Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (867)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
- Ohio; State law; State administrative decision; (23)
- Administrative law (4)
-
- Clean Air Act (3)
- Administrative Law (2)
- Agency jurisdiction (2)
- Chevron deference (2)
- Chevron v. NRDC (2)
- Climate change (2)
- Delegation (2)
- REINS Act (2)
- Regulations (2)
- Vehicle emission standards (2)
- 'Chevron' Doctrine (1)
- 'Chevron' deference (1)
- 467 U.S. 837 (1)
- 843 (1984) (1)
- Administrative (1)
- Administrative Jurisdiction (1)
- Administrave Law (1)
- Affordable Care Act (1)
- Agency oversight (1)
- Auer v. Robbins (1)
- Autonomous vehicles (1)
- Burkean minimalism (1)
- California Air Resources Board (1)
- Causes of Action (1)
- Chevron USA (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 91 - 120 of 910
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Appeal No. 0972: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0972: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0970: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0970: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0969: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0969: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0971: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0971: Andy Rataiczak, Dba Beaver Valley Gas V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-405, 2018-406, 2018-407, 2018-408, 2019-409
Appeal No. 0938: L.D. Jenking V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gulfport Energy Coropration, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0938: L.D. Jenking V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Gulfport Energy Coropration, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-437 & Chief's Order 2016-451; Hogston C & A Unites (Gulfport Energy Corporation)
Appeal No. 0965: Brookfield Citizens Against Injection Wells, Et Al. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Highland Field Services, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0965: Brookfield Citizens Against Injection Wells, Et Al. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And Highland Field Services, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-286; Highland Brookfield Well #5 (Highland Field Services, LLC)
Appeal No. 0974: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0974: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2019-69 & 2019-77; Smith East Unit & Smith Unit (Chesapeake Exploration)
Appeal No. 0973: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0973: L.D. Jenkins V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2019-69 & 2019-77; Smith East Unit & Smith Unit (Chesapeake Exploration)
Appeal No. 0950: General Electric Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0950: General Electric Company V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-347
Appeal No. 0962: Jeffrey D. Kuster, On Behalf Of David Kuster, Deceased V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0962: Jeffrey D. Kuster, On Behalf Of David Kuster, Deceased V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-114
Appeal No. 0915: Dynamerican, Llc, Et. Al V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And American Energy - Utica, Llc Nka Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0915: Dynamerican, Llc, Et. Al V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management And American Energy - Utica, Llc Nka Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc., Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-47 (American Energy - Utica nka Ascent Resources - Utica; Henry LND GR Unit)
Appeal No. 0966: Hardesty Production V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0966: Hardesty Production V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-242
Appeal No. 0907: Donald E. Wood, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0907: Donald E. Wood, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2015-345 (Financial Assurance)
Appeal No. 0930: M-I L.L.C. Dba M-S Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0930: M-I L.L.C. Dba M-S Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-267 (Temporary Authorization; Strasburg Facility)
Appeal No. 0964: Kevin Simballa, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0964: Kevin Simballa, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-231 (Auer North Unit; Hilcorp Energy)
Appeal No. 0956: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0956: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-45, 2018-87 & 2-18-88 (Old Farm Units; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0957: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0957: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-45, 2018-87 & 2-18-88 (Old Farm Units; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0955: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0955: Ms. Kelly M. Rahach, Trustee, Rahach Revocable Trust, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Orders 2018-45, 2018-87 & 2-18-88 (Old Farm Units; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0952: Patrick Hunkler, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0952: Patrick Hunkler, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-13 (Surratt Unit) (Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0954: Patrick Hunkler, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0954: Patrick Hunkler, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-42 (Keller Unit) (Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0953: George Jr. & Karen L. Dudich, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0953: George Jr. & Karen L. Dudich, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-13 (Surratt Unit; Chesapeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0963: Adams Oil & Gas, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0963: Adams Oil & Gas, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-124
Appeal No. 0958: Adams Oil & Gas, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0958: Adams Oil & Gas, Llc, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-89 (Plug Order; Hartline Richard Unit #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0949: Christ Community Church, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0949: Christ Community Church, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Alleged Violation of O.R.C. §1509.11
Appeal No. 0959: Thelma Schwender, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0959: Thelma Schwender, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2018-94 (McKeegan South Unit: Gulfport Energy Corporation)
Appeal No. 0948: Carolyn Robinson V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0948: Carolyn Robinson V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-255 (PA19B Unit; Gulfport Energy Corporation)
Appeal No. 0945: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0945: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-153 (Otto Unit) & Chief's Order 2017-168 (Reich Unit)
Appeal No. 0944: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0944: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-153 (Otto Unit) & Chief's Order 2017-168 (Reich Unit)
The Limits Of Copyright Office Expertise, Aaron K. Perzanowski
The Limits Of Copyright Office Expertise, Aaron K. Perzanowski
Faculty Publications
The mismatch between the expanding administrative and regulatory obligations of the United States Copyright Office and its limited institutional expertise is an emerging problem for the copyright system. The Office’s chief responsibility—registration and recordation of copyright claims—has taken a back seat in recent years to a more ambitious set of substantive rulemakings and policy recommendations. As the triennial rulemaking under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act highlights, the Office is frequently called upon to answer technological questions far beyond its plausible claims of subject matter expertise. This Article traces the Office’s history, identifies its substantial but discrete areas of expertise, and …
Auer Evasions, Jonathan Adler
Auer Evasions, Jonathan Adler
Faculty Publications
Auer v. Robbins requires federal courts to defer to federal agency interpretations of ambiguous regulations. Auer built upon, and arguably expanded, the Court’s long-standing practice of deferring to agency interpretations of their own regulations born in Bowles v. Seminole Rock. Although initially uncontroversial, the doctrine has come under fire from legal commentators and prominent jurists, including Auer’s author, the late Justice Antonin Scalia. As Justice Scalia came to recognize, Auer deference enables agencies to evade a wide range of legal constraints that are otherwise imposed upon agency behavior, the ability of agencies to take action with the force …