Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (209)
- Universitas Indonesia (123)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (71)
- University of Richmond (58)
- University of Maine School of Law (48)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (43)
- Fordham Law School (32)
- University of Michigan Law School (27)
- University of North Florida (27)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (25)
- Pepperdine University (24)
- Roger Williams University (20)
- St. Mary's University (19)
- UIC School of Law (19)
- Brooklyn Law School (14)
- University of New Hampshire (14)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (13)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (12)
- University of Georgia School of Law (12)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (12)
- Columbia Law School (11)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (11)
- Georgia State University College of Law (8)
- Saint Joseph University of Beirut (8)
- Rhode Island School of Design (7)
- University of Baltimore Law (7)
- Florida International University College of Law (6)
- University of Miami Law School (6)
- University of Washington School of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- Keyword
-
- Civil procedure (48)
- Constitution (35)
- State (29)
- College students -- Florida -- Jacksonville -- Political activity (27)
- Conservation of natural resources -- Florida -- Jacksonville -- Societies, etc -- History (27)
-
- Federal (27)
- Nature trails -- Florida -- Jacksonville (27)
- Sawmill Slough Conservation Club -- History (27)
- University of North Florida -- Societies, etc -- History (27)
- Civil Procedure (25)
- Evidence (25)
- Law (25)
- Supreme Court (25)
- Litigation (24)
- Constitutional law (22)
- New York (22)
- Discovery (21)
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (21)
- Due process (20)
- Civil law (19)
- Court (19)
- Discrimination (19)
- Jurisdiction (18)
- Civil (17)
- Civil Law (17)
- Statute (17)
- Supreme court (16)
- 1990) (15)
- Civil rights (15)
- Civil litigation (13)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (194)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- Touro Law Review (70)
- University of Richmond Law Review (55)
- Maine Law Review (47)
-
- Faculty Scholarship (35)
- Fordham Law Review (27)
- Historical Documents (27)
- Cardozo Law Review (22)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (21)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (19)
- Michigan Law Review (18)
- UIC Law Review (15)
- Articles (14)
- UNH Sports Law Review (13)
- Indiana Law Journal (12)
- Faculty Works (11)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (11)
- American Indian Law Journal (10)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (10)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (10)
- Faculty Publications (8)
- Proche-Orient, Études juridiques (8)
- School of Law Conferences, Lectures & Events (8)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (7)
- Georgia State University Law Review (7)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (7)
- Martin Luther King, Jr. Series (7)
- Books (6)
- Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law (6)
- Publication Type
Articles 961 - 990 of 1041
Full-Text Articles in Civil Law
Adjudicatory Jurisdiction And Class Actions, Diane P. Wood
Adjudicatory Jurisdiction And Class Actions, Diane P. Wood
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Alternative Dispute Resolution In The Federal Government: A View From Congress, Senator Orrin G. Hatch
Alternative Dispute Resolution In The Federal Government: A View From Congress, Senator Orrin G. Hatch
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Synthesis And Integration Of Supreme Court Precedent Regarding The Regulatory Taking Of Land, John W. Ragsdale Jr
A Synthesis And Integration Of Supreme Court Precedent Regarding The Regulatory Taking Of Land, John W. Ragsdale Jr
Faculty Works
In the post World War II era of rapid land development, emergent environmental problems, and heightened legislative response, the taking clause has proved to be the most pervasive and significant limitation on the power of government over private land usage. The dimensions and implications of this provision and the interpretive Supreme Court opinions have attracted the attention of numerous scholars whose efforts, usually, have been rather critical. The authors have often sought to question the logic, language and premises of fundamental opinions, to warn of the economic, moral and ecological consequences of portended judicial trends, to pose new taking tests …
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Procedure And Practice, W. Hamilton Bryson
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Procedure And Practice, W. Hamilton Bryson
University of Richmond Law Review
This article considers recent developments in the field of Virginia civil procedure and practice, including statutes, rules of court, and opinions of the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia that have appeared between May 1986 and May 1987. This article also comments on cases in volumes five through eight of Virginia Circuit Court Opinions, many of which were decided before 1986. It is appropriate to mention them here since they were only recently made generally available through publication. In order to facilitate the discussion of numerous Virginia Code sections, they will be referred to in …
Rent Control Price Fixing: Another Look At The Emperor's New Clothes, Robert N. Markle
Rent Control Price Fixing: Another Look At The Emperor's New Clothes, Robert N. Markle
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Repuation And Character In Defamation Actions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Repuation And Character In Defamation Actions, Charles W. Ehrhardt
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Can Mental Health Professionals Predict Judicial Decisionmaking? Constitutional And Tort Liability Aspects Of The Right Of The Institutionalized Mentally Disabled To Refuse Treatment: On The Cutting Edge, Michael L. Perlin
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig
The Arbitrability Of Domestic Antitrust Claims: An Evaluation Of The American Safety Doctrine, Edward G. Heilig
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: "Settling" The Differences In The Proposed Amendments To The Offer Of Settlement Rule, Nelson Perel
Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: "Settling" The Differences In The Proposed Amendments To The Offer Of Settlement Rule, Nelson Perel
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Procedure And Practice, W. Hamilton Bryson
Annual Survey Of Virginia Law: Civil Procedure And Practice, W. Hamilton Bryson
University of Richmond Law Review
This article considers recent developments in the field of Virginia civil procedure and practice, including statutes, rules of court, and opinions of the Supreme Court of Virginia and the Court of Appeals of Virginia that have appeared between May 1985 and May 1986. This article also comments on cases in volumes three and four of Virginia Circuit Court Opinions, many of which were decided before 1985, but it is appropriate to mention them here since they were only recently made generally available through publication.
Beyond Psychiatric Expertise (By Ben Bursten, M.D.), Bruce N. Morton
Beyond Psychiatric Expertise (By Ben Bursten, M.D.), Bruce N. Morton
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Proposed Amendment To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: Toughening The Sanctions, Julie M. Cheslik
The Proposed Amendment To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure 68: Toughening The Sanctions, Julie M. Cheslik
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
United States V. Doe, Lewis Powell Jr.
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital V. Mercury Construction Corporation, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital V. Mercury Construction Corporation, Lewis F. Powell, Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
United States V. Rylander, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
United States V. Rylander, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Pillsbury Co. V. Conboy, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Pillsbury Co. V. Conboy, Lewis F. Powell Jr.
Supreme Court Case Files
No abstract provided.
Recent Developments In Missouri: Civil Procedure - Extraordinary Remedies, Jeffrey B. Berman
Recent Developments In Missouri: Civil Procedure - Extraordinary Remedies, Jeffrey B. Berman
Faculty Works
New Missouri Supreme Court rules governing the procedure to be followed to obtain the extraordinary remedies of mandamus, prohibition, quo warranto and injunction became effective January 1, 1981. As a result of these new rules, prior practice and procedure with respect to these remedies have been modified substantially. This article will discuss the nature and purpose of each of these extraordinary remedies, describe the procedure to be foil owed under them and note the changes that have been made.
Non-Jury Trial Of Civil Litigation: Justifying A Complexity Exception To The Seventh Amendment, Barrett E. Pope
Non-Jury Trial Of Civil Litigation: Justifying A Complexity Exception To The Seventh Amendment, Barrett E. Pope
University of Richmond Law Review
The seventh amendment to the United States Constitution states that "[i]n Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved."' When Congress enacted the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the right to jury trial at common law remained undisturbed.
Due Process Requires Notice Before Individual Monetary Claims Of Absent Class Members Are Barred By Res Judicata., Teresa Agnes Hunter
Due Process Requires Notice Before Individual Monetary Claims Of Absent Class Members Are Barred By Res Judicata., Teresa Agnes Hunter
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Discovery Problems In Civil Cases, Joseph L. Ebersole, Barlow Burke
Discovery Problems In Civil Cases, Joseph L. Ebersole, Barlow Burke
Federal Judicial Center Reports
This publication is a product of a study undertaken in furtherance of the Center's statutory mission to conduct and stimulate research and development on matters of judicial administration. The analyses, conclusions, and points of view are those of the authors. This work has been subjected to staff review within the Center, and publication signifies that it is regarded as responsible and valuable. It should be emphasized, however, that on matters of policy, the Center speaks only through its Board.
The Standing Doctrine: A Dialogue Between The Court And Congress, Daan Braveman
The Standing Doctrine: A Dialogue Between The Court And Congress, Daan Braveman
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Private Causes Of Action From Federal Statutes: A Strict Standard For Implication By Sole Reliance On Legislative Intent, William Francis Drewry Gallalee
Private Causes Of Action From Federal Statutes: A Strict Standard For Implication By Sole Reliance On Legislative Intent, William Francis Drewry Gallalee
University of Richmond Law Review
The implication doctrine allows a federal court to create a private cause of action from a federal statute that does not expressly provide for a private remedy. In Cort v. Ash, the Supreme Court articulated a four factor test to determine when this doctrine should be utilized. This comment will provide a brief history of the implication doctrine and of the major Supreme Court decisions that culminated in the Cort test. Relevant Supreme Court decisions after Cort,will then be examined to reveal a new, more restrictive approach to implication. Finally, reasons will be advanced that justify this stricter approach.
"We're Only Trying To Help": The Burden And Standard Of Proof In Short-Term Civil Commitment, Lynne Henderson
"We're Only Trying To Help": The Burden And Standard Of Proof In Short-Term Civil Commitment, Lynne Henderson
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Toward Better Environmental Standard Setting: Lessons From Case Study, Douglas O. Linder
Toward Better Environmental Standard Setting: Lessons From Case Study, Douglas O. Linder
Faculty Works
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Literature On Discovery From 1970 To The Present: Expressed Dissatisfactions And Proposed Reforms, Daniel Segal
Survey Of Literature On Discovery From 1970 To The Present: Expressed Dissatisfactions And Proposed Reforms, Daniel Segal
Federal Judicial Center Reports
Eight years have passed since the last major revision of the discovery provisions of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. During those years, there has been a substantial amount of writing on the discovery rules. While much of it has been aimed at helping practitioners understand the rules, a large portion has been critical in nature, examining how well the rules are functioning, isolating their problem areas and making suggestions for reform. It was the purpose of the study on which this Report is based to survey and analyze that critical literature. The Report's first section sets out in detail …
Judicial Controls And The Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Paul R. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
Judicial Controls And The Civil Litigative Process: Discovery, Paul R. Connolly, Edith A. Holleman, Michael J. Kuhlman
Federal Judicial Center Reports
This report should be viewed as a beginning. It explores from one perspective the operation of the federal rules governing discovery as revealed in more than 7,000 docketed requests appearing in more than 3,000 terminated cases in six United States district courts, (A survey of practitioners in the six districts suggests that the docketed requests cover the great bulk of discovery activity.) The report is a continuation of the Center's District court studies Project, the first report of which (Case Management and Court Management in United States District Court) appeared several months ago.
The Time Of Discovery Rule And The Qualified Privilege Defense For Credit Reporting Agencies In Illinois After World Of Fashion V. Dun & (And) Bradstreet, Inc., 10 J. Marshall J. Of Prac. & Proc. 359 (1977), Paul Wangerin
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Demise Of The Ultimate Fact Rule In Indiana, Edward J. Liptak
The Demise Of The Ultimate Fact Rule In Indiana, Edward J. Liptak
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Assault Leading To Homicide May Be Used To Invoke Felony-Murder Rule, William P. Adams
Assault Leading To Homicide May Be Used To Invoke Felony-Murder Rule, William P. Adams
Mercer Law Review
In Baker v. State, the Georgia Supreme Court held that "the Georgia legislature intended felony murder to encompass all felonies as 'felony' is defined in Code §26-401(e)." The court refused to adopt the "merger" doctrine that has been applied by some states to the felony-murder rule., The defendant was convicted of felony murder' for the shooting death of Roger Clark and sentenced to life imprisonment. Clark and one other person entered the defendant's bedroom before 5:30 one morning to collect a debt allegedly owed to Clark by the defendant. The defendant fired one shot over the heads of the …