Administrative Law Commons^™

Department Of Insurance, R. Ford, K. Schorr, G. Trude, J. D'Angelo

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Board Of Chiropractic Examiners, E. Finelli

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

California Horse Racing Board, T. Taylor, G. Trude

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

State Bar Of California, J. Choi, M. Lorenzo, J. D'Angelo, R. C. Fellmeth

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Computerized Administrative Decision Making And Fundamental Rights, Jacques Fremont

Osgoode Hall Law Journal

Taking as a departure point the introduction of expert systems in the field of administrative adjudication, this paper aims to present some of the issues and problems that the law and jurists will face as a result of "new informational technologies." After an examination of how these technologies would function in a legal context, and a short discussion concerning administrative justice as it is now conceived and experienced, the impact of computerized administrative decision-making is examined. The paper assesses the likely impact of expert systems on administrative normativity, on the decision-making process, and on the quality of decisions made. This …

Apple Of Gold: Constitutionalism In Israel And The United States, Michel Rosenfeld

Articles

No abstract provided.

Integrating Public Land And Local Community Planning Objectives: The Rocky Mountain National Park Experience, Homer L. Rouse

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

7 pages.

Community-Public Lands Partnership: The Montezuma County Federal Lands Program, Michael F. Preston

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

18 pages (includes illustrations and maps).

Contains 1 page of references.

Regional Habitat Conservation Planning: The California Gnatcatcher Example, Marc J. Ebbin

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

10 pages.

The Utah Wilderness Debate (Or Is That Debacle), Jeffrey W. Appel

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

95 pages (includes illustrations and maps).

Public Land Management Decisions Affecting Water Rights: The Issue Of Requiring By- Pass Flows As A Condition Of National Forest Special Use Permits For Water Facilities, David H. Getches

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

12 pages.

Local And National Interests In Using Public Forests: Lessons From The Pacific Northwest, Part I: A Time For Scientists And Lawyers, K. Norman Johnson

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

18 pages.

Contains references.

Local And National Interests In Using Public Forests: Lessons From The Pacific Northwest[, Part] Ii, Margaret A. Shannon

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

12 pages.

Contains references.

Developments And Trends In Fiber Supply: Implications For The Northwest’S Forest Products Industry, James C. Geisinger

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

7 pages (includes illustrations).

Local And National Interests In Using Pub[L]Ic Forests, Andy Kerr

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

3 pages.

Appeal No. 0527: Katherine Haselberger Executrix O The Estate Of Nova Christman, V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Divisio Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 93-77

Appeal No. 0497: Arnold Twaddle V. Donald L. Mason, Chief Division Of Oil & Gas, Ohio Dept. Of Natural Resources, Ohio Oil & Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order 92-54

Appeal No. 0503: Echo Drilling, Inc. V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Divisionof Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-66

Appeal No. 0505: Energy Recovery Gropu V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas Oil Department Of Natural Resources, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-188

Appeal No. 0519: Edwin Green, V. Richard J. Simmers, Acting Chief Division Of Oil And Gas, Oil And Gas Board Of Review

Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions

Chief's Order No. 92-210

Decision Making And The Public Lands, Robert K. Davis

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

18 pages.

Contains 3 pages of references.

Background Material On The Colorado Grazing Roundtable, William E. Riebsame

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

10 pages.

Contains endnotes.

Rangeland Reform ‘94, Michael J. Penfold

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

18 pages.

Agenda: Who Governs The Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community?, University Of Colorado Boulder. Natural Resources Law Center

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

Conference organizers and/or session moderators included University of Colorado School of Law professors David H. Getches, Judith Jacobsen, Lawrence J. MacDonnell, Teresa Rice and Charles F. Wilkinson.

Shifting policy objectives and management approaches for the public lands of the West are provoking heated debate about how these decisions should be made and implemented. Are these policy directions a reflection of the "New West" or are they, in fact, a declaration of "war on the West"? Somewhere between these polarities of view, efforts are underway to open dialogue and reach consensus.

This second annual western lands conference will explore federal initiatives …

Constitutional And Congressional Requirements Directing Public Lands Decisionmaking, Joseph M. Feller

Who Governs the Public Lands: Washington? The West? The Community? (September 28-30)

15 pages.

Contains references.

Redeeming Judicial Review: The Hard Look Doctrine And Federal Regulatory Efforts To Restructure The Electric Utility Industry, Jim M. Rossi

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

Recent policy-effect studies denounce judicial review for its adverse effects on agency decision-making. In its strong version, the policy-effect thesis suggests that judicial review has paralyzed innovative agency decision-making. Professor Rossi reacts to policy-effect studies, particularly as they have been used to attack the hard look doctrine in administrative law. He revisits Professor Richard Pierce's policy-effect description of the effects of judicial review of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). Professor Rossi's survey of recent FERC decision-making provides some support for an attenuated version of the policy-effect thesis but leads him to reject the strong version of the thesis. Much …

Board Of Vocational Nurse And Psychiatric Technician Examiners, S. Cola

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Water Resources Control Board, P. Cooney, L. Grand

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Law Revision Commission Nears Completion Of New Apa, Michael Asimow

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.

Vial Committee Recommends Puc Reforms, Michael Asimow

California Regulatory Law Reporter

No abstract provided.