclaims may …

The Third Circuit Adopts The Relation-Back Doctrine To Prevent Defendants From Picking Off Representative Plaintiffs Of Putative Class Actions In Weiss V. Regal Collections, Dennis Lueck

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

How Can It Be Wrong When It Feels So Right - Appellate Review Of Remand Orders Under The Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act, Thomas F. Lamprecht

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Revision Del Codigo Civil Y La Responsabilidad Civil Extracontractual (Parte Ii); Una Propuesta Alternativa Al Borrador De La Comision De Revision, 74 Rev. Jur. U.P.R. 1 (2005), Alberto Bernabe

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

No abstract provided.

Dismissing The Class: A Practical Approach To The Class Action Restriction On The Legal Services Corporation, Joshua D. Blank, Eric A. Zacks

Law Faculty Research Publications

The class action lawsuit has emerged as an effective legal device for addressing common harms. Claimants who might not litigate their claims individually are empowered by the opportunity to speak with one voice. The class action device, however, has been made largely unavailable to legal services lawyers representing the poor. Congressional restrictions enacted in 1996 prohibit legal services organizations that receive federal funding from the Legal Services Corporation from using that funding to initiate or participate in any class action lawsuit. This article examines the social, legal and professional impact of the class action restriction on the Legal Services Corporation …

A Realistic Proposal For The Contract Duress Doctrine, Grace M. Giesel

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.