Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

In Re Minter-Higgins, Deanna Scorzelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A Chapter 7 trustee cannot recover from the debtor, through a turnover motion, postpetition transfers that were made out of the debtor’s bank account that resulted from pre-petition checks and debit expenditures that were not transferred by the bank to the payees until after the debtor filed for bankruptcy. The § 362(b)(11) exception from the automatic stay insulates a consumer debtor from the trustee’s attempt to require her to “turnover” these amounts.

Constructive Fraudulent Transfers—Determining Insolvency, Tyler Beach

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a debtor files for bankruptcy, all of the debtor's assets and liabilities are automatically transferred into a bankruptcy estate. These assets are then used either to help a debtor reorganize or to repay all of the debtor’s creditors in liquidation. Under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), to preserve the estate assets a bankruptcy trustee can avoid certain transfers made by debtors as fraudulent transfers. Without this power to avoid transactions that occur prior to a debtor filing for bankruptcy, debtors could engage in transactions that drain the company of any of its valuable assets and …

Filing A Proof Of Claim In A Bankruptcy Court Subjects The Filing Party To The Court’S Jurisdiction. Anti-Waiver Clauses In The Proof Of Claim Are Not The Same Thing As Objecting To Jurisdiction, Christina Buru

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In the United States, a federal court must have both personal and subject-matter jurisdiction to hear and rule on a case. Subject-matter jurisdiction can be met by satisfying the requirements under §1331 or §1332 of title 28 of the United States Code. These are typically referred to as “federal question” jurisdiction and “diversity” jurisdiction. §1331(a) allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction over “civil actions arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States”. §1332(a) allows district courts to exercise original jurisdiction over civil actions “where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000…and …

Exploring The Scope Of The Property Requirement Of Section 109(A) In Chapter 11 And 15 Cases, Rasha El Mouatassim Bih

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 109 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States . . . may be a debtor.” In In re Barnet, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that debtor eligibility requirements of section 109 apply to a debtor in recognition proceedings under chapter 15. If a debtor does not have a domicile or place of business in the United States, as is often the case with foreign debtors, then …

Selling A Vessel Free And Clear Of A Maritime Lien Pursuant To Section 363 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Aram Movaseghi

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor in possession or trustee may sell property of the debtor’s estate. However, a lien on a maritime vessel may make such a sale challenging, in particular because of jurisdictional issues. When a debtor’s assets become subject to the jurisdiction of both admiralty and bankruptcy cases, a complex conundrum arises. Maritime bankruptcies have generated complex legal issues and jurisdictional conflicts that have perplexed practitioners and implicated significant constitutional issues.

Under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor or trustee may seek authority from the court to …

Analyzing A Creditor’S Ability To Exercise Its Shareholder Rights To Prevent A Bankruptcy Filing By A Company, Frank Pecorelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) operates as a tool allowing an honest, struggling debtor to gain a fresh start absent of their burdensome debts. Generally, when a company is about to enter bankruptcy, shareholders and creditors of the insolvent company play two distinct roles. Shareholders, those with an ownership stake in the company, have voting rights enumerated in their shareholder agreement, allowing them to vote on certain actions, including the company’s bankruptcy filing. On the other hand, creditors generally have a claim (i.e., a right to payment) against the company, which typically has arisen …

Court’S Ability To Modify Or Terminate A Prior Recognition Order Under §1517(D) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Kristopher Peters

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) governs the process for obtaining recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings in the U.S. Section 1517 governs recognition of foreign proceedings and addresses two distinct, but related, issues: (1) whether a court must recognize a foreign court’s foreign proceeding; and (2) whether a court may modify or terminate a prior recognition of a foreign proceeding. This memorandum analyzes the second issue, which is governed by §1517(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.

This memorandum first examines the scope of §1517(d) and whether and when a court may modify or …

Distribution Of Property Overseen By Family Courts Will Not Bar Constructive Fraudulent Transfer Claims, Allyson Rivard

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In general, a transfer made by a debtor may be avoided under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) or applicable state law, if the transfer was actually or constructively fraudulent. Actual fraudulent transfer claims require a showing of actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud creditors. Constructive fraudulent transfer claims do not require proof of actual intent. Instead, a transfer will generally be constructively fraudulent if it is shown that (1) the debtor was insolvent at the time of, or rendered insolvent by, the transfer and (2) so long as the debtor received “less than …

Circuit Split Created Over Enactment Of Section 510(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code And Its Effect On The Rule Of Explicitness, Rossella Scarpa

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Bankruptcy law seeks to equitably distribute a debtor’s remaining assets among creditors. However, prior to bankruptcy, creditors can contract around their pro rata equitable distribution by executing inter-creditor agreements. Inter-creditor agreements are executed to delegate the rights and priorities of creditors as to a common borrower in the event the borrower defaults. Subordination agreements are a type of inter-creditor agreement, where junior creditors consent to senior creditors having their loans repaid in full before junior creditors receive their payment. Bankruptcy courts enforce subordination agreements through section 510(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), which …

Conflicting Norms: Impact Of The Model Law On Chapter 11'S Global Restructuring Role, G. Ray Warner

Faculty Publications

(Excerpt)

The Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency is said to embody the concept of modified universalism for cross-border insolvency matters. In a pure universalist system, a single proceeding would deal with all of the debtor’s assets and debts globally. This is in contrast to a purely territorial approach, where multiple local proceedings would be required; one in each jurisdiction where the debtor had assets or debts, but each limited to the assets and debts located in that jurisdiction. While universalism emphasizes the economic goals of insolvency theory – to maximize the value of the estate and minimize the expense of …

A Rash Decision In Sunnyslope: Confusion Lingers Over Collateral Valuation, Michael D. Manzo

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Comment argues that the Ninth Circuit’s Sunnyslope decision misconstrued the Rash Court’s holding and is divorced from the text and structure of the Code. Rash does not provide a brightline rule that answers valuation questions in cramdowns; it offers a flexible standard that is compatible with the Code’s protections for both debtors and secured creditors. Further, this Comment also argues that Sunnyslope could have been answered not as a valuation issue, but as a lien priority issue. In any event, the Ninth Circuit completely missed the mark in interpreting the Supreme Court’s holding in Rash and in understanding …

Combating Professional Error In Bankruptcy Analysis Through The Design And Use Of Decision Trees In Clinical Pedagogy, Timothy R. Tarvin

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Article will address the positive impact of using the decision tree model in four parts. Part I will provide a historical overview of the evolution of legal education and the profession’s call for more experiential education, both generally and specifically, through clinical training and the use of technology. This Section will provide context and argue that the use of decision trees in the clinical setting is the natural culmination of the legal academy’s goals of teaching analytical skills, preparing graduates for practice, and incorporating new technology into the practice of law.

Part II will describe the legal malpractice …

Protecting Valuable Estate Interests Through The Unenforceability Of Ipso Facto Clauses, Kayla Martin

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A trustee or debtor-in-possession is provided with a plethora of powers under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). A chapter 13 debtor-in-possession, pursuant to section 1322 of the Bankruptcy Code, may assume or reject any executory contract in connection with its plan. The ability, however, to assume or reject an executory contract is limited by section 365, which in part prohibits the modification or termination of a debtor’s interest in a contractual agreement on the sole basis that the debtor filed for bankruptcy, which is commonly known as an ipso facto provision. This prohibition of …

Effects Of Licensors’ Duty To Maintain Control Over A Trademark On Licensees’ Ability To Assert Rights Provided Under Section 365 Of The Bankruptcy Code, Arianna Clark

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor may reject or assume an executory contract, including a license for intellectual property. The definition of intellectual property does not include the term “trademark.” Consequently, it is not clear whether a non-debtor licensee can continue using a trademark if the debtor-licensor rejects it. Moreover, there appears to be a consensus forming among courts in that a debtor-licensee cannot assign a license to a third-party without the consent of the licensor. Regardless of which party initiates bankruptcy proceedings, there is a special consideration contemplated by courts– the …

Balancing Principles Of Cooperation And Public Policy In Applying Comity, Kristen Barone

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Comity is a common law legal principle that allows U.S. courts to afford deference to foreign judgments. Comity is utilized as a basis for granting extraterritorial effect to judgments of foreign courts. This principle plays an integral role in a number of cross-border bankruptcy proceedings and has been adopted as a predominate legal principal in the Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency (the “Model Law”), promulgated by the United Nation’s Commission on International Trade, and Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”).

Although American courts have long recognized the need to extend comity to …

Stop Right There! Assessing The Role Of Collateral Estoppel In A Fraud Proceeding Against A Debtor And A Debtor-Owned Business, Brandon Dorman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In an adversary proceeding, under section 523(a)(2)(A) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), to determine the non-dischargeability of a debt based upon fraud, a state courts finding of fraud against a debtor-owned business may collaterally estop the debtor in the adversary proceeding from relitigating the issue of fraud. Essential to this issue is the timing at which the debtor filed for bankruptcy. Timing is critical in determining whether the prior decision against the debtor-owned business in the state court action collaterally estopped the litigation against the debtor or whether the debtor was afforded the …

Adversary Proceeding Not Required For Bankruptcy Courts To Determine Lien Status, Justin Korenblatt

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. AMH Roman Two NC, LLC, the Fourth Circuit denied Wells Fargo’s motion to set aside an order canceling its mortgage because the motion was not timely. In 2002, Wells Fargo extended a mortgage to the debtors on a property in Pendleton, North Carolina. Two years later, debtors refinanced the property with PNC Bank. Although PNC fully repaid Wells Fargo’s loan, Wells Fargo allowed the debtors’ line of credit to remain open, and permitted the debtors to take advances totaling over $300,000. Then, in 2012, debtors filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter …

Application Of The Federal Rule Of Bankruptcy Procedure Rule 2004 Balancing Test, Patrick O’Connor

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2004 (“Rule 2004”) provides that “[o]n motion of any party in interest, the court may order the examination of any entity.” By its terms, the rule is broad. It is only marginally narrowed by Rule 2004(b) to require that examinations “relate only to the acts, conduct, or property or to the liabilities and financial condition of the debtor, or to any matter which may affect the administration of the debtor's estate, or to the debtor's right to a discharge.” Given that Rule 2004 is broadly available in bankruptcy cases to “any party in interest” …

Under What Circumstances Can A Bankruptcy Court Grant Innocent Spouse Relief To A Debtor?, Noreen Gilroy

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The United States tax system allows married couples to file joint tax returns. For those married couples that jointly file, there is joint and severable liability for the taxes due on those returns. Because spouses who file joint tax returns are held both jointly and severally liable for those joint returns, the drafters of the Tax Code created an exemption from liability for innocent spouses in Section 6015 of the Tax Code. Section 6015(e) of the Tax Code expressly grants subject matter jurisdiction to the Tax Courts to review determinations of innocent spouse relief. However, the language of Section …

Bankruptcy Schedules Will Not Be Treated As Judicial Admissions In Court, Charles Akinboyewa Jr.

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

When an individual debtor files for bankruptcy, it must file bankruptcy schedules listing, among other things, the creditors that hold claims against the individual. The information contained on the schedules may have ramifications on the debtor and its creditors. Specifically, often debtors unknowingly fail to list certain claims, which may affect the debtor’s right to discharge a creditor’s right to a recovery. Part I of this memo discusses bankruptcy schedules and claim dischargeability. Part II illustrates the distinction between judicial and evidentiary admissions. Part III explores cases that have held bankruptcy schedules to be admissions and others that have …

A Chapter 7 Trustee’S Qualified Right Of Immunity May Be No Shield For Intentional, Negligent, Or Grossly Negligent Conduct: Analyzing And Applying The Three-Way Circuit Split, Nataniel E. Arabov

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Quasi-judicial immunity is best understood as a blessing and a curse. A bankruptcy trustee is appointed to act as trustee through an order of the bankruptcy court. In Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, the Supreme Court provided a two-part test to analyze how far judicial immunity extends to persons who perform quasi-judicial functions in connection with their appointment. This test explains whether a judicial appointee is absolutely immune from personal liability to the estate or others. Under the test, a court (1) must decide whether the functions of the individual were historically adjudicative in nature, and (2) must …

Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction: Are Libel And Slander Personal Injury Torts?, Joseph Collini

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A bankruptcy court may adjudicate tort claims, including libel and slander against a debtor, if it concludes that it has jurisdiction over those claims. The statutes governing a bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction, including title 11 of the United States Code (“The Bankruptcy Code”) and title 28 of the United States Code, are ambiguous. Consequently, the bankruptcy courts are divided as to their jurisdiction over libel and slander claims.

At the heart of this issue is the personal injury tort exception under 28 U.S.C.A. §157(b). The exception specifically limits the jurisdiction of the bankruptcy courts and states that personal injury torts …

Uncertainty In The Gap Period: The Dangers Of Doing Business With An Alleged Debtor, Daniel Ishoo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 303 of the Bankruptcy Code allows creditors to initiate an involuntary case against a debtor by filing a petition with the court. Although the provisions applied to an involuntary case and a voluntary case are largely the same, one major difference surfaces in an involuntary case—the existence of what is commonly referred to as the “gap period.” The gap period is the period between the filing of an involuntary petition and a Judge’s entry of an order for relief.

Pursuant to § 303(f) of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor may continue to operate during the gap period as …

More Than Fraud: Proving Fraud On The Court, Stephen Van Doran

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In all adversarial proceedings, litigants have a duty of full disclosure and honesty with the court. Typically, where a party obtains a judgment through fraudulent conduct, the only way to overturn that judgment is through a motion to vacate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(3).

A final judgment can also be overturned by a motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(d)(3), as incorporated into the Bankruptcy Rules by Rule 9024, to vacate a judgment based upon fraud on the court. Fraud on the court is generally limited to instances where “the integrity of the judicial …

Circumstances In Which A Fee Is An Excise Tax Entitled To Priority, Valerie Hammel

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) enumerates several categories in which claims are entitled to receive priority. Indeed, Section 507(a)(8)(E) grants governmental units priority on obligations that are “excise tax[es] on a transaction.” The Bankruptcy Code, however, does not define the universe of circumstances necessary to fall within the excise tax priority category. Governmental units therefore spend considerable efforts litigating to ensure that their claims are granted priority under the Bankruptcy Code. Ultimately, the success of a claim will hinge on how narrowly or broadly a court interprets Section 507(a)(8)(E). Part I of this memorandum …

A Union's Duty In Bankruptcy Cases To Fairly Represent Its Constituency, Denise Dessel

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”), a union, as the sole representative of its workers, has a duty to fairly represent them. This duty entitles a union to fairly represent all employees, “whether members of the union or not, fairly.” A union breaches this duty when its conduct or decisions are arbitrary, discriminatory, or committed in bad faith.

The terms “arbitrary,” “discriminatory,” and “bad faith” have been interpreted through case law. Part I of this memorandum discusses the interpretation of arbitrary conduct; Part II addresses how courts have defined discriminatory conduct; and Part III analyzes how bad faith …

Bankruptcy Tourism: How A Comi Change Can Serve As Ammunition In Debt Wars, Taylor Anderson

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In general, Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides a mechanism to recognize a “foreign proceeding.” Upon recognition of a foreign proceeding, the foreign representative will be allowed to sue and be sued in the United States. However, Chapter 15 distinguishes between “foreign main proceedings” and “foreign nonmain proceedings.” Upon recognition of a “foreign main proceeding” section 1520 of the Bankruptcy Code provides for certain automatic relief, including an automatic stay of proceedings against the debtor in the United States. There is no automatic relief conferred upon recognition of a foreign nonmain …

Successful Motions For Reconsideration Require Extraordinary Circumstances, Maria A. Gomez

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Motions for reconsideration are not recognized under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Rule(s)”) or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure (the “Bankruptcy Rule(s)”). A party seeking reconsideration of an order in the bankruptcy courts can file either: (1) a motion to alter or amend a judgment under Bankruptcy Rule 9023, if the order is interlocutory; or (2) a motion for relief from judgment under Bankruptcy Rule 9024, if the order is a final one. The applicable rules to motions for reconsideration are different depending on whether the motion is for an interlocutory or final order. There are …

Exercising Dominion And Control; An Initial Transferee’S Liability For Avoidable Transfers, Shelley Fredericks

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 550(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code, a bankruptcy trustee may collect the full amount of an avoidable transfer from the initial transferee of a fraudulent or avoidable transfer. Specifically, it provides that, “[e]xcept as otherwise provided in this section, to the extent that a transfer is avoided…the trustee may recover, for the benefit of the estate, the property transferred or…the value of such property, from the initial transferee of such transfer or the entity for whose benefit such transfer was made.” This section of the Bankruptcy Code gives power to bankruptcy trustees seeking to collect improperly transferred funds, …

Conflicts Counsel Is Not A Cure All; It Does Not Overcome An Actual Conflict Of Interest, Stephanie Kenn

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution guarantees the right to assistance of counsel. With this right comes many nuances, including the right of an individual to obtain counsel of his or her choice in civil matters if they choose to engage in such matters. The lawyer-client relationship is a fiduciary one and it carries many responsibilities on the attorney’s part. For example, a lawyer must provide “undivided loyalty” to his or her clients. This means that a lawyer must be aware of any conflicts of interest that may arise in the ordinary course of business. Lawyers must take the …