Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Agriculture Law Commons™

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Energy and Utilities Law

Institution
Keyword
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 1201 - 1230 of 1483

Full-Text Articles in Agriculture Law

Consentimiento Libre, Previo E Informado: Implicaciones Para Las Empresas Transnacionales, Tendai Zvobgo Mar 2020

Consentimiento Libre, Previo E Informado: Implicaciones Para Las Empresas Transnacionales, Tendai Zvobgo

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Financiamiento Musulmán Como Un Mecanismo Para Reforzar La Seguridad Alimentaria En El Medio Oriente: Seguridad Alimentaria Waqf, Hdeel Abdelhady Mar 2020

Financiamiento Musulmán Como Un Mecanismo Para Reforzar La Seguridad Alimentaria En El Medio Oriente: Seguridad Alimentaria Waqf, Hdeel Abdelhady

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


El Débil Proceso De Planificatión Frustra La Protección De La Amenazda Línea Costera De Puerto Rico, Mark Borak Mar 2020

El Débil Proceso De Planificatión Frustra La Protección De La Amenazda Línea Costera De Puerto Rico, Mark Borak

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Una Norma Legal Por La Reforma Agraria Poscolonial, Amelia Chizwala Peterson Mar 2020

Una Norma Legal Por La Reforma Agraria Poscolonial, Amelia Chizwala Peterson

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Colaboración Y La Ecologia De La Democracia, Daniel Kemmis, Matthew Mckinney Mar 2020

Colaboración Y La Ecologia De La Democracia, Daniel Kemmis, Matthew Mckinney

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Crisis Del Agua En La Cuenca De Murray-Darling: Australia Intenta Equilibrar La Necesidad Agricola Con La Realidad Ambiental, Joshua Axelrod Mar 2020

Crisis Del Agua En La Cuenca De Murray-Darling: Australia Intenta Equilibrar La Necesidad Agricola Con La Realidad Ambiental, Joshua Axelrod

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Los Recursos Naturales De Alto Valor: ¿Una Bendición O Una Maldición Para La Paz?, Päivi Lujala, Siri Aas Rustad Mar 2020

Los Recursos Naturales De Alto Valor: ¿Una Bendición O Una Maldición Para La Paz?, Päivi Lujala, Siri Aas Rustad

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Dejarles En Bancarrota A Los Saqueadores De Paz: ¿Cuál Es El Rol De Las Fuerzas De Paz De La Onu?, Philippe Le Billon Mar 2020

Dejarles En Bancarrota A Los Saqueadores De Paz: ¿Cuál Es El Rol De Las Fuerzas De Paz De La Onu?, Philippe Le Billon

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Nota Del Los Editores, Veronica Kennedy, Jocelyn Rivera Mar 2020

Nota Del Los Editores, Veronica Kennedy, Jocelyn Rivera

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Faculty Profiles, David Newman Mar 2020

Faculty Profiles, David Newman

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Coral Reefs In The Philippines, Maggie Parks Mar 2020

Coral Reefs In The Philippines, Maggie Parks

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Practitioner's Corner: Ken Markowitz On Serving As An Environmental Advocate, Kimberly Righter Mar 2020

Practitioner's Corner: Ken Markowitz On Serving As An Environmental Advocate, Kimberly Righter

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


2001 Supreme Court Redux, Mary Stevens Mar 2020

2001 Supreme Court Redux, Mary Stevens

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Next Verse, Same As The First: Inadequacies In The Government's Legal Approach Toward Biotechnology, Kimberly Righter Mar 2020

Next Verse, Same As The First: Inadequacies In The Government's Legal Approach Toward Biotechnology, Kimberly Righter

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Implementing Kyoto, Glenn Wiser Mar 2020

Implementing Kyoto, Glenn Wiser

Sustainable Development Law & Policy

No abstract provided.


Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon Feb 2020

Preview—United States Forest Service V. Cowpasture River Preservation Association: Can The Pipeline Cross The Trail?, Alizabeth Bronsdon

Public Land & Resources Law Review

The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral argument in this matter on Monday, February 24, 2020, at 10 a.m. in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. Anthony Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, will likely argue for the United States. In a divided oral argument, Paul D. Clement will likely appear for Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, the petitioner in consolidated case No. 18-1587, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association. Michael K. Kellogg will likely appear for the Respondents.


Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review Jan 2020

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

Table of Contents


In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth Jan 2020

In Memory Of Professor James E. Bond, Janet Ainsworth

Seattle University Law Review

Janet Ainsworth, Professor of Law at Seattle University School of Law: In Memory of Professor James E. Bond.


Preview—Atlantic Richfield Company V. Christian: The Intersection Of Superfund And State-Law Restoration Claims, Emily M. Mcculloch Dec 2019

Preview—Atlantic Richfield Company V. Christian: The Intersection Of Superfund And State-Law Restoration Claims, Emily M. Mcculloch

Public Land & Resources Law Review

The Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in this matter on Tuesday, December 3, 2019, at 11:00 a.m. in the Supreme Court Building in Washington, D.C. Lisa S. Blatt will likely appear for the Petitioner. Joseph R. Palmore will likely appear for the Respondents. Solicitor General Noel J. Francisco will likely argue on behalf of the United States.


Wildearth Guardians V. Zinke, Emily M. Mcculloch Nov 2019

Wildearth Guardians V. Zinke, Emily M. Mcculloch

Public Land & Resources Law Review

WildEarth Guardians v. Zinke marks an important decision prompting the Bureau of Land Management to seriously consider greenhouse gas emissions when performing environmental assessments for oil and gas leasing. WildEarth Guardians and Physicians for Social Responsibility, two non-profit organizations, asserted BLM improperly failed to recognize greenhouse gas emissions and their impacts on climate change when issuing oil and gas leases in three western states. The United States District Court for the District of Columbia agreed, finding that by failing to take a hard look at environmental impacts from its leasing decisions, BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act’s requirements.


Preview—Murray V. Bej Minerals, Llc: Finding A Home For Fossils, Layne L. Ryerson Nov 2019

Preview—Murray V. Bej Minerals, Llc: Finding A Home For Fossils, Layne L. Ryerson

Public Land & Resources Law Review

The Montana Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in this matter on Thursday, November 7, 2019 at 9:30 AM in the courtroom of the Montana Supreme Court, Joseph P. Mazurek Building, Helena, Montana. The Honorable Olivia Rieger will hear the case in place of Justice Jim Rice, who recused himself. Eric B. Wolff is expected to argue for the Appellants. Harlan B. Krogh is expected to argue for the Appellees.


Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review Sep 2019

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Book Review Of "River Of Lost Souls", Clifford J. Villa Jul 2019

Book Review Of "River Of Lost Souls", Clifford J. Villa

Public Land & Resources Law Review

No abstract provided.


Juliana V. United States, Daniel Brister May 2019

Juliana V. United States, Daniel Brister

Public Land & Resources Law Review

In 2015, a group of adolescents between the ages of eight and nineteen filed a lawsuit against the federal government for infringing upon their civil rights to a healthy, habitable future living environment. Those Plaintiffs in Juliana v. United States alleged that the industrial-scale burning of fossil fuels was causing catastrophic and destabilizing impacts to the global climate, threatening the survival and welfare of present and future generations. Seeking to reduce the United States’ contributions to atmospheric carbon dioxide, Plaintiffs demanded injunctive and declaratory relief to halt the federal government’s policies of promoting and subsidizing fossil fuels, due to the …


Indigenous Environmental Network V. United States Department Of State, Seth Sivinski Apr 2019

Indigenous Environmental Network V. United States Department Of State, Seth Sivinski

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Pipelines are an extremely efficient way to move large amounts of oil and gas across long distances. However, pipelines have become a lightning rod for environmentalists opposing the lines’ construction and the energy sector which considers the lines a must to achieve energy independence and security. Pipelines are massive projects often crossing interstate and international boundaries. As a result, they are subject to an extensive amount of government regulation with an accompanying assortment of legal challenges. Indigenous Environmental Network v. United States Department of State is the latest case in the Keystone XL pipeline saga, wherein the United States District …


Murray V. Bej Minerals, Llc, Brett Berntsen Apr 2019

Murray V. Bej Minerals, Llc, Brett Berntsen

Public Land & Resources Law Review

Part of a dispute some 66 million years in the making, Murray v. BEJ Minerals, LLC considered for the first time whether dinosaur fossils—specifically a one-of-a-kind specimen containing entombed “dueling dinosaurs”—qualified as “minerals” for the purposes of a property transaction under Montana law. Finding no consistent statutory or dictionary definition for “mineral,” the Ninth Circuit relied on a test previously utilized by the Montana Supreme Court to hold that the dinosaur fossils constituted minerals due to their rare and exceptional qualities and were therefore part of the property’s mineral estate. The decision was promptly nullified, however, as the Ninth Circuit …


Hoopa Valley Tribe V. Ferc, Fredrick Aaron Rains Apr 2019

Hoopa Valley Tribe V. Ferc, Fredrick Aaron Rains

Public Land & Resources Law Review

In Hoopa Valley Tribe v. FERC, the Hoopa Valley Tribe challenged the intentional and continual delay of state water quality certification review of water discharged from a series of dams on the Klamath River in California and Oregon. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the states of Oregon and California, and PacifiCorp, a hydroelectric operator, were implementing an administrative scheme designed to circumvent a one-year temporal requirement for review imposed on states by the Clean Water Act. This scheme allowed PacifiCorp to operate the series of dams for over a decade without proper state water quality certification. The United States …


Save Our Sound Obx, Inc. V. North Carolina Department Of Transportation, Mitch L. Werbell V Apr 2019

Save Our Sound Obx, Inc. V. North Carolina Department Of Transportation, Mitch L. Werbell V

Public Land & Resources Law Review

The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals recently ruled in favor of several governmental agencies seeking to construct a new bridge in the Pamlico Sound adjacent to North Carolina’s Outer Banks. For years, state and federal agencies have put forth a massive coordinated effort to address the constant weather damage and erosion which occurs to a section of North Carolina Highway 12. The court found the agencies properly cleared NEPA’s environmental review requirements for the bridge’s construction. Additionally, the opponent-litigants’ efforts to add claims challenging the project, based on new information about a shipwreck in the bridge’s path, were futile.


Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review Feb 2019

Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review

Seattle University Law Review

No abstract provided.


Wildearth Guardians V. United States Bureau Of Land Management, Seth Sivinski Jan 2019

Wildearth Guardians V. United States Bureau Of Land Management, Seth Sivinski

Public Land & Resources Law Review

In WildEarth Guardians v. U.S. BLM, the District Court of Colorado showed that economic and developmental uncertainty is an area where agencies are given broad discretion in deciding whether an impact is reasonably foreseeable and requires a further conformity analysis under the Clean Air Act. This case exemplifies the tactical limitation of using climate change and the science around it to force greater analysis of projects undertaken by federal agencies. However, the court presented a potential roadmap for successful future challenges.