Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

A Receiver Lacks Standing To Recover Fraudulent Transfers Under Ufta When Corporation Has Not Been Adequately Cleansed From Fraudulent Actions Of Ponzi Schemers, Chelsea Mcgee

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A court-appointed receiver is charged with collecting the assets of an entity for the benefit of creditors. A receiver, however, only has standing to bring claims that the party in the receivership possessed. In determining whether a receiver has standing to bring a claim, it is necessary to differentiate between the types of claims that can be asserted on behalf of a corporation. First, there are actions that a receiver may bring directly against the principals of a corporation or the recipients of fraudulent transfers. Second, are common law tort claims that can be brought against a third party, …

Two Approaches For Evaluating A Debtor’S “Additional Circumstance” Under The Brunner Test To Qualify For A Hardship Discharge Of Student Loan Debt, Julie Aberasturi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loan debt is typically non-dischargeable in bankruptcy, except for circumstances in which the failure to discharge “would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents.” However, the Bankruptcy Code does not define “undue hardship.” Instead, Congress “left it up to the various Bankruptcy Courts to utilize their discretion in defining what that term means after an analysis of the statute and a review of applicable legislative history.”

In determining what constitutes an “undue hardship,” a majority of courts rely on the three-prong Brunner test …

Unqualified Student Loans Are Likely Dischargeable In Bankruptcy, Cristian Catanese

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excepr)

As a general matter, most student loans are excepted from discharge under section 523 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Bankruptcy Code prohibits discharge of certain student loans unless doing so “would impose undue hardship on the debtor and [their] dependents . . . .” Student debtors seeking to discharge student loan debt must file an adversary proceeding and demonstrate “undue hardship” — a difficult burden to meet. However, not all student loans may be subject to this requirement.

Jurisdictions are divided on whether unqualified student loans, i.e., loans outside the cost of …

Standing To Challenge Bankruptcy Court’S Approval Of Retiree Benefits Settlement, Inkook Choi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 1114 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides in relevant part that: “the debtor in possession shall timely pay and shall not modify any retiree benefits” unless “the court, on the motion of the [debtor] or authorized representative [of the retirees,]” orders or the debtor and the authorized representative agree to the modification of such benefits. A bankruptcy court may, after notice and hearing, approve a settlement, including a settlement of retiree benefit claims, under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019. Consequently, creditors and other parties in interest may voice their views on …

Bankruptcy Courts Are Divided On Reducing A Debtor’S Obligation To Pay Rent When Government Regulations Restrict A Debtor’S Ability To Generate Income, Brittany M. Clark

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Many indoor retail establishments and restaurants that faced shutdowns due to the COVID-19 pandemic (the “Pandemic”) filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), and subsequently requested rent abatement under § 365(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code or state law. Notwithstanding the unique and extreme circumstances caused by the Pandemic, not all bankruptcy courts agree on the extent to which judges have the discretion to grant abatement motions for rent payments that are otherwise due under § 365(d)(3). Some bankruptcy courts have granted debtors the ability to defer post-petition …

Impact Of Covid-19 On Debtor’S Obligations To Comply With Duties To Pay Rent, Joseph Diorio

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 365(d)(3) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor-in-possession is required to “timely perform all the obligations of the debtor . . . arising from and after the order for relief under any unexpired lease of nonresidential real property until such lease is assumed or rejected, notwithstanding section 503(b)(1) of this title.” Section 365 was implemented to relieve landlords from the burden of proving the rent payments owed by the debtors prior to rejection were “actual and necessary” costs of preserving the bankruptcy estate. Section 365 has been heavily litigated since early …

Evaluating The Availability Of An Income-Driven Repayment Plan Under The Two Doctrinal Tests For Undue Hardship, Emily R. Fisher

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A fundamental goal of bankruptcy is to give the debtor a “fresh start” by discharging their debts. For student loan debtors in bankruptcy, the opportunity of a “fresh start” is limited. Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loans are not dischargeable unless excepting such debt from discharge would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor’s dependents. Without guidance from the statutory text, the definition of undue hardship is left up to judicial interpretation, giving rise to much litigation.

An issue that frequently arises when undue hardship is litigated is the …

Ability Of The Eeoc To Litigate For Compensation On Behalf Of A Specific Individual Despite Automatic Stay, Julia Guthy

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

Section 362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides for an automatic stay, i.e., a “statutory injunction against efforts outside [a] bankruptcy to collect debts from a debtor under the protections of the Bankruptcy Code.” However, pursuant to section 362(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, a governmental agency may commence or continue an action against a debtor to enforce the agency’s police or regulatory power despite the automatic stay (hereinafter, the “§362(b)(4) Exception”). For the exception to apply, the action of the governmental agency must “protect the public health and safety” as opposed to “a …

A Bankruptcy Court May Temporarily Suspend Rent Obligation, Matthew Kipnis

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 365(d)(3) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) authorizes a court to “extend, for cause, the time for performance of any [rent] obligation[‘s] [on unexpired leases of nonresidential real property] that arise[] within 60 days after the date of the order for relief[.]” Historically, courts have recognized that under § 365(d)(3), there is a statutory obligation on debtors to pay rent on unexpired leases. Courts have also recognized that if a debtor’s rent obligation is deferred, lessors are entitled to adequate protection. However, courts are divided on the exact timing of when a debtor’s …

Did The Consolidated Appropriations Act Make Bankruptcy Debtors Eligible For Ppp Loans?, Mary Theresa Michalos

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In response to the economic fallout of the global COVID-19 pandemic, Congress passed the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), which makes government-guaranteed loans available to qualified small businesses through the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”). The PPP was not created as a standalone program but was added to the existing section 7(a) program, which subjects the PPP to existing conditions and regulations, as well as existing Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) authority. The CARES Act expressly gives the SBA “[e]mergency rulemaking authority” to “issue regulations” carrying out the PPP. And it provides that the SBA …

Section 1112(B) Of The Bankruptcy Code Allows A Bankruptcy Court To Dismiss A Case Filed In Bad Faith, Antonio Sciarrotta

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) offers a wide range of instances where a bankruptcy court can dismiss a case. Section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that “the court shall convert a case under this chapter to a case under chapter 7 or dismiss a case under this chapter, whichever is in the best interests of creditors and the estate, for cause . . . .” Section 1112(b)(4) lists different scenarios that constitute “for cause.” Although not explicitly within the statutory scheme, a requirement that the debtor files his bankruptcy petition in good faith is one …

The Debtor’S Conduct At The Time Of Filing Controls In Determining Whether A Debtor Is Eligible To Convert Their Existing Case To A Case Under Subchapter V Of The Bankruptcy Code, Eric Silverstein

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Congress passed the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (the “SBRA”) to give small businesses a better chance to successfully reorganize under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). One of the SBRA’s most important amendments was the addition of Subchapter V to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, which was designed to reduce the cost and complexity of a small business reorganization. Because the statute’s express terms do not address its application to existing debtors, courts have been forced to address issues of conversion and eligibility. Generally, conversion of a case is …

Do Parents Receive Reasonably Equivalent Value For Paying College Tuition For Their Children Making Such Payments Avoidable, Alexandria Stiteler

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 548 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a trustee may avoid a transfer by a debtor that was an actual or constructive fraud. An actual fraudulent transfer is a transfer made with actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors. In general, a constructive fraudulent transfer is a transfer or the incurrence of an obligation by a debtor that was made within two years before the date of filing the bankruptcy petition, for less than reasonably equivalent value, at a time when the debtor was insolvent and could not pay its debts …

Timing And Location Of Comi Determined At The Timing Of Filing Chapter 15 Petition, Priya Suresh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A debtor’s center of main interest (“COMI”) is not defined under title of 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). As a result, bankruptcy courts have taken a number of different approaches to determining a debtor’s COMI. The starting place for determining COMI is the statutory rebuttable presumption that a debtor’s registered office, or habitual residence is the debtor’s COMI. If the presumption is rebutted, the party seeking recognition as a foreign main proceeding must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the debtor's COMI is in the jurisdiction where the proceeding is pending. Under chapter …

How Courts In The Second Circuit Decide On A Stay Pending Appeal In Bankruptcy Actions, Valerie Timmerman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Absent a stay, an appeal may be mooted by actions taken while the appeal is pending. The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure permit a court to grant “a stay of a judgment, order, or decree” pending an appeal. The purpose of a stay “is to preserve the status quo pending appeal and to protect the rights of all parties in interest.” The standard for a grant or denial of a stay under Bankruptcy Rule 8007 has historically differed among courts, with some favoring the “judicial discretion” test and others opting for the “preliminary injunction” test, depending on the nature …

City’S Retention Of Impounded Vehicle Not Violation Of Automatic Stay, Alexis Zobeideh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon the filing of a petition under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), creditors and other parties in interest are generally automatically stayed from taking any action against a debtor or property of the estate. The estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as the commencement of the case,” with some exceptions. The automatic stay is “one of the most important protections and powerful tools available to a debtor in a bankruptcy.”

It is well established that a creditor cannot take affirmative steps against a debtor or estate property. Prior …

Are Settlement Agreements Executory Contracts? Courts That Say “No” Give More Power To Creditors In Bankruptcy Actions, Kevin Murray

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In order to provide for quick and efficient resolutions in bankruptcy cases, courts will often encourage settlement agreements. Settlement agreements are so common that it is unusual for there not to be a settlement between adversaries. Additionally, settlement agreements are favored by law to allow the parties to avoid the expense and burdens that are associated with litigating claims.

Courts have taken two approaches when analyzing disputes that involve settlement agreements. Some courts have held that a settlement agreement is a court approved contract between two adversarial parties and its interpretation is governed by the general provisions of contract …

Pleading Fraudulent Conveyances: Federal Vs. New York State Requirements, Tara Guarino

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Fraudulent conveyances are transfers of a debtor’s property made to defraud, burden, and unfairly place the property out of reach of the creditor. Such transfers are illegal and therefore prohibited under both federal and New York State law. Federal fraudulent conveyance law, the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), recognizes two different types of fraudulent conveyances: intentional (“actual”) fraudulent transfers and constructive fraudulent transfers. Each of these fraudulent transfers require different pleading standards. These two types of fraud are recognized in New York, as well. If these fraudulent conveyances can be proven, both federal and state law allow …

A District Court May Not Enjoin Third-Party Claims Against Insurers In A Securities-Fraud Receivership Without Alternative Compensation Scheme, Justin Henderson

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Within its equitable power, a district court may place the assets of a defendant into receivership and appoint a receiver to protect a plaintiff’s interest in property where the rights over that property are disputed. In general, the purpose of this equity receivership is to marshal assets, preserve value, equitably distribute to creditors, and, either reorganize, or orderly liquidate. This power is an extraordinary remedy only justified by extreme situations, such as where there is a high probability that fraudulent conduct has occurred or will occur to frustrate the claim, or when there is a threat that the disputed …

Exempt Assets May Not Be Considered When Determining If Student Loan Should Be Discharged, Kayla Mistretta

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Student loans are presumptively non-dischargeable under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Bankruptcy Code, however, provides that a debtor may rebut the presumption and be discharged from student loans if the debtor can prove that excepting the debt from discharge would cause “undue hardship” on the debtor or the debtor’s dependents. Proving undue hardship is a “formidable task” for a debtor, but not an impossible one. The Bankruptcy Code does not define undue hardship and does not provide bankruptcy courts with any guidance on how to evaluate it. Accordingly, Congress has given bankruptcy courts …

Bankruptcy Courts Are Largely Unavailable To Cannabis-Related Debtors But Not Off-Limits, Cameron Purcell

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Although title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) does not explicitly prohibit cannabis businesses from filing for bankruptcy, there are many hurdles that continue to preclude cannabis industry participants from obtaining bankruptcy relief. Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a debtor with an opportunity to reorganize its financial affairs in order to continue to operate while providing the fair and equitable distribution among creditors. When the continuation of the debtor’s business is not viable, chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a court-supervised procedure for liquidating the debtor’s assets to pay creditors. Under both forms …

Pension Trusts Should Not Be Considered Business Trusts For The Purpose Of § 109 Of The Bankruptcy Code And Thus Not Eligible To Be A Debtor Under The Bankruptcy Code, Danielle Ullo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Qualifying as a debtor is the first eligibility requirement for bankruptcy protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”). Failure to satisfy the requirements to be a qualifying debtor forecloses an entity from obtaining bankruptcy relief. Thus, it is crucial that qualifying debtor categories are defined and delineated, particularly for business entities for whom debtor status is not always so clear.

Section 109 of the Code includes “business trust[s]” as a party entitled to bankruptcy relief but excludes other trusts from that definition. While the Code is clear to exclude ordinary trusts from eligibility to be a debtor, …

The Enforceability Of Arbitration Agreements In Bankruptcy Throughout The United States, Laila Rizk

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy courts have historically been opposed to the use of arbitration in settling controversies in which a trustee was involved unless both parties agreed. The distrust of the bankruptcy system stemmed from a string of Supreme Court decisions that refused to compel arbitration. Following the introduction of the Federal Arbitration Act in 1925, there has been a slow move towards embracing arbitration by the bankruptcy courts in non-core matters. However, there has been pushback by the bankruptcy courts in enforcing arbitration clauses in core matters that are fundamental to a bankruptcy case.

In determining whether to enforce an arbitration …

Transfer Of Real Estate Title May Be Avoided As A Preference In Certain Jurisdictions, Aleksandra Adamska

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

This article addresses whether a transfer of real estate title may be avoided as a preference under section 547(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). Section 547 permits avoidance of preferential transfers. “A preference is a ‘transfer that enables a creditor to receive payment of a greater percentage of his claim against the debtor than he would have received if the transfer had not been made and he had participated in the distribution of assets of the bankrupt estate.’” Essentially, a preference allows one creditor to receive more value than other creditors. Preferential transfers …

Intangible Property Can Satisfy The Debtor Eligibility Requirement Under Section 109(A), Edward Cho-O’Leary

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 109(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) states that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States … may be a debtor under this title.” While a “foreign entity or individual domiciled abroad but owning property or doing business in the United States is eligible to be a debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 109,” the requirement can be difficult if the foreign entity or individual domiciled abroad has no commercial connection to the US. Consequently, the property component of Section 109(a) has …

Circuit Courts Interpret The Section 1123(A)(4) Equal Treatment Rule, Morgan Liptak

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 1123(a)(4) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a plan of reorganization must “provide the same treatment for each claim or interest of a particular class, unless the holder of a particular claim or interest agrees to a less favorable treatment of such particular claim or interest.” The Supreme Court has never interpreted this provision, nor has the Bankruptcy Code defined the standard of equal treatment. As a result, the circuit courts have created a standard for what exactly the equal treatment rule requires.

The first part of this memorandum discusses what the …

Circuit Split As To Whether Rejection Of Power Purchasing Agreements Are Subject To Bankruptcy Court Or Ferc Jurisdiction, Gabriela Zapata

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) enables troubled enterprises to be restructured, so that they can operate successfully in the future. Under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor in possession may reject a contract subject to bankruptcy court approval. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), however, has “exclusive jurisdiction” over the transmission of electric energy in interstate commerce, including power purchase agreements (“PPAs”). Accordingly, there is a dispute as to whether the rejection of a PPA is subject to bankruptcy court or FERC approval.

This memorandum addresses how courts have …

The High Burden Of A “Minimal Standard Of Living” Under The First Prong Of The Brunner Test, Samantha Alfano

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 523(a)(8) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loan debt is not dischargeable unless the debtor can show “undue hardship.” Courts have concluded that section 523(a)(8) creates a presumption that student loans are nondischargeable, finding that the burden of challenging this presumption rests upon the individual debtor. The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., articulated what has become the standard test (the “Brunner test”) for determining undue hardship. Subsequently, the Brunner test has been adopted by the …

Sdny Bankruptcy Judges Have Differing Views On A Bankruptcy Court’S Jurisdiction To Issue Third-Party Releases, Brandon Auerbach

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under chapter 11 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor may receive a discharge from claims under its plan of reorganization. A chapter 11 discharge functions as a release of liability for the debtor. Often debtors attempt to include releases for non-debtor parties as part of their reorganization plans to preclude creditors from asserting claims against non-debtors. However, the Bankruptcy Code does not expressly provide for such “third party releases,” except in the context of asbestos cases. Nevertheless, bankruptcy courts have approved third-party releases in other circumstances. The courts, however, are divided as …

Inconsistent Standards To Approve A Settlement Under Rule 9019, Zach Benaharon

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

“Settlements and compromises are favored in bankruptcy as they minimize costly litigation and further parties’ interests in expediting the administration of the bankruptcy estate.” In accordance with this policy, Congress promulgated Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019 (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), which governs settlements in a bankruptcy case. Rule 9019 gives a bankruptcy judge discretion to approve a proposed settlement and states in relevant part, that: “[o]n motion by the trustee, the court may approve a compromise or settlement.” Rule 9019 applies to both settlements brought before the court on a standalone basis as well as those presented as part …