Civil Procedure Commons^™

Burger King Corp. V. Rudzewicz, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Phillips Petroleum Co. V. Shutts, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Atascadero State Hospital V. Scanlon, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Mennonite Board Of Missions V. Adams: Insufficient Notice Under The New York In Rem Statutes, Richard M. Schaus

Buffalo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Diverting The Course Of Colorado River: A Reconciliation Of Seventh Circuit Adaptations, 17 J. Marshall L. Rev. 49 (1984), Michael W. Pinsof, Richard A. Wolfe

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Toward A Constitutional Framework For The Control Of State Court Jurisdiction, Robert H. Abrams

Journal Publications

No abstract provided.

Clear Standards For Discovery Protective Orders: A Missed Opportunity In Rhinehart V. Seattle Times Co., Carole J. Breitenbach

Seattle University Law Review

The Washington State Supreme Court has previously balanced the interests of privacy and effective judicial administration against those of free speech and public access in the context of judicial proceedings, and the court missed a significant opportunity to expand and apply this balancing test in Rhinehart. The United States Supreme Court similarly declined to create a balancing test to ensure the full protection of First Amendment interests during pretrial discovery. A need remains for a general standard to ensure that First Amendment interests in disseminating discovery information are identified and protected when a protective order is requested.

Helicoptieros Nationales De Colombia, S.A. V. Hall, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Seattle Times, Co. V. Rhinehart, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Calder V. Jones, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

The Constitutionality Of The Federal Magistrate System After The Northern Pipeline Decision, Kenneth J. Phelan

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

The Impact Of Allstate Insurance Co. V. Hague On Constitutional Limitations On Choice Of Law, W. Clark Williams Jr.

University of Richmond Law Review

The development of constitutional limitations on choice of law by the United States Supreme Court has turned primarily on the due process clause and the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution. In theory at least, each constitutional provision rests upon separate grounds. The full faith and credit clause, as it applies to public acts, would compel a forum state under appropriate circumstances to honor the sovereignty of a foreign state in the federal system and to apply the law of the foreign state whose interests are sufficiently compelling. The due process clause limits the power of …

Search, Seizure, And Section 7: Standing From Salvucci To Simpson, Mark H. Adams, George R. Nock

Seattle University Law Review

This article traces the evolution of automatic standing from Jones v. United States to United States v. Salvucci and discusses the approach that has replaced the Jones rule in the Supreme Court. It then discusses the Washington Supreme Court’s continued adherence to the automatic standing rule, despite the Salvucci decision, under the Washington Constitution rather than the fourth amendment. After focusing on the failure of the United States Supreme Court to fashion a standing rule consistent with the Court’s stated purpose for the exclusionary rule, this article urges the Washington court to interpret the state’s constitution in a more consistent, …

Federal Courts And Procedure, Various Editors

Villanova Law Review (1956 - )

No abstract provided.

Judicial Restraining Orders And The Media: Does It Really Matter Who Is Gagged?, James M. Jennings Ii

University of Richmond Law Review

Writing in Bridges v. California, Justice Hugo Black observed forty years ago that "free speech and fair trials are two of the most cherished policies of our civilization, and it would be a trying task to choose between them." And yet, these constitutionally guaranteed rights have been in conflict since at least 1807.

Case Digest, Journal Staff

Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law

Article III of the United States Constitution does not Grant Congress the Power to Extend United States Courts' Jurisdiction over Suits by Foreign Plaintiffs against Foreign Defendants

====================

Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(B), the Courts have the Power to Impose Sanction of Personal Jurisdiction when a Party Fails to Comply with Discovery Order

====================

Foreign Sovereign Immunity--A Strict Construction of the Concept of Instrumentalities under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act

The Conjurer's Circle--The Fifth Amendment Privilege In Civil Cases, Robert H. Heidt

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.

Reasonable Assurance Of Actual Notice Required For In Personam Default Judgment In Utah: Graham V. Sawaya, Robert Charles Martin

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

Nixon V. Fitzgerald, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Valley Forge Christian College V. Americans United For Separation Of Church And State, Inc., Lewis Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Survey Of Developments In The Fourth Circuit: 1980

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Student Practice In Colorado, Robert M. Hardaway

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Both the University of Denver College of Law and the University of Colorado Law School have active student law clinics. Law students in these clinics receive academic credit for representing indigent clients under the supervision of a faculty member or staff attorney. Students in the two clinics are permitted to practice in the Colorado courts pursuant to one of the nation's most liberal student practice rules.

The Constitutionality Of Special Interrogatories Under The Illinois Civil Practice Act, 14 J. Marshall L. Rev.761 (1981), Joseph F. Vosicky Jr.

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Civil Procedure–Quasi-In-Rem Jurisdiction–Attachment Of Insurer's Obligation To Nonresident Defendant (Seider Rule) Unconstitutional, Mary L. Harmon

University of Arkansas at Little Rock Law Review

No abstract provided.

Non-Jury Trial Of Civil Litigation: Justifying A Complexity Exception To The Seventh Amendment, Barrett E. Pope

University of Richmond Law Review

The seventh amendment to the United States Constitution states that "[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved."' When Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the right to jury trial at common law remained undisturbed.

Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Maryland V. Louisiana, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.

Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1979

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Constitutional Law-Civil Procedure-Implied Cause Of Action-Extending Bivens To The Fifth Amendment-Davis V. Passman, 442 U.S. 228 (1979)

BYU Law Review

No abstract provided.

World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. V. Woodson, Lewis F. Powell Jr.

Supreme Court Case Files

No abstract provided.