Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

Back To The Future With Chapter 13: A Response To Professor Scarberry, Adam J. Levitin

Pepperdine Law Review

Professor Mark Scarberry has put forth a formidable critique of my empirical study of mortgage market sensitivity to bankruptcy modification risk. As this response shows, however, his critique does not hold up under scrutiny. Professor Scarberry argues that my study design is invalid because, as he reads the current state of the law, cramdown is virtually impossible. Therefore, he contends, we should not expect markets to exhibit sensitivity to cramdown risk, so no policy conclusions can be derived from my finding of market insensitivity. Regrettably, Professor Scarberry overreads the state of the law. The law is in fact unsettled, and …

A Critique Of Congressional Proposals To Permit Modification Of Home Mortgages In Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, Mark S. Scarberry

Pepperdine Law Review

Proposed amendments to the Bankruptcy Code permitting strip down of under secured home mortgages to the court-determined value of the homes and other modifications of home mortgages in Chapter 13 would substantially alter the risk characteristics of home mortgages, with likely substantial effects on future mortgage interest rates and future mortgage availability. Thus, the future societal cost of such a change in the law likely would be large. This article explains and supports that thesis, primarily on the ground that the proposed changes would leave mortgage holders with all of the future downside risk in the real property market while …

Contingent Capital With Sequential Triggers, Wulf A. Kaal, Christoph K. Henkel

San Diego Law Review

Contingent capital has great potential to help make systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs) safer, minimize systemic risk, and help avoid another financial crisis. United States policymakers may not have fully utilized the potential of contingent capital. A draft by the European Union (EU) Commission already suggests the mandatory issuance of contingent capital securities in the resolution phase of systemically important banks in Europe. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act mandates a study on the feasibility of contingent capital. This Article proposes the use of contingent capital with a sequential trigger as an early preventative tool and as …

Bankruptcy Federalism: A Doctrine Askew , Margaret Howard

Pepperdine Law Review

No abstract provided.

Does Ideology Matter In Bankruptcy? Voting Behavior On The Courts Of Appeals, Jonathan Remy Nash, Rafael I. Pardo

William & Mary Law Review

This Article empirically examines whether courts of appeals judges cast ideological votes in the bankruptcy context. The empirical study is unique insofar as it is the first to examine the voting behavior of circuit court judges in bankruptcy cases. More importantly, it focuses on a particular type of dispute that arises in bankruptcy: debt-dischargeability determinations. The study implements this focused approach in order to reduce heterogeneity in result. We find, contrary to our hypotheses, no evidence that circuit court judges engage in ideological voting in bankruptcy cases. We also find, however, non-ideological factors—including the race of the judge and the …

Keeping Score When Bankruptcy Principles And The Federal Anti-Assignment Act Collide: Government Contractors' Options Concerning Executory Contracts, Tanya M. Kiatkulpiboone

The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law

No abstract provided.

Software Licenses, Source Code Escrows, And Trustee Powers Under 11 U.S.C. §365, James E. Raymond

The Journal of Business, Entrepreneurship & the Law

No abstract provided.

Mesa Airlines, Brittany Brent, Lindy Harris

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

The Bankruptcy Of Golfers' Warehouse, Inc.: A Lesson In How To Sell A Business In Chapter 11, Briton Collins, Will Smith, David Choi

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

Independence Air, Kara West, Patrick Woodside

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

Lambuth, Jennifer Crake, Zackarij Gradner, Scott Mcleod

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

Movie Gallery, Cornell Kennedy, Phylinda Ramsey, Kevin Rayburn

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

In Re Jazz Photo Corp., Archie Carden, Cory Swainston

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

In Re Adelphia Communications Corp., Hilari Sheffield, Adam Smith

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

New Era Bankruptcy, Holly N. Mancl

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

Cross-Border Bankruptcy And The Cooperative Solution, Leah Barteld

Student Articles and Papers

Cross-border bankruptcy continues to be an important topic within bankruptcy regimes worldwide. As more corporations find themselves interacting in a market without the confines of geographic borders, countries need to adapt their regulatory schemes to be able to properly handle an orderly liquidation or reorganization without an adverse impact on the economy. This paper discuses the challenges of a cross-border bankruptcy regime that would be effective and proposes a cooperative solution for increasing coordination among insolvency proceedings. As a result of increasing cooperation among jurisdiction in light of the recent and ongoing financial crisis, reform within the bankruptcy regimes around …

Reader's Digest, Walter Machnicki

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

Makalidung's Post: How Stern V. Marshall Is Shaking A Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction To Its Core, Christopher S. Lockman

Duquesne Law Review

No abstract provided.

Three Approaches To Applying 11 U.S.C § 546(E)’S “Safe Harbor” To Private Lbos, Shlomo Lazar

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Code gives a trustee and a debtor-in-possession the authority to avoid fraudulent transactions. However, 11 U.S.C. § 546(e) limits the trustee’s avoiding powers by providing a safe harbor for “settlement payments.” Generally, a “settlement payment” is a payment of cash or securities made to complete a securities transaction. For example, money that an individual pays to a stockbroker to buy publicly traded shares is a settlement payment. A recent issue that has arisen is whether payments made to former shareholders in connection with a private leveraged buyout (LBO) constitute a “settlement payment.”

Depending on which jurisdiction a …

The Ponzi Scheme Presumption And Fraudulent Conveyances In The 21st Century: It’S Not Just Black And White, Gabriella B. Zahn

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 548(a)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) allows the trustee of a bankruptcy estate to avoid a transfer made by the debtor “with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud” an entity to which the debtor was or became indebted, as long as the transfer was made within two years of filing. Because it is difficult to prove that a transfer was made with such actual intent, courts have applied the so-called “Ponzi scheme presumption.” In cases involving conveyances in Ponzi schemes, the “Ponzi scheme presumption” allows the court to assume that a transfer was made with the …

In Re J.J. Re–Bar Corp.: The Application Of The Anti-Injunction Act, Eric Dostal

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Anti–Injunction Act is a provision of the U.S Code that prohibits any court from impeding the Internal Revenue Service from collecting an assessed tax. The Circuits have applied the Anti–Injunction Act to bankruptcy proceedings in two different ways. When the IRS seeks to assess a tax against a corporate fiduciary of a bankrupt corporation, as when the IRS tries to collect a penalty associated with unpaid payroll taxes, the Circuits have held that the Anti–Injunction Act allows the IRS to collect the funds it is entitled to without any interference. However, when the IRS attempts to collect unpaid …

Discrimination In Hiring Based On Past Bankruptcy Filing Allowed For Private Employers, Megan Quail

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 525 of the Bankruptcy Code protects employees who currently are or have previously been in bankruptcy from discrimination. It contains two subsections. Subsection (a) states that government employers may not deny employment to, terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against a person who has filed bankruptcy solely because of that filing. Subsection (b) provides that no private employer “may terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against” individuals for declaring bankruptcy. The salient difference is that the section applying to private employers does not mention denial of employment in its list …

A Casus Omissus In Preventing Bankruptcy Fraud: Ordering A Search Of A Debtor’S Home, 73 Ohio State Law Journal 93 (2012)., Michael D. Sousa

Sturm College of Law: Faculty Scholarship

Most individual debtors file for bankruptcy relief with honest intentions. Nonetheless, there is also an underside to the American bankruptcy law system that often goes unreported and ignored in the scholarly literature, namely, the commission of fraud by debtors who seek protection under the Bankruptcy Code. One of the ways in which fraud upon the bankruptcy system occurs is when debtors intentionally conceal assets from the bankruptcy process. Indeed, reported bankruptcy court decisions are rife with examples of debtors attempting to hide or shield assets from their creditors. Debtors who are discovered concealing assets are subject to certain civil remedies, …

Business Insolvency And The Irish Debt Crisis, 11 Rich. J. Global L. & Bus. 407 (2012), Paul B. Lewis

UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship

Among the volume of material written about the Irish debt crisis and its impact over the past few years, strikingly little has been written about the ability to save a financially distressed company under Irish law and whether corporate restructuring could have mitigated some of the financial damage to Irish companies, particularly those in the property and construction industries. There is a reason for this. The number of filings under the Examinership law - the rough equivalent of Chapter 11 in the United States - remained small and relatively constant during both the recent boom and the more immediate bust …

Student Loans, Politics, And The Occupy Movement: Financial Aid Rebellion And Reform, 46 J. Marshall L. Rev. 105 (2012), Kamille Wolff Dean

UIC Law Review

No abstract provided.

Business Insolvency And The Irish Debt Crisis, Paul B. Lewis

Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business

No abstract provided.

Considerations For Private Equity Firms When Utilizing Chapter 11 New Value Deals, Alexandra Wilde

Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review

The new value exception to the Chapter 11 absolute priority rule provides a narrow avenue for equity holders to retain an equity interest in a reorganized company over the objections of senior creditors and interest holders. With the increasing number of Chapter 11 reorganization filings by private equity owned companies, private equity firms may be interested in exploring ways to retain their equity ownership in the debtor company. This Note explores the unique implications a private equity firm may encounter when attempting to utilize the new value exception as a last resort to maintain ownership in a debtor company. Part …

William Edwin Lindsey, Lida Griest, Chris Inklebarger, Sydney Koch

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case Studies

No abstract provided.

What We “Know” About Chapter 11 Cost Is Wrong, Stephen J. Lubben

Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law

Among the collective wisdom about large corporate bankruptcy cases, the following points are almost undisputed: Longer chapter 11 cases cost more; prepackaged chapter 11 cases cost less; cases filed in New York or Delaware cost more; and fee examiners control the costs of big chapter 11 cases. But each of these points is wrong, and in most cases entirely backward. This Article provides empirical evidence to show why. Ultimately, I argue that the complexity of the bankruptcy and the compensation structure of the professionals retained (which may itself reflect further aspects of complexity) are the key determinants of cost. The …

The Consumer Bankruptcy Fee Study: Final Report, Lois R. Lupica

Faculty Publications

The Consumer Fee Study’s primary objective is to identify and monetize these costs of bankruptcy access through the analysis of quantitative and qualitative data gathered from court dockets and from professionals working within the bankruptcy system. We began the quantitative section with the hypothesis that following BAPCPA’s enactment, the cost of accessing the consumer bankruptcy system increased. We set out to determine the degree of increased costs, as well as to identify the specific policies and practices affecting these costs. Additionally, we endeavored to evaluate, with specificity, how diverse local procedures and guidelines impact the system’s processes and outcomes. Our …