Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Judges (259)
- Jurisprudence (57)
- Disability Law (52)
- State and Local Government Law (45)
- Constitutional Law (42)
-
- Courts (42)
- Legal History (31)
- Legislation (31)
- Law and Society (29)
- Education Law (27)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (26)
- President/Executive Department (26)
- Labor and Employment Law (24)
- Social Welfare Law (20)
- Immigration Law (19)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (18)
- Health Law and Policy (18)
- Evidence (16)
- Environmental Law (15)
- Legal Profession (15)
- Litigation (15)
- Securities Law (15)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (11)
- Law and Politics (11)
- First Amendment (10)
- Food and Drug Law (10)
- Jurisdiction (10)
- Medical Jurisprudence (10)
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (105)
- National Association of Administrative Law Judges (81)
- Administrative procedure (77)
- NAALJ (51)
- Examiners (49)
-
- Administrative law judges (47)
- Administrative law judge (39)
- ALJ (33)
- Cases (31)
- Summaries (30)
- Due process (28)
- Administrative Procedure Act (27)
- Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (27)
- Judicial review (27)
- Government regulation (22)
- IDEA (22)
- Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary (22)
- Judicial independence (22)
- SEC (18)
- APA (17)
- Administrative courts (17)
- Securities and Exchange Commission (17)
- Social Security Administration (16)
- Administrative adjudication (15)
- Administrative agencies (15)
- Contents (15)
- Editorial board (15)
- Membership (15)
- Social security (15)
- Special education (15)
Articles 541 - 570 of 604
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
The Administrative Judiciary's Independence Myth, James E. Moliterno
The Administrative Judiciary's Independence Myth, James E. Moliterno
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Creeping Judicialization In Special Education Hearings?: An Exploratory Study, Perry A. Zirkel, Zorka Karanxha, Anastasia D'Angelo
Creeping Judicialization In Special Education Hearings?: An Exploratory Study, Perry A. Zirkel, Zorka Karanxha, Anastasia D'Angelo
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Administrative Alternatives To Judicial Branch Congestion, John G. Farrell
Administrative Alternatives To Judicial Branch Congestion, John G. Farrell
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Redressing The Balance: An Examination Of The Scope First Amendment Protections, Prosecutorial Discretion, And Probable Cause In The Wake Of Hartman V. Moore, Anjoli Terhune
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Legal Summaries, Leslie Polizzotto
Legal Summaries, Leslie Polizzotto
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
When Public Employees Speak Out On Issues Of Public Concern: The Applicability Of Pickering In Garcetti V. Ceballos, Jayne Chen
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Placing The Ball In Congress' Court: A Critical Analysis Of The Supreme Court's Decision In Arlington Central School District Board Of Education V. Murphy, 126 S. Ct. 2455 (2006), Ashlie D'Errico Surur
Placing The Ball In Congress' Court: A Critical Analysis Of The Supreme Court's Decision In Arlington Central School District Board Of Education V. Murphy, 126 S. Ct. 2455 (2006), Ashlie D'Errico Surur
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Supreme Court Once Again Says No To Taxpayer Standing - The Implications Of Daimlerchrysler Corp. V. Cuno, Natasha Patel
The Supreme Court Once Again Says No To Taxpayer Standing - The Implications Of Daimlerchrysler Corp. V. Cuno, Natasha Patel
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Active Bar Membership October 15, 2007 Federal Administrative Law Judges: A Critique Of The "Active" Bar Membership Regulation , David J. Agatstein
Active Bar Membership October 15, 2007 Federal Administrative Law Judges: A Critique Of The "Active" Bar Membership Regulation , David J. Agatstein
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
A Full And Fair Hearing: The Role Of The Alj In Assisting The Pro Se Litigant, Paris R. Baldacci
A Full And Fair Hearing: The Role Of The Alj In Assisting The Pro Se Litigant, Paris R. Baldacci
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Role Of Deference In Judicial Review Of Agency Action: A Comparison Of Federal Law, Uniform State Acts, And The Iowa Apa, Anuradha Vaitheswaran, Thomas A. Mayes
The Role Of Deference In Judicial Review Of Agency Action: A Comparison Of Federal Law, Uniform State Acts, And The Iowa Apa, Anuradha Vaitheswaran, Thomas A. Mayes
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Materiality In Sarbanes-Oxley Act Employee Protection Claims, William Dorsey
Materiality In Sarbanes-Oxley Act Employee Protection Claims, William Dorsey
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Legal Summaries, Leslie Polizzotto
Legal Summaries, Leslie Polizzotto
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
I Want My Mtv, But Not Your Vh1: A La Carte Cable, Bundling, And The Potential Great Cable Compromise, Holly Phillips
I Want My Mtv, But Not Your Vh1: A La Carte Cable, Bundling, And The Potential Great Cable Compromise, Holly Phillips
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
The Scales Tip In Favor Of Parents In Winkelman V. Parma City School District, Nidya Aldana Paredes
The Scales Tip In Favor Of Parents In Winkelman V. Parma City School District, Nidya Aldana Paredes
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
This case note presents a thorough examination of the Supreme Court's recent opinion in Winkelman and its effect on parents and school districts involved in special education law. Part II relates the historical background of special education law with an emphasis on the role of parents. In Part III the facts of the Winkelman decision are summarized. Part IV sets forth an analytical critique of the Supreme Court majority and dissenting opinions. Then Part V of the article contains the impact of the Winkelman decision on special education law in general and on parents and school districts. Part VI concludes …
Massachusetts V. Environmental Protection Agency, Exploring The Merits Of Greenhouse Gas Regulation, Elise Korican
Massachusetts V. Environmental Protection Agency, Exploring The Merits Of Greenhouse Gas Regulation, Elise Korican
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The purpose of this case note is to explore the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. EPA. Part II provides the historical background of global warming, related legislation, the enactment of the Clean Air Act and later amendments, as well as relevant case holdings as to judicial review of agency decisions and implementation of the Clean Air Act. Part III sets out the operative facts of the Massachusetts v. EPA case beginning with the initial rulemaking petition, through the decision of the district court of appeals, and describes the facts as presented to the Supreme Court. Part IV outlines the …
Refugee Roulette In An Administrative Law Context: The Deja Vu Of Decisional Disparities In Agency Adjudication, Margaret H. Taylor
Refugee Roulette In An Administrative Law Context: The Deja Vu Of Decisional Disparities In Agency Adjudication, Margaret H. Taylor
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
In Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication (the Asylum Study), Professors Ramji-Nogales, Schoenholtz, and Schrag provide a comprehensive analysis of new data to document decisional disparities that undermine the fairness of asylum adjudication. The Asylum Study is an empirical project of remarkable scope. It examines patterns of asylum decisions at four different adjudication levels: at the asylum office interview, in immigration court, on administrative appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), and on petition for review to the federal courts of appeals. At each level, the Asylum Study generates empirical findings to support what we knew mostly by anecdote …
Administrative Decision-Making By Judges In The United States' Environmental Protection Agency Administrator's Civil Penalty Assessment Process: Whatever Happened To The Law?, Richard R. Wagner
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
How Administrative Law Halted The Death Penalty In Maryland , Arnold Rochvarg
How Administrative Law Halted The Death Penalty In Maryland , Arnold Rochvarg
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Numerous arguments have been raised to halt the death penalty, including constitutional claims such as ineffective assistance of counsel, equal protection, right to trial by jury, and cruel and unusual punishment. The winning argument, however, in Evans v. State, a Maryland death penalty appeal, was based not on constitutional or criminal law, but rather Administrative Law. A death row inmate attacked the validity of the procedures for administering lethal injection capital punishment because the Maryland Department of Corrections had not followed the proper statutory procedures for adopting the regulation which set forth the capital punishment process. In order for a …
Substantial Evidence Review In Social Security Cases As An Issue Of Fact, Morton Denlow
Substantial Evidence Review In Social Security Cases As An Issue Of Fact, Morton Denlow
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Due Process; A Detached Judge; And Enemy Combatants, Julian Mann Iii
Due Process; A Detached Judge; And Enemy Combatants, Julian Mann Iii
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
In the landmark administrative law decision of Goldberg v. Kelly, Justice Brennan stated that an “impartial decision maker is essential” to procedural due process. As a corollary, in the more recent decision of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Justice O'Connor stated that “due process requires a neutral and a detached judge in the first instance.” Thus, the due process clauses of the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution require that the essential element of neutrality remain an integral part of any administrative hearing. There can be no departure from this fundamental guarantee of constitutional due process for the administrative hearings …
Legal Summaries, Oscar Gutierrez
Legal Summaries, Oscar Gutierrez
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Trust Issues: Will President Barack Obama Reconcile The Tenuous Relationship Between Antitrust Enforcement Agencies?, Kelly Everett
Trust Issues: Will President Barack Obama Reconcile The Tenuous Relationship Between Antitrust Enforcement Agencies?, Kelly Everett
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Given the importance President Obama has placed on antitrust law, this comment will address the tenuous relationship between the FTC and the DOJ, and the likelihood the Obama Administration will reconcile it. This comment will first explore the development and purpose of antitrust law in the United States. Second, it will discuss why the FTC and DOJ have a contentious and ineffective relationship. Third, it will address the narrowing effect the Obama Administration is likely to have on antitrust enforcement, despite the downturned economy. Finally, this comment will summarize what circumstances created a climate of under-enforcement and uncertainty, and describe …
The Supreme Court's Bright Line Ruling In Riegel V. Medtronic, Inc. Gives Manufacturers Of Defective Medical Devices Broad Immunity, Sadaf Bathaee
The Supreme Court's Bright Line Ruling In Riegel V. Medtronic, Inc. Gives Manufacturers Of Defective Medical Devices Broad Immunity, Sadaf Bathaee
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
"Yes, We Can" Grant Guantánamo Detainees Habeas Corpus Rights, In Boumediene V. Bush, Sarah Christian
"Yes, We Can" Grant Guantánamo Detainees Habeas Corpus Rights, In Boumediene V. Bush, Sarah Christian
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Administrative Hearing Opinion, E. Barrett Prettyman
Administrative Hearing Opinion, E. Barrett Prettyman
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Know Your Audience: How Nyc Tribunals Have Addressed Self-Represented Litigants And Increased Access To Justice, Sherry M. Cohen, Joanna Weiss
Know Your Audience: How Nyc Tribunals Have Addressed Self-Represented Litigants And Increased Access To Justice, Sherry M. Cohen, Joanna Weiss
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The first rule of communication is to know your audience. The “audience” at hearings in New York City (NYC) tribunals is mostly comprised of self-represented respondents with Limited English Proficiency. In order to provide full access to the hearing process, NYC tribunals must know and understand the needs of this audience of respondents. The challenge is not only to keep this audience engaged, but also to ensure that it can navigate and fully participate in the hearing process. Tribunals must communicate in a way that protects the respondents' rights and affords them an opportunity to be heard. NYC tribunals, especially …
The Times They Are A Changin': A New Jurisprudence For Social Security, Jeffrey S. Wolfe
The Times They Are A Changin': A New Jurisprudence For Social Security, Jeffrey S. Wolfe
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The Social Security Administration (SSA) is wading in waters knee deep and fast rising when it comes to what is described in repeated news stories as a rising tide of backlogged Social Security disability appeals. A change in the essential jurisprudence underlying hearings afforded to those appealing an administrative denial of Social Security disability benefits is necessary to remedy the single most pressing issue in the hearings and appeals process - the hue and cry over the pending backlog of such cases.
Considering Innovative Alternatives To Handling Cases Of Adults With Special Conditions Under The Social Security Act , Sarah Robichaud
Considering Innovative Alternatives To Handling Cases Of Adults With Special Conditions Under The Social Security Act , Sarah Robichaud
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act provide critical support to individuals with disabilities. However, until recently, the way that the Social Security Administration processed medical information to make disability determinations had not changed in any fundamental way since the inception of the Act. The disability determination process is logical for many frequently handled, well-known conditions, yet there are a significant number of cases regarding special conditions that are not as well-known or as frequently considered by the Office of Disability Adjudication and Review, which administers hearings and appeals for the Social Security Administration. The Social Security …
Delineating Administrative Exhaustion Requirements And Establishing Federal Courts' Jurisdiction Under The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Lessons From The Case Law And Proposals For Congressional Action , Lewis M. Wasserman
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), enacted through Congress's Spending Clause Power, is the principal federal statute aimed at insuring that children with disabilities receive a Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) in the nation's public schools. The Act has spawned a substantial and growing body of litigation between parents and local and state educational agencies in federal and state courts during the last decade. During this period nearly 20%-21% of these cases have addressed the issue of exhaustion of IDEA's administrative remedies, and the related concern about federal courts' jurisdiction, when the law's exhaustion requirements have not been satisfied. …