Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Declaring Dankruptcy: Exploring Avenues To Relief For Debtors Involved With Cannabis, Danny O'Connor

University of Cincinnati Law Review

No abstract provided.

Scarlet-Lettered Bankruptcy: A Public Benefit Proposal For Mass Tort Villains, Samir D. Parikh

Northwestern University Law Review

Financially distressed companies often seek refuge in federal bankruptcy court to auction valuable assets and pay creditor claims. Mass tort defendants—including 3M, Johnson & Johnson, and Purdue Pharma—introduce new complexities to customary Chapter 11 dynamics. Many mass tort defendants engage in malfeasance that inflicts widespread harm. These debtors fuel public scorn and earn a scarlet letter that can destroy value for an otherwise profitable business. Scarlet-lettered companies could file for bankruptcy and quickly sell their assets to fund victims’ settlement trusts. This Article argues, however, that this traditional resolution option would eviscerate victim recoveries. Harsh public scrutiny has diminished the …

Going Concerns And Environmental Concerns: Mitigating Climate Change Through Bankruptcy Reform, Alexander Gouzoules

Faculty Publications

This article examines how legislative reforms to the Bankruptcy Code could mitigate the effects of climate change, speed the adoption of renewable energy, and contribute to U.S. compliance with the Paris Agreement of 2015. It analyzes the benefits derived by the fossil fuel industry from Chapter 11, which allows extractive firms to survive boom-and-bust cycles caused by volatile oil and gas prices. Insolvent polluters are preserved as going concerns during price collapses, only to resume and expand production as prices recover.

This article proposes novel legislative reforms to the Bankruptcy Code that would require insolvent fossil fuel producers to liquidate …

Generalized Creditors And Particularized Creditors: Against A Unified Theory Of Standing In Bankruptcy, David G. Carlson, Jeanne L. Schroeder

Articles

Courts have struggled toward a unified theory to explain when the trustee has exclusive jurisdiction to sue a third party for harms done to a bankrupt debtor, and when creditors have exclusive jurisdiction to sue the third party. Courts have proclaimed that when every creditor can sue the third party, then none of them can, and the right belongs solely to the trustee. Creditor rights are “generalized.” If only a proper subset of creditors can sue the third party, then the trustee is not able to subrogate to the subset. Such creditors are “particularized.” This paper proclaims the test a …

Bankruptcy As Social Safety Net, Pamela Foohey

Online Publications

One in ten Americans have filed bankruptcy at some point during their adult lives. Contrary to the pronouncements of some politicians, these filings do not reflect a series of personal failures and should not be understood as failures of character. Indeed, most of the people who file bankruptcy struggle for years to pay their debts before turning to bankruptcy law and courts for help. And most of the people who file say that they felt shame upon filing. Instead, the bankruptcy filings of millions and millions of people reflect systematic policy choices over the past forty years that have left …

May The Executive Branch Forgive Student Loan Debt Without Further Congressional Action?, Colin Mark

Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary

On April 1, 2021, the Biden administration announced that Secretary of Education Michael Cardona will consider whether the President has legal authority to forgive up to $50,000 per debtor in student loan debt without further Congressional action. This paper interrogates the leading arguments for and against the Biden administration’s capacity to forgive this student loan debt strictly using administrative action. This article first surveys the history of federal student loan forgiveness programs in the United States. It then considers whether statutes on the books—in particular, the Higher Education Act of 1965 and the Federal Claims Collection Act of 1966—grant the …

The Long And Winding Road To The Small Business Reorganization Act: Why Our Next Stop Should Be Simplicity And Accessibility, Daniel O'Hare

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

When Is A Debt "Obtained By" Fraud?: Reconsideration Of The Fraud Nondischargeability Exception Under Section 523(A)(2) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Theresa J. Pulley Radwan

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Allocation Of Property Appreciation: A Statutory Approach To The Judicial Dialectic, Lawrence Ponoroff

William & Mary Business Law Review

Many, perhaps the majority, of Chapter 13 cases end up being converted to Chapter 7. The converted Chapter 7 case is not a new case, it is a continuation of the case that was commenced with the filing of the original Chapter 13 petition. However, there are important structural differences between the two chapters, including over what constitutes property of the estate. This creates some thorny issues surrounding whether property of the estate as generally defined in section 541(a) of the Bankruptcy Code or property of the estate as specifically defined in Chapter 13 controls in determining the scope of …

Portraits Of Bankruptcy Filers, Pamela Foohey, Robert M. Lawless, Deborah Thorne

Articles

One in ten adult Americans has turned to the consumer bankruptcy system for help. For almost forty years, the only systematic data collection about the people who file bankruptcy has come from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project (CBP), for which we serve as co-principal investigators. In this Article, we use CBP data from 2013 to 2019 to describe who is using the bankruptcy system, providing the first comprehensive overview of bankruptcy filers in thirty years. We use principal component analysis to leverage these data to identify distinct groups of people who file bankruptcy. This technique allows us to situate the distinctions …

The Revival Of Student Loan Discharge In Bankruptcy By The Tenth And Second Circuits, Biqi Chen

Cardozo Law Review

No abstract provided.

Section 546(E) Redux—The Proper Framework For The Construction Of The Terms Financial Institution And Financial Participant Contained In The Bankruptcy Code After The U.S. Supreme Court’S Holding In Merit, Peter V. Marchetti

Cardozo Law Review

This Article discusses and analyzes the proper framework for the construction of the terms “financial institution” and “financial participant” as defined in Sections 101(22)(A) and 101(22A) of the Bankruptcy Code (the Code), as they work in tandem with Section 546(e) of the Code. In 2018, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long awaited decision in Merit, which held that the language regarding transfers “made by or to (or for the benefit of) . . . a financial institution” contained in Section 546(e) does not insulate the ultimate transferee of a constructive fraudulent action (a CFTA) simply because the company being …

Chief Loophole Officer Or Chief Legal Officer: Inside Lehman Brothers—A Film Case Study About Corporate And Legal Ethics, Garrick Apollon

St. Mary's Journal on Legal Malpractice & Ethics

This Article discusses the continuing legal education (CLE) visual advocacy documentary-style program, which Garrick Apollon (author of this Article) researched and developed. The case study for this CLE documentary-style program is the film Inside Lehman Brothers—a documentary film by Jennifer Deschamps which chronicles the story of the Lehman whistleblowers. The film presents Mathew Lee, former senior vice president overseeing Lehman’s global balance sheet; Oliver Budde, former in-house counsel (associate general counsel) of the Lehman Brothers; and the racialized female mid-tier manager whistleblowers, who all paid a steep price in the 2008 American subprime mortgage crisis, while many of the …

True Sales Or Secured Transactions? The Contract Is Not Dispositive, Daniel Mosayov

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Receivables are debts owed to a company for goods or services. A company seeking liquidity may sell the future interest in receivables generated through operations or use the future interest in receivables as collateral to secure a loan. The parties’ rights will vary depending on whether the receivables are sold or used as collateral. If sold, the buyer holds absolute ownership of the acquired receivables protected from other interests. If the transaction is a loan, the lender holds a security interest in the receivables, which may be junior to other interests.

A bankruptcy court can recharacterize a transaction as …

A Foreign Debtor Who Lacks Permanent Residence In The U.S. May Qualify For Florida’S Homestead Exemption, Jenna Kirkland

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The home has special significance under Florida law, as public policy favors property ownership, citizen independence, and preserving a home where a family can be sheltered and “live beyond the reach of economic misfortune.” Generally, once an individual files for bankruptcy, all property of the debtor becomes property of the estate. However, Section 522 of title 11 of the United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) allows a debtor to exempt certain property from the estate. The Bankruptcy Code permits states to opt out of the federal exemption scheme provided. Florida is one of the states that has opted out, therefore …

The Features And Limitations Of Asbestos Settlement Trusts: A Primer, Michael Quintman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 524 of title 11 of the United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code”) prevents creditors from recovering pre-bankruptcy debts after plan approval if their recovery was not already provided for in the approved bankruptcy plan. Subsection (g) of section 524 provides a special procedure for debtors previously engaged in the sale or production of asbestos-containing products to restructure while ensuring those injured through exposure to those products are compensated. In particular, section 524(g) provides for the formation of a trust that can settle asbestos related tort claims after the plan has been confirmed by a bankruptcy court. These trusts are …

Chapter 15 Recognition Is Necessary For Efficient And Consistent Cross-Border Proceedings, Sarah Franzetti

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") was adopted in 2005, it repealed the former section 304, which had often led to ad-hoc and inconsistent rulings for foreign debtors seeking assistance in U.S. bankruptcy courts. The new Chapter was passed to achieve greater efficiency on a domestic scale, as well as the "fair and efficient administration of cross-border insolvencies" by promoting greater cooperation between U.S. and foreign courts. For a foreign debtor to reap the benefits of this cooperation, a representative of the foreign bankruptcy proceeding must petition a U.S. bankruptcy court …

Granting Derivative Standing To A Creditors’ Committee, Jordan Milite

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A party has “standing” (the right to challenge the conduct of another in court) when that person or entity has suffered an “injury in fact.” “Derivative standing” is when a person or entity other than the harmed party steps in to assert the claim in place of the harmed party. In a case under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy court may grant derivative standing to a creditors’ committee or similar body, rather than the bankruptcy estate itself, to bring a claim on behalf of a debtor’s estate. This often …

The Ability To Set And Enforce Bar Dates And Determine Untimely Administrative Expense Claims In A Chapter 11 Case, Kayla Nieves

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) does not expressly provide that bankruptcy courts may set and enforce deadlines, i.e., “bar dates,” for administrative expense claims. The Bankruptcy Code also does not expressly define “timely” or “tardy” administrative expense claims. Courts, however, have interpreted sections 105 and 503 of the Bankruptcy Code as sufficiently broad to provide bankruptcy courts with discretion to establish bar dates and allow untimely filed administrative expense claims “for cause.”

This memorandum explores the decisions that have addressed a bankruptcy court’s ability to set and enforce bar dates and to determine what …

When A Critical Vendor May Be Insulated From Preference Liability, Michael A. Solimani

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) a trustee or debtor in possession (“DIP”) may avoid certain payments made by the debtor to a creditor within ninety days prior to filing for bankruptcy, or one year if the creditor is an insider. The Bankruptcy Code contains certain defenses to preference claims. A court may also release a creditor from such claims. Such a release may be found in orders approving payment of pre-petition claims to a “critical vendor.” Absent such an express release, it is unclear whether a trustee or DIP is precluded from pursuing …

Circumstances Under Which A Court Will Dismiss A Chapter 11 Filing Made In Bad Faith, Nicholas Wogan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 1112(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a bankruptcy court may dismiss a Chapter 11 filing “for cause.” It is a generally accepted principle that “for cause” dismissal includes dismissal of filings made in bad faith, and this concept originates in a need for bankruptcy courts to uphold the jurisdictional integrity of the Chapter 11 process from those who would seek to abuse it. Courts deciding whether dismissal for bad faith is warranted typically employ a two-step analysis: first to determine whether a bad faith filing is “cause” for dismissal under section …

Clarity About Comity: How Courts Have Attempted Greater Guidance For Chapter 15 Litigants, Sabrina Lieberman

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Abstract

This note explores the development of courts’ refusal to extend comity to foreign representatives who have filed a proceeding under chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Congress adopted chapter 15 as part of a comprehensive 2005 bankruptcy reform. It allows foreign entities to receive protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. In most cases, foreign representatives who file a chapter 15 proceeding are involved with ancillary insolvency proceedings outside the United States. There is often a question of how or if a U.S. court overseeing the chapter 15 proceeding will defer to a judgment or process within the foreign …

Bankruptcy Grifters, Lindsey Simon

Scholarly Works

Grifters take advantage of situations, latching on to others for benefits they do not deserve. Bankruptcy has many desirable benefits, especially for mass-tort defendants. Bankruptcy provides a centralized proceeding for resolving claims and a forum of last resort for many companies to aggregate and resolve mass-tort liability. For the debtor-defendant, this makes sense. A bankruptcy court’s tremendous power represents a well-considered balance between debtors who have a limited amount of money and many claimants seeking payment.

But courts have also allowed the Bankruptcy Code’s mechanisms to be used by solvent, nondebtor companies and individuals facing mass-litigation exposure. These “bankruptcy grifters” …

Restructuring Support Agreements: An Empirical Analysis, Anthony J. Casey, Frederick Tung, Katherine Waldock

Faculty Scholarship

Restructuring support agreements (RSAs), or contracts that commit bankruptcy parties to supporting a plan of reorganization that will conform to certain requirements, are now a common feature of Chapter 11. Parties utilize these agreements in nearly half of all large cases. While prior literature has debated the normative value of RSAs, we take an empirical approach to look at what provisions the parties include in these agreements and how those provisions have changed over time.

Our analysis looks at all RSAs associated with large bankruptcies through the end of 2020. We characterize the types of firms with RSAs, the parties …

Against Bankruptcy Exceptionalism, Jonathan M. Seymour

Faculty Scholarship

Bankruptcy courts conceive of their mission differently than other courts do. For the Supreme Court, bankruptcy cases are ordinary statutory cases to be resolved “clearly and predictably using well established principles of statutory interpretation.” Many bankruptcy judges, though, believe that bankruptcy courts serve a distinctive mission for which ordinary adjudicative methods do not suffice. Often, that mission is characterized using the language of equity. Judges and commentators alike have observed that among the most spoken words in the bankruptcy courts are: “the bankruptcy court is a court of equity.” Others have contended that bankruptcy necessitates “creativity and flexibility,” pursuant to …

Biting The Bullet: A Bipartisan Solution To Increase Debtors' Access To Chapter 7 Relief While Exempting Firearms In A Bankruptcy Case, Ishaq Kundawala

Articles

Imagine an individual who is too broke to file for bankruptcy relief.' This irony is far too often a reality in America, especially for people living in underserved communities. Debtors are simply unable to skimp and save up even a thousand dollars to pay their bankruptcy attorney. Paying their bankruptcy attorney upfront in full is the only ticket to seeking Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief. For a variety of reasons, Chapter 7 bankruptcy relief is the most advantageous type for a majority of poor and middle-class individuals and families.4 It provides these individuals and families with an expedient, fresh financial start …

Portraits Of Bankruptcy Filers, Pamela Foohey, Robert M. Lawless, Deborah Thorne

Georgia Law Review

One in ten adult Americans has turned to the consumer bankruptcy system for help. For almost forty years, the only systematic data collection about the people who file bankruptcy has come from the Consumer Bankruptcy Project (CBP), for which we serve as co-principal investigators. In this Article, we use CBP data from 2013 to 2019 to describe who is using the bankruptcy system, providing the first comprehensive overview of bankruptcy filers in thirty years. We use principal component analysis to leverage these data to identify distinct groups of people who file bankruptcy. This technique allows us to situate the distinctions …

Bankruptcy & The Benefit Corporation, Christopher D. Hampson

UF Law Faculty Publications

As pressure grows for money-making businesses to prioritize social responsibility, the benefit corporation - a recent innovation in corporate governance - promises to require the directors of socially minded businesses to balance public benefit with shareholder interests. But will that promise survive the crucible of financial distress? While most discussions of the benefit corporation give only passing treatment to insolvency (or ignore it altogether), this Article provides the first complete analysis of how bankruptcy principles would apply to benefit corporations, informed by the practical context of out-of-court workouts and negotiations that take place in the shadow of the bankruptcy laws. …

An Innovative Framework: Evaluating The New German Business Stabilization And Restructuring Law (Starug), Andreas Rauch

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

This comment examines the restructuring framework, restrukturierungsgesetz (“StaRUG”), and argues that this new law represents an effective—albeit radical—departure from Germany’s previous, conservative insolvency regime. Passed in response to a 2019 EU Directive aimed at modernizing restructuring law Union-wide, and integrated into the German legal system against the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic, StaRUG and its ancillary reforms in other areas of German law create a restructuring proceeding that places a premium on a debtor’s continued business operations. Thus, in a striking shift from the traditional German approach to business distress, which strongly emphasized creditor rights, the new StaRUG focuses on …

Riding The Wave: Fairness For Foreign Investors In India’S Impending Insolvency Tsunami, Nicole Mecca

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Reminiscent of the warning signs of a tsunami, bankruptcy and insolvency courts across the globe have been eerily calm despite unprecedented conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. The full extent of the pandemic’s effect, including a tidal wave of wide-spread corporate and financial sector harm and wide-spread economic distress, remains to be seen. Much like victims of natural disasters, unsuspecting and increasingly delayed courts will find themselves totally overwhelmed. The inconvenience felt by the courts is distinct, however, from potential harm to financial investors. Although investors could also be harmed by these judicial conditions, they knowingly assumed certain financial risk when …