Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Administrative Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Ohio

Discipline
Institution
Publication Year
Publication
Publication Type

Articles 871 - 875 of 875

Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law

Ohio Revised Code Chapter 2506 - Judicial Review Of Administrative Rulings, Marshall J. Wolf, Donald M. Robiner Jan 1973

Ohio Revised Code Chapter 2506 - Judicial Review Of Administrative Rulings, Marshall J. Wolf, Donald M. Robiner

Cleveland State Law Review

Persons adversely affected by a decision of any officer, board, commission or other division of the great number of political subdivisions of the State usually encounter difficulty in appealing such decision. This fact has long troubled the judiciary of Ohio. Thus, adoption in 1957 of Chapter 2506 of the Ohio Revised Code- Appeals From Orders of Administrative Officers and Agencies was immediately welcomed by the courts as providing assistance to those citizens who found themselves adverse to, and totally at the mercy of, their government. Although Ohio Revised Code, Chapter 2506, radically changed the procedure with respect to appeals from …


A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones Jan 1973

A Survey Of The Ohio Administrative Procedures Act, Glenn R. Jones

Cleveland State Law Review

The recent expansion of the use of administrative agencies to facilitate the functioning of the various levels of governmental operations has created a correspondingly complex morass of procedural law. Administrative procedure being the creation of administrative law, a definition of the latter is necessary for an understanding of the former. This area of law has been demarcated by "the provisions of statutes conferring rule making and adjudicatory powers upon organizations in government outside the judicial branch and orders entered by these agencies pursuant to such powers."' It should be noted, however, that this definition, like other brief definitions of broad …


Judicial Review For Ohio's Civil Servants, Donald Applestein Jan 1973

Judicial Review For Ohio's Civil Servants, Donald Applestein

Cleveland State Law Review

With the proliferation of administrative agencies, numerous problems are naturally encountered. In spite of the tendency toward problems, one would hope that in establishing these agencies, the legislature whether it be on the local, state, or federal level would do its utmost to insure uniformity within a given area. A review of sections 119.12, 143.27, and 2506 of the Ohio Revised Code and the relevant case law, however, reveals the Ohio legislature's failure to insure that uniformity.


Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders Jun 1931

Administrative Tribunals-Right To Federal Injunction Against Administrative Orders

Michigan Law Review

The public utility commission of Ohio refused to permit the plaintiff motor bus company to operate over a portion of the route for which application was made for a certificate. The plaintiff applied to the federal district court for an injunction against enforcement of the commission's order on the ground that it amounted to a deprivation of property without due process. A temporary injunction was granted. Thereafter, the plaintiff took a statutory appeal to the state supreme court, which affirmed the order, after which the plaintiff sought a permanent injunction in the federal court. Held, the decision of the …


Administrative Tribunals--Judicial Notice Apr 1931

Administrative Tribunals--Judicial Notice

Michigan Law Review

The plaintiff corporation, a retail distributor of gas, contracted for its supply over a three-year period from a service company, and filed its rate schedule with the public utilities commission. The commission ordered a lower rate, its order being based on files of schedules of other distributing companies, which were found to show that the plaintiff's contract was excessive and that a lower rate could have been contracted for. These files were not introduced into evidence, but the commission took notice of them as a matter of public record. Plaintiff petitioned for an injunction against enforcement of the order. Held …