Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Business Organizations Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Antitrust and Trade Regulation

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1351 - 1366 of 1366

Full-Text Articles in Business Organizations Law

Corporations - Clayton Act - Service Of Process On Alien Corporations Through Their Local Subsidiaries, George R. Haydon Jr. Mar 1958

Corporations - Clayton Act - Service Of Process On Alien Corporations Through Their Local Subsidiaries, George R. Haydon Jr.

Michigan Law Review

Two affiliated German corporations, one of which is the defendant, established a jointly owned subsidiary in New York. Three members of the subsidiary's five-man board of directors are officers or directors of the German parents, while a fourth is a former employee sent to this country to manage the subsidiary. The American company is devoted exclusively to the business of the German parents. It assists in the negotiation of contracts, although it has no power to bind the parents, advises with respect to patents, and makes infrequent sales and purchases. For these services, it receives a flat fee plus a …


Edwards: Big Business And The Policy Of Competition, Carl H. Fulda Mar 1957

Edwards: Big Business And The Policy Of Competition, Carl H. Fulda

Michigan Law Review

A Review of Big Business and the Policy of Competition By Corwin D. Edwards.


Miscellaneous—Corporations—Stockholders’ Agreements, Robert Miller Jan 1957

Miscellaneous—Corporations—Stockholders’ Agreements, Robert Miller

Buffalo Law Review

Arbitration between Burkin and Katz, 1 N. Y. 2d 570, 136 N. E. 2d 862 (1956).


Integration Of Public Utility Holding Companies, Robert F. Ritchie Jan 1954

Integration Of Public Utility Holding Companies, Robert F. Ritchie

Michigan Legal Studies Series

The Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 was one of the most controversial pieces of legislation ever enacted by Congress, but despite this fact it has withstood numerous and vigorous attacks upon its constitutionality and, further, it has never been amended in any material respect. The Securities and Exchange Commission was confronted in 1935 with one of the most difficult administrative tasks in modern history. How it met and resolved the difficult problems of geographical and economic integration, arising under the so-called "death sentence" provisions of this Act, is the subject matter of this publication.

The research involved in …


"Fair And Equitable" Distribution Of Voting Power Under The Public Utility Holding Company Act Of 1935, Leo W. Leary Nov 1953

"Fair And Equitable" Distribution Of Voting Power Under The Public Utility Holding Company Act Of 1935, Leo W. Leary

Michigan Law Review

In the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 Congress gave the Securities and Exchange Commission the task of investigating voting power distribution among security holders in electric and gas holding companies and their subsidiaries. If the Commission finds that the corporate structure or continued existence of any company in a holding company system "unfairly or inequitably" distributes voting power among the investors in the system, it is the Commission's duty to order the offending corporation to take "such steps as the Commission shall find necessary" to cure this condition. This paper is an attempt to ascertain what the Commission …


Corporations - Shareholders - Right To Bring Derivative Action For Treble Damages Under Antitrust Laws, William K. Davenport S.Ed. Nov 1953

Corporations - Shareholders - Right To Bring Derivative Action For Treble Damages Under Antitrust Laws, William K. Davenport S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, owner of 50 percent of the stock in a theater corporation, brought a derivative action in federal court for treble damages for loss of profits allegedly suffered from defendant's violation of the antitrust laws. The district court sustained defendant's motion to dismiss. On appeal to the court of appeals, held, reversed and remanded. Under the new federal rules, a stockholder may bring a derivative action for treble damages under the antitrust laws. Fanchon & Marco, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., (2d Cir. 1953) 202 F. (2d) 731.


General Motors Acceptance Corporation And The Sherman Act Feb 1942

General Motors Acceptance Corporation And The Sherman Act

Indiana Law Journal

Notes and Comments: Trade Regulation


Tax Definition Of Reorganization: Mergers And Consolidations, Hugh B. Kuder Jr. Feb 1942

Tax Definition Of Reorganization: Mergers And Consolidations, Hugh B. Kuder Jr.

Michigan Law Review

In connection with income taxation, some importance is attached to the difference between mergers and consolidations. The difference may be of import in deciding whether or not income has been realized. Too, when the resulting corporation files a return, it may be necessary to determine whether it is the product of a merger or of a consolidation.


Consumers' Co-Operatives And Price Fixing Laws, Charles Bunn Dec 1941

Consumers' Co-Operatives And Price Fixing Laws, Charles Bunn

Michigan Law Review

The evolution of our business institutions shows us a long procession of experimental procedures, giving rise to de facto commercial forms, many of which have in turn demanded such recognition de jure as should make their position in the business world both clear and safe. Consumers' co-operation is such a procedure. Its underlying idea is simple, that a business owned by its customers, managed under their direction and having no legitimate loyalties except to them, has a better chance to meet their needs than one owned and managed by outsiders. But it has taken many years and many failures to …


Alternatives In Government Control Of Economic Enterprise, Ralph F. Fuchs Jan 1936

Alternatives In Government Control Of Economic Enterprise, Ralph F. Fuchs

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Book Review. Keezer, D. M. And May, S., The Public Control Of Business, Ralph F. Fuchs Jan 1930

Book Review. Keezer, D. M. And May, S., The Public Control Of Business, Ralph F. Fuchs

Articles by Maurer Faculty

No abstract provided.


Power Of Agricultural Co-Operative Associations To Limit Production, Milton J. Keegan Apr 1928

Power Of Agricultural Co-Operative Associations To Limit Production, Milton J. Keegan

Michigan Law Review

Farmers within recent years have recognized the necessity of combining in larger and still larger numbers, and great cooperative farm organizations have been formed, some of them with sales reaching $100,000,000 each year. These organizations in 1923 did a combined business estimated at $2,200,000,000. "Giant marketing associations, covering whole states, and even groups of states, have been organized with startling rapidity in the great cotton and tobacco growing states." Co-operative marketing legislation has given these groups great and far reaching powers to attain the end of making agriculture more profitable and to secure better returns to the producers of farm …


Case Books On Public Utilities, Oliver P. Field May 1927

Case Books On Public Utilities, Oliver P. Field

Indiana Law Journal

No abstract provided.


Book Reviews May 1923

Book Reviews

Michigan Law Review

A collection of book reviews by multiple authors.


The Standard Oil Decision: The Rule Of Reason, Horace Lafayette Wilgus Jan 1911

The Standard Oil Decision: The Rule Of Reason, Horace Lafayette Wilgus

Articles

After twenty-one years the Sherman Anti Trust Act has been applied to the typical combination restraining interstate commerce, which that act was designed to prevent.


The Northern Securities Decision, Horace Lafayette Wilgus Jan 1904

The Northern Securities Decision, Horace Lafayette Wilgus

Articles

March 14 the Supreme Court of the United States decided one of the most important cases that has been before it for a number of years. The litigation referred to is the Northern Securities case. The question involved was whether the control of the Great Northern and Northern Pacific railway companies through the ownership of the majority of the stock of each of those companies by the Securities company violated the national anti-trust act. The majority of the Supreme Court held it did, but four of the judges dissented.