Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Whether Foreign Avoidance Claims May Be Asserted Under Chapter 15, Peter I. Collorafi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 was added to title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in 2005, replacing former Section 304 as the Bankruptcy Code’s operative provision for dealing with cross-border insolvencies. Chapter 15 may be utilized by a foreign representative seeking assistance in U.S. courts in connection with a foreign proceeding. A foreign representative commences a chapter 15 case by filing a petition for recognition of the foreign proceeding in which the representative has been appointed.

After obtaining recognition, a foreign representative has the right to sue and be sued in the United States and may apply directly to a U.S. court …

Debt Discharge, Intent And Good Faith, Arielle Cummings

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Discharge is of singular importance to the individual in a Chapter 7 case. Discharge enables the debtor to begin a new financial life, and it provides the debtor with a fresh start. In order for this to happen, among other effects, section 524 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), which addresses the effects of discharge, voids any judgment against the debtor subject to the discharge. Section 524 also provides a statutory injunction against the continued prosecution of any action that would lead to liability on the claim subject to discharge. Section 727 of the …

Filing For Bankruptcy And Untying The Knot? Not Without Strings Attached, Justin A. Klingenberg

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Substantive consolidation is an equitable remedy used sparingly by bankruptcy courts to consolidate the bankruptcy estates of two debtors. Although it originated in the corporate context, consolidating the estates of two corporate entities or a corporate entity and an individual debtor, its application has extended to consumer bankruptcy. The consolidation of the bankruptcy estates of two debtor spouses has been addressed and recognized by the Second, Third, Fourth, Sixth, Eighth, and Eleventh Circuit Courts.

Part I of this article briefly examines the authority legitimizing substantive consolidation. Part II analyzes the remedy’s corporate origins and the differing approaches taken by …

A Showing Of Gross Recklessness Satisfies Section 523(A)(2)(A): Denying Deceivers The Ability To Discharge Debts Related To Fraudulently Obtained Funds, Megan Kuzniewski

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

11 U.S.C. Section 523(a) lists certain debts that may not be discharged through a debtor’s bankruptcy. In particular, section 523(a)(2)(A) provides that a debtor who files bankruptcy will not be discharged of debts that were obtained by “false pretenses, a false representation, or actual fraud, other than a statement respecting the debtor’s or an insider’s financial condition.” False representations, such as those described in section 523(a)(2)(A), carry a scienter requirement which requires that it be shown that an individual knowingly made false statements or representations. This requirement carries a heavy burden, as trying to prove that a person had …

Notice Of Bar Date To Employees Of A Multinational Corporation May Be Satisfied By Publication, Naffie Lamin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Courts have frequently held that notice to employees of the final day to file a proof of claim (the “bar date”), for purposes of satisfying constitutional due process requirements, may be satisfied by publication. To determine whether proper notice was served, bankruptcy courts distinguish between known and unknown creditors. While a known creditor must be provided with actual notice of a bar date, notice to an unknown creditor is satisfied by constructive notice, for example publication in a newspaper. In the context of the employer-employee relationship, it may seem counterintuitive that a creditor-employee would constitute an “unknown” creditor but …

Whose Claim Is It Anyway?—Direct And Derivative Claims In The Context Of Bankruptcy Litigation, Kristen M. Lasak

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In bankruptcy litigation, the line between direct and derivative claims may be a thin one, and courts are often entrusted with the task of determining whether the claims creditors set forth are actually derivative of claims owned by the bankruptcy estate. Companies entering into bankruptcy proceedings have the option of creating litigation trusts, which are authorized to pursue any claims the bankruptcy estate may own. A release of claims is often part of any settlement agreement, and such an agreement combined with the ownership of claims by the bankruptcy estate, often controlled through a litigation trust, can leave defrauded …

A Sublessee’S Rights In The Face Of A Debtor-Sublessor’S Rejection Of An Unexpired Lease Under Chapter 11, Adam K. Lau

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Whether or not rejection of a lease constitutes termination is of great concern to interested parties in a chapter 11 bankruptcy proceeding. This determination can alter the remedies available for injured parties. Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code establishes the general rule that rejection does not constitute termination, and sets forth the circumstances where exceptions to the general rule apply.

In In re Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc., a Delaware Bankruptcy Court held that the rejection of a lease constitutes a prepetition breach of the lease under section 365(g) of the Bankruptcy Code. The court determined the amount of …

Conflict In The Bankruptcy Code: Ramification Of A Trustee’S 363(F) Right To Sell Property “Free And Clear” On The Lessee’S 365(H) Right To Retain Property, Aaron Leaf

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 363(f) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) allows a trustee to sell property “free and clear of any interest in such property” that a third party might have if certain conditions are met. Section 365(h) of the Bankruptcy Code allows the lessee of a rejected lease to either retain the property with all rights appurtenant to the estate, or treat such lease as terminated and sue for damages. Courts are split on if these sections of the Bankruptcy Code are compatible. The majority of courts have found these sections are not compatible, and …

Whether Sovereign Immunity Is A Defense For States In Bankruptcy Cases, Melanie Lee

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Sovereign immunity, generally, prohibits suit against a sovereign without the sovereign’s consent. The defense of sovereign immunity may not be asserted by any state, or arm of the state, in any bankruptcy proceeding. The prohibition of asserting sovereign immunity in a bankruptcy case has been common practice, almost continuously, since the states agreed to such a waiver in the Constitutional Convention. Moreover, this waiver of sovereign immunity, has since been codified in Section 106 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). As a result, a state involved in a bankruptcy case will typically be treated …

Application Of The Automatic Stay To A Non-Debtor Corporation, Joanna Matuza

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a corporation files for bankruptcy, it is entitled to an automatic stay of any action that has been filed against it pursuant to section 362(a)(1) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). But today, litigation is often complex and involves more than one defendant. For example, I may commence an action against corporations X, Y and Z. Corporation X then files for bankruptcy and is entitled to an automatic stay. The question in these cases is whether the automatic stay applicable to the debtor corporation (Corporation X) also applies to the non-debtor corporations (Corporations …

May A Bankruptcy Court May Permanently Disbar An Attorney From Practicing Before Its District?, Maurice W. Sayeh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In most matters, the local bar association governs attorney discipline. Depending on the offense by the attorney, discipline can range from a private or public reprimand to a suspension or even disbarment. However, in special circumstances and when the court believes it must protect the general public from attorneys it finds unfit to practice, a bankruptcy court, as well as other courts, may permanently disbar an attorney from practicing before it. However this exercise of authority requires cautious judicial discretion.

Bankruptcy courts, in particular, may find the authority to discipline attorneys through multiple federal statutes, the Federal Rules of …

Duty To Advise Of The Legal Risks From Business Transactions, Nicole Strout

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Lawyers owe specific duties to their clients, mainly with respect to reasonable legal advice. If reasonable care is not exercised by an attorney when providing legal advice and services, there is a potential for a malpractice claim against that attorney. For attorneys that represent businesses, however, legal advice can sometimes be blurred with business advice. It is important to note that lawyers are not business consultants and do not specifically owe a duty to their clients to protect them from poor business decisions. The problem occurs when it is hard to distinguish between the legal and business advice. These …

Creditor And Debtor Burdens When Confirming A Chapter 11 Reorganization Plan, Corey Trail

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In Chapter 11 bankruptcy, after a debtor has submitted a reorganization plan, the creditor has the right to vote on that plan. However, the right to vote on that plan is grounded in the understanding that the creditor will not vote against a debtor’s reorganization plan in bad faith. If a court finds that the creditor rejected the plan in bad faith, the court may “designate” the votes of the creditor that voted against the plan. But the issue of good faith does not solely lie with the creditor’s behavior. Reorganization under Chapter 11 also demands that the debtor …

Can A Consumer Debtor Voluntarily Dismiss Own Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case?, Shane P. Walsh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Section 707(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a court may dismiss a chapter 7 bankruptcy case for cause. Section 707(a) provides a list of examples of conduct that constitutes cause to guide the court in making its determination. A chapter 7 consumer debtor has the right to voluntarily dismiss his own chapter 7 case, however, that right is not absolute. When a consumer debtor seeks to voluntarily dismiss his chapter 7 case he must establish cause for dismissal under section 707(a). The court will determine whether the debtor’s voluntary motion to dismiss …

Changes To Bankruptcy Forms And Pending Bankruptcy Rule Changes, Kathleen Klepfer

Law Faculty Publications

Nearly every form used by the bankruptcy courts went through a significant overhaul in December as part of a seven-year project designed to streamline the filing process. The voluntary petition—old Form B1—has now been split into three separate forms: B101 for individual debtors, B201 for nonindividual debtors, and B401 for foreign proceedings. This overhaul altered the format of most additional forms and schedules, including the internal “director’s forms,” all of which are now available on the court’s main form page. Because most form numbers changed as well, the courts have provided a conversion chart that aligns the old and new …

Regulating Public Offerings Of Truly New Securities: First Principles, Merritt B. Fox

Faculty Scholarship

The public offering of truly new securities involves purchases by investors in sufficient number and in small enough blocks that each purchaser’s shares can reasonably be expected to be freely tradable in a secondary market that did not exist before the offering. Increasing the ability of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to make such offerings has been the subject of much recent discussion.

At the time that a firm initially contemplates such an offering, unusually large information asymmetries exist between its insiders and potential investors. These can lead to severe adverse-selection problems that prevent a substantial portion of worthy offerings …

Horton V. O'Cheskey Opinion, Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.

Felonious, Erroneous, It’S All Odious: A Story Of Debt Gone Wrong, Virginia M. Brown

Fordham Law Review

    Iraq is paying off debt from Saddam Hussein’s rule. South Africa is paying off debt obligations incurred under apartheid rule. Argentina is renegotiating debts that can be traced back to a de facto military-civilian regime that was ousted in 1976. There are numerous examples in which sovereigns are paying off debts that previous governing regimes incurred while oppressing their citizens. Should sovereigns be obligated to pay these debts? Were the debts really incurred by the sovereign or were they incurred by the governing regime in question? What if the lender knew in advance what the proceeds would be used for? …

Bankruptcy Law, Hon. Kevin R. Huennekens, Nathan Kramer

University of Richmond Law Review

This article will cover both consumer and business bankruptcy issues, and is limited primarily to decisions by courts within the Fourth Circuit since mid-2012. Despite these general parameters, because bankruptcy is federal law, there are some cases outside the Fourth Circuit that are included due to their influential and instructive nature. The intention of this update is to provide bankruptcy practitioners in Virginia with concise, yet compre-hensive, case summaries that will prove to be a valuable researchtool.

Becker V. Becker, 131 Nev. Adv. Op. 85 (Oct. 29, 2015), Paul George

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

In response to a certified question by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada, the Court concluded that under NRS 21.090(1)(bb) a debtor can exempt his stock in the corporations described in NRS 78.746(2), but his economic interest in that stock is still subject to the charging order remedy in NRS 78.746(1).

Who Gets Paid? Section 365(N) Royalty Payments Under "Zombie Licenses" After A Sale Of Ip, Christopher G. Bradley

Law Faculty Popular Media

This short article discusses the Bankruptcy Code's unusual treatment of certain intellectual property licenses. First, it gives a brief overview of § 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. It then provides a short analysis of a difficult but important question: If a licensee of a debtor’s intellectual property opts to retain its license rights under § 365(n), who should receive the stream of licensing payments in the event that the IP is sold: the buyer of the IP, or the debtor in bankruptcy? The answer that has emerged in some of the case law is somewhat surprising -- after providing nuanced …

The Secured Party And His Nemesis, The Trustee In Bankruptcy: After-Acquired Property, Unidentified Proceeds, And Selected Preference Problems, John P. Finan

Akron Law Review

A trustee in bankruptcy, in addition to succeeding to the rights of the bankrupt,' has several avoiding powers. Some of these avoiding powers are based on practices which, like vice, are of "so frightful mien that to be hated [need] but to be seen." Preferences may not be included among such practices. Indeed, the English view exhibits ambivalence towards preferences. At one time it regarded "preferences [as] the good fortune of the creditor." A later view was "that the preferring of one creditor over others within a short time of bankruptcy and in contemplation thereof, was a 'fraud on the …

Access To Civil Courts - Indigents - Filing Fee; United States V. Kras, William I. Arbuckle

Akron Law Review

Robert William Kras presented his voluntary petition in bankruptcy to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York in May of 1971. With the petition his Legal Aid Society Attorneys filed a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of any of the filing fees required as a prerequisite to discharge. Kras alleged that he was unable to pay the fees, even in installments, and that they should not be required of him either because (1) he was entitled to proceed in forma pauperis under the Federal Statute, or (2) because the provisions of the Bankruptcy …

The Timing Of Perfection Of Security Interests Under The Uniform Commercial Code And The Bankruptcy Reform Act, Richard A. Mann, Michael J. Phillips

Akron Law Review

This article will examine this new relationship as it applies to a specific problem created by the interaction between Article 9 and bankruptcy law: the timing of a "transfer" when a security interest is challenged as preferential in a bankruptcy proceeding. Resolution of this question is often critical for determining the secured party's ability to recover assets pledged as collateral when the debtor goes into bankruptcy. The article will begin by explaining the "timing of transfer" problem as it arose under Article 9 and the Bankruptcy Act. Then it will describe and evaluate the new solution provided by the Bankruptcy …

The Rejection Of Collective Bargaining Agreements Within Bankruptcy Reorganization: Reconciling A Legislative Dilemma, Gust Goutras

Akron Law Review

In 1981, a Dallas based conglomerate, LTV Corporation, spun-off a subsidiary known as Wilson Foods. The purpose for this action was that Wilson Foods, the nation's fifth largest meat packer was suffering from financial difficulties. Shortly after the spin-off, Wilson Foods entered into a collective bargaining agreement with its unionized employees, initiating a wage freeze through 1985. Under this arrangement, Wilson Foods' losses continued to escalate.

Adequate Assurance Of Payment Under Section 366 Of The Bankruptcy Code: A Term For Interpretive Flexibility Or Judical Confusion?, Veryl Victoria Miles

Akron Law Review

This article will focus on the interpretive struggle that the courts have encountered in making determinations of what constitutes adequate assurance of payment under section 366 and how this struggle might be eliminated so as to make compliance with the requirements of adequate assurance of payment less of a problem for the utility and bankrupt debtor. It is the thesis of this article that section 366 determinations of adequate assurance have resulted in interpretive confusion, leaving debtors and creditors with little guidance as to what criteria should be considered in negotiating an adequate assurance of payment. The recommended solution to …

Section 542(C) Of The Bankruptcy Reform Act Of 1978 And Section 4-303 Of The Ucc: A Less Than Perfect Fit?, John P. Finan

Akron Law Review

The Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 4-303 addresses two areas where the UCC and the Bankruptcy Code intersect. The first relates to the vulnerability of drawee banks that honor checks after their customer has taken bankruptcy (has filed a voluntary petition or is the defendant in an involuntary case); the second relates to the timing of transfers made by check under 547 of the Bankruptcy Code (the preference section). In both areas there is a less than perfect fit between the Bankruptcy Code and UCC 4-303. The first area poses problems for practitioners whose clients have received notice of bankruptcy in …

Section 547(C)(2) Of The Bankruptcy Code: The Ordinary Course Of Business Exception Without The 45 Day Rule, David J. Desimone

Akron Law Review

This article will look at some of the principles set forth by case law and provide a more structured method of analyzing cases under section 547(c) (2). In addition, it will examine a few problem areas that are certain to arise in section 547(c) (2) litigation in the near future: (1) Does section 547(c) (2) now protect principal payments on long term debt?; and, (2) will section 547(c) (2) protect a payment to one creditor when all or nearly all other creditors were not paid during the preference period? But before doing so, a short explanation of the Code's definition …

Not So Secure: Should Social Security Benefits Be Considered In The Good Faith Analysis Under 11 U.S.C. § 1325(A)(3)?, Casey J. Davis

Akron Law Review

Part II of this Comment provides background information about Chapter 13 bankruptcy. This section is important because it provides a foundation for the remainder of this Comment. Part III of this Comment explores the source of this split and how the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) has affected this issue. Within Part III, this Comment will discuss why Congress enacted BAPCPA, the largest overhaul of bankruptcy law since its origin, and why BAPCPA did not affect the good faith requirement under § 1325(a)(3) even though BAPCPA drastically altered bankruptcy law. In addition, this section also …

Templeton V. O'Cheskey Opinion, Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals

Historical and Topical Legal Documents

No abstract provided.