Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Improving Bankruptcy Sales By Raising The Bar: Imposing A Preliminary Injunction Standard For Objections To § 363 Sales, Matthew A. Bruckner

Catholic University Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Scorecard So Far: Emerging Issues In Cross-Border Insolvencies Under Chapter 15 Of The U.S. Bankruptcy Code, Megan R. O'Flynn

Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business

Chapter 15 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code was modeled after the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency, drafted by the United Nations Commission on International Trade and Law (UNCITRAL) in 1997. Despite the relatively small number of cases commenced in U.S. Courts under Chapter 15 since its adoption, no other section of the current Bankruptcy Code has broader implications for international business transactions and global foreign business relations than the provisions of Chapter 15. Moreover, since the United States has long been an innovator at the forefront of international insolvency law, interpretation of key provisions of the Chapter and related UNCITRAL …

Sec V. Byers, David M. Brown

NYLS Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hamilton V. Lanning: The Economic Implications Of Forecasting A Debtor's Disposable Income, Tracy L. Leyba

Journal of Business & Technology Law

No abstract provided.

The Case For Value Billing In Chapter 11, Nancy B. Rapoport

Scholarly Works

This article explores the forces contributing to very high professional fees in large Chapter 11 cases and suggests that lawyers might want to consider valuing their services in ways other than the traditional billable hour approach.

Misbehavior And Mistake In Bankruptcy Mortgage Claims: Some Caveats Regarding The Porter Study, Gregory S. Crespi

Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters

This Article reviews the comprehensive empirical study of the bankruptcy mortgage foreclosure process conducted by Professor Katherine Porter and subsequently published in 2008 in the Texas Law Review. The results of her study, which analyzed 1,768 proof of claim submissions filed in a sample of 1,733 Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings, strongly suggest that there is a pervasive failure on the part of mortgage creditors to meet all of the formal documentation requirements for filing such bankruptcy claims. This documentation failure arguably impedes many mortgage debtors or bankruptcy trustees from reviewing these claims for their accuracy.

Porter's conclusion that the itemization …

Can A Secured Creditor Be Denied The Right To Credit Bid When The Creditor’S Collateral Is Sold Pursuant To A Chapter 11 Plan Of Reorganization?, Marshall E. Tracht

Articles & Chapters

CASE AT A GLANCE

A bankruptcy plan can only be confirmed over the objection of a secured creditor if the plan is found to be “fair and equitable.” The fair and equitable standard requires, at a minimum, that (i) the creditor may retain its lien on its collateral; (ii) the collateral will be sold subject to the creditor’s right to credit bid its debt; or (iii) the creditor will receive the “indubitable equivalent” of its claim. The Supreme Court must decide whether a plan can provide for the sale of collateral without granting the creditor the right to credit bid …

Constitutional Gaps In Bankruptcy, S. Todd Brown

Journal Articles

Federal bankruptcy law incorporates a broad range of commercial and related matters that are otherwise left to the States under the Constitution, follows an efficiency-centered process model that may implicate due process, and relies upon a judicial structure that appears to be inconsistent with Article III. In spite of the crushing volume of bankruptcy cases and proceedings each year in which the resolution of one or more of these questions may be relevant, the Supreme Court has had few opportunities to tackle them directly. Indeed, after more than two centuries, the Court has provided precious few insights into the limits …

Undo Undue Hardship: An Objective Approach To Discharging Federal Students Loans In Bankruptcy, Aaron N. Taylor

All Faculty Scholarship

A debtor seeking to discharge student loans in bankruptcy must prove that paying the debt would cause an undue hardship upon him and his dependents. Undue hardship, however, is an undefined concept, flummoxing debtors, creditors and judges alike. The result of this ambiguity is rampant inconsistency in the manners in which similarly-situated debtors (and creditors) are treated by the courts. This article argues that the undue hardship standard should be replaced by a framework that uses debt service thresholds to determine the propriety of federal student loan bankruptcy discharges. Eligibility for discharge would depend on outstanding loan amounts, debtor income …

Chapter 11 Reorganization And The Fair And Equitable Standard: How The Absolute Priority Rule Applies To All Nonprofit Entities, Pamela Foohey

Scholarly Works

In recent years, nonprofit entities increasingly have sought bankruptcy protection. Though the Bankruptcy Code does not prevent nonprofits from reorganizing, Chapter 11 was designed for and applies best to for-profit businesses. This creates challenges for courts evaluating a nonprofit’s reorganization plan. This Article focuses on one crucial aspect of a court’s evaluation — the fair and equitable standard, a necessary, but not sufficient condition of which is satisfaction of the absolute priority rule.

The few courts addressing absolute priority claims in nonprofit reorganizations have held that the rule is categorically inapplicable to nonprofit entities except in limited circumstances. These courts …

The Structural Exceptionalism Of Bankruptcy Administration, Rafael I. Pardo, Kathryn A. Watts

Scholarship@WashULaw

The current system of administration of the Bankruptcy Code is highly anomalous. It stands as one of the few major federal civil statutory regimes administered almost exclusively through adjudication in the courts, not through a federal regulatory agency. This means that rather than fitting bankruptcy into a regulatory model, Congress has chosen to give the courts primary interpretive authority in the field of bankruptcy, delegating to courts the power to engage in residual policymaking. Although scholars have noted some narrow aspects of the structural exceptionalism of bankruptcy administration, Congress’s decision to locate responsibility for bankruptcy policymaking almost exclusively with the …

Does Ideology Matter In Bankruptcy? Voting Behavior On The Courts Of Appeals, Rafael I. Pardo, Jonathan Remy Nash

Scholarship@WashULaw

This Article empirically examines the question of whether courts of appeals judges cast ideological votes in the context of bankruptcy. The empirical study is unique insofar as it is the first to specifically examine the voting behavior of circuit court judges in bankruptcy cases. More importantly, it focuses on a particular type of dispute that arises in bankruptcy - debt-dischargeability determinations. The study implements this focused approach in order to reduce heterogeneity in result. We find, contrary to our hypotheses, no evidence that circuit court judges engage in ideological voting in bankruptcy cases. We do find, however, non-ideological factors - …

Forward Contracts Preference Exception Broadly Construed, Brian King

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Derivative transactions and financial contracts are a critical component of the United States economy. There are three main types of derivative contracts executed in our markets: futures, options and forward contracts. Each of these instruments derives value from an underlying security or resource with focus on a possible change in its future value. These instruments can be used as speculative investments, as hedges on securities already owned, or as a means of mitigating risk on volatility within a specific industry. An essential attribute of trading in these derivatives is “the ability of the parties to value their transaction on …

Bankruptcy Courts’ Power To Recharacterize Debt Claims As Equity, David Saponara

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code enables bankruptcy courts to take certain measures to facilitate the claims process and priority system. For example, section 502(b)(1) enables bankruptcy courts, upon objection, to disallow creditors’ claims based on applicable law or an agreement between the creditor and the debtor, and section 510(c) enables bankruptcy courts to equitably subordinate claims of creditors that engaged in inequitable conduct such that subordination would be appropriate to remedy any injury suffered by another creditor. Whether bankruptcy courts may recharacterize debt claims as equity, however, is not explicitly addressed in the Bankruptcy Code. Because of this, recharacterization analysis has …

In Re Toft; Section 1506 Public Policy Exception Trumps General Grant Of Comity, Malerie Ma

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code allows courts in the United States to recognize the judgments of foreign courts on the basis of comity. Chapter 15's “public policy” exception, however, prevents recognition of such judgments if they are “manifestly contrary to the public policy of the United States.” In re Toft is one of the few cases to deny relief on the basis of the public policy exception. While courts will continue to apply this exception narrowly, In re Toft shows that the public policy exception can be a powerful impediment to requests for aid in foreign insolvency proceedings. …

Who Has Standing To Object To A Debtor’S Reorganization Plan? Analyzing Section 1128(B)’S “Party In Interest” Bankruptcy Standing Requirement And The “Persons Aggrieved” Appellate Standing Test, Michael Battema

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In a decision with important implications for parties listed in debtor reorganization plans, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently reiterated its position that section 1128(b) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) should be interpreted broadly to permit any listed party whose rights might be implicated by a debtor’s reorganization plan the ability to object to the plan’s terms in bankruptcy court. In its decision, the Third Circuit distinguishes between a party’s right to object to a debtor’s confirmation plan in bankruptcy court (“Bankruptcy Standing”) versus that party’s ability to appeal the debtor’s confirmation ruling …

In Re Awal Bank: Expanding Ability To Avoid Setoff In Chapter 15 Bankruptcy Cases, Jacob Chase

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Foreign bankruptcy representatives seeking to avoid setoff of fund transfers pursuant to section 553 of the Bankruptcy Code may enjoy more flexible standards than ever before. In a recent decision by the United States Bankruptcy Court of the Southern District of New York, In re Awal Bank, Judge Gropper allowed the foreign representative for Awal Bank to avoid a setoff by HSBC even though the bank had not filed a plenary chapter 7 or 11 bankruptcy proceeding within 90 days of the setoff, holding that Awal Bank’s filing under Chapter 15 within the relevant 90 day look-back period …

Is Your Retainer Safe?: How In Re Two Gales Ensures That Bankruptcy Professionals Keep Their Retainer Fees, Jonathan Abramovitz

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In a decision that bankruptcy professionals are certain to applaud, the United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit held that bankruptcy courts must not order disgorgement of attorneys’ retainers in bankruptcy cases if the attorney has perfected a lien in the retainer under state law. Prior to In re Two Gales, some bankruptcy courts had justified disgorgement as necessary to comply with 11 U.S.C. § 726(b), which requires administrative claimants to be compensated through pro rata distributions upon administrative insolvency. In re Two Gales confirmed what some other bankruptcy courts have already held: section 726(b) is …

Same-Sex Married Debtors May File A Joint Petition For Bankruptcy, Jennifer Arcarola

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Legally married couples may file a petition for bankruptcy jointly under section 302(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (“the Code”). The choice to file jointly is limited to only include married spouses, excluding partners and people in civil unions. Across virtually all jurisdictions, courts have explicitly rejected joint filings under section 302(a) filed by unmarried debtors. For example, an adult child cannot file for bankruptcy jointly with a parent, nor can a cohabiting unmarried couple file together. While the Bankruptcy Code does not purport to define who may qualify as a married couple, the Defense of Marriage Act (“DOMA”) does, …

Trustees Beware: Reviewing The Circuit Split On Bankruptcy Trustee Personal Liability, Barry Z. Bazian

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Imagine that you have been appointed to serve as a trustee in a bankruptcy case. As the “representative of the estate,” one of your responsibilities is to properly manage the estate’s assets. You decide to invest the estate’s funds in several risky penny stocks, relying on minimal research you performed online. Unfortunately, these investments quickly decrease in value, substantially diminishing the value of the estate. Now, of course, the debtor and his creditors are angry and want to sue you for mismanaging the estate’s funds. Can you be held personally liable? In other words, will you have to pay …

An Exercise In Economics: Determining “Value” Under § 548 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Gregory R. Bruno

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Determining whether a debtor receives value for a constructively fraudulent prepetition transfer under section 548 of the Bankruptcy Code can prove troublesome when a debtor receives only an indirect, intangible benefit. Section 548 allows a bankruptcy trustee to avoid and recover a debtor’s prepetition transfers for which the debtor did not receive “reasonably equivalent value.” However, judicial interpretation of the term “value” has greatly limited the kinds of benefits to the debtor that might qualify.

Gold v. Marquette (In re Leonard) both illustrates the limitations that courts have placed on the term “value” for purposes of section …

Avoidability Of Foreclosure Sales Under Section 547 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Adam Cohen

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Should foreclosure sales that comply with state law be subject to avoidance under federal bankruptcy law? In BFP v. Trust Resolution Corp., the Supreme Court said no, at least when dealing with alleged section 548 fraudulent conveyances, as doing so would, inter alia, undermine state interests and raise substantial federalism concerns. Some courts have taken this reasoning and applied it to section 547 preferences as well, while others feel that the plain language of section 547 prohibits such an application. One recent case in the latter category is In re Whittle Development, Inc.

In general, transfers are …

Exploring The Enforceability Of Pre-Petition Hindrance Mechanisms To Prevent Bankruptcy, Joshua Eisenson

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Insolvency and bankruptcy pose great risks to a creditor’s investments. Although business entities can never be truly bankruptcy-proof, certain techniques are commonly deployed to make debtors as bankruptcy-remote as possible. Creditors and practitioners have devised and employed a multitude of “hindrance mechanisms” to significantly discourage bankruptcy petitions, while not directly causing debtors to waive their right to voluntarily file for bankruptcy. Creditors will often require debtors to accept these contractual provisions to make it more difficult, or practically impossible, for debtors to declare bankruptcy. However, as a rule of law, courts will render a hindrance mechanism per se invalid …

The Challenge Of Retaining Interest For Original Equity Owners, Michael Harary

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy reorganization plans can pose a challenge for old equity shareholders wanting to retain their interests in a reorganized entity, Under the Bankruptcy Code these plans give most creditors a higher priority to receive equity in the reorganized company before shareholders. However, shareholders have different options that can aid them in retaining interests in the company; one such option is the contribution of new value that is subject to market evaluation.

Recently, in H.G. Roebuck & Son, Inc. v. Alter Communications, Inc., (“Roebuck”), the United States District Court for the District of Maryland reversed the bankruptcy …

Assumption Under Section 365(C)(1) Creates Uncertainty For Debtors, Heather Hili

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The assumption and assignment of executory contracts raises many issues in Chapter 11 bankruptcies. One issue is whether the trustee can assume an executory contract, thus forcing the non-debtor party to accept performance from the debtor-in-possession. Section 365(c)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) attempts to resolve this issue by providing that a trustee may not assume or assign an executory contract when applicable law would excuse the non-debtor party from accepting performance from someone other than the debtor-in-possession. But courts relying on Section 365(c)(1) to resolve this issue have interpreted it in different ways, creating a split among the …

Judicial Enforcement Of Default Interest Rates, Michael Lutfy

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Although secured creditors use default interest rates to protect their security interest throughout the bankruptcy process, courts are not required to enforce those contractual provisions. Secured creditors can legitimately use default interest rates to provide an offset for the “costs and delay of the bankruptcy process.” Equitable considerations may require judicial nullification of default interest rates. Inequitable default interest rates directly contradict the policy goals of bankruptcy. The difficulty in determining the reasonableness of default interest rates results from competing policy interests within bankruptcy. Courts favor enforcing contractual obligations and preserving rights inside of bankruptcy, as they would have …

In Re Pichhi; Modifications Of Multi-Family Home Mortgages, Patrick Mcburney

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In a decision with important implications for lenders in the real estate business, the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the First Circuit determined that debtors can strip down a creditor’s under-secured claim in a multi-family dwelling to the appraised value of the property. While the Bankruptcy Technical Corrections Act of 2010 (“BTCA”) were in effect at the time of the decision, the panel decided the issue under the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) because both parties argued the issue under the BAPCPA definitions and declined to raise the applicability of BTCA to the issue. Specifically …

The Evolution Of The Settlement Payment Defense?, Tianja Samuel

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Each year U.S. bankruptcy courts decide hundreds of cases in which debtors, or their trustees, seek to avoid preferential payments. In many of these cases, creditors successfully defend themselves by convincing the court that a statutory safe harbor provision is applicable. The settlement payment defense is one safe harbor provision that—although frequently utilized by creditors—has consistently raised questions about its own scope and applicability. The Second Circuit answered some of these questions, for the first time, in In re Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. In what some believe was an expansive decision, the court held that the settlement payment …

In Re Shamus Holdings, Llc And The Automatic Stay, Matthew Silverman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The automatic stay is recognized as one of the fundamental protections provided by bankruptcy law. The automatic stay prevents creditors from taking almost any type of formal or informal action against the debtor, including commencing or continuing foreclosure actions. There are, however, certain exceptions to the automatic stay, exceptions that permit the creditor to take action against the debtor despite the pendency of the bankruptcy proceeding. This memorandum focuses on one such exception, contained in section 362(b)(3) of the Code, and the effect courts have held it to have on the automatic tolling provision of the Bankruptcy Code. The …

Priority Treatment Of Employee Severance Compensation Claims, Eric Small

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a bankrupt company terminates employees, those former employees often have claims against the estate for severance compensation. Sections 507(a) and 503(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code provide for the priority treatment of such claims. Those sections apply to claims arising both pre-petition and post-petition. In the pre-petition context, courts must determine if a claim was earned within the pre-petition period prescribed by section 507(a)(4). For post-petition claims, whether such claims are given administrative expense priority for the full amount claimed turns on courts’ analysis of when the claims were earned, when services were rendered, and if and when the …