Admiralty Commons^™

The Admiralty Clause And State Workmen's Compensation For Fishermen, Maine Law Review

Maine Law Review

The current methods of compensating fishermen injured or killed at sea are products of federal law. Without exception, a fisherman or his representative must turn to federal law for compensation. Unlike certain maritime workers covered by a federal workmen's compensation scheme, the fisherman's remedies are exclusively judicial, burdened by the expenses and delays inherent in litigation. Although this method of determining rights and liabilities may be a satisfactory means of obtaining compensation for other types of seamen, it has come under increasing attack within the fishing industry. This Comment evaluates both the constitutionality and the practicability of state coverage of …

Mutiny, Shipboard Strikes, And The Supreme Court's Subversion Of New Deal Labor Law, Ahmed A. White

Publications

No abstract provided.

Osha's Impact On The Maritime Industry: A Case Of Administrative Confusion, Charles A. Edwards

Journal of Maritime Law and Commerce

No abstract provided.

Unseaworthiness And Personal Injuries Ashore, Frank R. Grundman

Cleveland State Law Review

This note examines the fundamental and dynamic concept of unseaworthiness, and investigates particularly the geographical limits ashore where such injuries may occur and yet be actionable. Crew misconduct will not be considered as a factor in unseaworthiness, as that subject has been treated elsewhere.

Longshoreman-Shipowner-Stevedore: The Circle Of Liability, Harney B. Stover, Jr.

Michigan Law Review

It is universally recognized that in the past two decades the United States Supreme Court has substantially revised the law under which seamen, longshoremen and harbor workers (or their survivors) may recover damages for personal injury and death. One of the more recent and most authoritative texts in the field of admiralty and maritime law devotes an entire chapter, 147 pages in length, to the subject of the rights of seamen and maritime workers (or their survivors) of recovery for injury and death. The introduction to that chapter likens the Court's rewriting of the law in this field to a …

Duration Of Seamen's Maintenance And Cure Rights, Howard S. Stern

Cleveland State Law Review

It is well settled that an injured or disabled seaman is entitled to "maintenance and cure" at the expense of the owners of his vessel at least until the end of the voyage,' provided that the need therefor exists that long. The minimum limits of this liability are fixed and certain, and have been so for over fifty years. The more important problem concerns the maximum limit of liability. Stating the problem in the form of a query: At what point does liability for maintenance and cure cease? On this point there is wide divergence of opinion. One of the …

Maritime Lien Priorities: Cross-Currents Of Theory, Roger G. Connor

Michigan Law Review

The purpose of this article is not to develop a synthesis, for no synthesis is possible, but to give an account of the general theories governing maritime lien priorities, together with a discussion of the concrete issues which arise in their application.

Admiralty-Duration Of Duty To Provide Maintenance And Cure, R. B. Barnett

Michigan Law Review

Libelant, while employed as engineer on a vessel operated by the United States, suffered a heart attack. He was paid maintenance and cure from May 31, 1946, when he was discharged from the hospital, until May 26, 1947. This action was brought to recover maintenance and cure from that date until March 25, 1951, when he returned to work, less two periods during which he had been employed for 60 and 93 days. Since April 1947, libelant had received treatment consisting of sedatives and medications designed to relieve chest pains and other discomforts. It was acknowledged there had been little …

Admiralty-Maintenance And Cure, Donald S. Leeper S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

The recent decision of Warren v. United States marks another instance of the growing interest of the Supreme Court in the remedies given injured seamen. The right of the seaman to maintenance and cure can be found in the earliest formulations of a law of the sea and is present in our admiralty law today. The ancient terminology is still used but the tendency is to construe the language liberally in favor of the seaman.

This comment is intended as a short survey of the development of the remedy in this country as represented by the landmark cases. It will …

Admiralty-Injury To Longshoreman Working Ashore By Unseaworthiness Of The Vessel, Jean Engstrom S.Ed.

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, employed by an independent contractor to lade defendant's ship, was injured by a "pontoon" hatch cover which fell on his foot while he was working on the dock beside the ship. The court below found that defendant was not negligent, but that the ship was unseaworthy and that its unseaworthiness caused plaintiff's injury. Held, judgment for plaintiff affirmed. Breach of the warranty of seaworthiness is a tort arising out of a maritime status or relation and is therefore cognizable by maritime law whether occurring at sea or on land; a longshoreman employed by an independent contractor to lade a …

Torts-Duty To Seamen-Jones Act-Personal Injury And Negligence

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff, personal representative of a seaman who was said to have died as a result of his employer's failure to provide proper medical attention at sea, sued the defendant-employer for the seaman's death. Judgment for the plaintiff having been reversed in the Circuit Court of Appeals on the ground that any cause of action abated with the death of the sailor, the case was brought before the Supreme Court of the United States on a writ of certiorari. Held that, under the Jones Act (Merchant Marine Act), the cause of action survived to the personal representative. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular …