Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Contracts (83)
- Business (60)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (53)
- Law and Economics (48)
- Commercial Law (47)
-
- Banking and Finance Law (33)
- Organizations Law (28)
- Securities Law (28)
- Law and Society (23)
- Tax Law (23)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (22)
- International Law (20)
- Agency (19)
- Legislation (18)
- Other Law (17)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (16)
- State and Local Government Law (16)
- Legal Profession (15)
- Consumer Protection Law (14)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (14)
- Torts (14)
- Criminal Law (13)
- Legal Education (13)
- Dispute Resolution and Arbitration (12)
- Law and Philosophy (12)
- Transnational Law (12)
- Civil Law (11)
- Courts (11)
- Institution
-
- Georgia State University College of Law (42)
- Columbia Law School (26)
- University of Michigan Law School (23)
- Seattle University School of Law (18)
- University of Georgia School of Law (16)
-
- UC Law SF (15)
- Brooklyn Law School (13)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (10)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- American University Washington College of Law (8)
- Brigham Young University Law School (7)
- Duke Law (7)
- Roger Williams University (7)
- Singapore Management University (7)
- William & Mary Law School (7)
- Boston University School of Law (6)
- New York Law School (6)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (6)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (6)
- University of Miami Law School (5)
- Florida State University College of Law (4)
- Pepperdine University (4)
- SJ Quinney College of Law, University of Utah (4)
- St. John's University School of Law (4)
- University of Colorado Law School (4)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (4)
- University of Richmond (4)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Wydział Zarządzania Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego/Faculty of Management University of Warsaw (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Keyword
-
- Corporations (25)
- Corporate governance (23)
- Corporate Law (13)
- Law (10)
- Arbitration (9)
-
- Law and Society (8)
- Shareholders (8)
- Contract law (7)
- Contracts (7)
- Corporate Governance (7)
- Corporate law (7)
- Entrepreneurship (7)
- Gateway 2000 (7)
- Hill (7)
- SSRN (7)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (7)
- Business (6)
- Commercial law (6)
- Corporation (6)
- Common sense (5)
- Contract (5)
- Internal Revenue Code (5)
- Law and Economics (5)
- The Theory of Fields (5)
- Clinic (4)
- Company (4)
- Compliance (4)
- Corporate (4)
- Corporate tax (4)
- Employment law (4)
- Publication
-
- Superior Court of Fulton County: Metro Atlanta Business Case Division Opinions (42)
- Faculty Scholarship (41)
- Seattle University Law Review (18)
- UC Law Business Journal (15)
- Articles (13)
-
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (12)
- Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review (10)
- Touro Law Review (10)
- American University Business Law Review (6)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (6)
- Ira M. Millstein Center for Global Markets and Corporate Ownership (6)
- Research Collection Yong Pung How School Of Law (6)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (5)
- Scholarly Articles (5)
- BYU Law Review (4)
- Faculty Works (4)
- Fordham Law Review (4)
- Monografie CARS/CARS Monographs (4)
- Publications (4)
- Rooftops Project (4)
- Utah Law Review (4)
- All Faculty Publications (3)
- Brooklyn Law Review (3)
- Faculty Articles (3)
- Journal of Law and Policy (3)
- Law School Blogs (3)
- The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law (3)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (3)
- All Faculty Scholarship (2)
- Publication Type
Articles 331 - 338 of 338
Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law
The "New Insiders": Rethinking Independent Directors' Tenure, Yaron Nili
The "New Insiders": Rethinking Independent Directors' Tenure, Yaron Nili
Faculty Scholarship
Director independence is a cornerstone of modern corporate governance. Regulators, scholars, companies and shareholders have all placed a strong emphasis on director independence as a means to ensure that investors’ interests in their companies are well served. But what makes a director independent? While regulators and stock exchanges have tackled this elusive standard in different ways, the end goal is always the same – ensuring that the director is able to exercise truly independent judgment and further the best interests of shareholders. Surprisingly, these regulatory bodies have failed to consider the impact board tenure might have on director independence. This …
Quieting The Sharholders' Voice: Empirical Evidence Of Pervasive Bundling In Proxy Solicitations, James D. Cox, Fabrizio Ferri, Colleen Honigsberg, Randall S. Thomas
Quieting The Sharholders' Voice: Empirical Evidence Of Pervasive Bundling In Proxy Solicitations, James D. Cox, Fabrizio Ferri, Colleen Honigsberg, Randall S. Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
The integrity of shareholder voting is critical to the legitimacy of corporate law. One threat to this process is proxy “bundling,” or the joinder of more than one separate item into a single proxy proposal. Bundling deprives shareholders of the right to convey their views on each separate matter being put to a vote and forces them to either reject the entire proposal or approve items they might not otherwise want implemented.
In this Paper, we provide the first comprehensive evaluation of the anti-bundling rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in 1992. While we find that the …
Restoring The Promise Of The Shareholder Derivative Suit, John Matheson
Restoring The Promise Of The Shareholder Derivative Suit, John Matheson
Georgia Law Review
The most fundamental and perplexing question in all of corporate law is how to ensure that the board of directors and corporate officers faithfully serve the interests of the corporation and its owners, the shareholders. A primary means of answering that challenge has been the implication and enforcement of directors' and officers' fiduciary duties to the corporation by means of the shareholder derivative action. Almost from its inception, however, the derivative suit has been subject to jaundiced treatment by companies, legislatures, and courts. The result is a costly, tortured derivative suit process unrelated to the merits of the underlying claims …
The Enduring Legacy Of Modern Efficient Market Theory After Halliburton V. John, Mark Klock
The Enduring Legacy Of Modern Efficient Market Theory After Halliburton V. John, Mark Klock
Georgia Law Review
In 1988 the U.S. Supreme Court approved the fraud on the market theory for securities trading in an efficient market thus enabling securities class action plaintiffs to establish their required reliance element of the case through a rebuttable presumption. Basic v. Levinson held that efficient markets incorporate publicly disseminated information and investors who purchased or sold securities in an efficient market therefore relied on any publicly disseminated misinformation. For more than a quarter century since Basic, the efficient market theory has sustained a barrage of assaults from commentators who object to the use of economic theory in legal decision making …
Democratizing Startups, Seth C. Oranburg
Democratizing Startups, Seth C. Oranburg
Scholarly Articles
President Obama signed the Jumpstart Our Business Startups (“JOBS Act”) of 2012 into law to “help entrepreneurs raise the capital they need to put Americans back to work and create an economy that’s built to last.” The goal is to “democratize startups” by making capital available to diverse entrepreneurs in new geographies. Yet the net effect of securities regulations and market conditions is the opposite. Startup companies are encouraged to stay private so capital is consolidating in large, mature firms instead of recycling into new startups. Evidence of consolidation is that once-rare “Unicorns” (billion-dollar startups) now number at least 170. …
When Tech Startups Outgrow The 1099 Model: Moving Firms Out Of The Kiddie Pool, Chelsea Fitzgerald
When Tech Startups Outgrow The 1099 Model: Moving Firms Out Of The Kiddie Pool, Chelsea Fitzgerald
Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law
The 1099 independent contractor has become the new norm for Silicon Valley startups. In the wake of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals decision in Alexander v. Fed Ex, tech startups have been scrutinized for their financially savvy preference for 1099 contractors through both class action lawsuits and administrative proceedings. As these movers and shakers grow from humble beginnings to companies with multi-billion dollar valuations, the choice between classifying workers as traditional W-2 employees or 1099 contractors will have dramatic effects on the peer economy's labor force and tax status. This Note examines the startup worker classification dilemma, concludes that …
Financing Corporate Elections, Andrew A. Schwartz
Financing Corporate Elections, Andrew A. Schwartz
Publications
Elections for corporate directorships have become more competitive and expensive in recent years, raising important questions of corporate campaign finance, such as whether an insurgent campaign must disclose the source of its funding and whether a director is permitted to receive third-party compensation during her term in office (known as a "golden leash"). These present novel and unanswered issues of corporate law, but many analogous issues have been resolved in the political sphere using the First Amendment and a well-developed line of Supreme Court case law beginning with Buckley v. Valeo and continuing through Citizens United and other key precedents. …
Investment Accelerators, Brad Bernthal
Investment Accelerators, Brad Bernthal
Publications
This Article documents and explains the legal and extralegal dimensions of Investment Accelerator (IA) systems. Accelerators are a new class of institution that supports entrepreneurs and early stage startups. Investment Accelerators take an ownership stake in companies that participate in an intensive, time-limited program. Interviews reveal the surprising extent to which parties in many Investment Accelerators exchange economic value in the absence of formal agreement. Startups share proprietary information with highly accomplished mentors who, in turn, contribute their time and connections without direct compensation. This under-contracted and informal arrangement raises concerns about opportunism. Data from an original investigation presents a …