Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Liens (2)
- Property--Personal and Real (2)
- Air and Space Law (1)
- Banking and Finance Law (1)
- Bankruptcy (1)
-
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Comparable Worth (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Courts (1)
- Employment Practice and the Law (1)
- Environmental Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Exculpatory Clauses (1)
- Expert Witnesses and Scientific Evidence (1)
- Gender and the Law (1)
- Government (General) (1)
- Government Liability (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Legal Practice and Procedure (1)
- Maritime Law (1)
- Medical Jurisprudence (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Testimony (1)
- Torts (1)
- Witnesses (1)
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Admiralty
Assumption Of Risk In Consumer Contracts And The Distraction Of Unconscionability, Zahra Takhshid
Assumption Of Risk In Consumer Contracts And The Distraction Of Unconscionability, Zahra Takhshid
Cardozo Law Review
For years, courts have struggled to determine when to enforce exculpatory clauses that would prevent personal injury victims from availing themselves of tort remedies under the doctrine of express assumption of risk. In the past, when courts declined to enforce these clauses, they did so on the ground that enforcing such a waiver for the activities in question was “against public policy.” Recently, however, many courts have addressed the issue through the contract doctrine of “unconscionability.” This change in focus has subtly but importantly altered the enforceability inquiry by emphasizing the conditions under which the plaintiff agreed to the contract, …
Taking Daubert’S “Focus” Seriously: The Methodology/Conclusion Distinction, Kenneth J. Chesebro
Taking Daubert’S “Focus” Seriously: The Methodology/Conclusion Distinction, Kenneth J. Chesebro
Cardozo Law Review
Last June's United States Supreme Court decision in Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., rejected the Frye "general acceptance" test for scientific evidence, and went on to make "some general observations" about proper admissibility analysis under Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Daubert was the Court's first decision squarely addressing the expert testimony provisions of the Federal Rules of Evidence, and United States Law Week called Daubert "probably the most important procedural case of the term."
Sexual Equality Before The Silver Oar: Lifting The Fog On Women, Ships, And The Law Of Admiralty, Robert M. Jarvis
Sexual Equality Before The Silver Oar: Lifting The Fog On Women, Ships, And The Law Of Admiralty, Robert M. Jarvis
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tacking A True Course For Maritime Liens On Freight, Uriel P. Bauer
Tacking A True Course For Maritime Liens On Freight, Uriel P. Bauer
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Salvage And The Public Interest, Steven F. Friedell
Salvage And The Public Interest, Steven F. Friedell
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.
Reconciling Maritime Liens And The Limitation Of Liability Act, David G. Carlson
Reconciling Maritime Liens And The Limitation Of Liability Act, David G. Carlson
Cardozo Law Review
No abstract provided.