Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (206)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (75)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (53)
- University of Michigan Law School (46)
-
- William & Mary Law School (25)
- West Virginia University (22)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (20)
- Liberty University (18)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (18)
- UIC School of Law (16)
- University of Richmond (16)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (15)
- Pepperdine University (15)
- University of Georgia School of Law (15)
- University at Buffalo School of Law (14)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (12)
- University of Maine School of Law (11)
- Duke Law (9)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (9)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (9)
- Brooklyn Law School (8)
- Roger Williams University (8)
- University of Washington School of Law (8)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (7)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (6)
- Notre Dame Law School (6)
- St. Mary's University (6)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (50)
- Constitutional law (49)
- Constitutional Law (40)
- Supreme Court (39)
- Civil Procedure (37)
-
- Civil procedure (37)
- Due process (33)
- State (33)
- Federal (32)
- Jurisdiction (32)
- Standing (32)
- New York (27)
- Federal courts (22)
- Supreme court (22)
- Law (21)
- Civil rights (19)
- Federal Courts (19)
- Discrimination (18)
- Separation of powers (18)
- 1990) (17)
- Article III (17)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (17)
- Court (15)
- Court of Appeals (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Federalism (14)
- Juries (14)
- Appellate Division (13)
- Courts (13)
- Legislation (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (196)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (73)
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
- Michigan Law Review (41)
-
- Supreme Court Case Files (41)
- West Virginia Law Review (22)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- William & Mary Law Review (16)
- UIC Law Review (15)
- Scholarly Works (14)
- University of Richmond Law Review (14)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (14)
- Pepperdine Law Review (13)
- Faculty Publications (11)
- Fordham Law Review (11)
- Maine Law Review (11)
- Northwestern University Law Review (11)
- Buffalo Law Review (10)
- American Indian Law Journal (9)
- Washington Law Review (8)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (7)
- Florida Law Review (6)
- Publications (6)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (6)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (6)
- Articles (5)
- BYU Law Review (5)
- Journal Articles (5)
- Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 871 - 900 of 964
Full-Text Articles in Civil Procedure
Franks V. Bowman Transportation Co. Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Franks V. Bowman Transportation Co. Inc., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Buckley V. Valeo, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Mathews V. Eldridge, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Mathews V. Eldridge, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
City Of New Orleans V. Dukes, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Gonzales V. Automatic Employees Credit Union, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Gonzales V. Automatic Employees Credit Union, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Weinberger V. Wiesenfeld, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Recent Cases, Author Unidentified
Recent Cases, Author Unidentified
Vanderbilt Law Review
Civil Procedure--Service of Process--California Long-Arm Statutes Abrogate State's Immunity Doctrine
Seeking recovery of money owed him by defendant European corporations;' plaintiff brought suit in a California state court.While attending federal district court in Florida for the sole purpose of giving a deposition in a trademark infringement suit instituted by one of the corporations, defendants' representative was personally served with process in the California action on behalf of himself and the defendant corporations. Defendants moved to quash service of process on the ground that the immunity rule prohibited service of civil process upon a witness in attendance in a court outside …
Federal Civil Procedure - Constitutional Law - Federal Class Action Rule Held To Require Notice By Plaintiff At His Own Expense To Potential Members Of The Class - Eisen V. Carlisle & (And) Jacquelin, Beverley Janis Klein
Loyola University Chicago Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law - Standing - The Zone Of Interest Test Of Data Processing Held Inapplicable To Plaintiff's Standing In A Suit Between Private Parties, Michael S. Burg
Constitutional Law - Standing - The Zone Of Interest Test Of Data Processing Held Inapplicable To Plaintiff's Standing In A Suit Between Private Parties, Michael S. Burg
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Milliken V. Bradley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Milliken V. Bradley, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Defunis V. Odegaard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Defunis V. Odegaard, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith V. Ware, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith V. Ware, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Constitutional Law—Creditor-Debtor Law: Procedural Due Process And Washington's Prejudgment Seizure Procedures—Fuentes V. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67 (1972), P. A. G.
Washington Law Review
A recent United States Supreme Court decision, Fuentes v. Shevin, and two recent Washington Court of Appeals decisions, Lucas v. Stapp and Seattle Credit Bureau v. Hibbitt, held that except in extraordinary situations the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States Constitution requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before any significant property interest can be seized by actions involving government officials. Under these cases, Washington's attachment, garnishment, and replevin statutes appear to be unconstitutional insofar as they provide for prejudgment seizure of a defendant's property without prior notice and an opportunity to be heard. …
On Privacy: Constitutional Protection For Personal Liberty, Susan Herman, L. Simonson
On Privacy: Constitutional Protection For Personal Liberty, Susan Herman, L. Simonson
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
United States V. Kras, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Kras, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Paris Adult Theatre I V. Slaton, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States Department Of Agriculture V. Moreno, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States Department Of Agriculture V. Moreno, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Linda R.S. V. Richard D., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Linda R.S. V. Richard D., Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railroad Co. V. Wichita Board Of Trade, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railroad Co. V. Wichita Board Of Trade, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Georgia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Georgia V. United States, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Treatment Of Debtors, O. John Rogge
The Constitutionality Of Indiana's Civil Change Of Venue Law: Change For The Sake Of Change, James R. Pielemeier
The Constitutionality Of Indiana's Civil Change Of Venue Law: Change For The Sake Of Change, James R. Pielemeier
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Criminal Law—Court Orders Broad Relief To Inmates Throughout The Virginia Penal System Where Constitutional Rights Have Been Violated., Arthur H. Ackerhalt
Criminal Law—Court Orders Broad Relief To Inmates Throughout The Virginia Penal System Where Constitutional Rights Have Been Violated., Arthur H. Ackerhalt
Buffalo Law Review
Landman v. Royster, 333 F. Supp. 621 (E.D. Va. 1971).
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Recent Developments, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Laird V. Tatum, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Declaratory Remedies And Constitutional Change, David L. Dickson
Declaratory Remedies And Constitutional Change, David L. Dickson
Vanderbilt Law Review
The Federal Declaratory Judgment Act' has now been law for more than 36 years. The debates over whether a purely declaratory judgment can be the product of a justiciable "controversy" in the constitutional sense have long since passed away, set to rest by the language of the Act itself and by the Supreme Court's decision that the Act was authorized by the judiciary article of the Constitution. The last edition of Professor Borchard's great work, Declaratory Judgments, was published in 1941,and the most recent article analyzing the constitutional significance of the Act was published shortly before Chief Justice Warren took …
Due Process And The Harsher Penalty After Appeal-An Unwarranted Extension Of Pearce
Due Process And The Harsher Penalty After Appeal-An Unwarranted Extension Of Pearce
University of Richmond Law Review
At common law there was no "right" to an appeal. Such a "right" could only be established by legislative enactment. The statutes creating a right to an appeal brought with them the problems of determining the constitutional protections that must be afforded this right. Much controversy has centered around one such problem, that of the constitutionality of imposing a more stringent sentence on a defendant after he has successfully appealed and attained a new trial.
The Pennsylvania Long-Arm: An Analytical Justification, Thomas B. Erekson
The Pennsylvania Long-Arm: An Analytical Justification, Thomas B. Erekson
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
Right To Court-Appointed Counsel For Misdemeanants In Virginia
Right To Court-Appointed Counsel For Misdemeanants In Virginia
University of Richmond Law Review
The Virginia Constitution makes no specific guarantee of the right to counsel for those charged with a crime as is provided in the federal Constitution, but the Supreme Court of Appeals has declared this to be a fundamental right within the Virginia Bill of Rights. Such right is intended to apply to all persons regardless of their financial status, so if a person charged with a felony proceeds in forma pauperis, it is the duty of the court to appoint counsel to defend him. The right to court-appointed counsel has been extended to persons being questioned concerning a felony, to …
Books Received
University of Richmond Law Review
These are the books received by the Law School in 1970.