Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (203)
- University of Michigan Law School (171)
- Universitas Indonesia (123)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (93)
- University of Richmond (59)
-
- Pepperdine University (53)
- William & Mary Law School (42)
- West Virginia University (38)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (37)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (37)
- UIC School of Law (32)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (32)
- Brigham Young University Law School (24)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (23)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (23)
- Cornell University Law School (22)
- University of Colorado Law School (22)
- St. Mary's University (20)
- University of Maine School of Law (19)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (18)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (18)
- University of Arkansas Little Rock (17)
- University of Georgia School of Law (17)
- Duke Law (15)
- Roger Williams University (15)
- Brooklyn Law School (12)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (12)
- Fordham Law School (11)
- Notre Dame Law School (11)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (11)
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (103)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (70)
- Federal courts (70)
- Civil Procedure (66)
- Courts (59)
-
- Jurisdiction (55)
- Supreme Court (50)
- Constitution (47)
- Litigation (44)
- Federal (40)
- Federal Courts (38)
- State (36)
- New York (35)
- Due process (34)
- Juries (30)
- Judges (29)
- Court (28)
- Class actions (27)
- Constitutional law (27)
- Discovery (27)
- Law (26)
- Procedure (25)
- Evidence (23)
- Civil rights (21)
- Supreme court (21)
- United States Supreme Court (21)
- Remedies (20)
- Standing (20)
- Trials (20)
- Access to justice (19)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (200)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Michigan Law Review (117)
- Touro Law Review (91)
- Faculty Publications (48)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (46)
- West Virginia Law Review (38)
- Law Faculty Publications (32)
- Articles (31)
- Faculty Articles (29)
- UIC Law Review (29)
- Pepperdine Law Review (27)
- University of Richmond Law Review (27)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (24)
- Scholarly Works (23)
- BYU Law Review (22)
- Publications (22)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (20)
- Indiana Law Journal (18)
- Northwestern University Law Review (18)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (17)
- Supreme Court Case Files (17)
- Maine Law Review (16)
- Journal Articles (12)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (11)
- Fordham Law Review (10)
- Oklahoma Law Review (10)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (10)
- Scholarly Articles (10)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (10)
- Publication Type
Articles 1261 - 1290 of 1478
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
The Summary Jury Trial, Thomas D. Lambros, Thomas H. Shunk
The Summary Jury Trial, Thomas D. Lambros, Thomas H. Shunk
Cleveland State Law Review
The American judicial system must necessarily rely on a steady flow of dispositions of cases by settlement lest it collapse because of a demand for trials beyond the ability of the courts to try cases. Settlements are achieved through a variety of procedures and techniques, yet many cases result in trials because of the uncertainty about prospective juror perceptions that pervades settlement discussions. Summary trial helps to eliminate this element of uncertainty and, at the same time, provides an additional basis for settlement of cases otherwise committed to trial. This is not to suggest that trial is to be avoided …
The Summary Jury Trial, Thomas D. Lambros, Thomas H. Shunk
The Summary Jury Trial, Thomas D. Lambros, Thomas H. Shunk
Cleveland State Law Review
The American judicial system must necessarily rely on a steady flow of dispositions of cases by settlement lest it collapse because of a demand for trials beyond the ability of the courts to try cases. Settlements are achieved through a variety of procedures and techniques, yet many cases result in trials because of the uncertainty about prospective juror perceptions that pervades settlement discussions. Summary trial helps to eliminate this element of uncertainty and, at the same time, provides an additional basis for settlement of cases otherwise committed to trial. This is not to suggest that trial is to be avoided …
Inquiries Into The Numerical Division Of Juries: Ellis V. Reed, James M. O'Brien
Inquiries Into The Numerical Division Of Juries: Ellis V. Reed, James M. O'Brien
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rush V. Savchuk, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States Parole Commission V. Geraghty, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States Parole Commission V. Geraghty, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
When A District Court Has Stayed A Claim Involving Concurrent Jurisdiction, Issuance Of A Writ Of Mandamus Compelling Adjudication Is Improper., James P. Keenan
When A District Court Has Stayed A Claim Involving Concurrent Jurisdiction, Issuance Of A Writ Of Mandamus Compelling Adjudication Is Improper., James P. Keenan
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Federal District Courts Have No Authority To Interrupt Preexisting State Sentence To Impose Confinement For Civil Contempt., Diane E. Hepford
Federal District Courts Have No Authority To Interrupt Preexisting State Sentence To Impose Confinement For Civil Contempt., Diane E. Hepford
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
The 1979 Civil Procedure Rules, James W. Spears
The 1979 Civil Procedure Rules, James W. Spears
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Proposed Citizens Right To Standing Act-Finding The Keys To Unlock The Courthouse Doors, Harold W. Wood, Jr.
Proposed Citizens Right To Standing Act-Finding The Keys To Unlock The Courthouse Doors, Harold W. Wood, Jr.
Seattle University Law Review
Recent Supreme Court decisions severely restrict the right of citizens to litigate in federal courts. The Court's standing requirements not only limit the ability of citizens to successfully invoke federal court jurisdiction, but also confuse lower courts and litigants attempting to apply the requirements. Standing requirements have met with increasing criticism. And Congress is now considering legislative modification of standing doctrine. Unfortunately, the Court's employment of constitutional foundations in establishing current standing requirements imposes substantial roadblocks Congress must avoid to enact remedial standing legislation. This comment examines the constitutional and pragmatic difficulties of statutory modification of standing requirements and recommends …
Shaffer V. Heitner: A Death Warrant For The Transient Rule Of In Personam Jurisdiction, Daniel O. Bernstine
Shaffer V. Heitner: A Death Warrant For The Transient Rule Of In Personam Jurisdiction, Daniel O. Bernstine
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Federal Practice And Procedure, Various Editors
Federal Practice And Procedure, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Civil Litigation And Jura Novit Curia, Lawrence G. Baxter
Civil Litigation And Jura Novit Curia, Lawrence G. Baxter
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The Influence Of Jury Deliberation On Juror Perception Of Trial, Credibility, And Damage Awards, S. Femi Sonaike
The Influence Of Jury Deliberation On Juror Perception Of Trial, Credibility, And Damage Awards, S. Femi Sonaike
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Literature On Discovery From 1970 To The Present: Expressed Dissatisfactions And Proposed Reforms, Daniel Segal
Survey Of Literature On Discovery From 1970 To The Present: Expressed Dissatisfactions And Proposed Reforms, Daniel Segal
Federal Judicial Center Reports
Eight years have passed since the last major revision of the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. During those years, there has been a substantial amount of writing on the discovery rules. While much of it has been aimed at helping practitioners understand the rules, a large portion has been critical in nature, examining how well the rules are functioning, isolating their problem areas and making suggestions for reform. It was the purpose of the study on which this Report is based to survey and analyze that critical literature. The Report's first section sets out in detail …
Judicial Controls And The Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Paul R. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
Judicial Controls And The Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Paul R. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
Federal Judicial Center Reports
This report should be viewed as a beginning. It explores from one perspective the operation of the federal rules governing discovery as revealed in more than 7,000 docketed requests appearing in more than 3,000 terminated cases in six United States district courts, (A survey of practitioners in the six districts suggests that the docketed requests cover the great bulk of discovery activity.) The report is a continuation of the Center's District court studies Project, the first report of which (Case Management and Court Management in United States District Court) appeared several months ago.
Is Justice Delayed? A Report From The Court Administrator, C. R. Huie, G. Lawrence Jegley
Is Justice Delayed? A Report From The Court Administrator, C. R. Huie, G. Lawrence Jegley
University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Courts-Rules Of Civil Procedure-Postjudgment Motion To Intervene To Appeal Denial Of Class Certification Is Timely-United Airlines, Inc. V. Mcdonald
BYU Law Review
No abstract provided.
Sentencing Alternatives For Virginia General District Courts, Jose R. Davila Jr., Robert L. Mordhorst
Sentencing Alternatives For Virginia General District Courts, Jose R. Davila Jr., Robert L. Mordhorst
University of Richmond Law Review
The endless parade of humanity that passes before the benches of Virginia's general district courts accused of minor offenses presents to those charged with deciding these cases one of the most challenging judicial tasks of our day. The challenge in addition to deciding guilt or innocence is also determining what to do with those judged guilty. Those decisions influence to one degree or another the direction of peoples lives for their own and society's good or ill. Most of the offenders appearing before these courts are young people, often first offenders. The behavior patterns of their lives are not yet …
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Village Of Arlington Heights V. Metropolitan Housing Development Authority Corp., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Standing, Mootness, And Federal Rule 23—Balancing Perspectives, Mary Kay Kane
Standing, Mootness, And Federal Rule 23—Balancing Perspectives, Mary Kay Kane
Buffalo Law Review
No abstract provided.
An Intermediate National Appellate Court: Solution Or Diversion, Stephen C. White
An Intermediate National Appellate Court: Solution Or Diversion, Stephen C. White
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Federal Practice And Procedure, Martin J. Kane
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Franks V. Bowman Transportation Co. Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Franks V. Bowman Transportation Co. Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Buckley V. Valeo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Norton V. Mathews, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Albemarle Paper Co. V. Moody, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Albemarle Paper Co. V. Moody, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Procedural Due Process In The Juvenile Courts Of West Virginia, Richard A. Warmuth
Procedural Due Process In The Juvenile Courts Of West Virginia, Richard A. Warmuth
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.