Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Food and Drug Law (18)
- Administrative Law (14)
- Animal Law (10)
- Environmental Law (7)
- Consumer Protection Law (6)
-
- Law and Society (5)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (5)
- Health Law and Policy (4)
- Legislation (4)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (4)
- Public Policy (4)
- State and Local Government Law (4)
- Agency (3)
- Life Sciences (3)
- Natural Resources Law (3)
- Election Law (2)
- Environmental Policy (2)
- Environmental Sciences (2)
- Forest Management (2)
- Forest Sciences (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Natural Resources Management and Policy (2)
- Natural Resources and Conservation (2)
- Other Law (2)
- Physical Sciences and Mathematics (2)
- President/Executive Department (2)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (2)
- Science and Technology Law (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Richmond (9)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (6)
- Pace University (5)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (3)
- Seattle University School of Law (3)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (2)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Richmond Journal of Law & Technology (9)
- Journal of Food Law & Policy (6)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (5)
- Animal Law Review (3)
- Seattle University Law Review (2)
-
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (2)
- Alumni Works (1)
- Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (1)
- Kentucky Journal of Equine, Agriculture, & Natural Resources Law (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Seattle Journal of Technology, Environmental, & Innovation Law (1)
- The Future of Natural Resources Policy (December 6) (1)
- Western Water Law, Policy and Management: Ripples, Currents, and New Channels for Inquiry (Martz Summer Conference, June 3-5) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 31 - 37 of 37
Full-Text Articles in Agriculture Law
Remarks On Food Safety In Dealing With Genetically Modified Foods, Dallas Hoover
Remarks On Food Safety In Dealing With Genetically Modified Foods, Dallas Hoover
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
It’s nice to be here, and I appreciate the opportunity to talk with you all. It’s my first time in a School of Law and you certainly have more wood in your rooms than we do in laboratories, so this is a different experience for me. I’m a food microbiologist by training, so to me, food safety means Salmonella and cantaloupe and viruses in cruise ships. With genetically engineered foods, it’s a little bit different because the effects aren’t as dramatic as far as safety issues as what I see in my daily professional life. Also, it’s different because genetically …
Remarks On Regulating Genetically Modified Foods In The United States, Gregory Jaffe
Remarks On Regulating Genetically Modified Foods In The United States, Gregory Jaffe
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Thank you very much for inviting me here today. I’m going to use PowerPoint here, but I will try to keep my comments brief. I’m going to spend just a minute or two introducing my organization to you and our biotech project. Then I’m going to talk a little about the regulatory system and what I see are some of the inadequacies in the current regulatory environment for agricultural biotechnology.
Remarks On Regulating Genetically Modified Foods In The United States, David Hegewood
Remarks On Regulating Genetically Modified Foods In The United States, David Hegewood
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
I would like to thank the Richmond Journal of Law & Technology for inviting me this afternoon and for organizing this forum. I’ve never been on Crossfire, and it’s easy to see why Val has, so I probably won’t be quite as entertaining. In fact most of what I wanted to say this afternoon has already been said in one form or another. Val just stole the last one with the Watson and Crick Fiftieth Anniversary. What I want to do is maybe give you more of a sense of perspective and then go over some of the facts.
Panel Remarks On Regulating Genetically Modified Foods In The United States, L. Val Giddings, Gregory Jaffe, David Hegewood, Kathleen Hart
Panel Remarks On Regulating Genetically Modified Foods In The United States, L. Val Giddings, Gregory Jaffe, David Hegewood, Kathleen Hart
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Thank you all. In my opinion, containment of pharmaceutical GM crops is essential and hard to do. The USDA just recently came up with some new guidelines for genetically modified pharm plants, but how can the public have an input into what’s going on if they don’t even know where the crops are growing, or what’s in the crops, because this is protected as confidential business information? Should the public have a say? How would we accomplish--giving the public a say about whether they want genetically engineered wheat, even aside from the export issues. Third, I understand GE salmon is …
Regulating Genetically Modified Foods: Is Mandatory Labeling The Right Answer?, Gregory Conko
Regulating Genetically Modified Foods: Is Mandatory Labeling The Right Answer?, Gregory Conko
Richmond Journal of Law & Technology
Thank you. It’s a very common mistake to believe that consumers could only have a choice if the government requires mandatory labeling of genetically engineered food. My question back to you, Jean, is, exactly what kind of information do consumers get if all you do is label the product as “Genetically Engineered?” We can take this up later in the debate part of our panel discussion. I think the one thing that we can all agree on, however, is that the food label is a very important source of information to consumers.
2000 Legislative Review, Alicia Finigan
2000 Legislative Review, Alicia Finigan
Animal Law Review
Our third Legislative Review reports the passage and de- feat of several state and federal, administrative and legislative actions. Ms. Laurie Fulkerson has researched and written on four major pieces of federal legislation; Mr. Chris Brown has discussed additional federal advances, and a review of state initiatives which both advance and undermine animal welfare; Ms. Amy Baggio has reviewed the passage of state anti-cruelty statues. Finally, Ms. Alicia Finigan has reported on the United State's Pelly Amendment certification of Japan for violating the International Whaling Commission's resolution to cease its illusory "research whaling" for minke, sperm and Bryde's whales.
Tracking The Adc: Ranchers' Boon, Taxpayers' Burden, Wildlife's Bane, David Hoch, Will Carrington Heath
Tracking The Adc: Ranchers' Boon, Taxpayers' Burden, Wildlife's Bane, David Hoch, Will Carrington Heath
Animal Law Review
Approximately thirty five million dollars are spent each year by the Animal Damage Control division of the US Department of Agriculture to destroy predator animals that supposedly kill livestock. The methods by which the ADC kills these "predators" are appalling. Mr. Hoch argues that the funding for this program is excessive, irresponsible, and raises serious ethical questions. He concludes that ADC activities should be terminated immediately.