Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (892)
- University of Colorado Law School (243)
- University of Montana (195)
- Seattle University School of Law (188)
- Universitas Indonesia (132)
-
- Barry University School of Law (40)
- Fordham Law School (31)
- DePaul University (24)
- West Virginia University (10)
- University of Kentucky (8)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (7)
- University of Michigan Law School (7)
- BLR (5)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (4)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (3)
- Brooklyn Law School (2)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (2)
- Purdue University (2)
- University of Cincinnati College of Law (2)
- University of Oklahoma College of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- City University of New York (CUNY) (1)
- Columbia Law School (1)
- National Law School of India University (1)
- Pepperdine University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- St. Mary's University (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- Keyword
-
- Ohio (868)
- State law; State administrative decision; (556)
- State law; State administrative decision (311)
- BLM (84)
- Public lands (70)
-
- United States (70)
- Colorado (56)
- U.S. Bureau of Land Management (53)
- FLPMA (44)
- BMPs (42)
- Best management practices (42)
- National Environmental Policy Act (42)
- NEPA (39)
- Climate change (37)
- Congress (37)
- EPA (36)
- U.S. Forest Service (36)
- Wyoming (36)
- Bureau of Land Management (35)
- Oil and gas development (32)
- Fracking (30)
- Mining (30)
- Hydraulic fracturing (29)
- Environment (28)
- Natural resources law (28)
- Regulation (28)
- Secretary of the Interior (28)
- Fracing (27)
- Law (27)
- Environmental Protection Agency (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions (892)
- Public Land & Resources Law Review (195)
- Seattle University Law Review (184)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (122)
- Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ) (37)
-
- Fordham Environmental Law Review (31)
- The Future of Natural Resources Law and Policy (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (28)
- DePaul Business & Commercial Law Journal (24)
- The Public Lands During the Remainder of the 20th Century: Planning, Law, and Policy in the Federal Land Agencies (Summer Conference, June 8-10) (22)
- Groundwater: Allocation, Development and Pollution (Summer Conference, June 6-9) (17)
- Public Lands Mineral Leasing: Issues and Directions (Summer Conference, June 10-11) (16)
- The Past, Present, and Future of Our Public Lands: Celebrating the 40th Anniversary of the Public Land Law Review Commission’s Report, One Third of the Nation’s Land (Martz Summer Conference, June 2-4) (15)
- Getting a Handle on Hazardous Waste Control (Summer Conference, June 9-10) (14)
- Best Practices for Community and Environmental Protection (October 14) (13)
- The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Summer Conference, June 6-8) (13)
- The Promise and Peril of Oil Shale Development (February 5) (13)
- Federal Lands, Laws and Policies and the Development of Natural Resources: A Short Course (Summer Conference, July 28-August 1) (12)
- Best Management Practices (BMPs): What? How? And Why? (May 26) (11)
- Best Management Practices and Adaptive Management in Oil and Gas Development (May 12-13) (11)
- Indonesia Law Review (10)
- Natural Gas Symposium: Contract Solutions for the Future of Regulatory Environment (March 24-25) (10)
- Opportunities and Obstacles to Reducing the Environmental Footprint of Natural Gas Development in Uintah Basin (October 14) (10)
- West Virginia Law Review (10)
- Faculty Scholarship (8)
- Journal of Natural Resources & Environmental Law (8)
- Regulatory Takings and Resources: What Are the Constitutional Limits? (Summer Conference, June 13-15) (7)
- Air Quality Impacts from Oil and Gas Development (January 27) (5)
- Challenging Federal Ownership and Management: Public Lands and Public Benefits (October 11-13) (5)
- ExpressO (5)
- Publications (5)
- Publication Type
Articles 721 - 750 of 1815
Full-Text Articles in Administrative Law
Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company, Ryan L. Hickey
Asarco Llc V. Atlantic Richfield Company, Ryan L. Hickey
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liabiltiy Act, commonly known as CERCLA, facilitates cleanup of hazardous waste sites and those contaminated by other harmful substances by empowering the Environmental Protection Agency to identify responsible parties and require them to undertake or fund remediation. Because pollution sometimes occurrs over long periods of time by multiple parties, CERCLA also enables polluters to seek financial contribution from other contaminators of a particular site. The Ninth Circuit clarified the particuar circumstances under which contribution actions may arise in Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co., holding non-CERCLA settlements may give rise to CERCLA contribution …
California V. U.S. Bureau Of Land Management, Oliver F. Wood
California V. U.S. Bureau Of Land Management, Oliver F. Wood
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a preliminary injunction against the Bureau of Land Management from implementing the Suspension Rule, which would delay the requirements of the Waste Prevention, Production Subject to Royalties, and Resource Conservation Rule. Additionally, the court denied the BLM and intervening third parties’ motion to transfer venue to the District of Wyoming. The court held the plaintiffs were entitled to a preliminary injunction because the BLM did not provide a reasoned analysis for the Suspension Rule. This failure to provide meaningful notice and comment was an arbitrary and capricious abuse …
Atlantic Richfield Company V. Montana Second Judicial District Court, Molly Kelly
Atlantic Richfield Company V. Montana Second Judicial District Court, Molly Kelly
Public Land & Resources Law Review
Landowners in Opportunity, Montana sought restoration damages from ARCO, Anaconda Copper Mining Company’s successor, to their property from over a century of processing ore at the Anaconda Smelter. ARCO argued that CERCLA preempted and barred any claim for restoration damages. The Montana Supreme Court held: landowners could bring their state common law claims seeking restoration damages; the state district court had subject matter jurisdiction; and landowners’ proposed restoration fund did not challenge EPA’s selected remedy under CERCLA.
National Association Of Manufacturers V. Department Of Defense, Summer L. Carmack
National Association Of Manufacturers V. Department Of Defense, Summer L. Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
In an attempt to provide consistency to the interpretation and application of the statutory phrase “waters of the United States,” as used in the Clean Water Act, the EPA and Army Corps of Engineers together passed the WOTUS Rule. Unfortunately, the Rule has created more confusion than clarity, resulting in a number of lawsuits challenging substantive portions of the Rule’s language. National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of Defense did not address those substantive challenges, but instead determined whether those claims challenging the Rule must be filed in federal district courts or federal courts of appeals. In its decision, the …
Appeal No. 0945: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0945: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-153 (Otto Unit) & Chief's Order 2017-168 (Reich Unit)
Appeal No. 0944: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0944: Mark & Marie Hill Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Antero Resources Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-153 (Otto Unit) & Chief's Order 2017-168 (Reich Unit)
California V. United States Bureau Of Land Management, Molly M. Kelly
California V. United States Bureau Of Land Management, Molly M. Kelly
Public Land & Resources Law Review
After President Trump’s Executive Order No. 13783 encouraging relaxing regulatory burdens on energy production, the Bureau of Land Management reevaluated its 2016 “Waste Prevention Rule” which addressed waste of natural gas from venting, flaring, or other leaks resulting from oil and natural gas production activities. The BLM sought to postpone the Rule’s compliance date to give the agency time to promulgate a new rule—effectively overruling the 2016 Rule. Plaintiffs challenged the agency’s compliance under the Administrative Procedures Act, and the court found the BLM did not properly follow APA requirements.
Food, Fracking, And Folly, Melissa Mortazavi
Food, Fracking, And Folly, Melissa Mortazavi
Faculty Articles
Few industries in the United States carry the clout and capital of the oil and gas and agricultural sectors. Economic behemoths, their booms and busts shape the destinies of states, define national policy, and secure the life or death of small towns across the United States. Like it or not, the agriculture and oil and gas industries have strong lobbies and vehement and mobilized constituencies. Recent years have seen both sectors facing public push-back on modern trends in extraction, growth, and methods of production. In response to these developments, these industries have used their considerable political capital to seek new …
Drilling When The Well Goes Dry: The Oklahoma Corporation Commission & The Police Power Exception To The Automatic Stay, Connor R. Bourland
Drilling When The Well Goes Dry: The Oklahoma Corporation Commission & The Police Power Exception To The Automatic Stay, Connor R. Bourland
Oklahoma Law Review
No abstract provided.
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
United States V. Osage Wind, Llc, Summer Carmack
Public Land & Resources Law Review
The Osage Nation, as owner of the beneficial interest in its mineral estate, issues federally-approved leases to persons and entities who wish to conduct mineral development on its lands. After an energy-development company, Osage Wind, leased privately-owned surface lands within Tribal reservation boundaries and began to excavate minerals for purposes of constructing a wind farm, the United States brought suit on the Tribe’s behalf. In the ensuing litigation, the Osage Nation insisted that Osage Wind should have obtained a mineral lease from the Tribe before beginning its work. In its decision, the Tenth Circuit applied one of the Indian law …
Appeal No. 0941: Duck Creek Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0941: Duck Creek Energy, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-452 (Temporary Authorization; Mogadore Facility)
Appeal No. 0943: Mario V. D/Amico V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0943: Mario V. D/Amico V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2017-94
The Earth's Atmosphere As A Global Trust: Establishing Proportionate State Responsibility To Maintain, Restore And Sustain The Global Atmosphere, Thomas Boudreau Ph.D.
The Earth's Atmosphere As A Global Trust: Establishing Proportionate State Responsibility To Maintain, Restore And Sustain The Global Atmosphere, Thomas Boudreau Ph.D.
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
Expanding upon the important work already accomplished by the Paris Agreement (2015), the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) can help create the international legal framework needed by recognizing, in a nonbinding resolution as a first step, the Earth’s atmosphere as a global trust and thus helping to create the necessary legal capacity- building among nation-states to monitor, maintain as well as restore the Earth’s atmosphere for future generations.
The Dangers Of Water Privatization: An Exploration Of The Discriminatory Practices Of Private Water Companies, Elana Ramos
The Dangers Of Water Privatization: An Exploration Of The Discriminatory Practices Of Private Water Companies, Elana Ramos
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
No abstract provided.
Putting The Sun Back Into The Sunshine State: How Florida's Transition To Solar Power Has Brought The State Out Of The Shadows Cast By Big Oil's Energy-Monopoly, Christopher Berman
Putting The Sun Back Into The Sunshine State: How Florida's Transition To Solar Power Has Brought The State Out Of The Shadows Cast By Big Oil's Energy-Monopoly, Christopher Berman
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
No abstract provided.
An Overview Of The Zika Virus Epidemic And What America Can Do To Prevent The Spread Of The Virus In The Future, Alexandra Parrish
An Overview Of The Zika Virus Epidemic And What America Can Do To Prevent The Spread Of The Virus In The Future, Alexandra Parrish
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
No abstract provided.
Clean Power Plan, Janice Chon
Clean Power Plan, Janice Chon
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
No abstract provided.
It's All Downhill From Here: How The Nation's Dispute With Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Is Solved, Spencer H. Newman
It's All Downhill From Here: How The Nation's Dispute With Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Is Solved, Spencer H. Newman
Environmental and Earth Law Journal (EELJ)
What makes the United States one of the most prosperous and safest nations in the modern world? Perhaps it is the durable economy, the strong military force, or the Constitutional protections. What most Americans take for granted, however, is something people in many nations base their entire lives around: safe, clean water. Promulgated in 1972, the original Clean Water Act has been opposed and amended over the course of forty years. No provision, however, has been as hotly contested as the § 404 program for “dredge and fill” permits. Specifically, this section led to divisions on what constitutes “water” that …
Appeal No. 0932: Steven Passerell V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Michael D. Hobbs, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0932: Steven Passerell V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Michael D. Hobbs, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-304 (H&R Smith Unit #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0926: Goerge Jr. & Karen L. Dudich V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources & Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0926: Goerge Jr. & Karen L. Dudich V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources & Ascent Resources - Utica, Llc, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-118; Troyer W LND DR Unit (Ascent Resources - Utica)
Appeal No. 0935: B&N, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0935: B&N, Inc. V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2016-346; (Weddle Wiley #1 Well)
Appeal No. 0912: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0912: John & Arlene Wehr V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management & Gulfport Energy Corporation, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-471 (Gulfport Energy Corporation; Brown #9 Unit)
Appeal No. 0928: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0928: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-46 & 2016-16 (Unitzation Order & Revocation Order; Huffman Trust South Unit; Chsepeake Exploration, LLC)
Appeal No. 0862: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0862: Clewell Family Farm, Llc V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Review of Chief's Order 2014-46 & 2016-16 (Unitzation Order & Revocation Order; Huffman Trust South Unit; Chsepeake Exploration, LLC)
Hawkes Co. V. United States Army Corps Of Engineers, Sarah M. Danno
Hawkes Co. V. United States Army Corps Of Engineers, Sarah M. Danno
Public Land & Resources Law Review
A peat mining company will not be required to obtain a permit under the Clean Water Act to discharge dredged and fill material into wetlands. The United States District Court for the District of Minnesota held that the United States Army Corps of Engineers fell short in its attempts to establish jurisdiction over the wetlands by twice failing to show a significant nexus existed between the wetlands and navigable waters. Further, the district court enjoined the Corps from asserting jurisdiction a third time because it would force the mining company through a “never ending loop” of administrative law.
Appeal No. 0927: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0927: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-158 (modifying Chief's Order 2016-121); M-I SWACO Facility
Appeal No. 0931: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0931: M-Il.L.C. Dba M_I Swaco, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Termination Letter; Strasburg Facility
Appeal No. 0908: Dover-Atwood Corporation V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0908: Dover-Atwood Corporation V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2015-416; Shirley et al Unit #3 Well
Appeal No. 0936: Coddingville Reality Ltd, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0936: Coddingville Reality Ltd, V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-368 (Liability Insurance)
Appeal No. 0929: Duck Creek Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Appeal No. 0929: Duck Creek Energy, Inc., V. Division Of Oil & Gas Resources Management, Ohio Oil & Gas Commission
Ohio Oil & Gas Commission Decisions
Chief's Order 2016-162; (Cessation of Operations; Mogadore Facility)