Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Constitutional Law (52)
- Environmental Law (51)
- State and Local Government Law (50)
- Natural Resources Law (43)
- Oil, Gas, and Mineral Law (40)
-
- Legislation (38)
- Science and Technology Law (28)
- Law and Society (25)
- Judges (24)
- Land Use Law (23)
- Energy and Utilities Law (22)
- President/Executive Department (22)
- Health Law and Policy (20)
- Agency (19)
- Animal Law (19)
- Immigration Law (19)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (17)
- Agriculture Law (16)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (16)
- Intellectual Property Law (16)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (15)
- Cultural Heritage Law (15)
- Food and Drug Law (15)
- Law and Politics (15)
- Securities Law (15)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (14)
- Courts (14)
- Supreme Court of the United States (14)
- Institution
-
- Pepperdine University (26)
- University of Michigan Law School (23)
- University of Montana (21)
- Notre Dame Law School (19)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (18)
-
- Universitas Indonesia (18)
- Ministry of Higher and Secondary Specialized Education of the Republic of Uzbekistan (16)
- University of San Diego (12)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (12)
- Brooklyn Law School (11)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (11)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (11)
- University of Colorado Law School (9)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (9)
- Columbia Law School (8)
- University of Georgia School of Law (8)
- Georgia State University College of Law (7)
- Southern Methodist University (7)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (7)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (7)
- Florida State University College of Law (6)
- St. John's University School of Law (6)
- American University Washington College of Law (5)
- Barry University School of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (5)
- Florida International University College of Law (5)
- Roger Williams University (5)
- Seattle University School of Law (5)
- Boston University School of Law (4)
- Georgetown University Law Center (4)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (32)
- Regulation (25)
- Administrative Law (18)
- Administrative Procedure Act (18)
- Ohio (16)
-
- State law; State administrative decision (16)
- Chevron (15)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (15)
- APA (13)
- Deference (11)
- SEC (11)
- Climate change (9)
- Due process (9)
- Environmental law (9)
- Law (9)
- PTAB (9)
- Regulations (9)
- Separation of powers (8)
- Article II (7)
- Judicial Review (7)
- Patent Trial and Appeal Board (7)
- Rulemaking (7)
- ALJ (6)
- Administrative Law Judges (6)
- Alexander Blewett III School of Law (6)
- Judicial review (6)
- Law reform (6)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (6)
- AB2138 (5)
- AIA (5)
- Publication
-
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (26)
- Faculty Scholarship (22)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (21)
- Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan (17)
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (16)
-
- Notre Dame Law Review (13)
- Review of law sciences (13)
- California Regulatory Law Reporter (11)
- Articles (9)
- Nevada Supreme Court Summaries (8)
- Publications (8)
- Scholarly Works (8)
- Washington and Lee Law Review (8)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (7)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (6)
- Georgia State University Law Review (6)
- Journal Articles (6)
- Michigan Journal of Environmental & Administrative Law (6)
- St. John's Law Review (6)
- Chicago-Kent Law Review (5)
- FIU Law Review (5)
- Faculty Publications (5)
- Michigan Law Review (5)
- Seattle University Law Review (5)
- Brooklyn Law Review (4)
- Cardozo Law Review (4)
- Catholic University Law Review (4)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (4)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (4)
- Journal of Air Law and Commerce (4)
- Publication Type
Articles 271 - 300 of 384
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Appeal No. 0944: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0944: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-153 (Otto Unit) & Chief's Order 2017-168 (Reich Unit)
California V. United States Bureau Of Land Management, Molly M. Kelly
California V. United States Bureau Of Land Management, Molly M. Kelly
Public Land & Resources Law Review
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy production, the Bureau of Land Management reevaluated its 2016 “Waste Prevention Rule” which addressed waste of natural gas from venting, flaring, or other leaks resulting from oil and natural gas production activities. The BLM sought to postpone the Rule’s compliance date to give the agency time to promulgate a new rule—effectively overruling the 2016 Rule. Plaintiffs challenged the agency’s compliance under the Administrative Procedures Act, and the court found the BLM did not properly follow APA requirements.
Do It In The Sunshine: A Comparative Analysis Of Rulemaking Procedures And Transparency Practices Of Lawyer-Licensing Entities, Bobbi Jo Boyd
Do It In The Sunshine: A Comparative Analysis Of Rulemaking Procedures And Transparency Practices Of Lawyer-Licensing Entities, Bobbi Jo Boyd
Arkansas Law Review
Regulation of occupational licensing has garnered national attention. During the last sixty years, the number of occupations regulated by governmental entities has notably increased. As the number of regulated occupations increases, employment opportunities and wages for individuals who cannot afford or otherwise meet licensing requirements decrease.
Hb 338 - Turnaround Elligible Schools, Eleanor F. Miller, Heather E. Obelgoner
Hb 338 - Turnaround Elligible Schools, Eleanor F. Miller, Heather E. Obelgoner
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act creates the position of Chief Turnaround Officer (CTO) and authorizes the State Board of Education, in collaboration with the State School Superintendent and the Education Turnaround Advisory Council, to search for and appoint the CTO. The CTO has the authority to recommend individuals to serve as turnaround coaches upon approval by the state board. The Act defines the term “turnaround eligible schools” and identifies factors upon which the CTO may identify such schools. The Act provides procedures by which the CTO and turnaround coaches shall intervene in such schools. The Act creates the Education Turnaround Advisory Council, which …
Hb 434 - Eminent Domain, Ashley M. Bowcott, Derek M. Schwahn
Hb 434 - Eminent Domain, Ashley M. Bowcott, Derek M. Schwahn
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act amends Georgia’s eminent domain laws by providing an exception to the general rule that condemnations cannot be converted to any use, other than a public use, for twenty years. The Act creates a new procedure which requires the condemnor to petition the jurisdiction’s superior court to determine whether the property is blighted property. Additionally, the condemnor must provide notice to all owners of the alleged blighted property. If the court finds the land is blighted property, the condemnor must file a petition to condemn the property according to the established procedure set forth in Article 3 Chapter 2 …
Hb 249 - Controlled Substances And Prescription Drug Monitoring Database, Emily R. Polk, Brandon M. Reed
Hb 249 - Controlled Substances And Prescription Drug Monitoring Database, Emily R. Polk, Brandon M. Reed
Georgia State University Law Review
The Act amends Georgia’s controlled-substances statutes to expand medical provider requirements to record prescription drug information in an electronic prescription drug monitoring program database (PDMP). Medical providers are now required to use the PDMP to enter information about their prescription of certain types and quantities of opioids. The purpose of the act is to fight Schedule II opioid abuse throughout the state of Georgia. A medical provider’s failure to report required information is reported to his or her respective state regulatory board for possible reprimand. In addition to mandatory reporting, the Act includes various other provisions related to regulating opioid …
Heat & Frost Insulators & Allied Workers Loc. 16 V. Lab. Comm’R; Univ. Of Nev., Reno; & Core Constr., 134 Nev. Adv. Op. 1 (Jan. 4, 2018), Alma Orozco
Nevada Supreme Court Summaries
NRS 233B.130(2)(c)(1)’s service requirement is mandatory and jurisdictional. Further, under NRS 233B.130(5), the district court has jurisdiction to extend time for service for good cause, either before or after the 45-day service period has run.
Mental Injury And Reasonable Administrative Action Green And Comcare -- Case Note, Philip Evans
Mental Injury And Reasonable Administrative Action Green And Comcare -- Case Note, Philip Evans
The University of Notre Dame Australia Law Review
No abstract provided.
Analyzing Justice Cardozo’S Opinions On The Constitutionality Of The New Deal, Robert J. Pushaw Jr
Analyzing Justice Cardozo’S Opinions On The Constitutionality Of The New Deal, Robert J. Pushaw Jr
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Tax As Part Of A Broken Budget: Good Taxes Are Good Cause Enough, Stephanie Mcmahon
Tax As Part Of A Broken Budget: Good Taxes Are Good Cause Enough, Stephanie Mcmahon
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
The federal budget is a myth. Despite being a myth, Congress uses the budget to limit its choices by linking its revenue-raising and spending powers under a federal debt ceiling. Through its self-imposed limits, Congress puts tremendous pressure on how it calculates its budget, and that calculation generally assumes any tax provisions will raise revenue when the law becomes effective. However, many tax provisions require additional direction to ensure they operate as the budgetary process expects. That task falls to the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) as a bureau of the Department. Consequently, limiting the production of …
The Brand-X Effect: Declining Chevron Deference In The 21st Century, Stephen Johnson
The Brand-X Effect: Declining Chevron Deference In The 21st Century, Stephen Johnson
Articles
Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. is the most frequently cited Supreme Court administrative law decision and has generated substantial scholarship over the past thirty-four ears. Almost three decades ago, Robert Glicksman and Christopher Schroeder examined the nature of judicial review of the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") by the federal courts during the agency's first twenty years of existence, focusing, in part, on the changing nature of that review in light of the Chevron decision. Glicksman and Schroeder concluded that the courts aggressively reviewed EPA's actions during the agency's early years, interpreting the …
Administrative License Renewal And Due Process -- A Case Study, Delcianna J. Winders
Administrative License Renewal And Due Process -- A Case Study, Delcianna J. Winders
Florida State University Law Review
Scholars have recently noted the paucity of scholarship on administrative licenses as especially significant given the prevalence-indeed ubiquity-of administrative licenses today.This Article contributes to filling that void by tackling an aspect of administrative licensing that has received especially little attention and, as a result, has been a source of serious confusion: license renewals. As this Article details, administrative license renewal practices raise interesting and important questions about administrative law and procedural due process. Does one have a property interest in a license after that license expires by its terms? Is an agency's decision not to renew a license more akin …
The Tortoise And The Hare Of International Data Privacy Law: Can The United States Catch Up To Rising Global Standards?, Matthew Humerick
The Tortoise And The Hare Of International Data Privacy Law: Can The United States Catch Up To Rising Global Standards?, Matthew Humerick
Catholic University Journal of Law and Technology
Technological developments spur the development of big data on a global scale. The breadth of data companies collect, maintain, process, and transmit affects nearly every country and organization around the world. Inherent to big data are issues of data protection and transfers to third countries. While many jurisdictions emphasize the importance of protecting consumer data, such as the European Union, others, like the United States, do not. To circumvent this issue, the United States and European Union contracted around data privacy standard discrepancies through the Safe Harbor Agreement, which eased cross-border data transfers. However, the Court of Justice of the …
The Limits Of Copyright Office Expertise, Aaron K. Perzanowski
The Limits Of Copyright Office Expertise, Aaron K. Perzanowski
Faculty Publications
The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office’s chief responsibility—registration and recordation of copyright claims—has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office’s history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and …
Auer Evasions, Jonathan Adler
Auer Evasions, Jonathan Adler
Faculty Publications
Auer v. Robbins requires federal courts to defer to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous regulations. Auer built upon, and arguably expanded, the Court’s long-standing practice of deferring to agency interpretations of their own regulations born in Bowles v. Seminole Rock. Although initially uncontroversial, the doctrine has come under fire from legal commentators and prominent jurists, including Auer’s author, the late Justice Antonin Scalia. As Justice Scalia came to recognize, Auer deference enables agencies to evade a wide range of legal constraints that are otherwise imposed upon agency behavior, the ability of agencies to take action with the force …
Masterpiece Cakeshop: “Does Anybody Really Know What Time It Is?”, 52 Uic J. Marshall L. Rev. 83 (2018), Ted Hong
UIC Law Review
The purpose of this article is to highlight the less controversial part of the Court’s opinion. This article is intended for counsel representing parties before federal, state, municipal and local administrative agencies, counsel representing administrative agencies and people serving on administrative agencies. The article discusses how the Masterpiece Cakeshop opinion was the culmination of discussing the role of procedural due process in the administrative agency process. The Court’s opinion has “real time” application in a current case before the Intermediate Court of Appeals, State of Hawai`i. This article also highlights the difference in appointment of boards and commissioners in three …
Clowning Around With Final Agency Action, Beau J. Baumann, Greg Mina
Clowning Around With Final Agency Action, Beau J. Baumann, Greg Mina
Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
While Chevron and Auer deference dominate the administrative law literature, another doctrine—the final agency action requirement—has been perverted by the lower federal courts. Several circuits have developed an undergrowth of formalistic rules that tighten the Supreme Court’s standard, as it was laid out in Bennett v. Spear. This development ignores the Court’s decades-old refrain that the final agency action requirement should be flexible. Unfortunately, this development comes at the worst possible time. The interconnectedness of federal and state agencies has led to a sort of division of labor. Data collection, designations, and enforcement are increasingly divided across different agencies. Because …
State Standing In United States V. Texas: Opening The Floodgates To States Challenging The Federal Government Or Proper Federalism?, Bradford Mank
State Standing In United States V. Texas: Opening The Floodgates To States Challenging The Federal Government Or Proper Federalism?, Bradford Mank
Faculty Articles and Other Publications
In United States v. Texas, the Supreme Court by an equally divided vote, 4 to 4, affirmed the decision of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals that the State of Texas had Article III standing to challenge in federal court the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) directive establishing a Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (“DAPA”) program to grant lawful immigration status to millions of undocumented immigrants. A serious question is whether state standing in this case will open the floodgates to allow states to challenge virtually every federal executive action. On the other hand, …
Federal Circuit Jurisdiction: Looking Back And Thinking Forward, Timothy B. Dyk
Federal Circuit Jurisdiction: Looking Back And Thinking Forward, Timothy B. Dyk
American University Law Review
No abstract provided.
Who Are “Officers Of The United States”?, Jennifer L. Mascott
Who Are “Officers Of The United States”?, Jennifer L. Mascott
Scholarly Articles
For decades courts have believed that only officials with “significant authority” are “Officers of the United States” subject to the Constitution’s Article II Appointments Clause requirements. But this standard has proved difficult to apply to major categories of officials. This Article examines whether “significant authority” is even the proper standard, at least as that standard has been applied in modern practice. To uncover whether the modern understanding of the term “officer” is consistent with the term’s original public meaning, this Article uses two distinctive tools: (i) corpus linguistics-style analysis of Founding-era documents and (ii) examination of appointment practices during the …
The Missing Element Of Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis: Compensation For The Loss Of Regulatory Benefits, Karl S. Coplan
The Missing Element Of Environmental Cost-Benefit Analysis: Compensation For The Loss Of Regulatory Benefits, Karl S. Coplan
Elisabeth Haub School of Law Faculty Publications
Despite its critics, cost-benefit analysis remains a fixture of the environmental regulation calculus. Most criticisms of cost-benefit analysis focus on the impossibility of monetizing environmental and health amenities protected by regulations. Less attention has been paid to the regressive wealth-transfer effects of regulations foregone based on cost-benefit analysis. This regressive effect occurs as long as downwind communities that suffer health and harms from environmental contamination are generally less wealthy than the owners of pollution sources that avoid regulatory-compliance costs. The availability of compensation to pollution-victims has the potential to ameliorate this regressive effect. This Article recommends that the availability of …
Centralized Review Of Tax Regulations, Clinton G. Wallace
Centralized Review Of Tax Regulations, Clinton G. Wallace
Faculty Publications
Centralized oversight of agency policymaking and spending by the President’s Office of Management and Budget is a hallmark of the modern administrative state. But tax regulations have almost never been subject to centralized review. The Trump administration recently proposed to require centralized review of tax regulations, but it is unclear what regulations would be subject to such review or how it would be conducted.
This Article examines the normative desirability of the longstanding approach of exempting tax regulations from centralized review, and the alternative of imposing such review. Scholars and policymakers have provided various incomplete justifications for excepting tax policy …
Deliberative Public Engagement With Science: An Empirical Investigation, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez, Alan Tomkins
Deliberative Public Engagement With Science: An Empirical Investigation, Lisa M. Pytlikzillig, Myiah J. Hutchens, Peter Muhlberger, Frank J. Gonzalez, Alan Tomkins
Lisa PytlikZillig Publications
The purpose of this book is to share some results and the data from four studies in which we used experimental procedures to manipulate key features of deliberative public engagement to study the impacts in the context of deliberations about nanotechnology. In this chapter, we discuss the purpose of this book, which is to advance science of public engagement, and the overarching question motivating our research: What public engagement methods work for what purposes and why? We also briefly review existing prior work related to our overarching goal and question and introduce the contents of the rest of the book. …
Chevron Step Two's Domain, Kent H. Barnett, Christopher J. Walker
Chevron Step Two's Domain, Kent H. Barnett, Christopher J. Walker
Scholarly Works
An increasing number of judges, policymakers, and scholars have advocated eliminating or narrowing Chevron deference—a two-step inquiry under which courts defer to federal agencies’ reasonable interpretations of ambiguous statutes the agencies administer. Much of the debate centers on either Chevron’s domain (i.e., when Chevron should apply at all) or how courts ascertain statutory ambiguity at Chevron’s first step. Largely lost in this debate on constraining agency discretion is the role of Chevron’s second step: whether the agency’s resolution of a statutory ambiguity is reasonable. Drawing on the most comprehensive study of Chevron in the circuit courts, this Essay explores how …
Administrative Law's Political Dynamics, Kent H. Barnett, Christina L. Boyd, Christopher J. Walker
Administrative Law's Political Dynamics, Kent H. Barnett, Christina L. Boyd, Christopher J. Walker
Scholarly Works
Over thirty years ago, the Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. commanded courts to uphold federal agency interpretations of ambiguous statutes as long as those interpretations are reasonable. This Chevron deference doctrine was based in part on the Court’s desire to temper administrative law’s political dynamics by vesting federal agencies, not courts, with primary authority to make policy judgments about ambiguous laws Congress charged the agencies to administer. Despite this express objective, scholars such as Frank Cross, Emerson Tiller, and Cass Sunstein have empirically documented how politics influence circuit court review of agency statutory …
Non-Alj Adjudicators In Federal Agencies: Status, Selection, Oversight, And Removal, Kent H. Barnett, Russell Wheeler
Non-Alj Adjudicators In Federal Agencies: Status, Selection, Oversight, And Removal, Kent H. Barnett, Russell Wheeler
Scholarly Works
This article republishes—in substantively similar form—our 2018 report to the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) concerning federal agencies’ adjudicators who are not administrative law judges (ALJs). (We refer to these adjudicators as “non-ALJ Adjudicators” or “non-ALJs.”) As our data indicate, non-ALJs significantly outnumber ALJs. Yet non-ALJs are often overlooked and difficult to discuss as a class because of their disparate titles and characteristics. To obtain more information on non-ALJs, we surveyed agencies on non-ALJs’ hearings and, among other things, the characteristics concerning non-ALJs’ salaries, selection, oversight, and removal. We first present our reported data on these matters, which …
Framing Contemporary U.S. Wild Horse And Burro Management Processes In A Dynamic Ecological, Sociological, And Political Environment, J. Derek Scasta, Jacob D. Hennig, Jeffrey L. Beck
Framing Contemporary U.S. Wild Horse And Burro Management Processes In A Dynamic Ecological, Sociological, And Political Environment, J. Derek Scasta, Jacob D. Hennig, Jeffrey L. Beck
Human–Wildlife Interactions
The Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act (WFRHBA) of 1971 established all “unbranded or unclaimed” equids on U.S. public lands as “living symbols of the historic and pioneer spirit of the West.” Today, >72,000 feral horses (Equus ferus caballus) and burros (E . asinus ; WHB) live on western U.S. public rangelands. The number of WHBs exceeds the Bureau of Land Management’s maximum Appropriate Management Level (AML) of 26,715 by a factor of approximately 2.7 and has nearly doubled from 2007–2015. The AML was set to balance WHB numbers with rangeland health and support other uses such as wildlife habitat …
Uber’S Arbitration Trickery: Mohamed’S Holding, The New Era Of Limiting The Scope Of Administrative Protection And The Vindication Of Rights Doctrine, 51 J. Marshall L. Rev. 439 (2018), Kerby Kniss
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
Risks Faced By Foreign Lawyers In China, Chenglin Liu
Risks Faced By Foreign Lawyers In China, Chenglin Liu
Faculty Articles
This article provides an objective assessment of the potential risks that foreign lawyers face in China as they push the boundaries of the limits on their activities set by Chinese law. When the Shanghai Bar Association (SBA), a government-controlled organization, accused foreign lawyers of violating Chinese law and called for official action, some scholars dismissed the threat, claiming that there was no legal basis for a crackdown on foreign lawyers. These scholars erroneously maintained that the Chinese laws that regulate foreign lawyers are ambiguous and create "gray areas." In fact, the claims of the SBA are justified because the applicable …
Understanding Administrative Sanctioning As Corrective Justice, Eithan Y. Kidron
Understanding Administrative Sanctioning As Corrective Justice, Eithan Y. Kidron
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
When should a regulator prefer criminal sanctions over administrative sanctions? What procedural protections should apply if a process is labeled civil but the sanctions are, in fact, criminal in type? And can the state justifiably conduct parallel proceedings for punitive sanctions against the same person or entity for the same conduct?
Throughout the years, judges and scholars alike have tried to understand and classify administrative sanctioning. Common to all of these conceptions is their failure to provide a complete normative framework for this unique body of law, which in turn makes it difficult to identify its practical limits and to …