Civil Procedure Commons^™

N.Y. General Municipal Law Section 50-E(5): Ameliorating New York's Notice Of Claim Requirements, Lawrence M. Nessenson, Lawrence M. Nessenson, Lawrence M. Nessenson, Lawrence M. Nessenson

Fordham Urban Law Journal

A multitude of provisions scattered throughout New York's consolidated and unconsolidated laws require that plaintiffs serve "notice of claim" of their tort actions on defendant public corporations. New York General Municipal Law section 50-e governs New York procedure for serving this notice of claim upon public corporations including when and upon whom service should be made, the form and contents of the notice of claim, and how notice of claim may be served. Compliance with the requirements of section 50-e is a condition precedent to commencement of a tort action against a public corporation wherever such notice of claim is …

Book Review. Civil Procedure In Japan By Takaaki Hattori And Dan Fenno Henderson, Bryant G. Garth

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Seattle Times, Co. V. Rhinehart, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Article III of the United States Constitution does not Grant Congress the Power to Extend United States Courts' Jurisdiction over Suits by Foreign Plaintiffs against Foreign Defendants

====================

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(B), the Courts have the Power to Impose Sanction of Personal Jurisdiction when a Party Fails to Comply with Discovery Order

====================

Foreign Sovereign Immunity--A Strict Construction of the Concept of Instrumentalities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

Civil Procedure - Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure - Scope Of Rule 3 - Tolling The Statute Of Limitations - Conflict Between Rule 3 And State Tolling Statute, Pamela J. Zepka

Duquesne Law Review

The United States Supreme Court has determined that in a federal diversity action, Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is not broad enough to displace an integral state tolling provision for purposes of tolling the state statute of limitations.

Walker v. Armco Steel Corp., 446 U.S. 740 (1980).

Essay--Prejudgment Attachments And The Concept Of The Neutral Magistrate: A Tale Of Two Cases, James Audley Mclaughlin

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Sneaker Circus V. Carter: Import Relief - Jurisdiction Of Federal District Courts In International Trade Disputes, James Haynes

Maryland Journal of International Law

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure--Concepts Of Personal Jurisdiction Before And After Shaffer V. Heitner, James E. Showen

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Recent Cases, Cornelia H. Boozman, R. Preston Bolt, Jr., Kenneth L. Stewart

Vanderbilt Law Review

Administrative Law--Ripeness--Agency Head's Informal Opinion Letters Held Unripe for Review When No Substantial Hardship Placed on Parties

Cornelia H. Boozman

The basic premise of the ripeness doctrine is that judicial machinery should operate only on concrete problems that are present or imminent, not on problems that are abstract, hypothetical,or remote... The Supreme Court articulated a more definitive standard for determining ripeness in "Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner." Espousing what it considered to be the basic rationale of the ripeness doctrine, avoidance of premature adjudication of discretionary administrative policies, the Court established a procedure for evaluating the ripeness issue in challenges to …

Chapters Of The Civil Jury, Doug Rendleman

Scholarly Articles

The civil jury, though constitutionally protected by the seventh amendment, has remained a controversial institution throughout much of Anglo-American legal history. Our romantic ideals are questioned by critics who view the civil jury as prejudiced and unpredictable; proponents note the sense of fairness and "earthy wisdom" gained by community participation in the legal process. This debate surfaces in the process of accommodation between certain substantive goals of the law and the pre-verdict and post-verdict procedural devices courts have employed to control the jury. In this article, Professor Rendleman examines this conflict in his three "chapters" involving racially motivated discharges of …

Civil Procedure--Jurisdiction--The West Virginia Long-Arm Statute, John A. Rollins

West Virginia Law Review

In 1957 the West Virginia legislature enacted a statute which provides that in certain instances foreign corporations would be deemed to be doing business in this state for the purpose of service of process. In enacting this "long-arm" statute, West Virginia joined many other states in taking advantage of the United States Supreme Court's decisions that expanded the extent to which states could exercise personal jurisdiction over nonresidents within the limits of due process. However, upon comparing the jurisdiction afforded by the West Virginia statute to that exercised under other long-arm statutes, it becomes apparent that this state has taken …

Recent Cases, Sara P. Walsh, Don B. Cannada, Frances L. Adams, William T. Luedke, Iv

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Procedure - Appellate Jurisdiction - Orders Denying Disqualification of Counsel on Ethical Grounds Are Not Final Decisions Subject to Immediate Review Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Sara Porter Walsh

Petitioner,' an applicant for a Federal Communications Commission (FCC) broadcasting license, sought interlocutory review of a Commission order' denying a motion to disqualify the law firm that had represented competitor RKO for thirty years. Petitioner alleged that participation by the firm, which included an attorney who was chairman of the FCC while RKO's application was under consideration, constituted a violation of Canons Five and Nine' of the ABA Code of …

Fears V. Lunsford, 314 So. 2d 578 (Fla. 1975), Diane Kay Kiesling

Florida State University Law Review

Civil Procedure- VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL- PLAINTIFF'S RIGHT TO TAKE VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL IS ABSOLUTE; OR PLAINTIFF GETS A SECOND CHANCE.

The Use Of Comparative Law In Teaching American Civil Procedure, Sidney B. Jacoby

Cleveland State Law Review

The use of comparative law can enhance the teaching of American civil procedure, especially by a comparison of foreign form book material with American forms. In this way, with some basic knowledge of comparative civil procedure, the student will better appreciate our own concepts and will also understand some fundamental principles of the civil procedure of civil law countries when he is confronted with them in private practice

Kentucky Law Survey: Civil Procedure, William H. Fortune

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

This article provides a survey of civil procedure developments in the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The most significant civil procedure case decided by the Kentucky Court of Appeals during the period covered by this Survey is Nazareth Literary and Benevolent Institution v. Stephenson. That case, which deals with discovery of privileged communications, may have created problems that will require legislative action. Other decisions by the Court during this period serve to illustrate and amplify existing procedural points. The more important of these decisions will be briefly discussed prior to the consideration of Stephenson.

Recent Cases, Author Unidentified

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Procedure--Service of Process--California Long-Arm Statutes Abrogate State's Immunity Doctrine

Seeking recovery of money owed him by defendant European corporations;' plaintiff brought suit in a California state court.While attending federal district court in Florida for the sole purpose of giving a deposition in a trademark infringement suit instituted by one of the corporations, defendants' representative was personally served with process in the California action on behalf of himself and the defendant corporations. Defendants moved to quash service of process on the ground that the immunity rule prohibited service of civil process upon a witness in attendance in a court outside …

Voluntary Dismissals And The Savings Statute: Has Rule 41(A) Changed The Law, J. Patrick Browne

Cleveland State Law Review

Prior to the adoption of the new Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure, it had been held that a suit voluntarily dismissed could not be refiled under the provisions of the savings statute. Ohio Civil Rule 41(A) replaced the prior Code section providing for voluntary dis- missals and, by its language, suggested that at least one refiling of the suit would be permitted under the savings statute. However, the one reported judicial decision squarely on point at the time of this writing, Brookman v. Northern Trading Co., rejects the apparent purpose of Rule 41 (A) and adheres to the pre-Rule view …

Jurisdiction: Federal Court, Federal Question; Taxation: State; Tribal Courts: Judicial Immunity; Indian Civil Rights Act: Federal Jurisdiction; Rights Of Way: Railroads; Jurisdiction, Federal Courts: Exhaustion Of Tribal Remedies; Equal Protection: Illegitimates; Civil Procedure: Full Faith And Credit

American Indian Law Review

No abstract provided.

Capacity To Sue: The Developing 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Exception To The Federal Rule 17(B) Domicile Principle

Washington and Lee Law Review

No abstract provided.

Zahn V. International Paper Co. - The Aggregation Principle And Its Effect On Jurisdiction In Rule 23 (B)(3) Class Actions, Zygmont A. Pines

Cleveland State Law Review

The course of the present inquiry begins with a consideration of the current obstacles confronting a diversity (b) (3) class action and proceeds toward an analysis of such considerations and the re- sulting ramifications, Special emphasis is placed on the policy aspects of the aggregation doctrine, the jurisdictional amount statute (28 U.S.C. § 1332), and the modern class action device, with specific reference to the problematic condition of the current judicial system.'

Recent Cases, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Civil Procedure--Class Actions--Order Dismissing Class Action that Leaves Plaintiff To Litigate a Small Monetary Claim Is Not a Final Appealable Order Under 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Plaintiff consumer, claiming to represent one and one-half million purchasers of defendants" products, filed a class action under section 4 of the Clayton Act, seeking treble damages, costs, and attorney's fees from defendants for alleged antitrust violations. Defendants successfully moved for a stay of proceedings pending the district court's determination of whether the case could be maintained as a class action.The court found the class unmanageable and, in accordance with Rule 23(c)(1) of the …

Venue Of Civil Actions In Kentucky, William H. Fortune

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

The purpose of this paper is primarily to analyze Kentucky’s venue statutes, and secondarily to suggest the path to reform. The paper is divided into four parts. Part I is a brief history of the confusion in Kentucky between jurisdiction and venue. Some exposure to this history is essential to an understanding of the older cases, which in some areas are the only cases in point. Part II is an analysis of the four major venue statutes in KRS Chapter 454: KRS § 452.400—actions involving land; KRS § 452.450-actions against corporations; KRS § 452.460—actions for personal injury or property damage; …

Excessive Delay In The Courts: Toward A Continuance Policy Relating To Counsel And Parties, Thomas O. Gorman

Cleveland State Law Review

The maxim "Justice delayed is justice denied" is an expression which is becoming all too meaningful in our courts today. Many of the large metropolitan courts in this country are being strangled by the ever-increasing backlog of cases. ...In most court systems, continuance policies are either non-existent or couched in vague terms such as "good cause shown.' It is the aim of this study to formulate guidelines for a sound continuance policy which will serve to speed the administration of justice without interfering with the high standard of judicial fairness necessary to proper adjudication.

Preserving Objections To In Personam Jurisdiction - Ohio's Persistent Shibboleth, J. Patrick Browne

Cleveland State Law Review

The scenario is commonplace: Plaintiff causes summons to be served on the defendant. The defendant believes the summons is fatally defective, or the service is faulty, or that, for some reason or another, the court in which the action is brought cannot lawfully obtain jurisdiction over his person. Accordingly, he files a motion to quash and set aside the summons, or a motion to dismiss for want of in personam jurisdiction. As so frequently happens, the court does not quite see the wisdom of defendant's position, and overrules the motion. Usually, the court's journal entry will note that the defendant's …

Pendent Jurisdiction - The Problem Of "Pendenting Parties", William H. Fortune

Law Faculty Scholarly Articles

Federal courts have generally discouraged the joinder of a third party solely on the basis of a claim pendent to a federal cause of action. They have, however, been more liberal in allowing joinder in diversity cases. The author reviews the case law and argues that a more liberal attitude toward joinder should be adopted, except in diversity cases where, he believes, liberal joinder erodes the requirement of complete diversity.

Declaratory Remedies And Constitutional Change, David L. Dickson

Vanderbilt Law Review

The Federal Declaratory Judgment Act' has now been law for more than 36 years. The debates over whether a purely declaratory judgment can be the product of a justiciable "controversy" in the constitutional sense have long since passed away, set to rest by the language of the Act itself and by the Supreme Court's decision that the Act was authorized by the judiciary article of the Constitution. The last edition of Professor Borchard's great work, Declaratory Judgments, was published in 1941,and the most recent article analyzing the constitutional significance of the Act was published shortly before Chief Justice Warren took …

Rule 41 (B), Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure - Is A Specifying Dismissal Order Unimpeachable? - Weissinger V. United States

Maryland Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Removal And Injunction To Protect Political Expression And Racial Equality: A Proposed Change, Christopher B. Mueller

Publications

No abstract provided.

Special Appearances Under The Rules Of Civil Procedure, Ray L. Hampton Ii

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, John Welton Fisher Ii

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.