Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (49)
- Litigation (21)
- Courts (17)
- Contracts (15)
- Jurisprudence (10)
-
- Civil Law (9)
- Other Law (9)
- International Law (8)
- Jurisdiction (8)
- Business Organizations Law (6)
- Conflict of Laws (6)
- Judges (6)
- Labor and Employment Law (6)
- Legal Remedies (6)
- Commercial Law (4)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (4)
- Legal History (4)
- Legislation (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Supreme Court of the United States (4)
- Administrative Law (3)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (3)
- Constitutional Law (3)
- Consumer Protection Law (3)
- Criminal Procedure (3)
- Insurance Law (3)
- Torts (3)
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (10)
- University of Georgia School of Law (5)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
-
- University of Michigan Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- New York Law School (2)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (2)
- Pace University (2)
- Southern Methodist University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri School of Law (2)
- University of Richmond (2)
- West Virginia University (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Association of American Law Schools (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Roger Williams University (1)
- St. John's University School of Law (1)
- St. Thomas University College of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- Universitas Indonesia (1)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (1)
- University of Colorado Law School (1)
- University of Washington School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Scholarly Works (13)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (3)
-
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (2)
- Faculty Publications (2)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (2)
- West Virginia Law Review (2)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (1)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Circuit Court Opinions (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Working Papers (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Indiana Journal of Law and Social Equality (1)
- Journal of Legal Education (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law Review (1)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (1)
- Maurer Theses and Dissertations (1)
- NYLS Law Review (1)
- Northwestern University Law Review (1)
- Notre Dame Law Review (1)
- Pace International Law Review (1)
- Pepperdine Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 61 - 70 of 70
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Recent case developments in Insurance Law in the years 1999 and 2000.
Contracting Access To The Courts: Myth Or Reality? Bane Or Boon?, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Contracting Access To The Courts: Myth Or Reality? Bane Or Boon?, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Many scholars of the dispute resolution system perceive a sea change in attitudes toward adjudication that took place in the mid-1970s. Among the events of the time included the Pound Conference, which put the Chief Justice of the United States and the national judicial establishment on record in favor of at least some refinement, if not restriction, on access to courts. In addition, Chief Justice Burger, the driving force behind the Pound Conference, also used his bully pulpit as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court to promote ADR, particularly court-annexed arbitration. The availability of judicial adjuncts such as court-annexed arbitration …
New Paradigm, Normal Science, Or Crumbling Construct? Trends In Adjudicatory Procedure And Litigation Reform, Jeffrey W. Stempel
New Paradigm, Normal Science, Or Crumbling Construct? Trends In Adjudicatory Procedure And Litigation Reform, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
One aspect of a possible new era is the increasing ad hoc activity of various interest groups, including the bench and the organized bar, primarily pursued through official organizations such as the Judicial Conference, the Federal Judicial Center, the American Bar Association (“ABA”), and the American Law Institute. Traditionally, of course, judges and lawyers have lobbied Congress and state legislatures for litigation change, as demonstrated by the saga of the Rules Enabling Act (“Enabling Act” or “Act”). But, the legal profession's more recent “political” activity regarding litigation reform differs from the traditional model in several ways. First, the participation of …
A Better Approach To Arbitrability, Jeffrey W. Stempel
A Better Approach To Arbitrability, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Historically, Anglo-American courts refused to enforce arbitration agreements, jealously guarding their dispute resolution monopoly. During the early twentieth century, merchants and attorneys began seeking legislation requiring courts to defer to arbitration. The United States Abitration Act took effect January 1, 1926 and has remained essentially unchanged. It was written with the implicit assumption that it would be invoked by commercial actors having relatively equal bargaining power and emotive appeal to a jury. The Act says nothing to direct the court's inquiry concerning the quality of either party's assent to the arbitration clause other than requiring a written arbitration agreement and …
Reconsidering The Employment Contract Exclusion In Section 1 Of The Federal Arbitration Act: Correcting The Judiciary's Failure Of Statutory Vision, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Reconsidering The Employment Contract Exclusion In Section 1 Of The Federal Arbitration Act: Correcting The Judiciary's Failure Of Statutory Vision, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
The Federal Arbitration Act (the Act), seeks to eliminate centuries of perceived judicial hostility toward arbitration agreements. The Act made written arbitration agreements involving interstate commerce specifically enforceable. It also provided a procedural structure for enforcing awards, which were protected through deferential judicial review. The Act intended to have a wide reach, employing a broad definition of commerce that has presumably grown in breadth along with the expansion of judicial notions of commerce. Although courts applied the Act in tentative and cautious fashion until the 1960's, arbitration gained momentum during the 1970's and the 1980's. Despite growing judicial enthusiasm for …
Integrating Dispute Resolution Into Standard First-Year Courses: The Missouri Plan, Leonard L. Riskin, James E. Westbrook
Integrating Dispute Resolution Into Standard First-Year Courses: The Missouri Plan, Leonard L. Riskin, James E. Westbrook
Journal of Legal Education
No abstract provided.
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Report On Survey Of The Bar, Committee On Federal Courts Of The New York State Bar Association
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Getting A Full Bite Of The Apple: When Should The Doctrine Of Issue Preclusion Make An Administrative Or Arbitral Determination Binding In A Court Of Law?, Jay C. Carlisle
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
In recent years, alternative means of dispute resolution have become important resources. Therefore, the question of when the determination of issues at administrative hearings and arbitrations should be granted preclusive effect in subsequent judicial litigations requires critical evaluation. Part I of this Article focuses on the general evolution of issue preclusion in New York. Part II discusses recent New York case law giving preclusive effect to administrative and arbitral issue determinations in subsequent state court proceedings. Part III analyzes the policy reasons for applying issue preclusion to administrative and arbitral issue determinations in such proceedings. Part IV concludes that the …
Commercial Arbitrations And Awards, M. S. Brechenridge
Commercial Arbitrations And Awards, M. S. Brechenridge
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Arbitration As A Judicial Process Of Law. A New Era In Legal Procedure Created By The New York And New Jersey Statutes. The Principles And The Practice Defined, Joseph Wheless
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.