Bankruptcy Law Commons^™

A Bankruptcy Court May Temporarily Suspend Rent Obligation, Matthew Kipnis

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 365(d)(3) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) authorizes a court to “extend, for cause, the time for performance of any [rent] obligation[‘s] [on unexpired leases of nonresidential real property] that arise[] within 60 days after the date of the order for relief[.]” Historically, courts have recognized that under § 365(d)(3), there is a statutory obligation on debtors to pay rent on unexpired leases. Courts have also recognized that if a debtor’s rent obligation is deferred, lessors are entitled to adequate protection. However, courts are divided on the exact timing of when a debtor’s …

Section 1112(B) Of The Bankruptcy Code Allows A Bankruptcy Court To Dismiss A Case Filed In Bad Faith, Antonio Sciarrotta

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) offers a wide range of instances where a bankruptcy court can dismiss a case. Section 1112(b) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that “the court shall convert a case under this chapter to a case under chapter 7 or dismiss a case under this chapter, whichever is in the best interests of creditors and the estate, for cause . . . .” Section 1112(b)(4) lists different scenarios that constitute “for cause.” Although not explicitly within the statutory scheme, a requirement that the debtor files his bankruptcy petition in good faith is one …

How Courts In The Second Circuit Decide On A Stay Pending Appeal In Bankruptcy Actions, Valerie Timmerman

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Absent a stay, an appeal may be mooted by actions taken while the appeal is pending. The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure permit a court to grant “a stay of a judgment, order, or decree” pending an appeal. The purpose of a stay “is to preserve the status quo pending appeal and to protect the rights of all parties in interest.” The standard for a grant or denial of a stay under Bankruptcy Rule 8007 has historically differed among courts, with some favoring the “judicial discretion” test and others opting for the “preliminary injunction” test, depending on the nature …

Impact Of Covid-19 On Debtor’S Obligations To Comply With Duties To Pay Rent, Joseph Diorio

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 365(d)(3) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor-in-possession is required to “timely perform all the obligations of the debtor . . . arising from and after the order for relief under any unexpired lease of nonresidential real property until such lease is assumed or rejected, notwithstanding section 503(b)(1) of this title.” Section 365 was implemented to relieve landlords from the burden of proving the rent payments owed by the debtors prior to rejection were “actual and necessary” costs of preserving the bankruptcy estate. Section 365 has been heavily litigated since early …

Timing And Location Of Comi Determined At The Timing Of Filing Chapter 15 Petition, Priya Suresh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A debtor’s center of main interest (“COMI”) is not defined under title of 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). As a result, bankruptcy courts have taken a number of different approaches to determining a debtor’s COMI. The starting place for determining COMI is the statutory rebuttable presumption that a debtor’s registered office, or habitual residence is the debtor’s COMI. If the presumption is rebutted, the party seeking recognition as a foreign main proceeding must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the debtor's COMI is in the jurisdiction where the proceeding is pending. Under chapter …

City’S Retention Of Impounded Vehicle Not Violation Of Automatic Stay, Alexis Zobeideh

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Upon the filing of a petition under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), creditors and other parties in interest are generally automatically stayed from taking any action against a debtor or property of the estate. The estate includes “all legal or equitable interests of the debtor in property as the commencement of the case,” with some exceptions. The automatic stay is “one of the most important protections and powerful tools available to a debtor in a bankruptcy.”

It is well established that a creditor cannot take affirmative steps against a debtor or estate property. Prior …

The Debtor’S Absolute Right To Dismiss A Chapter 13 Case, Jared Brady

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 1307(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a debtor has an absolute right to dismiss a Chapter 13 bankruptcy case. A bankruptcy case may be voluntarily filed under any chapter so long as the individual is eligible to be a debtor under the chapter selected. Section 1307(b) requires the court, on request of the debtor, to dismiss a Chapter 13 case if the case has not already been converted from Chapter 7 or Chapter 11.

This memorandum addresses a debtor’s right to dismiss a Chapter 13 case in three sections. Section one …

Enforcing Make Whole Premiums In Bankruptcy, Brian P. Campbell Jr.

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

A debt instrument typically has two components: principal and interest. The lender usually has some expectation in receiving a certain amount of interest over the life of a loan. The borrower may in many instances reduce the amount of the interest paid by pre-paying the loan in full prior to maturity. In certain instances, a lender will protect its interest recovery by including a “make whole premium” (“MWP”) in the loan. When borrowings are either paid back early or are accelerated forward by a default, MWPs provide for the payment of an additional amount by the borrower to “compensate …

Qualifications And Standards: What Courts Require To Hold A Statement As A Judicial Admission, Lianna Murphy

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Judicial admissions are factual statements made by a litigant in their pleadings that become binding throughout a case. Judicial admissions serve an important function by foreclosing an admitting party from later disputing such fact or making a statement inconsistent with the admission. It is therefore necessary to distinguish between the types of statements courts will hold as judicial admissions and those they will not.

Recently, the Second Circuit expanded upon existing precedent to clarify that judicial admissions must be “deliberate, clear, and unambiguous,” adopting language already embraced by other circuits. This memorandum will explore the factors that a court …

The Differing Standards To Obtain A Student Loan Debt Discharge, Nicholas Bonelli

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Discharging student loans in a bankruptcy case is often an uphill battle. Under section 523 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), student loans are presumed nondischargeable. Thus, a discharge is generally unavailable for student loans “[u]nless excepting such debt from discharge . . . would impose an undue hardship on the debtor and the debtor's dependents.” To obtain a discharge, a debtor bears the burden of showing “undue hardship” by a preponderance of the evidence. In determining “undue hardship,” a majority of courts use the Brunner Test. A minority of courts use the more …

Bankruptcy Debtor Eligibility For Federal Coronavirus Aid Under The Cares Act, Meghan Paola

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

In March of 2020, Congress enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) to provide assistance to individuals and businesses affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. The Paycheck Protection Program (the “PPP”) was established under section 7(a)(36) of the Small Business Act to provide economic relief in the form of loans to small businesses negatively impacted by Covid-19. The CARES Act tasks the Small Business Administration (the “SBA”) with administering the PPP loans.

The PPP application form provides that a loan will not be approved if an applicant is “presently involved in any bankruptcy.” However, debtors …

Financial Advisory Firms Whose Affiliate’S Employees Served As Independent Officers Or Directors Of The Debtor Prepetition Should Be Retained Under Section 327(A) Of The Bankruptcy Code, Lauren Jusas

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The retention of financial advisors by chapter 11 debtors must be approved by a bankruptcy court. Currently, debtors may file employment applications for financial advisors, whose affiliate’s employees, prepetition, served as a chief restructuring officer (“CRO”), under two different sections of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). Under section 327(a), financial advisors must satisfy a stringent two-part test to be approved. Alternatively, financial advisors may seek approval under section 363(b) pursuant to the J. Alix Protocol, a national settlement protocol developed by the United States Trustee Program (the “USTP”). Since its inception, the J. Alix …

Mandatory Abstention Is Required When Foreign Law Claims Are Brought In Conjunction With State Law Claims, Matthew Seymour

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

When a case is wrongfully removed from state court, mandatory abstention provides moving parties with a way to remand their non-core claims. 28 U.S.C. § 1334(c)(2) provides the framework for a motion that would require a federal district court to abstain. Congress enacted the statute to allow a party to litigate state claims in state court when the case was only removed to federal court because of its relation to a bankruptcy case. The case law interpreting the statute has created a five-step test to determine when mandatory abstention is required. The Third Circuit in Stoe articulated that:

upon …

The Debtor’S Conduct At The Time Of Filing Controls In Determining Whether A Debtor Is Eligible To Convert Their Existing Case To A Case Under Subchapter V Of The Bankruptcy Code, Eric Silverstein

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Congress passed the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (the “SBRA”) to give small businesses a better chance to successfully reorganize under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). One of the SBRA’s most important amendments was the addition of Subchapter V to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, which was designed to reduce the cost and complexity of a small business reorganization. Because the statute’s express terms do not address its application to existing debtors, courts have been forced to address issues of conversion and eligibility. Generally, conversion of a case is …

Ability Of The Eeoc To Litigate For Compensation On Behalf Of A Specific Individual Despite Automatic Stay, Julia Guthy

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Exceprt)

Section 362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) provides for an automatic stay, i.e., a “statutory injunction against efforts outside [a] bankruptcy to collect debts from a debtor under the protections of the Bankruptcy Code.” However, pursuant to section 362(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code, a governmental agency may commence or continue an action against a debtor to enforce the agency’s police or regulatory power despite the automatic stay (hereinafter, the “§362(b)(4) Exception”). For the exception to apply, the action of the governmental agency must “protect the public health and safety” as opposed to “a …

Enterprise Group Restructuring: Dutch Options And United States Enforcement, G. Ray Warner, Michael Veder

Faculty Publications

On 1 January 2021 the Dutch Wet Homologatie Onderhands Akoord, also referred to as the Dutch scheme, entered into force. The Dutch scheme represents a robust restructuring framework that incorporates many of the main restructuring concepts from both the English scheme of arrangement and US chapter 11. It also adds a few new restructuring tools that will make it easier to restructure enterprise group debt by expressly providing that a restructuring plan may include the release of group guarantees and by adopting liberal jurisdictional rules that should permit proceedings to be opened in the Netherlands for all members of …

Express Preclusion Of The Federal Arbitration Act For All Bankruptcy-Related Matters, John R. Hardison

St. John's Law Review

(Excerpt)

This Article sets forth a more solid justification for bankruptcy courts to refuse to order arbitration of any matter related to and affecting a bankruptcy case through express preclusion. First, this Article describes the historical development of the Supreme Court’s holdings on preclusion of the FAA in general and on the courts of appeals’ current formulation of a bankruptcy exception to the FAA. Next, this Article discusses the statutory, historical, and policy-based support for reading the bankruptcy jurisdictional provisions as creating an express exception to the FAA, or alternatively as supporting an implied exception to the FAA. As discussed, …

Intangible Property Can Satisfy The Debtor Eligibility Requirement Under Section 109(A), Edward Cho-O’Leary

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Section 109(a) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) states that “only a person that resides or has a domicile, a place of business, or property in the United States … may be a debtor under this title.” While a “foreign entity or individual domiciled abroad but owning property or doing business in the United States is eligible to be a debtor under 11 U.S.C. § 109,” the requirement can be difficult if the foreign entity or individual domiciled abroad has no commercial connection to the US. Consequently, the property component of Section 109(a) has …

Pleading Fraudulent Conveyances: Federal Vs. New York State Requirements, Tara Guarino

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Fraudulent conveyances are transfers of a debtor’s property made to defraud, burden, and unfairly place the property out of reach of the creditor. Such transfers are illegal and therefore prohibited under both federal and New York State law. Federal fraudulent conveyance law, the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), recognizes two different types of fraudulent conveyances: intentional (“actual”) fraudulent transfers and constructive fraudulent transfers. Each of these fraudulent transfers require different pleading standards. These two types of fraud are recognized in New York, as well. If these fraudulent conveyances can be proven, both federal and state law allow …

A District Court May Not Enjoin Third-Party Claims Against Insurers In A Securities-Fraud Receivership Without Alternative Compensation Scheme, Justin Henderson

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Within its equitable power, a district court may place the assets of a defendant into receivership and appoint a receiver to protect a plaintiff’s interest in property where the rights over that property are disputed. In general, the purpose of this equity receivership is to marshal assets, preserve value, equitably distribute to creditors, and, either reorganize, or orderly liquidate. This power is an extraordinary remedy only justified by extreme situations, such as where there is a high probability that fraudulent conduct has occurred or will occur to frustrate the claim, or when there is a threat that the disputed …

Exempt Assets May Not Be Considered When Determining If Student Loan Should Be Discharged, Kayla Mistretta

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Student loans are presumptively non-dischargeable under title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Bankruptcy Code, however, provides that a debtor may rebut the presumption and be discharged from student loans if the debtor can prove that excepting the debt from discharge would cause “undue hardship” on the debtor or the debtor’s dependents. Proving undue hardship is a “formidable task” for a debtor, but not an impossible one. The Bankruptcy Code does not define undue hardship and does not provide bankruptcy courts with any guidance on how to evaluate it. Accordingly, Congress has given bankruptcy courts …

Bankruptcy Courts Are Largely Unavailable To Cannabis-Related Debtors But Not Off-Limits, Cameron Purcell

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Although title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) does not explicitly prohibit cannabis businesses from filing for bankruptcy, there are many hurdles that continue to preclude cannabis industry participants from obtaining bankruptcy relief. Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a debtor with an opportunity to reorganize its financial affairs in order to continue to operate while providing the fair and equitable distribution among creditors. When the continuation of the debtor’s business is not viable, chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code provides a court-supervised procedure for liquidating the debtor’s assets to pay creditors. Under both forms …

Pension Trusts Should Not Be Considered Business Trusts For The Purpose Of § 109 Of The Bankruptcy Code And Thus Not Eligible To Be A Debtor Under The Bankruptcy Code, Danielle Ullo

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Qualifying as a debtor is the first eligibility requirement for bankruptcy protection under the United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”). Failure to satisfy the requirements to be a qualifying debtor forecloses an entity from obtaining bankruptcy relief. Thus, it is crucial that qualifying debtor categories are defined and delineated, particularly for business entities for whom debtor status is not always so clear.

Section 109 of the Code includes “business trust[s]” as a party entitled to bankruptcy relief but excludes other trusts from that definition. While the Code is clear to exclude ordinary trusts from eligibility to be a debtor, …

The Scope And Retroactivity Of The Honoring American Veterans In Extreme Need “Haven” Act In Chapter 7 And Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Cases, Carole Ann Liscio

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

On August 23, 2019, President Donald J. Trump signed the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act (the “HAVEN Act”). Congress stated that the HAVEN Act’s purpose is to correct an “obvious inequity” in title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) as it relates to veterans. The HAVEN Act is silent as to whether it applies retroactively. Certain courts, however, have explored the idea that it should apply to cases pending as of the HAVEN Act’s enactment.

This memorandum analyzes whether the HAVEN Act can be applied retroactively or only to cases filed following its enactment. …

Center Of Main Interest For Members Of A Group Of Companies, Loredana Miranda

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under Chapter 15 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a court can recognize a foreign bankruptcy, insolvency, or restructuring proceeding (i.e., a foreign proceeding) as either a “foreign main proceeding” or a “foreign nonmain proceeding.” The Bankruptcy Code defines a foreign main proceeding as “a foreign proceeding pending in the country where the debtor has the center of its main interests.” The Bankruptcy Code does not define the “center of main interest” or “COMI.” Thus, bankruptcy courts have formulated different definitions and factors to determine a debtor’s COMI.

Complex corporate structures have made it …

Creditors Can Recover Post-Petition Interest By Incorporating Original Agreement Into The Plan Of Reorganization By Referencing A Specific Clause In The Original Agreement, Emmanuelle Yeremou-Ngah

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Courts will generally interpret a contract according to its plain language, and any intent to incorporate a separate document must be clearly manifested with sufficient specificity. The parties’ intent will be inferred from the express language of the contract. Under section 506(b) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), an oversecured creditor is entitled to post-petition interest on its secured claim up to the value of the collateral securing its claim. Additionally, most courts have ruled that a secured creditor is entitled to post-petition interest according to the rate specified in the contract or a …

Inconsistent Standards To Approve A Settlement Under Rule 9019, Zach Benaharon

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

“Settlements and compromises are favored in bankruptcy as they minimize costly litigation and further parties’ interests in expediting the administration of the bankruptcy estate.” In accordance with this policy, Congress promulgated Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9019 (the “Bankruptcy Rules”), which governs settlements in a bankruptcy case. Rule 9019 gives a bankruptcy judge discretion to approve a proposed settlement and states in relevant part, that: “[o]n motion by the trustee, the court may approve a compromise or settlement.” Rule 9019 applies to both settlements brought before the court on a standalone basis as well as those presented as part …

The In Pari Delicto Defense May Bar Trustees That Bring Claims Which Are Property Of The Estate Under 11 U.S.C. § 541(A), Carmine Broccole

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

The in pari delicto doctrine states that “[i]n a case of equal or mutual fault … the position of the [defending] party … is the better one.” This doctrine is guided by the premise that it is not within the purview of the court to resolve disputes among wrongdoers, and that denial of judicial relief in these instances effectively deters illegal activity. Within the bankruptcy context, “every Circuit to have considered the question has held that in pari delicto can be asserted against a trustee bringing a claim on behalf of a debtor in bankruptcy.”

Under Section 541(a)(1) of …

The Objective Standard For Holding A Creditor In Civil Contempt For Violating A Discharge Order, Alexander Cirkovic Koban

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

An individual debtor is generally entitled to a discharge at the conclusion of a bankruptcy case. A discharge is a legal injunction that both releases the debtor from liability for most pre-bankruptcy debts and bars creditors from collecting any debt that has been discharged. A creditor that violates the discharge may be held in contempt and subject to sanctions by a court.

In Taggart v. Lorenzen, the Supreme Court set the standard for when to impose civil contempt, holding that “a court may hold a creditor in civil contempt for violating a discharge order if there is no …

Circuit Courts Interpret The Section 1123(A)(4) Equal Treatment Rule, Morgan Liptak

Bankruptcy Research Library

(Excerpt)

Under section 1123(a)(4) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), a plan of reorganization must “provide the same treatment for each claim or interest of a particular class, unless the holder of a particular claim or interest agrees to a less favorable treatment of such particular claim or interest.” The Supreme Court has never interpreted this provision, nor has the Bankruptcy Code defined the standard of equal treatment. As a result, the circuit courts have created a standard for what exactly the equal treatment rule requires.

The first part of this memorandum discusses what the …