Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1480)
- Litigation (1193)
- Civil Law (1042)
- Constitutional Law (965)
- Jurisdiction (751)
-
- State and Local Government Law (747)
- Criminal Procedure (711)
- Torts (688)
- Supreme Court of the United States (616)
- Jurisprudence (609)
- Judges (551)
- Legislation (550)
- Administrative Law (539)
- Evidence (525)
- Criminal Law (509)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (498)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (496)
- Legal History (487)
- International Law (468)
- Contracts (467)
- Business Organizations Law (444)
- Conflict of Laws (441)
- Family Law (430)
- Law and Society (428)
- Legal Remedies (402)
- Law and Politics (393)
- Legal Profession (393)
- Other Law (388)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (607)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (382)
- West Virginia University (295)
- University of Richmond (259)
- Seattle University School of Law (254)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (229)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (184)
- University of Washington School of Law (170)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (164)
- William & Mary Law School (156)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (140)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (139)
- University of Kentucky (136)
- Universitas Indonesia (126)
- University of Georgia School of Law (122)
- Pepperdine University (119)
- Cornell University Law School (115)
- Fordham Law School (109)
- UIC School of Law (104)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (97)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (91)
- Brigham Young University Law School (89)
- The University of Akron (89)
- Roger Williams University (88)
- St. Mary's University (85)
- Mercer University School of Law (79)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- Cleveland State University (72)
- University of Maine School of Law (68)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (67)
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (521)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (376)
- Civil Procedure (294)
- Discovery (185)
- Jurisdiction (181)
-
- Litigation (141)
- Class actions (136)
- Federal courts (121)
- Supreme Court (104)
- Procedure (93)
- Juries (92)
- Evidence (90)
- Due process (86)
- Personal jurisdiction (86)
- Courts (85)
- Pleading (81)
- Standing (77)
- Class action (74)
- Arbitration (70)
- Constitution (61)
- Rule 23 (61)
- New York (60)
- Constitutional law (59)
- Federal Courts (59)
- Law (59)
- Civil rights (58)
- Pleadings (58)
- Remedies (58)
- United States Supreme Court (56)
- Judges (52)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (418)
- Faculty Scholarship (331)
- West Virginia Law Review (293)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (258)
- Seattle University Law Review (228)
-
- Buffalo Law Review (169)
- Scholarly Works (156)
- Articles (146)
- Washington Law Review (144)
- Faculty Publications (141)
- University of Richmond Law Review (126)
- Law Faculty Publications (123)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (120)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (116)
- Kentucky Law Journal (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (111)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (104)
- Indiana Law Journal (90)
- UIC Law Review (83)
- Faculty Articles (81)
- BYU Law Review (79)
- Mercer Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (78)
- Akron Law Review (72)
- Fordham Law Review (72)
- Supreme Court Case Files (70)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (69)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (65)
- Maine Law Review (64)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2671 - 2700 of 6648
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Give It To Me Uniformly: West Virginia Wants Initial Disclosure, Evan Olds
Give It To Me Uniformly: West Virginia Wants Initial Disclosure, Evan Olds
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cultural Dimensions Of Group Litigation, Janet Walker
Cultural Dimensions Of Group Litigation, Janet Walker
Conference Papers
No abstract provided.
Redeeming Erie: A Response To Suzanna Sherry , Donald Earl Childress Iii
Redeeming Erie: A Response To Suzanna Sherry , Donald Earl Childress Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Wrong, Out Of Step, And Pernicious: Erie As The Worst Decision Of All Time, Suzanna Sherry
Wrong, Out Of Step, And Pernicious: Erie As The Worst Decision Of All Time, Suzanna Sherry
Pepperdine Law Review
This essay was written for “Supreme Mistakes: Exploring the Most Maligned Decisions in Supreme Court History.” A symposium on the worst Supreme Court decision of all time risks becoming an exercise best described by Claude Rains’s memorable line in Casablanca: “Round up the usual suspects.” Two things saved this symposium from that fate. First, each of the usual suspects was appointed defense counsel, which made things more interesting. Second, a new face found its way into the line-up: Erie Railroad v. Tompkins. My goal in this essay is to explain why Erie is in fact guiltier than all of the …
Science On Law's Terms: Implications Of Procedural Legitimacy On Scientific Evidence, Nayha Acharya
Science On Law's Terms: Implications Of Procedural Legitimacy On Scientific Evidence, Nayha Acharya
LLM Theses
Scientific evidence is relied on more and more in litigation. Discussions and debates aimed at enabling courts to make the best use scientific evidence are increasingly critical. This thesis adds the perspective of procedural legitimacy to the science and law discussion. Procedural Legitimacy is the concept that consistent adherence to legal procedure maintains the overall legitimacy of the legal system, and the validity of its outcomes. I argue that the integrity of legal procedures must be maintained where scientific evidence is presented, so that judicial decisions that rely on scientific evidence are legitimate.
Summary Of Bonnell V. Lawrence, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 37, Richard A. Andrews
Summary Of Bonnell V. Lawrence, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 37, Richard A. Andrews
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court order dismissing an independent action to obtain relief from an otherwise unreviewable final judgment.
Summary Of Consipio Holding, Bv V. Carlberg, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 43, Brandon C. Sendall
Summary Of Consipio Holding, Bv V. Carlberg, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 43, Brandon C. Sendall
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered whether Nevada courts can exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresident officers and directors who directly harm a Nevada corporation.
Summary Of Washoe County V. Otto, 128 Nev. Advanced Opinion No. 40, Emily Navasca
Summary Of Washoe County V. Otto, 128 Nev. Advanced Opinion No. 40, Emily Navasca
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered an appeal from a district court’s order dismissing a petition for judicial review of a State Board of Equalization tax decision pursuant to the Nevada Administrative Procedure Act (APA).
Determining The Proper Pleading Standard Under The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Of 1995 After In Re Silicon Graphics , Erin Brady
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Hypothetical Jurisdiction And Interjurisdictional Preclusion: A "Comity" Of Errors, Ely Todd Chayet
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
14th Annual Open Government Summit: Access To Public Records Act & Open Meetings Act, 2012, Department Of Attorney General, State Of Rhode Island
14th Annual Open Government Summit: Access To Public Records Act & Open Meetings Act, 2012, Department Of Attorney General, State Of Rhode Island
School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events
No abstract provided.
Appellate Courts As First Responders: The Constitutionality And Propriety Of Appellate Courts' Resolving Issues In The First Instance, 87 Notre Dame Law Review 1521 (2012)., Joan E. Steinman
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Class Actions, Thomas M. Byrne, Stacey Mcgavin Mohr
Class Actions, Thomas M. Byrne, Stacey Mcgavin Mohr
Mercer Law Review
The United States Supreme Court's landmark recalibration of class certification requirements in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Dukes, together with its broad approbation of class action waivers in arbitration agreements in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, establishes 2011 as a watershed year in class action practice. During the year, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit only began to deal with the ramifications of Dukes but addressed Concepcion's impact directly.
The Post-Iqbal State Of Pleading: An Argument Opposing A Uniform National Pleading Regime, Mark W. Payne
The Post-Iqbal State Of Pleading: An Argument Opposing A Uniform National Pleading Regime, Mark W. Payne
University of Miami Business Law Review
The U.S. Supreme Court's 2009 decision in Ashcroft v. Iqbal placed a squeeze on the once touted liberal Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by requiring judges to consider the veracity of potential plaintiffs' federal claims in light of Iqbal's new heightened pleading standard. This article examines post-Iqbal pleading standards across United States jurisdictions and argues that states should exert caution before choosing to adopt Iqbal's new "plausibility" standard, and if they elect to modify their pleading standards in light of the Iqbal decision, they should also carefully contemplate their method of adoption.
Civility And Collegiality—Unreasonable Judicial Expectations For Lawyers As Officers Of The Court?, Lonnie T. Brown
Civility And Collegiality—Unreasonable Judicial Expectations For Lawyers As Officers Of The Court?, Lonnie T. Brown
Scholarly Works
It is a well-settled and often-recited fact that lawyers are “officers of the court.” That title, however, is notoriously hortatory and devoid of meaning. Nevertheless, the Eleventh Circuit recently took the somewhat unprecedented step of utilizing the officer-of-the-court label to, in effect, sanction an attorney for the purportedly uncivil act of failing to provide defendant attorneys with pre-suit notice. While the author applauds the court’s desire to place greater emphasis on lawyer-to-lawyer collegiality as a component of officer-of-the-court status, the uncertainty the decision creates in terms of a lawyer’s role will potentially force litigators to compromise important client-centered duties. This …
Summary Of Choy V. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. 78, Justin Shiroff
Summary Of Choy V. Ameristar Casinos, Inc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. 78, Justin Shiroff
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
A petition for an en banc reconsideration of a panel opinion affirming the district court’s summary judgment in a tort action.
Racial Disparities In Sentencing In The U.S. And Georgia, Kamal Rattray, Nicole Lee
Racial Disparities In Sentencing In The U.S. And Georgia, Kamal Rattray, Nicole Lee
Georgia Journal of Public Policy
Incarceration represents the ultimate use of coercive power, and in the state of Georgia, that power is being disproportionately levied upon people of color, particularly African Americans.1 According to 2011 statistics from the Georgia Department of Corrections, the total prison population statewide was approximately 53,341 inmates. The majority of that number were Blacks (33,069 inmates), followed by Whites (17,752 inmates), Hispanics (2,306 inmates) and other ethnic groups.
Summary Of Ryan’S Express V. Amador Stage Lines, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 27, Richard A. Andrews
Summary Of Ryan’S Express V. Amador Stage Lines, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 27, Richard A. Andrews
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered a motion to disqualify a law firm from participating in the appeal of a failed settlement program.
Court Reform And Breathing Space Under The Establishment Clause, Mark C. Rahdert
Court Reform And Breathing Space Under The Establishment Clause, Mark C. Rahdert
Chicago-Kent Law Review
Flast v. Cohen held that federal taxpayers have standing to challenge government spending for religion. While Frothingham v. Mellon generally prohibits taxpayer standing in federal courts, the Court reasoned that the Establishment Clause specifically prohibits taxation in any amount to fund unconstitutional religious spending. For several decades Flast has been settled law that supplied jurisdiction in many leading establishment cases. But Hein v. Freedom from Religion Foundation, Inc. and Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Winn signal that Flast may soon be overruled. This jurisdictional ferment raises two questions: Why this sudden shift? And what does it signify for the …
Class Actions: Settlement, Approval; Res Judicata; Claims Administration And Cy-Pres Awards, Janet Walker
Class Actions: Settlement, Approval; Res Judicata; Claims Administration And Cy-Pres Awards, Janet Walker
Conference Papers
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court’S Regulation Of Civil Procedure: Lessons From Administrative Law, Lumen N. Mulligan, Glen Staszewski
The Supreme Court’S Regulation Of Civil Procedure: Lessons From Administrative Law, Lumen N. Mulligan, Glen Staszewski
Faculty Works
In this Article, we argue that the Supreme Court should route most Federal Rules of Civil Procedure issues through the notice-and-comment rulemaking process of the Civil Rules Advisory Committee instead of issuing judgments in adjudications, unless the case can be resolved solely through the deployment of traditional tools of statutory construction. While we are not the first to express a preference for rulemaking on civil procedure issues, we advance the position in four significant ways. First, we argue that the Supreme Court in the civil procedure arena is vested with powers analogous to most administrative agencies. Second, building upon this …
Ashcroft V. Iqbal: Contempt For Rules, Statutes, The Constitution, And Elemental Fairness, Steve Subrin
Ashcroft V. Iqbal: Contempt For Rules, Statutes, The Constitution, And Elemental Fairness, Steve Subrin
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. V. Shute: The Titanic Of Worst Decisions, Linda S. Mullenix
Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. V. Shute: The Titanic Of Worst Decisions, Linda S. Mullenix
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Lassiter V. Department Of Social Services: Why Is It Such A Lousy Case?, Brooke D. Coleman
Lassiter V. Department Of Social Services: Why Is It Such A Lousy Case?, Brooke D. Coleman
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Tending To Potted Plants: The Professional Identity Vacuum In Garcetti V. Ceballos, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Tending To Potted Plants: The Professional Identity Vacuum In Garcetti V. Ceballos, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Nevada Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Summary Of In Re Nevada State Engineer Ruling No. 5823, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. No 22, Alan R. Smith
Summary Of In Re Nevada State Engineer Ruling No. 5823, 129 Nev. Adv. Op. No 22, Alan R. Smith
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
Appeal from a district court decision dismissing a petition for judicial review of the State Engineer’s ruling in a water rights action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
Summary Of Club Vista Financial Servs. V. Dist. Ct., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 21, Cameron M. Daw
Summary Of Club Vista Financial Servs. V. Dist. Ct., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 21, Cameron M. Daw
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered what circumstances are necessary to allow for the deposition of an opposing party’s former attorney during discovery. The Court balanced the competing interests of discovering vital information to a litigant’s case and the importance of the attorney-client privilege.
Trial Objections From Beginning To End: The Handbook For Civil And Criminal Trials, Craig Lee Montz
Trial Objections From Beginning To End: The Handbook For Civil And Criminal Trials, Craig Lee Montz
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annexation Of The Jury's Role In Res Judicata Disputes: The Silent Migration From Question Of Fact To Question Of Law, Steven J. Madrid
Annexation Of The Jury's Role In Res Judicata Disputes: The Silent Migration From Question Of Fact To Question Of Law, Steven J. Madrid
Cornell Law Library Prize for Exemplary Student Research Papers
When the application of res judicata involves factual disputes, the jury must be the judicial actor to resolve these discrepancies. The fact-law distinction, which gives questions of fact to the jury and questions of law to the judge, has guided American courts for hundreds of years. From the time of the adoption of the Seventh Amendment until the end of the nineteenth century, courts have viewed res judicata disputes as factual determinations within the province of the jury.The migration from question of fact to question of law in the twentieth century lacked any proffered legal justification, and even as the …
The Lay Of The Land: Examining The Three Opinions In J. Mcintyre Machinery, Ltd. V. Nicastro, Adam N. Steinman
The Lay Of The Land: Examining The Three Opinions In J. Mcintyre Machinery, Ltd. V. Nicastro, Adam N. Steinman
Faculty Scholarship
It was a long time coming. The Supreme Court's decisions last Term in J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro and Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown ended a two-decade high-court hiatus from the subject of personal jurisdiction. In McIntyre, the more controversial of the two, the Court concludes that New Jersey state courts lacked jurisdiction over a British manufacturer in a suit by a New Jersey plaintiff who was injured in New Jersey by a machine purchased by his New Jersey employer. McIntyre lacks a majority opinion, however. Instead we have a four-Justice plurality authored by Justice Kennedy, a …