Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Courts (1480)
- Litigation (1193)
- Civil Law (1042)
- Constitutional Law (965)
- Jurisdiction (751)
-
- State and Local Government Law (747)
- Criminal Procedure (711)
- Torts (688)
- Supreme Court of the United States (616)
- Jurisprudence (609)
- Judges (551)
- Legislation (550)
- Administrative Law (539)
- Evidence (525)
- Criminal Law (509)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (498)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (496)
- Legal History (487)
- International Law (468)
- Contracts (467)
- Business Organizations Law (444)
- Conflict of Laws (441)
- Family Law (430)
- Law and Society (428)
- Legal Remedies (402)
- Law and Politics (393)
- Legal Profession (393)
- Other Law (388)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (607)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (382)
- West Virginia University (295)
- University of Richmond (259)
- Seattle University School of Law (254)
-
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (229)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (184)
- University of Washington School of Law (170)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (164)
- William & Mary Law School (156)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (140)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (139)
- University of Kentucky (136)
- Universitas Indonesia (126)
- University of Georgia School of Law (122)
- Pepperdine University (119)
- Cornell University Law School (115)
- Fordham Law School (109)
- UIC School of Law (104)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (97)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (91)
- Brigham Young University Law School (89)
- The University of Akron (89)
- Roger Williams University (88)
- St. Mary's University (85)
- Mercer University School of Law (79)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (79)
- Cleveland State University (72)
- University of Maine School of Law (68)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (67)
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (521)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (376)
- Civil Procedure (294)
- Discovery (185)
- Jurisdiction (181)
-
- Litigation (141)
- Class actions (136)
- Federal courts (121)
- Supreme Court (104)
- Procedure (93)
- Juries (92)
- Evidence (90)
- Due process (86)
- Personal jurisdiction (86)
- Courts (85)
- Pleading (81)
- Standing (77)
- Class action (74)
- Arbitration (70)
- Constitution (61)
- Rule 23 (61)
- New York (60)
- Constitutional law (59)
- Federal Courts (59)
- Law (59)
- Civil rights (58)
- Pleadings (58)
- Remedies (58)
- United States Supreme Court (56)
- Judges (52)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Michigan Law Review (418)
- Faculty Scholarship (331)
- West Virginia Law Review (293)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (258)
- Seattle University Law Review (228)
-
- Buffalo Law Review (169)
- Scholarly Works (156)
- Articles (146)
- Washington Law Review (144)
- Faculty Publications (141)
- University of Richmond Law Review (126)
- Law Faculty Publications (123)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (120)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (116)
- Kentucky Law Journal (115)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (111)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (104)
- Indiana Law Journal (90)
- UIC Law Review (83)
- Faculty Articles (81)
- BYU Law Review (79)
- Mercer Law Review (78)
- Pepperdine Law Review (78)
- Akron Law Review (72)
- Fordham Law Review (72)
- Supreme Court Case Files (70)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (69)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (65)
- Maine Law Review (64)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 2611 - 2640 of 6648
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Brief Of Professor Stephen E. Sachs As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Neither Party, Stephen E. Sachs
Brief Of Professor Stephen E. Sachs As Amicus Curiae In Support Of Neither Party, Stephen E. Sachs
Faculty Scholarship
The parties in this case defend two sides of a many-sided circuit split. This brief argues that a third view is correct.
If a contract requires suit in a particular forum, and the plaintiff sues somewhere else, how may the defendant raise the issue? Petitioner Atlantic Marine Construction Company suggests a motion under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(3) or 28 U.S.C. § 1406, on the theory that the contract renders venue improper. Respondent J-Crew Management, Inc. contends that venue remains proper, and that the defendant¹s only remedy is a transfer motion under § 1404.
Both sides are wrong. Forum-selection …
Protect Yourself: Why The Eleventh Circuit's Approach To Sanctions For Protective Order Violations Fails Litigants, Adam J. Fitzsimmons
Protect Yourself: Why The Eleventh Circuit's Approach To Sanctions For Protective Order Violations Fails Litigants, Adam J. Fitzsimmons
Georgia Law Review
Litigants commonly struggle to balance the need to comply with discovery requests and the desire to protect valuable trade secrets. Protective orders to help strike that balance. Questions arise, however, when one of the parties violates that protective order and discloses the opponent's confidential information. Chiefly, what remedies are available for a party whose invaluable intellectual property has been disclosed? At least one circuit has held the most common sanction, payment of attorney's fees, is unavailable for a violation of a protective order. Generally, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(b)(2) governs sanctions for violations of discovery orders, but the text …
Trial By Preview, Bert I. Huang
Trial By Preview, Bert I. Huang
Faculty Scholarship
It has been an obsession of modern civil procedure to design ways to reveal more before trial about what will happen during trial. Litigants today, as a matter of course, are made to preview the evidence they will use. This practice is celebrated because standard theory says it should induce the parties to settle; why incur the expenses of trial, if everyone knows what will happen? Rarely noted, however, is one complication: The impact of previewing the evidence is intertwined with how well the parties know their future audience-that is, the judge or the jury who will be the finder …
They Were Meant For Each Other: Professor Edward Cooper And The Rules Enabling Act, Mark R. Kravitz, David F. Levi, Lee H. Rosenthal, Anthomy J. Scricia
They Were Meant For Each Other: Professor Edward Cooper And The Rules Enabling Act, Mark R. Kravitz, David F. Levi, Lee H. Rosenthal, Anthomy J. Scricia
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Protecting The Right Of Citizens To Aggregate Small Claims Against Businesses, Paul D. Carrington
Protecting The Right Of Citizens To Aggregate Small Claims Against Businesses, Paul D. Carrington
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Twelve-Person Federal Civil Jury In Exile, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
Twelve-Person Federal Civil Jury In Exile, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Disaggregating, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Disaggregating, Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Scholarly Works
Commonality is a defining characteristic of mass-tort litigation. But mass-tort claimants typically do not share enough in common to warrant class certification. That is, commonality does not predominate. Yet, without class certification, judges cannot conclude these cases as a unit absent a private settlement.
This paradox prompts two questions. First, what level of commonality justifies aggregating mass torts, shorn of Rule 23’s procedural protections? And, second, should the federal judicial system continue to centralize claims with nominal commonality when judges typically cannot resolve them collectively absent a private settlement? This Article’s title suggests one answer: if minimal commonality continues to …
Erie's International Effect, Michael Steven Green
Summary Of Butwinick V. Hepner, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 65, Robert Stewart
Summary Of Butwinick V. Hepner, 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 65, Robert Stewart
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered Respondents’ motion to substitute themselves as the real parties in interest after acquiring Appellants’ rights and interests in the underlying district court action at a judgment execution sale, and to dismiss Appellants’ appeal from a district court order.
Summary Of Beazer Homes Holding Corp. V. Dist. Ct., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 66, Jamie Stilz-Outlaw
Summary Of Beazer Homes Holding Corp. V. Dist. Ct., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 66, Jamie Stilz-Outlaw
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered the ability of a homeowners’ association (HOA) to litigate construction-defect claims on behalf of its members’ homes under NRS 116.3102(1)(d) without fulfilling NRCP 23 class action requirements.
Summary Of Casey V. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 64, Casey Seale
Summary Of Casey V. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 64, Casey Seale
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
An appeal of a motion to confirm an arbitration award that the Court summarily granted without reviewing the arbitration record and without giving the nonmovant an opportunity to file an opposition to the motion.
Application Of Digital Forensic Science To Electronic Discovery In Civil Litigation, Brian Roux
Application Of Digital Forensic Science To Electronic Discovery In Civil Litigation, Brian Roux
LSU New Orleans Theses and Dissertations
Following changes to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 2006 dealing with the role of Electronically Stored Information, digital forensics is becoming necessary to the discovery process in civil litigation. The development of case law interpreting the rule changes since their enactment defines how digital forensics can be applied to the discovery process, the scope of discovery, and the duties imposed on parties. Herein, pertinent cases are examined to determine what trends exist and how they effect the field. These observations buttress case studies involving discovery failures in large corporate contexts along with insights on the technical reasons those …
Summary Of Aspen Financial Services Inc. V. Dist. Ct., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 57, Oscar Peralta
Summary Of Aspen Financial Services Inc. V. Dist. Ct., 128 Nev. Adv. Op. 57, Oscar Peralta
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
The Court considered a petition for a writ of prohibition or mandamus in response to a district court’s denial of a motion to stay certain testimonial discovery in a civil proceeding occurring simultaneously to a criminal investigation.
Irregularities In Procedure – Reconsidering Section 392, Pearlie M. C. Koh
Irregularities In Procedure – Reconsidering Section 392, Pearlie M. C. Koh
Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law
In corporate administration, procedures, and their due compliance, are often of as much significance as the outcomes of the proceedings they regulate. The consequence of a failure to comply with procedures, whether laid down statutorily or in the company's constitution, is often the invalidation of the subject proceeding. Such invalidation may perhaps be justified on the basis that faithful compliance does much to foster a perception that the outcomes determined at the proceedings so held are fair, a perception that is vitally important to the acceptability of the outcome by all concerned. Nevertheless, it is also the case that corporate …
Standing To Sue A Carrier's Killers , Davis J. Howard
Standing To Sue A Carrier's Killers , Davis J. Howard
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Child's Right To Be Heard And Represented In Judicial Proceedings , Howard A. Davidson
The Child's Right To Be Heard And Represented In Judicial Proceedings , Howard A. Davidson
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Qualified Immunity: When Is A Loss Ultimately A Win?, Michael J. Hooi
Qualified Immunity: When Is A Loss Ultimately A Win?, Michael J. Hooi
Florida Law Review
No abstract provided.
Distilling Minimum Due Process Requirements For Punitive Damages Awards, Benjamin J. Robinson
Distilling Minimum Due Process Requirements For Punitive Damages Awards, Benjamin J. Robinson
Florida Law Review
No abstract provided.
Does A Cartel Aim Expressly? Trusting Calder Personal Jurisdiction When Antitrust Goes Global, Larry Dougherty
Does A Cartel Aim Expressly? Trusting Calder Personal Jurisdiction When Antitrust Goes Global, Larry Dougherty
Florida Law Review
This Note suggests that while Calder jurisdiction fits well with some types of antitrust allegations, the Calder analogy weakens when charges of broad-based anticompetitive conduct collide with the long-arm statutes of particular states. The risk of forcing the analogy too far, of course, is a violation of due process. Part II of this Note reviews the facts and holding of Calder, and some of the key cases that followed it. Part III addresses the question of how the effects test might be different for antitrust complaints. Part IV reviews one type of anticompetitive conduct that seems to place particular …
Confusion And Unpredictability In Shareholder Derivative Litigation: The Delaware Courts' Response To Recent Corporate Scandals, Ann M. Scarlett
Confusion And Unpredictability In Shareholder Derivative Litigation: The Delaware Courts' Response To Recent Corporate Scandals, Ann M. Scarlett
Florida Law Review
The Delaware courts responded to the recent wave of corporate scandals, exemplified by Enron and WorldCom, by changing their approach to shareholder derivative litigation. This Article analyzes the Delaware courts’ response to these scandals and concludes that the courts have created doctrinal confusion and introduced unpredictability into derivative litigation. This Article also analyzes the future negative consequences for shareholders, corporations, directors, investors, and other litigants. Finally, this Article proposes improvements for derivative litigation that may alleviate the confusion and unpredictability created by the Delaware courts’ response to the recent scandals
Florida's Eminent Domain Overhaul: Creating More Problems Than It Solved, Scott J. Kennelly
Florida's Eminent Domain Overhaul: Creating More Problems Than It Solved, Scott J. Kennelly
Florida Law Review
This Note initially discusses how the Florida Legislature’s reaction to Kelo v. City of New London was unnecessary. However, accepting that the legislature felt the influence of the body politic to enact significant eminent domain reform, this Note argues that the legislature did not fully consider the consequences of its actions. Instead, the legislature’s measures were overly broad and created ambiguity. Additionally, the measures will have unintended consequences that could leave landowners and the community worse off than under the previous system. Finally, this Note offers solutions that would both provide Florida with a more comprehensive eminent domain framework and …
Substantive Due Process Limits On Punitive Damages Awards: "Morals Without Technique"?, F. Patrick Hubbard
Substantive Due Process Limits On Punitive Damages Awards: "Morals Without Technique"?, F. Patrick Hubbard
Florida Law Review
In a series of cases decided over the last two decades, the Supreme Court has used the Due Process Clause to establish a procedural and substantive framework for awarding punitive damages. Initially, the substantive aspects of this framework were sufficiently clear and flexible that they required little change in the system and probably generated a helpful level of debate and uniformity as to some basic requirements for awards. However, in BMW of North America, Inc. v. Gore, the Court adopted an approach characterized by a lack of clarity and consistency, an inadequate basis in theory and policy, and ad …
Three Faces Of Supplemental Jurisdiction After The Demise Of United Mine Workers V. Gibbs, C. Douglas Floyd
Three Faces Of Supplemental Jurisdiction After The Demise Of United Mine Workers V. Gibbs, C. Douglas Floyd
Florida Law Review
In a post-Gibbs world, three competing views of the permissible scope of federal subject matter jurisdiction over non-diverse state law claims have emerged. First, a “delegation” model, which reads the Constitution to have delegated to Congress an apparently unrestricted power to define the scope of an Article III case or controversy, provided at least one claim in the action falls within the scope of Article III. Second, a “factual relationship” model, which seeks to give more precise content to Gibbs’s “common nucleus of operative fact” standard and to distinguish it from the “same transaction or occurrence” joinder standard …
Mandatory Class Action Lawsuits As A Restructuring Technique, Bryant B. Edwards, Jeffrey A. Herbst, Selina K. Hewitt
Mandatory Class Action Lawsuits As A Restructuring Technique, Bryant B. Edwards, Jeffrey A. Herbst, Selina K. Hewitt
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
The New Uniform Statute Of Limitations For Federal Securities Fraud Actions: Its Evolution, Its Impact, And A Call For Reform, Anthony Michael Sabino
The New Uniform Statute Of Limitations For Federal Securities Fraud Actions: Its Evolution, Its Impact, And A Call For Reform, Anthony Michael Sabino
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
California Practicum: A Guide To Coordination Of Civil Actions In California, Darren L. Brooks
California Practicum: A Guide To Coordination Of Civil Actions In California, Darren L. Brooks
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Cooperative Agreements: Government-To-Government Relations To Foster Reservation Business Development, Joel H. Mack, Gwyn Goodson Timms
Cooperative Agreements: Government-To-Government Relations To Foster Reservation Business Development, Joel H. Mack, Gwyn Goodson Timms
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Scientific Evidence In The Age Of Daubert: A Proposal For A Dual Standard Of Admissibility In Civil And Criminal Cases , William P. Haney Iii
Scientific Evidence In The Age Of Daubert: A Proposal For A Dual Standard Of Admissibility In Civil And Criminal Cases , William P. Haney Iii
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Judicial And Legislative Jurisdiction Over Entities Abroad: The Long-Arm Of U.S. Antitrust Law And Viable Solutions Beyond The Timberlane/Restatement Comity Approach, Michael G. Mckinnon
Federal Judicial And Legislative Jurisdiction Over Entities Abroad: The Long-Arm Of U.S. Antitrust Law And Viable Solutions Beyond The Timberlane/Restatement Comity Approach, Michael G. Mckinnon
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Toward A Balanced Approach To "Frivolous" Litigation: A Critical Review Of Federal Rule 11 And State Sanctions Provisions , Byron C. Keeling
Toward A Balanced Approach To "Frivolous" Litigation: A Critical Review Of Federal Rule 11 And State Sanctions Provisions , Byron C. Keeling
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.