Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Environmental Law (105)
- Natural Resources Law (99)
- Constitutional Law (95)
- Land Use Law (95)
- Energy and Utilities Law (93)
-
- Water Law (92)
- Administrative Law (91)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (90)
- Cultural Heritage Law (86)
- Animal Law (84)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (78)
- International Law (73)
- Law and Race (73)
- Science and Technology Law (73)
- Food and Drug Law (72)
- International Trade Law (72)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (70)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (68)
- Law of the Sea (68)
- Air and Space Law (67)
- Civil Law (67)
- Human Rights Law (67)
- Natural Law (67)
- Property Law and Real Estate (66)
- Disaster Law (65)
- Admiralty (64)
- Agency (64)
- Construction Law (64)
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (55)
- University of Montana (23)
- Fordham Law School (9)
- Universitas Indonesia (5)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (5)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (4)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (3)
- University of Colorado Law School (2)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Edith Cowan University (1)
- Lewis & Clark Law School (1)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Purdue University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Tennessee State Library and Archives (1)
- The University of San Francisco (1)
- University of Arkansas, Fayetteville (1)
- University of Maine School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nebraska - Lincoln (1)
- University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (1)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Keyword
-
- Law (11)
- Environmental law (7)
- SFFA (7)
- Affirmative Action (6)
- Diversity (5)
-
- Agriculture Law (3)
- Supreme Court (3)
- Corporate Governance (2)
- Corporate Law (2)
- ESG (2)
- Education (2)
- Environmental justice (2)
- Equality (2)
- Fourteenth Amendment (2)
- International law (2)
- Justice (2)
- Negligence (2)
- SEC (2)
- Securities (2)
- Securities Law (2)
- Stakeholder Governance (2)
- A Fragile Framework: How Global Food Systems Intersect with the International Legal Order (1)
- A History of Securities Law in the Supreme Court (1)
- A.C. Pritchard (1)
- AI (1)
- Academic (1)
- Academic Resources (1)
- Acceptance (1)
- Accountability (1)
- Adjacent (1)
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (55)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (23)
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (9)
- Sustainable Development Law & Policy (4)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (3)
-
- Villanova Environmental Law Journal (1991 - ) (3)
- Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal (2)
- Animal Law Review (1)
- Annual Reports on Kerosene & Motor Fuel Quality (1)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Articles (1)
- Brooklyn Journal of International Law (1)
- Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice (1)
- Cardozo Law Review de•novo (1)
- Cornhusker Economics (1)
- Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Indonesia Law Review (1)
- Journal of Legislation (1)
- Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial (1)
- Keep Up With the Latest News from the Law School (blog) (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Libraries Faculty and Staff Presentations (1)
- Maine Law Review (1)
- Publications (1)
- Reports & Public Policy Documents (1)
- Scholarly Articles (1)
- Theses and Dissertations (1)
- Theses: Doctorates and Masters (1)
- UMKC Law Review (1)
- University of Colorado Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 121 - 123 of 123
Full-Text Articles in Agriculture Law
Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez
Students For Fair Admissions: Affirming Affirmative Action And Shapeshifting Towards Cognitive Diversity?, Steven A. Ramirez
Seattle University Law Review
The Roberts Court holds a well-earned reputation for overturning Supreme Court precedent regardless of the long-standing nature of the case. The Roberts Court knows how to overrule precedent. In Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard (SFFA), the Court’s majority opinion never intimates that it overrules Grutter v. Bollinger, the Court’s leading opinion permitting race-based affirmative action in college admissions. Instead, the Roberts Court applied Grutter as authoritative to hold certain affirmative action programs entailing racial preferences violative of the Constitution. These programs did not provide an end point, nor did they require assessment, review, periodic expiration, or revision for greater …
Antisocial Innovation, Christopher Buccafusco, Samuel N. Weinstein
Antisocial Innovation, Christopher Buccafusco, Samuel N. Weinstein
Articles
Innovation is a form of civic religion in the United States. In the popular imagination, innovators are heroic figures. Thomas Edison, Steve Jobs, and (for a while) Elizabeth Holmes were lauded for their vision and drive, and seen to embody the American spirit of invention and improvement. For their part, politicians rarely miss a chance to trumpet their vision for boosting innovative activity. Popular and political culture alike treat innovation as an unalloyed good. And the law is deeply committed to fostering innovation, spending billions of dollars a year to make sure society has enough of it. But this sunny …
Open Hunting Season: Black Bodies As A Threatened Species, Mark C. Grafenreed
Open Hunting Season: Black Bodies As A Threatened Species, Mark C. Grafenreed
Cardozo Journal of Equal Rights & Social Justice
Tracing the Endangered Species Act of 1973 provides striking parallels with the historical, legal, and cultural aspects of bondage mapped upon Black bodies. The United States Congress promulgated the Endangered Species Act to protect and conserve threatened and endangered wildlife species. However, this gives rise to a serious moral dilemma and cognitive dissonance in that nearly 1,500 wildlife species benefit from the Endangered Species Act's protections. At the same time, Black bodies disproportionately suffer without similar federal protections. Congress has strengthened the Endangered Species Act's force through four amendments since its inception, even while there have been mounting threats to …