Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Alternatives To Delaware? Evaluating Corporate Law In Nevada, Texas, And Wyoming, Joseph Landau, Bailey Swartz, Anthony Rickey, Robert Ragazzo, Benjamin Edwards, George A. Mocsary

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

No abstract provided.

Consider This: Make-Whole Premiums As Unmatured Interest, Kathryn G. Berman

Fordham Law Review

Make-whole premiums have become mainstream in corporate bond indentures because of the protections they provide to lenders. Although they are generally enforceable as a matter of contract law, make-whole premiums have been treated inconsistently in bankruptcy courts in several areas. One point of inconsistency is whether make-whole premiums are treated as liquidated damages or unmatured interest. Such a determination has significant implications on the allowance of the claim and its recovery from an insolvent debtor.

Most bankruptcy courts have treated make-whole premiums as liquidated damages and allowed their recovery in creditors’ claims. In doing so, their analyses have treated liquidated …

Bankruptcy Appeal Barriers, Jonathan M. Seymour

Washington and Lee Law Review

Appeals in bankruptcy do not look like appeals elsewhere in the federal court system. In particular, bankruptcy appeal barriers are strikingly distinctive. These barriers serve outright to block an appeal from being decided. An appellate court may dismiss an appeal, rather than consider the merits, if facts on the ground have changed so much since the original decision that providing a remedy to an appellant, even if victorious, would not be prudent. Take ongoing litigation in the Boy Scouts bankruptcy case. A plan of reorganization was confirmed fixing the entitlements of victims to compensation. Dissenting creditors argued bitterly the plan …

Assessing The Post-Purdue Landscape Of Consensual Third-Party Releases Through Contract Law, Kaori Nagase

American University Law Review

In Harrington v. Purdue Pharma L.P., the Supreme Court invalidated non-consensual third-party releases in Chapter 11 bankruptcy plans. In doing so, however, the Court left open the question of what constitutes valid consent to a release. This Comment argues that lower courts must now require a higher threshold of affirmative consent—particularly in mass-tort bankruptcies involving highly culpable non-debtors. In light of Purdue’s implication that third-party releases are anchored in contract law principles, this Comment suggests that courts should evaluate what constitutes adequate consideration for a release.

The End(S) Of Bankruptcy Exceptionalism: Purdue Pharma And The Problem Of Social Debt, Pamela Foohey, Jonathan C. Lipson

Scholarly Works

The Supreme Court’s recent 5-4 decision in the controversial chapter 11 bankruptcy reorganization of opioid-maker Purdue Pharma ends the use of nonconsensual third-party “releases,” which discharge (eliminate) liabilities of non-debtors who may share liability with a corporate debtor. Although the majority opinion is correct that the Bankruptcy Code does not permit this, it failed to recognize the problematic exceptionalism of the lower courts which approved those releases or the “social” qualities of Purdue Pharma’s mass tort liability.

Bankruptcy exceptionalism has been a contested concept since it emerged over fifteen years ago, and reflects a willingness to bend the rule of …

Strategies For Unsecured Creditors To Mitigate The Pro-Debtor Policies Of Subchapter V And Suggestions For Changes To The Bankruptcy Code, Micah Mays

Oklahoma Law Review

No abstract provided.

Controlling The Mischief Of New York’S Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act Through Constitutional Pre-Emption, Shelby D. Green

Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications

FAPA aimed to ease the burdens of long-delayed foreclosure proceedings by restating the operation of the statute of limitations. It contains provisions across several sections of state statutes that specify that once the six year statute of limitations on actions to foreclose commences, typically by the acceleration of the balance due on the promissory note and commencement of suit, it continues to run, even after the parties have entered into a workout agreement and have dismissed the complaint. By express terms, the Act had immediate effect, such that those lenders who withdrew complaints pursuant to a workout agreement before the …

Discharging Government Debt, Nicole Langston

Vanderbilt Law Review

The bankruptcy system tries to strike a balance between a fresh economic start through debt forgiveness, or discharge, and the need to repay creditors. When the debt is owed to the government, however, the scale seemingly tips toward repayment because of the government’s role in providing essential services to society. But there are certain debts owed to the government that can be forgiven in bankruptcy and some that cannot. The consumer bankruptcy system does not forgive government-owed child support debt, penal debt, and student loan debt, which are disproportionally carried by poor women and racial minorities, but the system does …

Lambat Asal Selamat: The Slow But Safe Twenty-Five Year Recalibration Of Personal Bankruptcy In Malaysia, Jason J. Kilborn

South Carolina Journal of International Law and Business

A popular Malay proverb advises, “[L]et it be slow, as long as it is safe” (biar lambat asal[kan] selamat),1 combining the sentiments of two similar English proverbs: “haste makes waste,” and “slow and steady wins the race.” These principles certainly seem to have guided Malaysian lawmakers in the quarter-century, multistage development of the most important element of modern bankruptcy law: the discharge. Adopted in 1967,2 Malaysian bankruptcy law has long included a very limited debt discharge, but as it left more and more economically debilitated debtors in perpetual bankruptcy limbo, policymakers became dissatisfied with leaving a huge and growing mass …

Opening Remarks, Douglas J. Whaley

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Acceptance Remarks For The 2025 Distinguished Service Award For Lifetime Achievement, Jay Lawrence Westbrook

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

The Nightmare Loophole: Circumventing Section 365(N) And Erasing A Non-Debtor Licensee’S Intellectual Property Rights, Grant Marshall

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

In today’s knowledge-driven economy, the significance of intellectual property licenses cannot be overstated. Nevertheless, a loophole within the Bankruptcy Code allows a non-debtor’s license agreement to be erased, stripping them of their right to utilize the intellectual property without any avenue for recourse. Selling intellectual property “free and clear” of encumbrances before the debtor rejects the license agreement could deprive the non-debtor licensee of the opportunity to continue using the intellectual property. This loophole not only undermines the policy goals of both intellectual property and bankruptcy, but also subverts the clear intentions of Congress and the Supreme Court to protect …

Climate Adaptation And Bankruptcy: Preparing Utilities For What Is To Come, Hayley Roy

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Climate change is an existential crisis that has and will continue to impact every aspect of our daily lives. An overlooked component of life in the United States, except in times of crisis, is our energy grid, which will continuously feel the consequences of climate change. Electricity is a basic necessity for most people in the U.S., but it is underprepared for the realities of climate change. Climate adaptation is a necessary step forward that energy utilities must take to ensure the resilience and reliability of electricity. Failure to adequately adapt will lead to dangerous situations as seen in the …

Testing The Waters: Expanding Chapter 9 Bankruptcy To Encourage Treatment Of Chemically Contaminated Drinking Water, Alexandra Zimmer

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Chemical contamination of drinking water supplies has become a significant issue across the globe with serious health and safety impacts. While the true extent of the impact is still being determined, costs associated with remediation efforts to clean up are astonishing. Municipalities, in particular cities, towns, and counties, suffer significant damages both through costs incurred directly for treatment of chemically contaminated drinking water supplies and through lost revenues resulting from municipal residents’ exposure.

This Comment argues Congress should expand municipal access to filing for bankruptcy under chapter 9 of the Bankruptcy Code to encourage local government efforts to clean up …

A Commitment Rule For Insolvency Forum: A Response To Critics, Anthony J. Casey, Aurelio Gurrea-Martinez, Robert K. Rasmussen

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Party Commitment And Flexibility In Corporate Restructuring, Robert K. Rasmussen

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Chapter 11 Mediation, Laura N. Coordes

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Mediation has become an increasingly popular and powerful tool in chapter 11 reorganizations, especially in large cases. Despite its widespread and growing use, mediation in chapter 11 is under-studied. This Article begins to fill this gap in the literature by critically assessing mediation, a form of largely private dealmaking, in the context of a bankruptcy process that is supposed to be largely public. The Article begins by discussing mediation’s popularity within the bankruptcy process before turning to a review of issues that have arisen in recent cases, providing a critical assessment of mediation’s promise and perils. In particular, the Article …

The Walking Debt: How Zombie Pacs Threaten Federal Elections And Proposals For Reform, Ariel Bagley

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

Zombie political action committees are political entities that are legally alive but whose candidate the committee is attached to has either died or functionally retired from politics. These committees form as a byproduct of skewed incentives in campaign finance law. The Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) is tasked with enforcing campaign finance laws and terminating political committees. However, it is structurally ineffective at enforcing those laws. Congress, meanwhile, has defunded the FEC and is poorly incentivized to improve its efficacy, as any Congressperson may one day benefit from having a zombie committee. When zombies do form, they are almost impossible to …

Defending "Second-Party" Releases In Mass Tort Bankruptcies, Brook E. Gotberg, Annette W. Jarvis

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The Bankruptcy Code enables corporate debtors to restructure their debts, including liability for tort damages. Recovery from an insolvent debtor poses daunting collective action problems for tort victims. By creating and funding a trust in bankruptcy, the liable company can streamline settlement and distribute available assets to give all claimants—including individuals who have been harmed by the company’s past activity but are not yet aware of the harm—an aliquot portion of available funds.

Frequently, tort damages levied against a bankrupt company implicate not only the debtor but other related parties, like the company’s insurers, directors and officers, corporate affiliates, and …

Full Discharge Ahead? An Empirical First Look At The New Student Loan Discharge Process In Bankruptcy, Belisa Pang, Dalié Jiménez, Matthew Adam Bruckner

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

The legal framework for discharging student loan debt held by bankruptcy filers cases changed in November 2022 with the Biden Administration’s Department of Justice issuing its “Guidance for Department Attorneys Regarding Student Loan Bankruptcy Litigation,” fundamentally altering the legal framework for discharging student loan debt in bankruptcy cases. The Guidance aims to enhance consistency and equity by: (1) ensuring transparent and consistent expectations; (2) reducing the burden on debtors; and (3) making it easier for DOJ attorneys to recommend discharging a debtor’s student loans. The DOJ has touted the new Guidance as having “made a real difference in borrowers’ lives,” …

Introduction: A Tribute To Professor Jay L. Westbrook, Barbara Wilkie, Molly Wilson

Emory Bankruptcy Developments Journal

No abstract provided.

Scaling 'Reverse Cfius': A Comparative Review Of Outbound Foreign Investment, Hannah Pérez

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

The note examines the evolution of U.S. regulations on outbound foreign investments, particularly under Executive Order 14105, known as "Reverse CFIUS," aimed at mitigating national security risks by restricting investments in critical industries in countries like China. It explores the legal, economic, and geopolitical implications of these regulations and compares them with similar measures in the EU, Japan, and Australia, emphasizing the need for international cooperation to effectively address these security concerns.

Executory Contract Provisions That Provide Solely For An Equitable Remedy Are Enforceable Post-Rejection., Ashley Romeo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Section 365(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), "a trustee [or debtor in possession], subject to the court’s approval, may assume, or reject an executory contract." Generally, a contract is executory if "performance remains due to some extent on both sides." In general, a debtor may decide whether its executory contract is a good deal going forward. The debtor will likely want to reject a contract that is no longer a good deal in order to repudiate any further performance of its duties. When reviewing the trustee or debtor-in-possession’s decision to assume or …

Rejection Of An Executory Contract Does Not Invalidate Rights Exercised Or Performance Rendered Prior To Rejection, Samantha B. Caraballo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 365 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), a trustee or a debtor in possession may "reject" an executory contract. Rejection results in a breach of contract. Courts consider non-bankruptcy contract law to determine the impact of the breach on the executory contract. In general, rejection does not undo a party’s past performance or exercise of rights under the contract. Instead, it relieves a debtor from its future obligation to perform.

Part I of this Article explains the different approaches to defining "executory contract." Part II of this Article elaborates on a trustee …

Property Of The Estate Under Section 541—Accrual Of Causes Of Action And The "Sufficiently Rooted" Test, Hayung Park

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

This article examines the scope of property included in a bankruptcy estate under section 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, with a focus on causes of action arising both before and after the bankruptcy petition date. Courts apply a two-part analysis to determine whether a claim is part of the estate: (1) whether it accrued as of the petition date, and (2) whether a post-petition claim is sufficiently rooted in the pre-bankruptcy past. This article explores how courts interpret and apply these components to determine estate property.

Non-Consensual Third-Party Releases From Mass-Tort Liabilities Cannot Be Part Of A Chapter 11 Plan, Seth Woodhall

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 11 bankruptcy is a process that has allowed many corporations to "work with its creditors to develop a reorganization plan governing the distribution of the estate’s assets[.]" Under 11 U.S.C. §1141(a) once the bankruptcy court confirms the plan, that plan becomes legally binding on the debtor and all creditors—including those who may have not agree to it. "Some plan terms are mandatory, §1123(a); others are optional, §1123(b). [Terms permitting a third-party release] is a provision a debtor may include and a court may approve in a reorganization plan." By presenting a plan to the bankruptcy court as part …

Dismissal Of Chapter 11 Cases For Lack Of Good Faith Filing, Amanda Alongi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 1112 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") provides that a Chapter 11 case can be converted or dismissed, upon the request of an interested party, "for cause." While cause is required, the Bankruptcy Code does not provide a definition. Rather, section 1112(b)(4) provides a non-exhaustive list of examples that constitute "cause." In addition to the statutory examples, almost all courts interpret "cause" to include a lack of good faith. The Bankruptcy Code also does not define good faith, resulting in courts adopting different approaches to determine good faith. Therefore, when an interested party …

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court's Approach To The Subjective Prong Of The Ordinary Course Of Business Defense, Andrew Cardello

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The ordinary course of business defense (the "OCB Defense") to preference claims under section 547(c)(2)(A) of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") protects transfers that are consistent with previous transactions between a debtor and creditor. In evaluating this defense, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court") conducts a fact-intensive inquiry into whether the challenged transfers were consistent with the parties’ previously established business practices. Key considerations include the length and regularity of the relationship, the timing and method of the transactions, and the absence of aggressive collection tactics …

Insurers Have Standing To Object To Reorganization Plans, Haley Daniels

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 1109 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") allows any "party in interest" to raise, appear, and be heard on any issue in a chapter 11 bankruptcy case. The term party in interest is not otherwise defined in the Bankruptcy Code. The United States Supreme Court has interpreted the phrase to describe a party that has a sufficient stake in the outcome of the bankruptcy reorganization. Importantly, Section 1128(b) of the Bankruptcy Code explicitly provides that a party in interest "may object to confirmation of a plan" in a chapter 11 case.

The United …

Granting A Stay For Non-Debtors, Daniel Denaroso

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the "Bankruptcy Code"), the filing of a bankruptcy petition results in an automatic stay of actions against a debtor or its assets. While the automatic stay is primarily for the benefit of the debtor, courts have generally extended the stay to non-debtors. However, the Supreme Court disrupted this principle in Purdue by interpreting that the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize a release that effectively discharges a non-debtor’s obligations. Since then, courts have generally interpreted Purdue narrowly to avoid eliminating the ability to grant a stay for non-debtors.

This …