Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Civil Procedure Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

William & Mary Law School

Discipline
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 121 - 150 of 156

Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure

The Supreme Court's Backwards Proportionaility Jurisprudence: Comparing Judicial Review Of Excessive Criminal Punishments And Excessive Punitive Damages Award, Adam M. Gershowitz Sep 2000

The Supreme Court's Backwards Proportionaility Jurisprudence: Comparing Judicial Review Of Excessive Criminal Punishments And Excessive Punitive Damages Award, Adam M. Gershowitz

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


Focus On Business And Complex Litigation Courts, Paula Hannaford-Agor, David Rottman, Roxana Gonzalez Aug 2000

Focus On Business And Complex Litigation Courts, Paula Hannaford-Agor, David Rottman, Roxana Gonzalez

Popular Media

On November 16, 1999, the National Center for State Courts convened a Justice Roundtable at which representatives from the Delaware, New York, and California business and complex litigation courts described their respective procedures to an audience of judicial, corporate and bar leaders. The Justice Roundtable is an annual joint meeting of the National Center's Board of Directors and Lawyers and Corporate Counsel Committees dedicated to a current issue in the administration of justice. The purpose of this Roundtable was to discuss innovative methods and successful approaches for managing business and complex litigation, and to identify the principle issues and problems. …


Deciding To Decide: Class Action Certification And Interlocutory Review By The United States Courts Of Appeals Under Rule 23(F), Michael E. Solimine, Christine Oliver Hines May 2000

Deciding To Decide: Class Action Certification And Interlocutory Review By The United States Courts Of Appeals Under Rule 23(F), Michael E. Solimine, Christine Oliver Hines

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Utilizing Statistics And Bellwether Trials In Mass Torts: What Do The Constitution And Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Permit?, R. Joseph Barton Dec 1999

Utilizing Statistics And Bellwether Trials In Mass Torts: What Do The Constitution And Federal Rules Of Civil Procedure Permit?, R. Joseph Barton

William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal

Traditional judicial mechanisms that preserve litigants' rights to due process and a jury trial challenge courts to provide litigants their day in court in an efficient and timely manner. This challenge is made exponentially harder where the litigation concerns tortious conduct affecting a large number of persons and giving rise to latent injury. In response to the recent increase in mass tort filings, courts have sought an alternative means of adjudication-the extrapolation of a statistically average, representative plaintiff to other plaintiffs. This Note examines the problems associated with mass tort actions and how two circuit courts of appeals have implemented …


Arbitration And Reform In Private Securities Litigation: Dealing With The Meritorious As Well As The Frivolous, Steven A. Ramirez Apr 1999

Arbitration And Reform In Private Securities Litigation: Dealing With The Meritorious As Well As The Frivolous, Steven A. Ramirez

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Creating The 'Portable' Guardianship: Legal And Practical Implications Of Probate Court Cooperation In Interstate Guardianship Cases, Charlene D. Daniel, Paula Hannaford-Agor Jan 1999

Creating The 'Portable' Guardianship: Legal And Practical Implications Of Probate Court Cooperation In Interstate Guardianship Cases, Charlene D. Daniel, Paula Hannaford-Agor

Faculty Publications

In this article, we discuss the legal and practical issues associ­ated with interstate guardianships--that is, those guardianships in which the ward has ties to more than one state. Part I addresses these issues in the context of jurisdictional questions, securing nec­essary information, judicial monitoring and enforcement of guardi­anship orders, and property management. Part II proposes some modest solutions to these problems, many borrowed from other ar­eas of law (e.g., child support enforcement, child custody determinations, enforcement of civil protection orders, involuntary civil commitment).

This abstract has been taken from the authors' introduction.


The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: The Views Of Trial Participants, Judges, And Jurors, Valerie P. Hans, Paula Hannaford-Agor, G. Thomas Munsterman Jan 1999

The Arizona Jury Reform Permitting Civil Jury Trial Discussions: The Views Of Trial Participants, Judges, And Jurors, Valerie P. Hans, Paula Hannaford-Agor, G. Thomas Munsterman

Faculty Publications

In 1995, the Arizona Supreme Court reformed the jury trial process by allowing civil jurors to discuss the evidence presented during trial prior to their formal deliberations. This Article examines and evaluates the theoretical, legal, and policy issues raised by this reform and presents the early results of a field experiment that tested the impact of trial discussions. Jurors, judges, attorneys, and litigants in civil jury trials in Arizona were questioned regarding their observations, experi­ences, and reactions during trial as well as what they perceived to be the benefits and drawbacks of juror discussions. The data revealed that the majority …


The Current State Of The Peremptory Challenge, Coburn R. Beck Mar 1998

The Current State Of The Peremptory Challenge, Coburn R. Beck

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


How Judges View Civil Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, B. Michael Dann, G. Thomas Munsterman Jan 1998

How Judges View Civil Juries, Paula Hannaford-Agor, B. Michael Dann, G. Thomas Munsterman

Faculty Publications

In any given case, the judge's view of the jury may mani­fest itself as a complex and subtle mixture of respect, gratitude, con­cern, pride, impatience, and even frustration. But more revealing than what judges say about juries is what judges do to prepare jurors for their roles in civil cases. This paper explores the various indicators of judges' views of the civil jury, including the social and institutional factors and contemporary jury reform efforts that affect judges' views about the civil jury.

This abstract has been taken from the authors' introduction.


Civil Commitment And The "Great Confinement" Revisited: Straightjacketing Individual Rights, Stifling Culture, William Hoffman Pincus May 1995

Civil Commitment And The "Great Confinement" Revisited: Straightjacketing Individual Rights, Stifling Culture, William Hoffman Pincus

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Presumed Frivolous: Application Of Stringent Pleading Requirements In Civil Rights Litigation, Douglas A. Blaze May 1990

Presumed Frivolous: Application Of Stringent Pleading Requirements In Civil Rights Litigation, Douglas A. Blaze

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Inadvertent Waiver Of The Attorney-Client Privilege By Disclosure Of Documents: An Economic Analysis, Alan J. Meese Jan 1990

Inadvertent Waiver Of The Attorney-Client Privilege By Disclosure Of Documents: An Economic Analysis, Alan J. Meese

Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.


The Right To Appointed Counsel For Indigent Civil Litigants: The Demands Of Due Process, William L. Dick Jr. Apr 1989

The Right To Appointed Counsel For Indigent Civil Litigants: The Demands Of Due Process, William L. Dick Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Modern Status Of The Rules Permitting A Judge To Punish Direct Contempt Summarily, Teresa S. Hanger Apr 1986

The Modern Status Of The Rules Permitting A Judge To Punish Direct Contempt Summarily, Teresa S. Hanger

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Chapters Of The Civil Jury, Doug R. Rendleman Jan 1977

Chapters Of The Civil Jury, Doug R. Rendleman

Faculty Publications

The civil jury, though constitutionally protected by the seventh amendment, has remained a controversial institution throughout much of Anglo-American legal history. Our romantic ideals are questioned by critics who view the civil jury as prejudiced and unpredictable; proponents note the sense of fairness and "earthy wisdom" gained by community participation in the legal process. This debate surfaces in the process of accommodation between certain substantive goals of the law and the pre-verdict and post-verdict procedural devices courts have employed to control the jury. In this article, Professor Rendleman examines this conflict in his three "chapters" involving racially motivated discharges of …


Restricted Venue In Suits Against National Banks: A Procedural Anachronism Oct 1973

Restricted Venue In Suits Against National Banks: A Procedural Anachronism

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Practice And Pleading (15th Annual Survey Of Virginia Law), W. Taylor Reveley Iii Jan 1970

Practice And Pleading (15th Annual Survey Of Virginia Law), W. Taylor Reveley Iii

Faculty Publications

After quickly outlining recent, legislation in the field of practice and pleading, this Article proceeds to a more detailed treatment of pertinent judicial developments. Several of the Supreme Court of Appeals' decisions merit close attention, principally Rakes v. Fulcher and Sullivan v. Little Hunting' Park, Inc. Recurrent in the discussion of the judicial opinions is concern not only with the announced law, but also with the manner of the announcement-concern, that is, with both the legal results and the legal craftsmanship. Organizationally, an attempt has been made to discuss the judicial material at the time of its "moment of truth" …


Book Review Of The Biography Of A Legal Dispute, Charles E. Torcia May 1969

Book Review Of The Biography Of A Legal Dispute, Charles E. Torcia

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Federal Procedure (1959-1967), Dudley Warner Woodbridge Jan 1968

Federal Procedure (1959-1967), Dudley Warner Woodbridge

Virginia Bar Notes

No abstract provided.


Federal Procedure - Standing Of Class Representing Organizations - Smith V. The Bd. Of Educ., 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966), Robert Wick Oct 1967

Federal Procedure - Standing Of Class Representing Organizations - Smith V. The Bd. Of Educ., 365 F.2d 770 (8th Cir. 1966), Robert Wick

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Federal Procedure - Diversity Jurisdiction - Unincorporated Labor Unions. United Steelworkers Of America V. Bouligny, 86 S. Ct. 272 (1965), David K. Sutelan May 1966

Federal Procedure - Diversity Jurisdiction - Unincorporated Labor Unions. United Steelworkers Of America V. Bouligny, 86 S. Ct. 272 (1965), David K. Sutelan

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Motion To Strike Out The Evidence In Virginia, J. Brendel Jan 1965

The Motion To Strike Out The Evidence In Virginia, J. Brendel

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Book Review Of Civil Practice In Municipla And Country Courts, Shannon T. Mason Jr. Oct 1961

Book Review Of Civil Practice In Municipla And Country Courts, Shannon T. Mason Jr.

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Summary Judgment In Virginia, Thomas D. Terry Mar 1960

Summary Judgment In Virginia, Thomas D. Terry

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Book Review Of Handbook Of The Virginia Rules Of Procedure In Actions At Law, Thomas D. Terry Mar 1960

Book Review Of Handbook Of The Virginia Rules Of Procedure In Actions At Law, Thomas D. Terry

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Some Problems Of Removal And Appeal From Courts Not Of Record In Virginia, Harmon D. Maxson Oct 1959

Some Problems Of Removal And Appeal From Courts Not Of Record In Virginia, Harmon D. Maxson

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Rule 3:21, John E. Messick Oct 1957

Rule 3:21, John E. Messick

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Procedure, Section I - The Pleading Stage (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), Montgomery Knight Jr. May 1956

Procedure, Section I - The Pleading Stage (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), Montgomery Knight Jr.

William and Mary Review of Virginia Law

No abstract provided.


Procedure, Section Ii - Issue For Jury (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), James A. Leftwich May 1956

Procedure, Section Ii - Issue For Jury (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), James A. Leftwich

William and Mary Review of Virginia Law

No abstract provided.


Procedure, Section Iii - Objections, Right To Appeal (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), James P. Mcgeein May 1956

Procedure, Section Iii - Objections, Right To Appeal (Survey Of Virginia Case Law - 1955), James P. Mcgeein

William and Mary Review of Virginia Law

No abstract provided.