Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

The Evolution Of The Settlement Payment Defense?, Tianja Samuel

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Each year U.S. bankruptcy courts decide hundreds of cases in which debtors, or their trustees, seek to avoid preferential payments. In many of these cases, creditors successfully defend themselves by convincing the court that a statutory safe harbor provision is applicable. The settlement payment defense is one safe harbor provision that—although frequently utilized by creditors—has consistently raised questions about its own scope and applicability. The Second Circuit answered some of these questions, for the first time, in In re Enron Creditors Recovery Corp. In what some believe was an expansive decision, the court held that the settlement payment …

In Re Shamus Holdings, Llc And The Automatic Stay, Matthew Silverman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The automatic stay is recognized as one of the fundamental protections provided by bankruptcy law. The automatic stay prevents creditors from taking almost any type of formal or informal action against the debtor, including commencing or continuing foreclosure actions. There are, however, certain exceptions to the automatic stay, exceptions that permit the creditor to take action against the debtor despite the pendency of the bankruptcy proceeding. This memorandum focuses on one such exception, contained in section 362(b)(3) of the Code, and the effect courts have held it to have on the automatic tolling provision of the Bankruptcy Code. The …

Priority Treatment Of Employee Severance Compensation Claims, Eric Small

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a bankrupt company terminates employees, those former employees often have claims against the estate for severance compensation. Sections 507(a) and 503(b)(1)(A) of the Bankruptcy Code provide for the priority treatment of such claims. Those sections apply to claims arising both pre-petition and post-petition. In the pre-petition context, courts must determine if a claim was earned within the pre-petition period prescribed by section 507(a)(4). For post-petition claims, whether such claims are given administrative expense priority for the full amount claimed turns on courts’ analysis of when the claims were earned, when services were rendered, and if and when the …

Attorney Retention And Disqualification In Bankruptcy, Jessica Stukonis

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Two essential issues to bankruptcy practitioners are attorney retention and the threat of disqualification. These issues are closely related and are governed by several ethical rules and bankruptcy statutes. Generally, all legal professionals must abide by the standards imposed by their states’ ethical code, which are largely adapted from the American Bar Association Model Rules of Professional Conduct (the “Model Rules”). Bankruptcy practitioners, however, must also abide by section 327 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”), which only permits the retention of “disinterested” professionals in a proceeding. If the attorney does not meet these standards, the presiding …

Does Section 329 Grant Exclusive Jurisdiction To Bankruptcy Courts?, Samantha M. Tusa

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Fee agreements between bankruptcy debtors and their counsel must often be settled in court. In which court those fee disputes can be heard is a question that is not yet settled. One court has looked to section 329 of the Bankruptcy Code for the answer. Section 329 states that if the compensation agreed upon by the debtor and attorney exceeds a reasonable value for the services rendered, “the court” may cancel the agreement or return some of the payment. In re Piccinini is the first case to hold that the phrase “the court” in section 329 confers exclusive jurisdiction …

Intentional Conduct May Be Required To Prove Defalcation Under Section 523(A)(4) In Certain Circuits, Elizabeth Vanderlinde

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the average bankruptcy case, individual debtors seek to discharge some, all, or most of their debts. The Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) sets certain limits on the dischargeability of obligations. For example, section 523 of the Code provides circumstances in which certain debts are not dischargeable. Specifically, section 523(a)(4) provides that an individual debtor will not be discharged from any debt “for fraud or defalcation while acting in a fiduciary capacity.” In the bankruptcy context, defalcation means “the failure to meet an obligation.” However, the Code is silent as to the level of culpability required to prove defalcation. The …

Class Proofs Of Claim And Class Certification In Bankruptcy, Ravi Vohra

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Rules”) make class action procedures available to litigants in bankruptcy litigation. However, the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) and Rules leave open the question of whether a class representative may file a class proof of claim on behalf of a putative class. Because the Code and Rules are silent, bankruptcy courts have to look to case law to “fill the gaps.” Different courts have adopted different interpretations, and a circuit split has emerged regarding the permissibility of class proofs of claim.

Initially, most bankruptcy courts and the first court of appeal that addressed …

Granting Foreign Representatives Automatic Section 108 Relief In Chapter 15 Cases, Andrew J. Zapata

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In a matter of first impression, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) in In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd. was confronted with the issue of whether the tolling provisions of section 108 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”) are automatically available to Foreign Representatives in chapter 15 cases. As written, section 108(a) of the Code gives trustees, rather than Foreign Representatives, a minimum two-year extension from when the order for relief is entered to commence claims in the interest of the debtor’s estate. However, in In re Fairfield Sentry Ltd., the Court looked …

Article 9'S Bankrupt Proceeds Rule: Amending Bankruptcy Code Section 552 Through The Ucc Proceeds Definition, G. Ray Warner

Faculty Publications

Ten years ago, just as revised Article 9 was becoming effective, I documented how several of the Article 9 revisions had little or no nonbankruptcy function, but were designed primarily to alter bankruptcy law outcomes in favor of secured creditors. I argued that such attempts to amend federal bankruptcy law through the state uniform laws revision process were improper and suggested theories that would limit or avoid the intended bankruptcy law changes. This anniversary symposium provides an excellent opportunity to revisit one of those Article 9 revisions in greater detail and see how successful the drafters' anti-bankruptcy agenda has been.

Religion And Bankruptcy, Keith Sharfman, G. Ray Warner

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

From the time of its creation and throughout its evolution, bankruptcy law has affected and been affected by religion. Important aspects of current bankruptcy law, such as the discharge of debt and the exemption of personal property, originated in religious traditions before making their way into secular law. At the same time, religious individuals and institutions are themselves often parties in bankruptcy cases, and the Bankruptcy Code specifically protects religious contributions from avoidance as fraudulent transfers, excludes them from consideration in connection with the dismissal of a bankruptcy case for reasons of abuse, and allows them as a deductible …

The Sec In Bankruptcy, G. Ray Warner, Keith Sharfman

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

Since its founding, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") has played an important role as both an advisor and regulator in bankruptcy cases, valuing debtor assets, opining on plans of reorganization, regulating the trading of claims and the disclosure of information, and much else. After a period of relative inactivity following the passage of the Bankruptcy Code (which has a less expansive view of the SEC's role than that of the former Chandler Act whose regime the Code replaced), the SEC's involvement in bankruptcy has intensified in recent years with the ascendancy of equity committees and with the increased …

Bankruptcy Reform And Economic Recovery, G. Ray Warner

Journal of Civil Rights and Economic Development

(Excerpt)

In 2005, following years of intensive lobbying by the consumer credit industry, the focus of the consumer bankruptcy law was changed from the liberal debtor-focused "fresh start" approach embodied in the 1978 Bankruptcy Code to a creditor-focused "can pay/must pay" approach. Although the shift to a can pay/must pay system started years earlier to address perceived abuses, the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 ("BAPCPA") completed that shift by engrafting onto the bankruptcy law a fairly strict and largely objective test for determining a debtor's ability to repay debt and by setting forth channeling rules designed …

Case Analysis Of In Re Atlantic Gulf Comtys. Corp., Meagan Mahar

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In In re Atlantic Gulf Comtys. Corp., a Delaware Bankruptcy Court applied New York law to both equitable and legal arguments made by the debtor, holding that funds in an escrow account created by the debtor were not property of the debtor’s estate. 369 B.R. 156, 164–65 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007). First, this memo will examine the two opposing legal and equitable arguments made by the parties, with each relying on different theories of characterizing the debtor’s interest in escrow accounts as they have evolved throughout New York caselaw. Second, it will analyze the contingency argument made by the …

Defense Of In Pari Delicto Does Not Affect Trustee Standing, Elizabeth L. Anderson

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Rejecting the Second Circuit’s Wagoner rule and agreeing with the First, Third, Fifth, and Eleventh Circuits, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the collusion of corporate insiders with third parties to injure the corporation does not deprive the corporation’s trustee of standing to sue third parties, resulting in a greater rift between Second Circuit and the other Courts of Appeal on this issue. Moratzka v. Morris, 482 F.3d 997, 1004 (8th Cir. 2007). Nevertheless, the court affirmed that such a situation may give rise to the defense of in pari delicto barring the …

What Exactly Does The Term “Fair And Equitable” Mean?, Peter Doggett Jr.

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In a plan of reorganization, the Bankruptcy Code outlines a priority scheme that must be strictly adhered to. 11 U.S.C. § 1129. According to the Code, “the holder of any claim or interest that is junior to the claims of such class will not receive or retain under the plan on account of such junior claim or interest any property.” 11 U.S.C. § 1129(b)(2)(B)(ii). When faced with the question of extending the codified priority rule to settlement approvals, the Fifth Circuit in United States v. AWECO Inc. (In re AWECO, Inc.), 725 F.2d 293 (5th Cir. 1984) held …

Ride Through Option For Real Property Survived Bapcpa, James Lynch

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Bankruptcy Abuse Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) largely eliminated the so-called “ride through” option for security interests in personal property; however, for nearly two years there was no clear indication as to whether the ride through option still existed for security interests in real property. Recently, in In re Caraballo, the Connecticut Bankruptcy Court confronted this uncertainty head on and determined that the ride through option still exists for real property. 386 B.R. 398, 400 (Bankr. D. Conn. 2008). Importantly for bankrupt individuals, utilizing the ride through option allows them to “keep their property during and after bankruptcy …

Non-Claim Status Of Environmental Clean-Up Injunctions Limited To States, Klevis Peshtani

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Does the equitable right of an individual, whose property has been damaged by the debtor’s pollution, to injunctive clean-up relief constitute a “claim” that may be discharged in the debtor’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy? This was the issue of first impression which the Pennsylvania Bankruptcy Court dealt with in Krafczek v. Exide Corp., No. 00-1965, 2007 WL 1199530, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 19, 2007). The Krafczek court answered the question in the affirmative, 2007 WL 1199530 at *3, setting new precedent in an already narrow area of Bankruptcy Law upon which other courts had trodden carefully.

This article …

In Re Kara Homes, Inc., Anna Drynda

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Recently, the United States Bankruptcy Court for District of New Jersey held in In re Kara Homes, Inc., 363 B.R. 399 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2007) that secured construction lenders of affiliated chapter 11 debtors were entitled to expedited relief from an automatic stay of foreclosure pursuant to section 362(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code because the court determined each debtor constituted single asset real estate case under section 101(51B) of the Code. The significance of expedited relief under section 362(d)(3) is it imposes an “expedited time frame for filing a plan” of reorganization in chapter 11 for single asset real estate …

A Prime Brokers Good Faith Defense To Fraudulent Transfers, Michael Maffei

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The exposure of Madoff Ponzi scheme, and others like it, will undoubtedly have an impact on the way that bankruptcy courts deal with fraudulent transfers to prime brokers, particularly the degree to which the prime broker on inquiry notice of fraud must act with diligence. Due to the recent economic tumult, the number of bankruptcies is continually growing. Another result of the economic decline is that a large number of investment funds have failed. After these funds failed, many prime brokers discovered that some of the funds were not operating funds at all. They were in fact Ponzi schemes. …

The Exclusive View V. The Non-Exclusive View: Can A Creditor’S Claim Be Dismissed For Failing To Provide Supporting Documentation?, Robert J. Ryan

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

May a creditor’s claim be dismissed simply because he failed to provide supporting documentation in violation of Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3001? The answer depends on which jurisdiction the creditor is pursuing its claim in. Courts are currently sharply divided on the issue. If the creditor is fortunate enough to be in a jurisdiction which follows the “exclusive” view, which is the majority rule, the answer to this problem will be yes. However, if the creditor happens to be in a jurisdiction which follows the “non-exclusive” view, which is the minority rule, the answer to this problem will …

Introduction: Adr Meets Bankruptcy, G. Ray Warner

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

On October 2, 2009, the American Bankruptcy Institute Law Review, the Hugh L. Carey Center for Dispute Resolution, and the St. John's Institute for Bankruptcy Policy convened respected bankruptcy jurists and dispute resolution scholars to host "ADR Meets Bankruptcy: Cross-Purposes or Cross-Pollination." Bankruptcy is a dispute resolution process unlike other forms of court adjudication, both in the flexibility of the process and in the systemic goals. In many ways, bankruptcy is a form of alternative dispute resolution. Yet there has been little formal engagement between students and practitioners of bankruptcy and students and practitioners of the nominally separate …

We Can Work It Out: Entertaining A Dispute Resolution System Design For Bankruptcy Court, Elayne E. Greenberg

Faculty Publications

On October 2, 2009, dispute resolution scholars and bankruptcy court jurists courageously began the difficult conversation about the feasibility of an expanded dispute resolution system design for bankruptcy court. This commentary distills that conversation through a dispute resolution system design lens. Dispute resolution system design offers a framework for organizations to more effectively manage and resolve recurring conflicts. The design of a dispute resolution system requires clarifying ideas, elucidating values, prioritizing goals, considering options and incorporating that information into a more workable process to respond to conflict. All the while, the stakeholders and dispute resolution designers work together to clarify, …

Allowing Trustee Removal For Cause, Sua Sponte, After Notice And A Hearing, Jonathan Grasso

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The issue of whether a bankruptcy judge can sua sponte remove a trustee has rarely been addressed; however, two courts have recently considered the issue. The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel in Morgan v. Goldman (In re Morgan), 375 B.R. 838 (B.A.P. 8th Cir. 2007) and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in Walden v. Walker (In re Walker), 515 F.3d 1204 (11th Cir. 2008) both concluded that a bankruptcy judge has the ability to remove a trustee “for cause,” sua sponte, after “notice and a hearing.”

Morgan was the first case to ever deal …

Chapter 13 Plan Must Pay Adequate Protection Payments Prior To Attorney’S Fees, Brian Lacoff

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In In re Dispirito, a decision of importance to Chapter 13 debtors’ attorneys, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey ruled that an undersecured creditor was entitled not only to adequate protection payments, but that the section 507(b), 11 U.S.C. § 507(b) (2006), “super-priority” status of the inadequate adequate protection provided during the case meant that the Chapter 13 plan had to pay those amounts before paying any of the debtor’s attorneys fees. 371 B.R. 695, 695 (Bankr. D.N.J. 2007). This article will compare how the Dispirito court’s ruling compares to other bankruptcy court’s rulings. It …

Applying The “Applicable” Standard Or The Actual Amount: Monthly Rent In A Debtor’S Chapter 13 Plan, Paola Chiarenza

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under The Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA”) (S. 256, Pub. L. No. 109–8, 119 Stat. 23), debtors are subjected to a test in order to ensure their creditors are repaid as much as possible. Chapter 13 requires debtors in bankruptcy to file a plan indicting a monthly amount they will repay to creditors over a given set of years. The amount to be repaid is a debtor’s entire “disposable income,” which is income minus expenses. See 11 U.S.C. § 1325 (2007). Deductable expenses are to be calculated the same as a chapter 7 filing. …

Lien Preservation Does Not Give Trustee Right To Collect All Debt, Elizabeth Filardi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In Morris v. St. John National Bank, 516 F.3d 1207 (10th Cir. 2008), the Tenth Circuit addressed the issue of whether a bankruptcy trustee who successfully avoids a lien and preserves the in rem security interest for the bankruptcy estate under the powers granted to him by the Bankruptcy Code automatically assumes all the rights the original lienholder may have against the debtor. The Court, affirming the decisions of the bankruptcy court and bankruptcy appellate panel, concluded the trustee did not automatically assume all the rights the original lienholder may have against the debtor. Id. at 1212. …

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. V. Knupfer, Thomas Scappaticci

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An important and traditional power afforded by the Bankruptcy Code to debtors and trustees is the power to sell encumbered property free and clear of any liens or encumbrances. See G COLLIER ON BANKRUPTCY, App. Pt. 44, at 44-529 (Alan N. Resnick et al. eds., 15th ed. rev. 2006). One way in which this power is given to debtors and trustees is through Section 363(f)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, which provides a mechanism for property to be sold free and clear of any liens. See 11 U.S.C. § 363(f)(3) (2006). Yet, the application of Section 363(f)(3) is not entirely …

A Bankruptcy Court’S “Preference” Towards Mandatory Mediation, Seth Meyer

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Mediation has gained general acceptance in the legal community but has been slow to take root in bankruptcy. See generally Geetha Ravindra, Reflections on Institutionalizing Mediation, 14 DISP. RESOL. MAG. 28, (Spring/Summer 2008). Over the past 20 years, mandatory bankruptcy mediation has become a feasible alternative to traditional litigation of adversary proceedings. In the beginning, creditors and debtors would mediate only if they agreed to mediate. As statutory authority for court ordered mediation strengthened, bankruptcy courts ordered parties to mediate with more regularity. Presently, mandatory mediation is statutorily authorized and bankruptcy courts have institutionalized the use of mandatory bankruptcy …

Whether “Hedging” Anticipated Contingency Fees Should Be Deemed Impermissible Fee-Sharing Under Section 504 When The Policy Considerations Underlying The Statute Are Not Offended, David Bloom

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Although the Bankruptcy Code establishes a clear prohibition against the sharing of fees by persons receiving compensation or reimbursement under section 504, it is unclear whether bankruptcy attorneys may be permitted to enter into “hedging” arrangements in order to obtain downside protection against risks associated with appeal. Ultimately, what is needed to decide this issue is a determination of what constitutes “sharing” of compensation within the meaning of the Code. Recently, in In re Winstar Communications, Inc., 378 B.R. 756 (Bankr. D. Del. 2007), the bankruptcy court found no ambiguity in the statute, and gave the term “sharing” …

In Re Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc., Jonathan Borst

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In In re Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc., No. 08-11261(KG), 2008 WL 2951974 (Bankr. D. Del. July 28, 2008), the court held against Whitehall Jewelers Holdings, Inc. (“Debtors”), in favor of approximately 124 consignment vendors (“Consignment Vendors”), where Debtors sought an order permitting the “free and clear” sale of all of their assets and inventory, including consigned goods from Consignment Vendors. See id. at *1–2. In order to develop a full understanding of the court’s holding, it is necessary to understand its statutory context, specifically sections 363 and 541 of the Bankruptcy Code, as well as Federal Rule of …