Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Civil Procedure Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Remedies

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 391 - 401 of 401

Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure

A "Pragmatic Definition" Of The "Cause Of Action"?, Bernard C. Gavit Jan 1933

A "Pragmatic Definition" Of The "Cause Of Action"?, Bernard C. Gavit

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Federal Practice - Class Suits - Community Of Interest Under Federal Equity Rule 38 Feb 1932

Federal Practice - Class Suits - Community Of Interest Under Federal Equity Rule 38

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff filed suit in a federal court, sitting in equity, in behalf of himself and others, to enjoin the collection of an illegal tax imposed by North Carolina upon peddlers of foreign fruit within that state. He alleged that 400 others were similarly situated and that over 100 of them had contributed to the expense of the litigation. Held, the individual legal remedy available under state statute was inadequate in view of the multiplicity of suits it necessitated, and the plaintiff was entitled under Federal Equity Rule 38 (post) to bring a class suit to enjoin the collection of …


Garnishment Of Alimony, Fowler V. Harper Jan 1928

Garnishment Of Alimony, Fowler V. Harper

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State Dec 1926

Privity Of Parties And Attack For Fraud On Judgments Of Sister State

Michigan Law Review

An interesting recent decision in Minnesota, Schendel v. C. M. & St. P. Ry. Co., raises two important questions concerning the effect to be given in one state of the Union to a judgment rendered in the courts of another. An action was brought in Minnesota by a special administrator, there appointed, to recover damages for the death of his decedent. The accident resulting in death had occurred in Iowa while the decedent, it was claimed, was engaged in inter-state commerce, so as to bring the claim within the federal statute. To this Minnesota action the defendant set up …


Are All Permanent Injunctions Temporary? Feb 1925

Are All Permanent Injunctions Temporary?

Michigan Law Review

Injunctions may be classified with reference to the stage in the cause at which they are granted, viz. at a preliminary bearing, or at a final bearing, and they may be classified with reference to the time for which they are to stand, viz. for a limited period, or in perpetuity. For the first distinction we have a superfluity of terms. "Temporary," "provisional," "interlocutory," "ad interim" "pendente lite" indicate the first class: "permanent," "perpetual," "final," indicate the second class. But unfortunately several of these terms also suggest the character of the injunction with regard to …


Simplified Civil Procedure Under The Wisconsin Code Jun 1924

Simplified Civil Procedure Under The Wisconsin Code

Michigan Law Review

A rare illustration of the possibility of simplified procedure, under the modern codes, is presented by a recent decision of the Wisconsin court. Singularly enough the case was also productive of some very interesting problems of substantive law, and will be commented upon, from that standpoint, elsewhere in this publication. As for the fact situation, it will be sufficient for our present purposes, to note that the plaintiff was injured, while riding as a guest, as the result of a collision occasioned by the negligent driving of her host and the operator of another automobile. The guest and the driver …


Error Without Prejudice Apr 1924

Error Without Prejudice

Michigan Law Review

An examination of almost any of our reports of decisions now current, will impress one with the great number of cases reported in which the courts discuss the matter of reversal for error as affected by the question of whether prejudice results from such error.


Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review Apr 1922

Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review

Michigan Law Review

Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …


Patent Law, John Barker Waite Jan 1920

Patent Law, John Barker Waite

Books

The comparatively small size of the book is not due to any conscious superficiality of treatment nor omission of pertinent subject matter. It purports to cover only the substantive law of patents, their nature, validity, effect, and their characteristics as property. Matters of procedure in securing patents or suing on them, and the difficult subject of the amount of compensation recoverable by suit, would require a volume for themselves and are not included here. But of the matter which is included, it has been my desire to present every issue which has come before the courts....

This book is intended …


Options And The Rule Against Perpetuities, John R. Rood Mar 1917

Options And The Rule Against Perpetuities, John R. Rood

Articles

"The question to be discussed in this article is whether an option to buy property is void by reason of the fact that it may be exercised at a period more remote from the time of its creation than the law of the state permits contingent interest to vest."


Is A Judgment Open To Collateral Attack If Rendered Without Written Pleadings As Required By Statute, Or If The Writings Do Not Comply With The Statutory Requirements?, John R. Rood Jan 1912

Is A Judgment Open To Collateral Attack If Rendered Without Written Pleadings As Required By Statute, Or If The Writings Do Not Comply With The Statutory Requirements?, John R. Rood

Articles

It is believed that no good reason can be assigned for answering the above question in the affirmative. Certainly none has yet been discovered in a careful search of the cases involving the point. And yet the assurance and unanimity with which lawyers and judges give the affirmative answer to it on first thought is indeed remarkable. For instance, Mr. Justice FIELD in speaking for the Supreme Court of the United States, on the question as to whether a judgment is subject to collateral attack if one served with process is not permitted to make any defense when he appears …