Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- AB 104 (5)
- AB 563 (5)
- AB 884 (5)
- AB 936 (5)
- AB 1122 (4)
-
- AB 1142 (4)
- AB 1213 (4)
- AB 207 (3)
- AB 2165 (3)
- AB 222 (3)
- AB 2642 (3)
- AB 311 (3)
- AB 4097 (3)
- AB 417 (3)
- AB 489 (3)
- AB 618 (3)
- AB 63 (3)
- Macias v. State of California (3)
- People v. Reilly (3)
- SB 46 (3)
- SB 536 (3)
- SB 539 (3)
- SB 952 (3)
- SB 970 (3)
- AB 1028 (2)
- AB 1454 (2)
- AB 1596 (2)
- AB 1681 (2)
- AB 1685 (2)
- AB 1742 (2)
Articles 1 - 21 of 21
Full-Text Articles in Agriculture Law
Incentivizing Transparency: Agricultural Benefit Corporations To Improve Consumer Trust, Kathryn Smith
Incentivizing Transparency: Agricultural Benefit Corporations To Improve Consumer Trust, Kathryn Smith
San Diego Law Review
In the face of inadequate, often abysmal agricultural practices and laws that enable them, producers who provide the social good of transparency should receive a benefit. Amidst the debate that all benefit corporations should qualify for special tax treatment, this Comment proposes the development of a federal benefit corporation class offering special tax treatment to worthy agricultural producers. By reallocating current agricultural subsidies, Congress can feasibly correct the agricultural industry’s failure to adequately inform consumers.
Property Rights In Land, Agricultural Capitalism, And The Relative Decline Of Pre-Industrial China, Taisu Zhang
Property Rights In Land, Agricultural Capitalism, And The Relative Decline Of Pre-Industrial China, Taisu Zhang
San Diego International Law Journal
Scholars have long debated how legal institutions influenced the economic development of societies and civilizations. This Article sheds new light on this debate by reexamining, from a legal perspective, a crucial segment of the eighteenth and nineteenth century economic divergence between England and China: By 1700, English agriculture had become predominantly capitalist, reliant on managerial farms worked chiefly by hired labor. On the other hand, Chinese agriculture counterproductively remained household-based throughout the Qing and Republican eras. The explanation for this key agricultural divergence, which created multiple advantages for English proto-industry, lies in differences between Chinese and English property right regimes, …
Department Of Food And Agriculture, P. Penn, B. Reznik
Department Of Food And Agriculture, P. Penn, B. Reznik
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, P. Penn, B. Reznik
Department Of Food And Agriculture, P. Penn, B. Reznik
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, P. Penn, B. Reznik
Department Of Food And Agriculture, P. Penn, B. Reznik
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Gerry, L. Rainey, D. Rupard
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Hillard, C. Merrill, A. Urrutia, J. D'Angelo
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Hillard, C. Merrill, A. Urrutia, J. D'Angelo
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Hillard, C. Merrill, A. Urrutia
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Hillard, C. Merrill, A. Urrutia
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Hillard, C. Merrill, A. Urrutia
Department Of Food And Agriculture, S. Hillard, C. Merrill, A. Urrutia
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
Department Of Food And Agriculture, K. Rager, D. Rankin, M. Staples
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, G. Filter, M. Livingston, N. Wilson
Department Of Food And Agriculture, G. Filter, M. Livingston, N. Wilson
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, G. Filter, M. Livingston, N, Wilson
Department Of Food And Agriculture, G. Filter, M. Livingston, N, Wilson
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, G. Filter, M. Livingston, N. Wilson
Department Of Food And Agriculture, G. Filter, M. Livingston, N. Wilson
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, R. Bargetto, J. Hecht, M. Livingston
Department Of Food And Agriculture, R. Bargetto, J. Hecht, M. Livingston
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.
Department Of Food And Agriculture, R. Bargetto, J. Hecht, M. Livingston
Department Of Food And Agriculture, R. Bargetto, J. Hecht, M. Livingston
California Regulatory Law Reporter
No abstract provided.