Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons^™

Why Courts Should Not Interpret The Meaning Of Art, Amy Adler

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that courts are ill-equipped to interpret the meaning of art, particularly in fair use cases, as seen in the Supreme Court's decision in Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith. The Court's reliance on determining the meaning of art exacerbates confusion and inconsistency in fair use jurisprudence, highlighting the need for alternative approaches that avoid judicial interpretation of artistic meaning.

Why The Supreme Court Rejected The Prospect Theory Of Copyright Scope, Michael W. Carroll

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

In Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. ("Google v. Oracle"), and again in Andy Warhol Found. for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith ("Warhol"), the parties and various amici presented the Court with a variety of arguments about the relationship between a copyright owner's right to make derivative works from a protected work and a user's right to make fair uses of that same work. At bottom, these arguments were about the proper, or even optimal, scope of copyright.

This Essay argues that these arguments were instead grounded in a form of "prospect theory" of copyright scope that …

Antisocial Innovation, Christopher Buccafusco, Samuel N. Weinstein

Articles

Innovation is a form of civic religion in the United States. In the popular imagination, innovators are heroic figures. Thomas Edison, Steve Jobs, and (for a while) Elizabeth Holmes were lauded for their vision and drive, and seen to embody the American spirit of invention and improvement. For their part, politicians rarely miss a chance to trumpet their vision for boosting innovative activity. Popular and political culture alike treat innovation as an unalloyed good. And the law is deeply committed to fostering innovation, spending billions of dollars a year to make sure society has enough of it. But this sunny …

Antitrust Regulation Of Copyright Markets, Jacob Noti-Victor, Xiyin Tang

Articles

Late last year, a federal court sided with the Department of Justice and blocked the planned merger of book publishers Simon & Schuster and Penguin Random House. The decision was a rare collision between antitrust law and the deeply consolidated copyright content industries. Over the course of the past decade, acquisitions and mergers in the recording, music publishing, and audiovisual space have left just a handful of juggernaut content producers in their wake. Moreover, new technology companies that have entered the content-creation and distribution markets have begun to leverage their scale to further their own industry consolidation.

This Article examines …

Why Antitrust? Perspectives On Antitrust Career Paths, Cardozo Antitrust Society, New York State Bar Association

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.

What Is Antitrust?, Cardozo Antitrust Society

2023–2024 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Horizontal Price Exchanges, Joseph E. Harrington Jr., Christopher R. Leslie

Cardozo Law Review

The private exchange of prices by competitors has long been a source of anticompetitive concern. Based on claims of possible procompetitive effects, the Supreme Court decided that antitrust challenges to these exchanges should be evaluated under the rule of reason. In reviewing the jurisprudence applying the rule of reason approach to horizontal price exchanges, we find it suspect as it is long on claims of procompetitive benefits but short on economic theory and evidence substantiating those claims. To fill this gap, this Article injects economic reasoning into the judicial discussion. While our analysis identifies several reasons for these exchanges to …

Demystifying The Elusive Quest For Cyber Insurance Protection: The Need For New Contract Language, Deborah L. Johnson

Cardozo Law Review

Cyberattacks and electronic data breaches are on the rise, and the costs associated with those breaches can be astronomical. In response, the insurance industry has created a specialty market for cyber coverage. However, despite the number of cyber insurance policies currently offered on the market, insurers frequently deny claims for cyber coverage under both these specialty and traditional policies.

Examining the evolution of cyberattacks, data breaches, and the massive harm they can cause to businesses, this Article explores the legal and market obstacles to obtaining adequate cyber insurance coverage and offers potential solutions to policyholders and insurers to satisfy this …

Venture Predation, Matthew T. Wansley, Samuel N. Weinstein

Articles

Predatory pricing is a strategy firms use to suppress competition. The predator prices below its own costs to force its rivals out of the market. After they exit, the predator raises its prices to supracompetitive levels and recoups the cost of predation. The Supreme Court has described predatory pricing as “rarely tried” and “rarely successful” and has established a liability standard that is nearly impossible for plaintiffs to satisfy. We argue that one kind of company thinks predatory pricing is worth trying and at least potentially successful—venturebacked startups.

A venture predator is a startup that uses venture finance to price …

A Comparative Case Against Criminalizing Ip Infringements In The Uk And China, Dennis J. Baker, Xiaoxiao Wang

Cardozo International & Comparative Law Review

In this Article, it is argued comparatively that across the world intellectual property rights have been expanded to the point of absurdity. Beyond lengthy monopoly protections being backed up with prison sentences of up to ten years in both China and the UK, these monopolies have been extended in the UK to cover vague concepts such as publicity rights and performance rights. It is argued that due to the incredible lobbying power of Western multinational corporations, China was railroaded into enacting Western-style offenses in order to join the WTO. It is submitted that numerous economic studies have shown that intellectual …

Careers In Antitrust, Cardozo Antitrust Society

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Artificial Intelligence And The Future Of Law, Cardozo Startup Society, Cardozo Fame Center, Cardozo Law And Data Science Society

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Heyman Center Presents: Regulating The Metaverse, Heyman Center On Corporate Governance, Andrea Guaccero

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

Antitrust And Big Tech, Cardozo Antitrust Society, Cardozo Federalist Society

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

The Power Of Influence: Standardizing The Influencer Marketing Industry Through Alternative Dispute Resolution, Michele Lehat

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Keynote Address, Andrew Zimbalist

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article examines the evolution of name, image, and likeness (NIL) policies in college athletics, highlighting the legal, economic, and educational implications of allowing college athletes to profit from their NIL. It argues that while recent legal cases and state legislation have expanded NIL rights, the lack of enforceable guardrails has created a chaotic system dominated by booster collectives, exacerbating financial and equity issues in college sports. The analysis critiques the NCAA's ineffective oversight and advocates for congressional intervention to establish a national framework addressing these challenges.

Conflict Resolution-Negotiation: Liv V. Pga Tour, Ross Herman

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

No abstract provided.

Big Screen Or Bust?: How Contractual Negotiations In Hollywood Must Adapt In The Streaming Era, Alexis Narotzky

Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution

Scarlett Johansson made her first appearance as her superhero alter-ego, the Black Widow, on May 7, 2010, in the movie Iron Man 2. Over the next intervening eleven years, Johansson appeared in several of Disney's Marvel ("Disney" or "Marvel") movies in supporting roles. On July 9, 2021, Marvel released the Black Widow with Scarlett Johansson as the lead character. Johansson's agreement for her character's eponymous film was built upon the expectation of large bonuses based on profit from outsized box-office receipts, understood as a profit-participation or contingent compensation contract. Johansson's lawyers negotiated for a "wide theatrical release" to protect …

Pay No Attention To The Influencer Behind The Curtain, Eliza Logan

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must strengthen its regulation of social media influencers, particularly on platforms like Instagram, due to their significant influence on consumer behavior and the potential for deceptive marketing practices. It emphasizes that influencers should be held accountable similarly to advertising agencies, as their unique ability to build trust and authenticity with followers makes their endorsements more impactful than traditional advertising.

The Ftc's "Made In America" Enforcement Policy Is Too Stringent For Small Businesses To Comply With, Jamie Cutler

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the Federal Trade Commission's (FTC) "Made in America" policy is overly stringent and disproportionately burdensome for small businesses. The policy requires products labeled as "Made in America" to contain "all or virtually all" parts and processing from the U.S., a standard that is often ambiguous, economically prohibitive, and misaligned with consumer perceptions. The note contends that this strict enforcement creates a "Hobson's choice" for small businesses, making it infeasible for them to comply without suffering financial harm or reputational damage. It advocates for lowering the threshold to allow more flexibility, which would support small businesses, promote …

Should The Ncaa Be Subject To Title Ix?, Sarah Allen

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The note argues that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) should be held accountable under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, despite its current exemption, due to its significant role in college athletics and the persistent gender disparities in treatment of male and female athletes. It advocates for overturning the Supreme Court's decision in NCAA v. Smith to bring the NCAA under Title IX purview.

Panel 1: Race, Gender & Equity, Len Elmore, Jo Potuto, Kassandra Ramsey, Felix Wu

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article discusses the evolution of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) rights in college athletics, focusing on the challenges these rights present for race, gender, and equity. It highlights the need for legal and regulatory reforms to address disparities in NIL opportunities and ensure equitable treatment of student-athletes.

Nil Collectives - Title Ix's Latest Challenge, Kassandra Ramsey

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article explores the intersection of Name, Image, and Likeness (NIL) Collectives and Title IX, arguing that while NIL Collectives are not directly subject to Title IX, colleges and universities must ensure these organizations comply with Title IX to maintain gender equity. Schools are responsible due to their federal funding and their promotion of these collectives, necessitating guidelines, education, and audits to prevent disparities in opportunities for male and female athletes.

The Supreme Court's Decision In Ncaa V. Board Of Regents: Did The Ncaa Really Misread It So Badly?, John Wolohan

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

Today, college athletes like LSU gymnast Olivia Dunne and Alabama quarterback Bryce Young can earn hundreds of thousands of dollars a year from social media and product endorsements. However; it was only a couple of years ago that the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) declared University of Central Florida football player Donald De La Haye ineligible to play because he refused to stop monetizing his videos on YouTube, thereby losing his scholarship. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact the Supreme Court's 1984 decision in NCAA v. Board of Regents has had in the NCAA, going from …

Ambushing Nil Restrictions: How Nil "Conflict Language" Policies Conflict With The First Amendment, Sam C. Ehrlich, Neal C. Ternes

Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal

The article argues that state NIL (Name, Image, and Likeness) laws and institutional policies restricting college athletes from signing sponsorship deals conflicting with school sponsors infringe upon athletes' First Amendment rights. These restrictions, often broad and imprecise, fail to meet constitutional standards, particularly under the Central Hudson test for commercial speech, and risk being struck down as unconstitutional prior restraints.

Title Theft, Stewart E. Sterk

Articles

Real property owners across the country have been targeted by scammers who prepare deeds purporting to convey title to property the scammers do not own. Sometimes, the true owners are entirely unaware of these bogus transfers. In other instances, the scammers use misrepresentation to induce unsophisticated owners to sign documents they do not understand. Property doctrine protects owners against forgery and fraud—the primary vehicles scammers use in their efforts to transfer title. Owners enjoy protection not only against the scammers themselves, but generally against unsuspecting purchasers to whom the scammers transfer purported title. Recovery of title, however, involves costs and …

The Private Attorney General In A Time Of Hyper-Polarized Politics, Myriam E. Gilles

Articles

With the enactment of the Federal Trade Commission Act (“FTC Act”) in 1914 and the Wheeler–Lea Act in 1938, Congress sought to establish a brawny federal consumer protection regime to guard against the myriad unfair and deceptive practices that threatened harm to American consumers. But courts in this era interpreted these statutes to confer exclusive enforcement authority in the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), declining to infer a private right of action. For many decades, the resulting enforcement gap in consumer protection law was filled largely by state Unfair and Deceptive Practices Acts (“UDAPs”), which sanction litigation by both public and …

The Intersection Of Data Science, Tech And Law, Cardozo Law And Data Science Society, Cardozo Business Law Society, Cardozo Antitrust Society, Cardozo Intellectual Property Law Society (Ipls)

2022–2023 Flyers

No abstract provided.

The Challenge Of Holding Big Business Accountable, Roy Shapira

Cardozo Law Review

In July 2021, a sweeping Executive Order committed the entire U.S. federal government to reining in big business. Dozens of proposed bills at the state level similarly target big business for stricter regulatory treatment. But unlike in past decades, today’s calls to break up and intensely regulate big business do not hinge on harms to consumers qua consumers. Instead, today’s anti-bigness sentiment rests to a large extent on the claim that big is bad because it is ungovernable. Giant corporations with market power treat legal requirements as mere recommendations, and routinely engage in behavior that harms our civil liberties and …

Anticompetitive Merger Review, Samuel N. Weinstein

Articles

U.S. antitrust law empowers enforcers to review pending mergers that might undermine competition. But there is growing evidence that the merger-review regime is failing to perform its core procompetitive function. Industry concentration and the power of dominant firms are increasing across key sectors of the economy. In response, progressive advocates of more aggressive antitrust interventions have critiqued the substantive merger-review standard, arguing that it is too friendly to merging firms. This Article traces the problem to a different source: the merger-review process itself. The growing length of reviews, the competitive restrictions merger agreements place on acquisition targets during review, and …