Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Air and Space Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Property Law and Real Estate

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 241 - 245 of 245

Full-Text Articles in Air and Space Law

United States V. Causby: An Extension Thereof, Stuart Randolph Hayes Oct 1961

United States V. Causby: An Extension Thereof, Stuart Randolph Hayes

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.


Eminent Domain--Constitutional Taking--Recovery Against Municipal Airport By Adjacent Property Owners, H. S. S. Jr. Jun 1960

Eminent Domain--Constitutional Taking--Recovery Against Municipal Airport By Adjacent Property Owners, H. S. S. Jr.

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


The Landowner Versus The Airport, I. Martin Leavitt Jun 1947

The Landowner Versus The Airport, I. Martin Leavitt

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.


Air Law - Legal Status Of Airplane Flight, Philip A. Hart Jr. May 1937

Air Law - Legal Status Of Airplane Flight, Philip A. Hart Jr.

Michigan Law Review

The classical statement of the extent of the landowner's right to the air space above his land is the maxim, Cujus est solum ejus est usque ad coelum. It is recognized, however, that decisions stating such a rule are not in point upon the status of air navigation today, for when those decisions were rendered flights were made in fancy only. Hence it is that all cases deciding this modern problem have disregarded the literal meaning of this maxim and tried to strike a compromise between the claims of air navigation and the claims of ownership. Three theories have …


Aerial Navigation Nov 1930

Aerial Navigation

Michigan Law Review

With the rapid increase of the use of the air by airplanes and other craft, courts are bound to be called upon frequently to determine the rights and liabilities of the owners and operators of aircraft with reference to other persons in various positions. It is probable that, as was found to be true in the cases of other new devices, the principles of the common law are sufficiently elastic and adaptable to determine the settlement of most, if not all, of the controversies.