Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (730)
- Seattle University School of Law (183)
- UIC School of Law (6)
- Columbia Law School (5)
- University of Michigan Law School (4)
-
- University of Colorado Law School (3)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- University of Richmond (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- University of Baltimore Law (1)
- University of Dar es Salaam (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (14)
- Campaign finance (9)
- Corporations (8)
- Citizens United (7)
- SFFA (7)
-
- Supreme Court (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- ESG (6)
- First Amendment (6)
- Corporate law (5)
- Diversity (5)
- Public health (5)
- Regulation (5)
- Securities and exchange commission (5)
- Addiction (4)
- Artificial intelligence (4)
- Constitution (4)
- Legislation (4)
- SEC (4)
- Shareholder (4)
- Technology (4)
- Citizens United v. FEC (3)
- Corporate (3)
- Corporate Governance (3)
- Data (3)
- Discrimination (3)
- Education (3)
- Election law (3)
- Elections (3)
- Indonesia (3)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (730)
- Seattle University Law Review (183)
- UIC Law Review (6)
- Faculty Scholarship (4)
- Publications (3)
-
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Michigan Law Review (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Brooklyn Law Review (1)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Faculty Books (1)
- Fordham Law Review (1)
- Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (1)
- Kentucky Law Journal (1)
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review (1)
- Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review (1)
- Nevada Law Journal (1)
- St. Mary's Law Journal (1)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Villanova Law Review (1956 - ) (1)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (1)
- West Virginia Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 931 - 950 of 950
Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law
The Real Error In Citizens United, Joanna M. Meyer
The Real Error In Citizens United, Joanna M. Meyer
Washington and Lee Law Review
No abstract provided.
Selectica Resets The Trigger On The Poison Pill: Where Should The Delaware Courts Go Next?, Paul H. Edelman, Randall S. Thomas
Selectica Resets The Trigger On The Poison Pill: Where Should The Delaware Courts Go Next?, Paul H. Edelman, Randall S. Thomas
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
Since their invention in 1982, shareholder rights plans have been the subject of intense controversy. Rights plans, or as they are known more pejoratively “poison pills,” enable a target board to “poison” a takeover attempt by making it prohibitively expensive for a bidder to acquire more than a certain percentage of the target company’s stock (until recently 15-20%). Not surprisingly, some commentators view rights plans as an inappropriate means of shifting power from shareholders to the board of directors.
In this Article, we critically examine Delaware law on the use of shareholder rights plans and propose a new approach to …
Commentary: Campaign Finance In The Wake Of Citizens United, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2011), Thomas E. Mann
Commentary: Campaign Finance In The Wake Of Citizens United, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 583 (2011), Thomas E. Mann
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
A Capitalist Joker: The Strange Origins, Disturbing Past, And Uncertain Future Of Corporate Personhood In American Law, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 643 (2011), David H. Gans, Douglas T. Kendall
A Capitalist Joker: The Strange Origins, Disturbing Past, And Uncertain Future Of Corporate Personhood In American Law, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 643 (2011), David H. Gans, Douglas T. Kendall
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
So What If Corporations Aren't People?, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 701 (2011), Ilya Shapiro, Caitlyn W. Mccarthy
So What If Corporations Aren't People?, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 701 (2011), Ilya Shapiro, Caitlyn W. Mccarthy
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Citizens United And Tiered Personhood, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 717 (2011), Atiba R. Ellis
Citizens United And Tiered Personhood, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 717 (2011), Atiba R. Ellis
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Back To The Future? The Effects Of Citizens United V. Fec In The 2010 Election, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 595 (2011), Peter L. Francia
Back To The Future? The Effects Of Citizens United V. Fec In The 2010 Election, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 595 (2011), Peter L. Francia
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Rational Coercion: Citizens United And A Modern Day Prisoner's Dilemma, Anne M. Tucker
Rational Coercion: Citizens United And A Modern Day Prisoner's Dilemma, Anne M. Tucker
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
Corporations, Corruption, And Complexity: Campaign Finance After Citizens United, Richard Briffault
Corporations, Corruption, And Complexity: Campaign Finance After Citizens United, Richard Briffault
Faculty Scholarship
Few campaign finance cases have drawn more public attention than the Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. FEC. The Court's invalidation of a sixty-year-old federal law – and comparable laws in two dozen states – banning corporations from engaging in independent spending in support of or opposition to candidates strongly affirms the right of corporations to engage in electoral advocacy. Critics – and most, albeit not all, of both the popular and academic commentary on the decision has been critical – have condemned the idea that corporations enjoy the same rights to spend on elections as natural persons. …
The Transformation Of Freedom Of Speech: Unsnarling The Twisted Roots Of Citizens United V. Fec, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 69 (2010), Steven J. André
The Transformation Of Freedom Of Speech: Unsnarling The Twisted Roots Of Citizens United V. Fec, 44 J. Marshall L. Rev. 69 (2010), Steven J. André
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
The Seductive Comparison Of Shareholder And Civic Democracy, Usha Rodrigues
The Seductive Comparison Of Shareholder And Civic Democracy, Usha Rodrigues
Scholarly Works
This Comment takes the common comparison of shareholder democracy and political democracy in a new direction by exploring the parallels between the board of directors and the Electoral College, examining both institutions in light of the differences between nation and corporation and their contrasting histories. Both are "once removed" representative democracies, because both systems only give the voters the right to vote for representatives who then select those who actually govern. The Comment next considers, with a critical eye, the underlying premise that shareholder and civic democracies can be compared at all, given the radically different nature of the corporate …
Regulating Section 527 Organizations, Gregg D. Polsky, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Regulating Section 527 Organizations, Gregg D. Polsky, Guy-Uriel E. Charles
Scholarly Works
In this Essay, we consider whether the Federal Election Commission (FEC) has the authority to regulate independent 527 organizations (e.g., Swiftboat Veterans for Truth, Moveon.org, etc.) as political committees under the Federal Election Campaign Act. This issue, which was hotly debated during the last election cycle when it was considered and ultimately tabled by the FEC, is an extremely complex one that requires a deep understanding of election, tax, administrative, and constitutional law. After considering how these areas of law intersect, we conclude that the FEC lacks the authority to regulate independent 527 organizations as political committees.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
University Of Richmond Law Review
University Of Richmond Law Review
University of Richmond Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
Survey Of Developments In West Virginia Law: 1980
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Corporate Political Speech: The Effect Of First National Bank Of Boston V. Bellotti Upon Statutory Limitations On Corporate Referendum Spending, Francis H. Fox
Corporate Political Speech: The Effect Of First National Bank Of Boston V. Bellotti Upon Statutory Limitations On Corporate Referendum Spending, Francis H. Fox
Kentucky Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Federal Statues And Government Regulation, Various Editors
Federal Statues And Government Regulation, Various Editors
Villanova Law Review (1956 - )
No abstract provided.
A Corporation May Not Contribute Funds To Affect The Outcome Of A Referendum., Larry D. Brockman
A Corporation May Not Contribute Funds To Affect The Outcome Of A Referendum., Larry D. Brockman
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract Forthcoming.
Corporate Contributions To Ballot-Measure Campaigns, Gail L. Achterman
Corporate Contributions To Ballot-Measure Campaigns, Gail L. Achterman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
It is not clear that the perceived dangers of corporate participation in politics are real dangers, or that outright prohibition of such participation is the best means of preserving the democratic character of the electoral process. Any controls on corporate spending in initiative campaigns should be firmly based upon articulated conceptions of the corporation's legitimate role in society. This article examines some of these conceptions and their relationship to the process of direct legislation and thereafter makes recommendations for workable controls in light of that analysis.
Corporations - Political Activities - Interpretation Of Statute Prohibiting Political Contributions By Corporation, George Kircos
Corporations - Political Activities - Interpretation Of Statute Prohibiting Political Contributions By Corporation, George Kircos
Michigan Law Review
Defendant corporation, organized to promote the recall of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy, was charged with violating section 346.12 of the Wisconsin statutes, which prohibits corporations doing business in Wisconsin from paying or contributing any money, etc., to promote or defeat the candidacy of any person for nomination, appointment, or election to any political office. The trial court entered a forfeiture judgment against the defendant. On appeal, held, reversed. The statutory phrase "doing business" was intended to limit the scope of the prohibition to corporations organized for profit. Corporations, such as the defendant, organized solely for political purposes are not …