Administrative Law Commons^™

Jeffrey A. Silver: The Man Who Exiled Frank "Lefty" Rosenthal From Nevada Gaming, Kirk D. Homeyer

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Should Casinos Exist As Monopolies Or Should Casinos Be In Open Markets?, William N. Thompson, Catherine Prentice

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Indecency Sells. . . But It Comes At An Unfortunate Price: A Look At Whether Gaming Authorities Can Regulate Advertising, Jonathan Peck

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Nevada Administrative Law Research Guide, Wiener-Rogers Law Library, University Of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School Of Law

Nevada Legal Research Guides / Reference Desk Guides

No abstract provided.

Summary Of State, Dep’T Of Taxation V. Masco Builder, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. 66, Rami Hernandez

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal from a district court order granting a petition for judicial review in a tax matter.

Summary Of City Of North Las Vegas V. Warburton, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 62, Daniella Labounty

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting a petition for judicial review in a workers’ compensation action.

Summary Of City Of North Las Vegas V. State, Emrb, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 57, Colin Seale

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal of an order denying a petition for judicial review in a local government employment matter.

Summary Of Village League V. State, Bd. Of Equalization, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 30, Christopher Scott Connell

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Appeal from a district court order granting a writ of mandamus for the overpayment of property taxes.

Summary Of State, Tax Comm’N V. American Home Shield, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 31, Chelsey Bosworth

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal from a taxpayer refund action where the district court determined that the taxpayer was entitled to refunds from prior years and interest.

Summary Of Southern California Edison V. First Judicial District Court, 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 22, Cayla Witty

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

A petition for a writ of mandamus challenging whether the district court hears use tax refund claims as independent actions, requiring de novo review, or as a petition for judicial review under NRS Chapter 233B, which is more deferential to the Nevada Tax Commission’s prior decision.

Summary Of Western Surety Co. V. Adco Credit Inc., 127 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 8, Meredith Still

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court considered an appeal from a district court order granting a petition for judicial review in a Department of Motor Vehicles bond matter.

Summary Of City Of Las Vegas V. Lawson, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 52, Dan Hill

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

District court’s denial to review administrative hearing affirmed because claimant’s condition satisfied the statutory requirements.

Summary Of Personhood Nevada V. Bristol, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 56, Ryan Henry

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

The Court considered an appeal from a First Judicial District Court order that found a proposed initiative violated NRS 295.009’s single-subject rule and prohibited its placement on the 2010 general election ballot.

Summary Of Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe V. State Engineer, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 48, Sean W. Mcdonald

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

No abstract provided.

Summary Of Citizens Of Reno V. Citizens For Cold Springs, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 27, Thomas D. Pilkington

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Appeal from a district court’s finding that the City failed to properly amend the Reno Master Plan (“RMP”) and finding that the City violated former Reno Municipal Code (“RMC”) §18.06.404(d)(1)(b).

Summary Of Great Basin Water Network V. State Eng’R, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 2, Jason Vanmeetren

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

A 2003 amendment to section 533.3702 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, empowered the State Engineer to postpone taking action on water appropriation applications “[for] municipal use,” where disputants filed applications within one year prior to the amendment.

Summary Of Marvin V. Fitch, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 18, Ammon Francom

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

An appeal from a district court order of dismissal, certified as final under NRCP 54(b), in a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.

Summary Of Naiw V. Nevada Self-Insurers Ass’N, 126 Nev. Adv. Op. 7, Thomas D. Pilkington

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Feb. 25, 2010

Luck Of The Irish: Will The Casinos Tranform From Gaelic Grey To Gaelic Green $$, William N. Thompson

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

As the first decade of the twenty-first century evolved, Ireland was one of only two countries in the European Union that did not have legal, regulated casinos. The Irish Gaming and Lotteries Act of 1956 does not prohibit games with equal chances. Moreover, games can be conducted lawfully, according to the Act, if promoters assess minor seat charges to players, and “the promoter derives no personal profit from the promotion of the game.” Additionally, Part III of the 1956 law indicates that amusement centers can have slot machines that award small prizes. The Act also includes provisions for private lotteries, …

Sparks Nugget. State Tax Exemption Of Food Used By Casinos For Comped Meals, Steve Johnson

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

In their search for new sources of revenue, states have legalized and sought to tax many kinds of gaming. Forty-eight of the fifty states of the United States permit one or more types of legal gaming. An important technique in casino and some other types of gaming is giving “comps” – complimentary goods or services – to player-customers. A frequent type of comp is free meals on the casino premises or elsewhere. Gaming establishments also often give free meals to their employees.

Comps have been controversial for federal income tax purposes. A recent Nevada case, Sparks Nugget, and related cases …

Betting On Dog Racing. The Next Legalised Gambling Opportunity In South Africa? A Cautionary Note From The Regulation Of Greyhound Racing In Great Britain, Marita Carnelley

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

This article commences with a brief overview of the history of dog racing in South Africa. It provides a synopsis of South Africa’s current legal position on dog racing and the betting thereon. The main question this article addresses is whether there is any policy reason why dog racing and wagering should not be legalised and regulated. Furthermore, some comments are included discussing how such regulation should fit into the broader existing gambling regulatory framework should the legislature make the decision to legalise dog racing and wagering.

The article concludes with a discussion of the greyhound racing industry in Britain …

A Post-Carcieri Vocabulary Exercise: What If "Now" Really Means "Then"?, Heidi M. Staudenmaier, Ruth K. Khalsa

UNLV Gaming Law Journal

When the Indian Reorganization Act1 (“IRA”) was passed in 1934, it officially defined an “Indian” as a member of a recognized tribe “now under federal jurisdiction.” For nearly three-quarters of a century, this definition of an Indian and an Indian tribe — hallmarked by the four-word phrase “now under federal jurisdiction” — guided federal policy and agency action on a host of matters, including management of federal lands, land-into-trust acquisitions made on behalf of tribes, and — after 1988 — application of the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (“IGRA”).

In February 2009, however, the United States Supreme Court upended seventy-five years …

Summary Of Garcia V. Scolari’S Food & Drug, 125 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 6, Richard Manhattan

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

As a matter of first impression, the Court offered guidance on what constitutes—or rather what does not constitute—good reason for failing to present evidence during an administrative hearing under NRS 233B.131(2). The statute is part of Nevada’s Administrative Procedure Act. In a related matter, the Court affirmed the administrative tribunal’s denial of occupational disease benefits for reasons of insufficient evidence.

Summary Of Canyon Villas V. State, Tax Comm’N, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 7, Casey G. Perkins

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Appeal from a district court order denying judicial review of property tax valuation.

Summary Of Dutchess Business Services, Inc.; And Legend Pharmaceuticals, Inc. V. Nevada State Board, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 63, Elham Roohani

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Appeal from a district Court order denying review of a Nevada State Board of Pharmacy Decision to revoke wholesaler licenses and impose fines.

Summary Of Duchess Bus. Servs., Inc. V. Nev. St. Bd. Of Pharmacy, 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 32, Danielle Tarmu

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Two pharmaceutical wholesalers appeal from the district court’s denial of a petition for judicial review of an order by respondent Nevada State Board of Pharmacy (the Board) revoking the wholesalers’ licenses for violations of Nevada’s statutes and regulations governing the secondary prescription drug market. The wholesalers appeal on multiple grounds, three of which raise issues of first impression: (1) an administrative agency’s discretion concerning joinder in an administrative proceeding; (2) an administrative agency’s discretion with respect to discovery in an administrative proceeding; and (3) whether intent must be proven to render an entity liable for violating NRS § 585.520(1).2

Summary Of Father & Sons & A Daughter Too Vs. Transp. Servs. Auth. Of Nev., 124 Nev. Adv. Op. 24, Danielle Tarmu

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Consolidated appeal from a district court order denying Father & Sons & a Daughter Too’s (FSD2) petition for judicial review regarding citations for two violations of NRS 706.386. The Court holds that FSD2 had held itself out to be a common motor carrier and substantial evidence supported the determination that it had violated NRS 706.386.

Summary Of Halverson V. Hardcastle, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 29, Jennifer Arias

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Petition granted in part and denied in part for a writ of quo warranto challenging a chief justice’s authority to require another district judge to meet with a committee of judges, to remove and reassign that judge’s criminal caseload, and to temporarily bar that judge from entering the courthouse.

Summary Of Valdez V. Employers Insurance Company Of Nevada, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 21, Matt Lay

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Claimant appeals from an order of the Eighth Judicial District Court, State of Nevada, denying a petition for judicial review in a workers’ compensation matter.

Summary Of Savage V. Pierson, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 12, Judy Carol Cox

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Debtor filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy and tried to claim that the security deposit for his residential lease was exempt under Nevada’s dwelling exemption. Trustee objected because debtor had no equity in the lease-hold. Due to a lack of state law precedent, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nevada submitted the following certified question to the Nevada Supreme Court: Is a security deposit in a residential lease exempt from the claim of creditors either as a part of an exempt dwelling under NRS 21.090(1)(m) or as a homestead under NRS 21.090(1)(l)? The Court concluded that it was not exempt …