Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Universitas Indonesia (851)
- Seattle University School of Law (187)
- UIC School of Law (40)
- University of Michigan Law School (25)
- University of Colorado Law School (22)
-
- University of Richmond (12)
- BLR (10)
- Fordham Law School (10)
- Pepperdine University (9)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
- Brooklyn Law School (6)
- University of Georgia School of Law (6)
- William & Mary Law School (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Columbia Law School (4)
- Brigham Young University Law School (3)
- Duke Law (3)
- Georgetown University Law Center (3)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (3)
- Roger Williams University (3)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (3)
- University of Miami Law School (3)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (3)
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- Notre Dame Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (2)
- St. Mary's University (2)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (2)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (2)
- Keyword
-
- Corporations (27)
- Courts (20)
- Corporate law (15)
- Law (15)
- Corporation (13)
-
- Litigation (12)
- Supreme Court (11)
- Delaware (10)
- Jurisdiction (9)
- Legislation (9)
- Shareholders (9)
- Commercial Law (8)
- Copyright (8)
- Corporate (8)
- Corporate governance (8)
- International Law (8)
- SEC (8)
- Securities Law (8)
- Securities and exchange commission (8)
- Antitrust (7)
- Contracts (7)
- First Amendment (7)
- Law and Economics (7)
- Regulation (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Securities (7)
- Technology (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Constitution (6)
- Dispute Resolution (6)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (730)
- Seattle University Law Review (187)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (40)
- Faculty Scholarship (15)
-
- Articles (13)
- Publications (11)
- Strategies in Western Water Law and Policy: Courts, Coercion and Collaboration (Summer Conference, June 8-11) (11)
- University of Richmond Law Review (11)
- ExpressO (9)
- Michigan Law Review (7)
- Touro Law Review (7)
- Pepperdine Law Review (6)
- Scholarly Works (5)
- Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law (4)
- Fordham Law Review (4)
- Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (3)
- BYU Law Review (3)
- Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law (3)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (3)
- Life of the Law School (1993- ) (3)
- Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review (3)
- Northwestern University Law Review (3)
- Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal (3)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (2)
- Faculty Articles (2)
- Faculty Works (2)
- University of Miami Law Review (2)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1231 - 1260 of 1260
Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law
Proposal To Change The Patent Reexamination Statute To Eliminate Unnecessary Litigation, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 887 (1994), Marvin Motsenbocker
Proposal To Change The Patent Reexamination Statute To Eliminate Unnecessary Litigation, 27 J. Marshall L. Rev. 887 (1994), Marvin Motsenbocker
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Hail Britannia?: Institutional Investor Behavior Under Limited Regulation, John C. Coffee Jr., Bernard S. Black
Hail Britannia?: Institutional Investor Behavior Under Limited Regulation, John C. Coffee Jr., Bernard S. Black
Faculty Scholarship
A central puzzle in understanding the governance of large American public firms is why most institutional shareholders are passive. Why would they rather sell than fight? Until recently, the Berle-Means paradigm – the belief that separation of ownership and control naturally characterizes the modern corporation – reigned supreme. Shareholder passivity was seen as an inevitable result of the scale of modern industrial enterprise and of the collective action problems that face shareholders, each of whom owns only a small fraction of a large firm's shares.
A paradigm shift may be in the making, however. Rival hypotheses have recently been offered …
Corporate Pro-Choice: New York Assumes An Anti-Takover Position, Paula Walter
Corporate Pro-Choice: New York Assumes An Anti-Takover Position, Paula Walter
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Privity, Products Liability, And Ucc Warranties: A Retrospect Of And Prospects For Illinois Commercial Code 2-318, 25 J. Marshall L. Rev. 177 (1991), Steven Bonanno
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Recent Judicial Developments In Delaware Takeover Law, Mark J. Loewenstein
Recent Judicial Developments In Delaware Takeover Law, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
No abstract provided.
Toward An Auction Market For Corporate Control And The Demise Of The Business Judgment Rule, Mark J. Loewenstein
Toward An Auction Market For Corporate Control And The Demise Of The Business Judgment Rule, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
No abstract provided.
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
Brief For Petitioner, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 955 (1988), L. Lee Byrd, Yvonne T. Griffin, G. Rodney Young
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
Brief For Respondent, 21 J. Marshall L. Rev. 983 (1988), Matthew W. Nakon, Laura J. Steffe, Steven R. Yoo
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Book Review Of Passion: An Essay On Personality , Richard F. Devlin Frsc
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
Passion is a cogently structured, compel Jingly argued and seductively enthralling masterpiece which, in years to come, will undoubtedly stand out as an inspirational source for many who seek social transformation. Unger's style, in this essay at least, is lucid and inviting. Substantively, Passion demonstrates not only the depth of his penetrating intellect but also his command of an array of' disciplines. Unger's polymathy is all the more impressive when we remember that ours is an era in which idiosyncratic specialization is the norm.
The Copyright Monopoly After Sony Corp. Of America V. Universal City Studios, Inc.
The Copyright Monopoly After Sony Corp. Of America V. Universal City Studios, Inc.
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Ancillary Relief In Federal Securities Law: A Study In Federal Remedies, George W. Dent
Ancillary Relief In Federal Securities Law: A Study In Federal Remedies, George W. Dent
Faculty Publications
After describing the history and current practice of ancillary relief in federal securities law, this Article analyzes the general law of federal remedies and ancillary relief, including ancillary relief in other areas of administrative law, recent developments in federal equity, statutory interpretation, and federal common law, and implied statutory remedies. The Article then examines pertinent aspects of the federal securities laws, including their legislative history and recent judicial interpretations. On this basis the Article recommends both a general approach to ancillary relief in federal securities law and responses to problems of specific remedies. Finally, the Article discusses ancillary relief under …
Section 14(E) Of The Williams Act And The Rule 10b-5 Comparisons, Mark J. Loewenstein
Section 14(E) Of The Williams Act And The Rule 10b-5 Comparisons, Mark J. Loewenstein
Publications
The passage of the Williams Act in 1968 added a set of provisions to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to govern tender offers. In this article, Professor Loewenstein examines the antifraud provision of the Williams Act, codified as section 14(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the development of decisional law under it. After discussing the propriety of inferring a private cause of action from section 14(e), Professor Loewenstein argues that the judiciary's reliance on rule 10b-5 precedents to set the bounds of the 14(e) cause of action is unwarranted. He concludes: 1) that scienter should not …
Adjusting To The Managerial Revolution: The Law Of Corporations In The Federal Courts Of Delaware 1900-1941, Stephen B. Presser, Richard E. Simpson
Adjusting To The Managerial Revolution: The Law Of Corporations In The Federal Courts Of Delaware 1900-1941, Stephen B. Presser, Richard E. Simpson
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
Survival Of Rights Of Action After Corporate Merger, Michigan Law Review
Survival Of Rights Of Action After Corporate Merger, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Once a corporation ceases to exist, most courts permit neither primary nor derivative suits to be brought in its name. If a merger precipitates that corporate demise, courts usually hold that standing to sue, like other assets of the "merged" corporation, passes to the surviving corporation. This Note ponders the merit of that rule of passage.
Section I categorizes the cases defining the rule of passage. Some courts have steadfastly adhered to the rule and denied standing to the merged corporation's shareholders. Other courts, fearing that the rule would preclude meritorious actions, have created exceptions allowing these shareholders to sue …
Allocation Of Scarce Goods Under Section 2-615 Of The Uniform Commercial Code: A Comparison Of Some Rival Models, James J. White
Allocation Of Scarce Goods Under Section 2-615 Of The Uniform Commercial Code: A Comparison Of Some Rival Models, James J. White
Articles
Section 2-615 of the Uniform Commercial Code authorizes a contract seller to allocate goods in short supply when full performance has become commercially impracticable. Most of the cases under and commentary on that section have focused on the issue of commercial impracticability. The allocation aspects of the section have attracted much more modest attention in the cases and in the scholarly journals. The purpose of this article is to examine critically the allocation rule set out in section 2-615(b). That subsection authorizes a seller, upon a finding of commercial impracticability, to allocate "in any manner which is fair and reasonable." …
Recent Legislation, J. Rodney Johnson
Recent Legislation, J. Rodney Johnson
University of Richmond Law Review
The 1972 session of the General Assembly was especially active in the areas of wills, trusts, and estates. Much of this legislation deals with fine points not affecting the average lawyer in his practice. However, the following items of legislation should be of general interest to the attorney whose practice involves probate work or estate planning, even though he does not hold himself out as a specialist in these areas.
Removal Of The Corporate Director During His Term Of Office, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Removal Of The Corporate Director During His Term Of Office, Arthur H. Travers Jr.
Publications
The traditional rules governing the removal of corporate directors have evolved so as to insulate the board of directors from the shareholders who elect them. Professor Travers in his article examines initially the interests being advanced by protecting the board members from removal by their electorate. He then critically analyzes the law as it relates to these interests in order to suggest a more rational approach.
Federal Venue And The Corporate Plaintiff: Judicial Code Section 1391 (C)
Federal Venue And The Corporate Plaintiff: Judicial Code Section 1391 (C)
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Reorganization Of The Federal Judiciary, Thomas Frank Konop
Reorganization Of The Federal Judiciary, Thomas Frank Konop
Journal Articles
This article examines the controversy the Supreme Court have declaring unconstitutional several acts of Congress by striking social and beneficial laws from the statute books. The Supreme Court in effect told the American people that because of the Constitution their representatives could not pass these laws. It is the Supreme Court that is usurping the power of Congress and the President. It is the Supreme Court that has been destroying laws passed by Congress for a better life, more liberty and equality; social justice, and pursuit of happiness of one hundred thirty million people. This article favors the President's proposal …
Receivers - Consent Receivership Not Allowed In Michigan
Receivers - Consent Receivership Not Allowed In Michigan
Michigan Law Review
A general creditor filed a bill alleging that the defendant corporation's assets as shown by its books have a value in excess of its indebtedness but that it cannot meet its current obligations although its assets, when converted into money would be sufficient to meet them and continue its business; that several suits have been instituted by defendant's creditors and that if executions are issued and levies made, defendant will be compelled to cease operations and losses will be suffered by all of defendant's creditors, whereas, if a receiver is appointed to operate its business their claims may be paid …
Limitation Of Diversity Jurisdiction In Cases Affecting Foreign Corporations, Gustavus Ohlinger
Limitation Of Diversity Jurisdiction In Cases Affecting Foreign Corporations, Gustavus Ohlinger
Michigan Law Review
On February 29, 1932, President Hoover sent to the Senate and House of Representatives a message recommending that the jurisdiction of federal courts based on diversity of citizenship be modified by "providing that where a corporation, organized under the laws of one State, carries on business in another State it shall be treated as a citizen of the State wherein it carries on business as respects suits brought within that State between it and the residents thereof arising out of the business carried on in such State."
International Law--Witholding Of Political Recognition--Suit By Russian Corporation In Court Of Equity, Edwin D. Dickinson
International Law--Witholding Of Political Recognition--Suit By Russian Corporation In Court Of Equity, Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
"The plaintiff corporation was incorporated in Russia under the Imperial government. Prior to the Russian Revolution it had deposited certain securities and moneys with the defendant, as trustee, as required by the New York statutes, for the protection of policy-holders and creditors. In this suit to compel the return of the funds the defendant claimed that the plaintiff corporation was no longer in existence because of the Russian Soviet decrees.... Held, that although the court cannot recognize the legal validity of the decrees of the Soviet government, the facts of the situation are such that justice and reason require …
The Russian Reinsurance Case, Edwin D. Dickinson
The Russian Reinsurance Case, Edwin D. Dickinson
Articles
Professor Dickinson's second commentary on Russian Reinsurance Company v. Stoddard and Bankers Trust Company: "The facts in the Russian Reinsurance Company case were without precedent. The Reinsurance Company had been incorporated in Russia in 1899 under a special statute constituting its charter and by-laws.... In 1917 the revolutionary Soviet Government was established in Russia and seven of the eight persons constituting the company's board of directors was driven into exile. In 1918 Soviet decrees nationalized the company, confiscated its property, and apparently terminated its corporate existence. Nevertheless, the exiled directors held meetings in Paris and continued to direct the …
Public Utility Valuation, Edwin C. Goddard
Public Utility Valuation, Edwin C. Goddard
Articles
It has been so often remarked that the "valuation" of public utilities is determined by no rule of thumb, that there are no fixed rules or formulas to guide courts or commissions, that determination of value as a rate base is matter of judgment and discretion in each case, Minnesota Rate Cares, 230 U. S. 352, 434, that the statement has come to be believed by reason in part of its much repetition. It is usually accepted as axiomatic. The glorious uncertainty resulting from such an admission will continue so long as judgments of one man or set of men …
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Recent Important Decisions, Michigan Law Review
Michigan Law Review
Admiralty - Workmen's Compensation - Is a Hydroplane a Vessel? - Claimant was employed in the care and management of a hydroplane which was moored in navigable waters. The hydroplane began to drag anchor and drift toward the beach, where it was in danger of being wrecked. Claimant waded into the water and was struck by the propeller. Held, claimant is not entitled to compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law, since a hydroplane while on navigable waters is a vessel, and therefore the jurisdiction of the admiralty excludes that of the State Industrial Commission. Reinhardt v. Newport Flying Service Corp. …
Note And Comment, Gordon W. Stoner, Newton K. Fox, Walle W. Merritt, Albert E. Meder
Note And Comment, Gordon W. Stoner, Newton K. Fox, Walle W. Merritt, Albert E. Meder
Michigan Law Review
The Power of a Court to Compel a jury to Render its Verdict in Accordance with a Peremptory Instruction; The Liability of Municipal Corporations in the Discharge of Public or Governmental Duties and of Private or Corporate Duties; Some views of the Nature and Effect of Corporateness; Mitigation of Damages or Substituted Contract; Limitation of the Amount of a Carrier's Liability
The Standard Oil Decision: The Rule Of Reason, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
The Standard Oil Decision: The Rule Of Reason, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Articles
After twenty-one years the Sherman Anti Trust Act has been applied to the typical combination restraining interstate commerce, which that act was designed to prevent.
The Northern Securities Decision, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
The Northern Securities Decision, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Articles
March 14 the Supreme Court of the United States decided one of the most important cases that has been before it for a number of years. The litigation referred to is the Northern Securities case. The question involved was whether the control of the Great Northern and Northern Pacific railway companies through the ownership of the majority of the stock of each of those companies by the Securities company violated the national anti-trust act. The majority of the Supreme Court held it did, but four of the judges dissented.
Northwestern Railway Situation, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Northwestern Railway Situation, Horace Lafayette Wilgus
Articles
What promises to be the most important corporate litigation that has or is likely to come before the Supreme Court for many years is involved in the various suits against the Northern Securities Company. To understand its full significance, it is desirable to recall something of the railroad history of the western states.